Serological Evidence of Mpox Virus Infection During Peak Mpox Transmission in New York City, July to August 2022.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which infections may have been undetected in an epicenter of the 2022 mpox outbreak is unknown. METHODS: A serosurvey (July and August 2022) assessed the seroprevalence and correlates of mpox infection among a diverse sample of asymptomatic patients with no prior mpox diagnoses and no known histories of smallpox or mpox vaccination. We present seropositivity stratified by participant characteristics collected via survey. RESULTS: Two-thirds of 419 participants were cismen (281 of 419), of whom 59.1% (166 of 281) reported sex with men (MSM). The sample also included 109 ciswomen and 28 transgender/gender nonconforming/nonbinary individuals. Overall seroprevalence was 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1%-8.8%); 3.7% among ciswomen (95% CI, 1.0%-9.1%), 7.0% among cismen with only ciswomen partners (95% CI, 2.0%-11.9%), and 7.8% among MSM (95% CI, 3.7%-11.9%). There was little variation in seroprevalence by race/ethnicity, age group, HIV status, or number of recent sex partners. No participants who reported close contact with mpox cases were seropositive. Among participants without recent mpox-like symptoms, 6.3% were seropositive (95% CI, 3.6%-9.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 15 vaccine-naive people in our study had antibodies to mpox during the height of the NYC outbreak, indicating the presence of asymptomatic infections that could contribute to ongoing transmission.

Delays in sexual health care among patients attending New York City Sexual Health Clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic, March 2020 to February 2021.

BACKGROUND: Public health emergencies can lead to reduced or suspended services in sexual health clinics (SHCs), raising questions about optimal ways to maintain access to care. We examined changes in sexual behaviors, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, telehealth preference, and correlates of delayed sexual health care among patients attending New York City (NYC) publicly funded SHCs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: 470 patients from four SHCs (July-September 2021) completed a self-administered survey that collected data on access to sexual health care, overall and over three distinct time periods [Spring 2020 (COVID-19 wave 1), Summer 2020, Fall 2020/Winter 2021 (COVID-19 wave 2)]. We used log-binomial models to examine factors associated with delayed sexual health care. RESULTS: Participants reporting multiple in-person sexual contacts increased from 28% to 57% (P < 0.0001) between the first and second wave. Almost half of participants (35/72) taking HIV PrEP cited decreased use. Over 90% (423/460) of participants preferred in-person clinic visits over telehealth. Overall, delays in routine and urgent sexual health care were reported by 34% (129/375) and 12% (46/373) of participants, respectively. More men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender/gender non-conforming/nonbinary (TGNCNB) individuals experienced delayed care compared with women [MSM: aPR 1.43 (95% CI, 1.00-2.03); TGNCNB: 1.67 (1.04-2.69)]. Compared with participants who primarily sought sexual health care from private providers, those who primarily used SHCs experienced significantly more delayed care [1.72 (1.14-2.59)]. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in sexual health care access can have serious implications for certain patient populations. Additional resources are needed to maintain access to sexual health clinic services.

Health Care Provider Decisions to Initiate Oral HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in New York City Public Sexual Health Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is safe and effective but underutilized. Health care providers' beliefs about PrEP and attitudes toward people who could benefit may affect PrEP access. METHODS: This mixed-methods study (2016-2018) was conducted in 8 New York City public sexual health clinics that implemented a PrEP program. Data included 32 in-depth qualitative interviews with clinicians, quantitatively coded to reflect their PrEP beliefs; a provider questionnaire; and 6 months of medical record visit data for these providers. Among patients with a PrEP indication, we examined the odds of a patient being initiated on PrEP associated with providers' PrEP beliefs and demographic characteristics, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Providers reported strong support for offering PrEP to eligible patients. The majority denied concerns about possible development of drug-resistant viral strains, giving PrEP to people who might not benefit, and PrEP toxicity. Nevertheless, about one-third agreed with each of these concerns, and 55% thought PrEP use might limit condom use. Of 2176 patients with a PrEP indication, 20% were initiated. Providers with more restrictive PrEP beliefs did not have lower odds of initiating patients on PrEP. Women as well as Black and Latinx patients were less likely to be initiated on PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypotheses, providers' negative PrEP beliefs did not seem to reduce initiation of PrEP for eligible patients. This may be attributable to clear clinical protocols, strong staff support, and training on implementing PrEP in this setting. Racial and gender disparities in PrEP uptake urgently require attention.

Self-Reported Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Is Highly Accurate Among Sexual Health Clinic Patients in New York City.

ABSTRACT: In New York City, 91% of sexually transmitted infection clinic patients reported preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use that matched the detection of PrEP in their serum. Self-report had 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity ( κ = 0.79) compared with measured PrEP. Our findings suggest that self-report may be a valid indicator of PrEP uptake.

The Cost of Operating Sexual Health Clinics During the Ending the (HIV) Epidemic Initiative in New York City.

BACKGROUND: As part of New York State's Ending the Epidemic (EtE) initiative, sexual health clinics (SHCs) in New York City invested in clinic enhancements and expanded their HIV-related services to increase access to HIV prevention interventions and treatment. The objective of this study was to estimate and describe the change in SHC operating costs related to clinic enhancements and expanded patient services implemented as part of the EtE initiative. METHODS: A comprehensive microcosting approach was used to collect retrospective cost information from SHCs, broken down by category and programmatic activity. Cost information was collected from 8 clinics across New York City during two 6-month time periods before (2015) and during (2018-2019) EtE. RESULTS: Eight SHCs reported comprehensive cost data. Costs increased by $800,000 on average per clinic during the 6-month EtE period. The cost per visit at an SHC increased by $120 on average to $381 (ranging from $302 to $464) during the EtE period. Personnel costs accounted for 69.9% of EtE costs, and HIV-related medications accounted for 8.9% of costs. Employment of social workers and patient navigators increased costs by approximately $150,000 on average per clinic. Postexposure prophylaxis was the costliest medication with average expenditures of $103,800 per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the key drivers of cost increases when offering enhanced HIV services in SHCs. Documenting the changes in resources necessary to implement these services and their costs can inform other health departments on the viability of offering enhanced HIV services within their own clinics.

Targeting Culture Criteria to Maximize Culture Positivity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in 3 Sexual Health Clinic Settings.

BACKGROUND: Although most gonorrhea (GC) cases in the United States are detected using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) using culture specimens is needed for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). We present data on NAATs and cultures collected before and during the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstration project (Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea [SURRG]) to describe a process to define culture criteria for NG isolation for surveillance of NG with reduced susceptibility. METHODS: For sexually transmitted infection clinics in New York City, NY; San Francisco, CA; and Milwaukee, WI, we calculated NAAT positivity by anatomic site in 2016 (pre-SURRG) across 3 groups: (1) sex partners of persons with GC, (2) patients with symptoms (e.g., urethral or cervical discharge), (3) patients who had tested positive and were returning for GC treatment and compared it with positivity among all other patients. We then examined SURRG-period NAAT positivity among patients from whom a culture was or was not collected, and culture positivity, by specimen site and jurisdiction. RESULTS: Pre-SURRG, NAAT positivity across the 3 select groups was at least twice that of patients who did not meet any criteria. SURRG-period NAAT positivity was higher among patients from whom a culture was also collected. Overall culture positivity was relatively high (New York City, 34.8%; San Francisco, 26.7%; Milwaukee, 24.8%); the proportion of specimens tested varied widely (range, 5.7%-26.5%) by jurisdiction. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of NAAT data can inform the establishment of criteria for culture collection for AST. Routine evaluation and quality improvement activities related to culture collection/isolation techniques could increase NG isolation for AST.

Lymphogranuloma Venereum: An Increasingly Common Anorectal Infection Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Attending New York City Sexual Health Clinics.

Using Chlamydia trachomatis anorectal specimens routinely tested for lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) (2008-2011) and samples of archived specimens tested for LGV (2012-2015), we observed increased LGV positivity among men who have sex with men attending NYC Sexual Health Clinics. Using clinical data, we determined predictors of anorectal LGV that may guide clinical management.

Frequency of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Positivity Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Returning for a Test-of-Cure Visit 7 to 30 Days After Treatment of Laboratory-Confirmed Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection at 2 Public Sexual Health Clinics, New York City, 2013 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines recommend that clinicians consider cephalosporin treatment failure in patients who deny interval sexual exposure and are nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) at least 7 days after adequate treatment. We evaluate the real-world implications of the interval the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends for a NAAT test-of-cure (TOC), by ascertaining the frequency of NG NAAT positivity at different anatomic sites among men who have sex with men (MSM) at TOC 7 to 30 days after treatment. METHODS: We analyzed data from the medical records of MSM with laboratory-confirmed NG who were presumptively treated for NG during the period from June 2013 to April 2016 and returned for a TOC visit within 30 days. Data examined included symptoms, site of NG specimen collection, treatment regimen, follow-up testing, and intervening sexual activity. RESULTS: There were 1027 NG-positive specimens obtained from 763 MSM patients at 889 presumptive treatment visits. Of these, 44% (337/763) MSM returned for 1 or more TOC visits, and 413 specimens were collected a median of 10 days after presumptive treatment. Three percent (14/413) of specimens collected were NG NAAT positive at TOC a median of 13 days after treatment: 5% (12/256) of urethral specimens, 1% (1/147) of anorectal specimens (P = 0.037, urethral vs. anorectal), and 10% (1/10) of oropharyngeal specimens (P = 0.40, urethral vs. oropharyngeal). CONCLUSIONS: A small percent of patients were NG NAAT positive at TOC. Compared with anorectal specimens, urethral specimens were more frequently still positive at TOC. A large proportion of MSM will return for a TOC visit as part of standard clinical care.

Incidence and Predictors of HIV Infection Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Attending Public Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics, New York City, 2007-2012.

We examined five annual cohorts (2007-2011) of men who have sex with men (MSM) attending New York City STD clinics who had negative HIV-1 nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) on the day of clinic visit. Annual HIV incidence was calculated using HIV diagnoses within 1 year of negative NAAT, determined by matching with the citywide HIV registry. Predictors (demographic; behavioral; bacterial STD from citywide STD registry match) of all new HIV diagnoses through 2012 were calculated from Cox proportional hazards models. Among 10,487 HIV NAAT-negative MSM, 371 had an HIV diagnosis within 1 year. Annual incidence was 2.4/100 person-years, and highest among non-Hispanic black MSM (4.1/100 person-years) and MSM aged <20 years (5.7/100 person-years). Characteristics associated with all 648 new HIV diagnoses included: black race (aHR 2.2; 95 % CI 1.6-3.1), condomless receptive anal sex (aHR 2.1; 95 % CI 1.5-2.8), condomless insertive anal sex (aHR 1.3; 95 % CI 1.1-1.8), and incident STD diagnosis (aHR 1.6; 95 % CI 1.3-1.9). MSM attending STD clinics have substantial HIV incidence and report risk behaviors that are highly associated with HIV acquisition. Increased uptake of effective interventions, e.g., pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, is needed.

Racial inequities in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men prior to and amidst an Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine trends in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) relative to the scale up of Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiatives, including biomedical prevention strategies, and to describe racial inequities over time. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study, matching annual cohorts of New York City (NYC) Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) patients from 2010 to 2018 to the citywide HIV registry to identify seroconversions during 1 year of follow-up, through 2019. METHODS: We examined HIV incidence for each annual cohort of MSM using diagnoses within 1 year after last negative HIV test. We calculated incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) pooled across 3-year intervals (2010-2012, 2013-2015, 2016-2018) by race/ethnicity, age, neighborhood poverty level, recent STI diagnosis, and condom use during anal sex. RESULTS: There were 36 156 study visits among MSM attending NYC SHCs, including 37% among White MSM and 63% among MSM of color. From 2010 to 2018, HIV incidence decreased overall from 2.82 to 0.82/100 person-years, and among all race/ethnicity, age, poverty, STI, and condom use subgroups. For 2010-2012 vs. 2016-2018, adjusted IRRs (95% CI) increased for Black MSM [1.8 (1.3-2.6) vs. 6.0 (3.5-10.2)], Latino MSM [1.4 (1.0-2.0) vs. 4.0 (2.3-6.8)], and MSM of other races [1.0 (0.6-1.7) vs. 2.5 (1.3-4.9)] compared with White MSM. Black and Latino MSM seroconverted at significantly higher rates than White MSM in the same age groups and neighborhood poverty level. CONCLUSION: Despite decreases in HIV incidence among MSM, racial inequities were exacerbated over time. Addressing structural factors that impact racial inequities in risk of HIV should undergird EHE initiatives.

Brief Report: Use of Remnant Specimens to Assess Use of HIV PrEP Among Populations With Risk of HIV Infection: A Novel Approach.

BACKGROUND: HIV-uninfected persons being evaluated for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) may be good HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) candidates. We measured PrEP use in a sentinel STI patient population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, New York City Sexual Health Clinics (January 2019-June 2019). METHODS: Remnant serum samples from 644 HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men (MSM) and 97 women diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea, and/or early syphilis were assayed for tenofovir and emtricitabine levels using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Using paired test results and medical records, we assessed (1) prevalence and (2) correlates of PrEP use on the day of STI diagnosis (adjusted prevalence ratios [aPRs]). RESULTS: PrEP use among 741 patients was 32.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 29.3 to 36.0]; 37.3% for MSM and 2.1% for women. PrEP use was high among White MSM (46.8%) and lowest among women. Among MSM with rectal chlamydia/gonorrhea or early syphilis, PrEP use was associated with age [aPR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.4) for ages 25-34 years and aPR = 2.0 (1.4 to 2.9) for ages 35-44 years, vs. 15 to 24 years]; number of recent sex partners [aPR = 1.4 (1.0 to 2.0) for 3-5 partners, aPR = 2.1 (1.5 to 3.0) for 6-10 partners, aPR = 2.2 (1.6 to 3.1) for >10 partners, vs. ≤2 partners]; having sex/needle-sharing partners with HIV [aPR = 1.4 (1.1-1.7)]; and inconsistent condom use [aPR = 3.3 (1.8-6.1)]. Race/ethnicity, past-year STI diagnosis, and postexposure prophylaxis use were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: One in 3 people with newly diagnosed STIs had detectable serum PrEP, and PrEP use was exceedingly rare among women. Routinely collected remnant samples can be used to measure PrEP use in populations at high risk of HIV acquisition.

Initiating antiretroviral treatment for newly diagnosed HIV patients in sexual health clinics greatly improves timeliness of viral suppression.

OBJECTIVE: The 'JumpstART' program in New York City (NYC) public Sexual Health Clinics (SHC) provides patients newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with antiretroviral medication (ART) (1-month supply) on day of diagnosis and active linkage to HIV care (LTC). We examined viral suppression (VS) among patients who did and did not receive JumpstART services. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: Among newly diagnosed SHC patients (23 November 2016-30 September 2018) who were matched to the NYC HIV surveillance registry to obtain HIV laboratory test results through 30 June 2019, we compared 230 JumpstART and 73 non-JumpstART patients regarding timely LTC (≤30 days), probability of VS (viral load < 200 copies/ml) by 3 months post-diagnosis, and time to and factors associated with achieving VS within the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 76% (230/303) were JumpstART and the remaining were non-JumpstART patients; 36 (11%) had acute HIV infections. LTC ≤30 days was observed for 63% of JumpstART and 73% of non-JumpstART patients. By 3 months post-diagnosis, 83% of JumpstART versus 45% of non-JumpstART patients achieved VS (log-rank, P < .0001). Median times to VS among virally suppressed JumpstART and non-JumpstART patients were 31 (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-51) and 95 days (IQR: 52-153), respectively. For groups with and without timely LTC, JumpstART was associated with viral suppression within 3 months post-diagnosis, after adjusting for age and baseline viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt ART initiation among SHC patients, some with acute HIV infections, resulted in markedly shortened intervals to VS. Immediate ART provision and active LTC can be key contributors to improved HIV treatment outcomes and the treatment-as-prevention paradigm, with potential for downstream, population-level benefit.

The HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Cascade at NYC Sexual Health Clinics: Navigation Is the Key to Uptake.

BACKGROUND: Clinics providing sexual health care pose unique opportunities to implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs. The PrEP program at New York City's Sexual Health Clinics provides intensive on-site navigation for linkage to PrEP care. We assessed uptake of this intervention. METHODS: We categorized men who have sex with men (MSM) without HIV hierarchically as having had (1) HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) use (past year); or (2) selected sexually transmitted infections (STI) (past year); or (3) HIV-diagnosed sex/needle-sharing partners (past 6 months); or (4) expressed interest in PrEP (day of clinic visit). We constructed PrEP cascades and used multivariable regression to examine acceptance of PrEP navigation, referral to a PrEP provider, linkage (<60 days), and PrEP prescription. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred one of 2106 PrEP (62%) patients accepted navigation. Of those, 55% (718/1301) were black or Hispanic MSM. STI and PEP patients had lowest navigation acceptance levels (35%-46%). Of navigated patients, 56% (628/1114) accepted referrals, 46% (288/628) linked to PrEP providers, and 82% (235/288) were prescribed PrEP; overall, 11% of those offered navigation (235/2106) received prescriptions. Navigated MSM with PEP history [adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16 to 1.56)], previous STI (aPR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.45), or HIV-diagnosed partners (aPR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.37) were more likely than those with PrEP interest to accept referrals. Probability of linkage varied by insurance status; prescription did not vary by patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although MSM in key priority groups (eg, previous STI) showed low navigation uptake, those who accepted navigation were likely to be referred for PrEP, suggesting a need for expanded up-front engagement.

HIV Care and Viral Load Suppression After Sexual Health Clinic Visits by Out-of-Care HIV-Positive Persons.

Outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH) in New York City (NYC) remain suboptimal. To assess the potential role of the city's sexual health clinics (SHCs) in improving HIV outcomes and reducing HIV transmission, we examined HIV care status and its correlates among HIV-positive SHC patients in NYC. Clinic electronic medical records were merged with longitudinal NYC HIV surveillance data to identify HIV-positive patients and derive their retrospective and prospective HIV care status. Evidence of HIV care and viral load suppression (VLS) after clinic visit were considered outcomes. Logistic regression models were used to assess their correlates. A third of the 1045 PLWH who visited NYC SHCs in 2012 were out of HIV care (OOC) in the 12 months preceding the clinic visit, and were less likely than those previously in HIV care (IC) to have subsequent evidence of HIV care (42% vs. 72%) or VLS in the 12 months after the visit (39% vs. 76%). VLS was particularly low among patients diagnosed with ≥2 sexually transmitted infections (46%). The odds of VLS were lowest among those OOC before the clinic visit [versus those IC, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.29], non-Hispanic blacks (versus non-Hispanic whites, aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.90), and residents of high-poverty neighborhoods (>30% vs. <10%, aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89). Our findings suggest that SHCs could serve as an intervention point to (re-)link PLWH to HIV care. Real-time provider alerts about patients' OOC status could help achieve that goal.

Gaps Along the HIV Care Continuum: Findings Among a Population Seeking Sexual Health Care Services in New York City.

BACKGROUND: Linkage/relinkage to HIV care for virally unsuppressed people with new sexually transmitted infections is critical for ending the HIV epidemic. We quantified HIV care continuum gaps and viral suppression among HIV-positive patients attending New York City (NYC) sexual health clinics (SHCs). METHODS: One thousand six hundred forty-nine HIV-positive patients and a 10% sample of 11,954 patients with unknown HIV status on clinic visit date (DOV) were matched against the NYC HIV registry. Using registry diagnosis dates, we categorized matched HIV-positive patients as "new-positives" (newly diagnosed on DOV), "recent-positives (diagnosed ≤90 days before DOV), "prevalent-positives" (diagnosed >90 days before DOV), and "unknown-positives" (previously diagnosed but status unknown to clinic on DOV). We assessed HIV care continuum outcomes before and after DOV for new-positives, prevalent-positives, and unknown-positives using registry laboratory data. RESULTS: In addition to 1626 known HIV-positive patients, 5% of the unknown sample (63/1196) matched to the registry, signifying that approximately 630 additional HIV-positive patients attended SHCs. Of new-positives, 65% were linked to care after DOV. Of prevalent-positives, 66% were in care on DOV; 43% of the out-of-care patients were relinked after DOV. Of unknown-positives, 40% were in care on DOV; 21% of the out-of-care patients relinked after DOV. Viral suppression was achieved by 88% of in-care unknown-positives, 76% in-care prevalent-positives, 50% new-positives, 42% out-of-care prevalent-positives, and 16% out-of-care unknown-positives. CONCLUSIONS: Many HIV-positive people, including those with uncontrolled HIV infection, attend SHCs and potentially contribute to HIV spread. However, HIV status often is not known to staff, resulting in missed linkage/relinkage to care opportunities. Better outcomes could be facilitated by real-time ascertainment of HIV status and HIV care status.

Measuring Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Coverage: A Match of Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic and Immunization Registry Data.

PURPOSE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is recommended for adolescents. By the end of 2013, 64% of female and 40% of male New York City residents aged 13-18 years had received ≥1 HPV vaccine dose. Adolescents attending sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics are at high risk for HPV exposure and could benefit from vaccination. Our objective was to estimate HPV vaccination coverage for this population. METHODS: We matched records of New York City's STD clinic patients aged 13-18 years during 2010-2013 with the Citywide Immunization Registry. We assessed HPV vaccine initiation (≥1 dose) and series completion (≥3 doses among those who initiated) as of clinic visit date and by patient demographics. We compared receipt of ≥1 dose for HPV, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis, and meningococcal conjugate vaccine. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of clinic attendees (13,505/16,364) had records in the Citywide Immunization Registry. Receipt of ≥1 HPV dose increased during 2010-2013 (females: 57.6%-69.7%; males: 1.5%-36.3%). Among females, ≥1-dose coverage was lowest among whites (53.4%) and highest among Hispanics (73.3%); among males, ≥1-dose coverage was lowest among whites (6.9%) and highest among Asians (20.9%). Series completion averaged 57.7% (females) and 28.0% (males), with little variation by race/ethnicity or poverty level. Receipt of ≥1 dose was 59.7% for HPV, 82% for tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis, and 76% for meningococcal conjugate vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccine initiation and completion were low among adolescent STD clinic patients; coverage was lower compared with other recommended vaccines. STD clinics may be good venues for delivering HPV vaccine, thereby enhancing efforts to improve HPV vaccination.