Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Children Who Survived after End-of-Life Decisions in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term outcomes of infants who survive despite life-and-death discussions with families and a decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining interventions (WWLST) in one neonatal intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records for neonatal intensive care unit admissions from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed for presence of WWLST discussions or decisions, as well as the 2-year outcome of all children who survived. WWLST discussions were prospectively recorded in a specific book; follow-up to age 2 years was determined by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: WWLST discussions occurred for 266 of 5251 infants (5%): 151 (57%) were born at term and 115 (43%) were born preterm. Among these discussions, 164 led to a WWLST decision (62%) and 130 were followed by the infant's death (79%). Of the 34 children (21%) surviving to discharge after WWLST decisions, 10 (29%) died before 2 years of age and 11 (32%) required frequent medical follow-up. Major functional limitations were common among survivors, but 8 were classified as functionally normal or with mild-to-moderate functional limitations. CONCLUSIONS: When a WWLST decision was made in our cohort, 21% of the infants survived to discharge. By 2 years of age, the majority of these infants had died or had major functional limitations. This highlights the uncertainty of WWLST decisions during neonatal intensive care and the importance of ensuring that parents are informed of all possibilities. Additional studies including longer-term follow-up and ascertaining the family's views will be important.

Guilt and Regret Experienced by Parents of Children Born Extremely Preterm.

OBJECTIVES: To explore decisional regret of parents of babies born extremely preterm and analyze neonatal, pediatric, and parental factors associated with regret. STUDY DESIGN: Parents of infants born <29 weeks of gestational age, aged between 18 months and 7 years, attending neonatal follow-up were enrolled. Hospital records were reviewed to examine morbidities and conversations with parents about levels of care. Parents were asked the following question: "Knowing what you know now, is there anything you would have done differently?" Mixed methods were used to analyze responses. RESULTS: In total, 248 parents (98% participation) answered, and 54% reported they did not have regret. Of those who reported regret (n = 113), 3 themes were most frequently invoked: 35% experienced guilt, thinking they were responsible for the preterm birth; 28% experienced regret about self-care decisions; and 20% regretted decisions related to their parental role, generally wishing they knew sooner how to get involved. None reported regret about life-and-death decisions made at birth or in the neonatal intensive care unit. Impairment at follow-up, gestational age, and decisions about levels/reorientation of care were not associated with regret. More mothers reported feeling guilt about the preterm birth (compared with fathers); parents of children with severe lesions on ultrasonography of the head were less likely to report regret. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-half of the parents of infants born extremely preterm had regrets regarding their neonatal intensive care unit stay. Causes of regret and guilt should be addressed and minimized.

Care of suspected long bone fractures in the emergency department: Families' perspectives and priorities.

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing interests in patient-reported outcomes, youth and families are rarely involved in designing quality improvement measures. Few quality indicators exist for the care of children with injuries in the Emergency Department (ED) and extremity fractures are among the most common injuries in children. This study's aim was to identify both parents' and youth's perspectives about ED care in the context of a suspected long-bone fracture. METHODS: Youth (10-18 years old) and their parents were surveyed prospectively during their ED visit. Participants were asked: 1) to identify their main concerns, 2) to identify quality measures that were most important to them, and 3) to evaluate the ED care they received. Descriptive analyses present participants' responses. Continuous data was analyzed using a Student t-test and categorical data using a Chi-square test. RESULTS: Over 15 months, 350 families met eligibility criteria and were approached to participate, of which 300 participants consented and 249 surveys were completed (71% response rate): 148 parents and 101 youth (median age: 12) completed their respective surveys. Participants placed a high importance on several themes: pain management, short length of stay, and quality interactions with ED clinicians. Youth as a group prioritized their overall wellbeing and the ED environment (e.g., waiting room comfort, signage), while parents focused on accurate diagnoses and treatments. The following items were less prioritized: that radiology be close to the ED, to see the radiograph, to have access to a wheelchair, to know the identities of clinicians on the team, and to have access to entertainment. Parents and youth within the same family often did not share the same priorities. Ninety-two percent of parents reported their child's pain was treated, while 81% and 63% of youth reported their pain was treated sufficiently and quickly, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and youth can identify their priorities for ED care and should be engaged in efforts to improve and report on the quality of care in the ED. Youths' and parents' perspectives are complimentary and may not align, even within families. The priorities identified in this study can help inform quality improvement initiatives and personalized patient care.

Pulmonary important outcomes after extremely preterm birth: Parental perspectives.

AIM: To describe pulmonary important outcomes (PIO) reported by parents of children born extremely preterm. METHODS: Over 1-year, all parents of children aged 18 months-7-years born <29 weeks' GA were asked regarding their perspectives. The proportion of parents who described PIO and the themes they invoked were examined. Results were analysed using mixed methods. RESULTS: Among parental responses (n = 285, 98% participation rate), 44% spoke about PIO, invoking 24 themes pertaining to NICU hospitalisation and/or long-term respiratory health. Some themes had an impact primarily on the child (e.g. exercise limitation), while the majority had an impact on the whole family (e.g. hospital readmissions). None mentioned oxygen at 36 weeks nor bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The proportion of responses invoking PIO were statistically similar between parents of children with and without BPD, born before or after 25 weeks or with birthweight < or ≥750 g. PIO were more likely to be mentioned in males and among those readmitted for respiratory problems. CONCLUSION: Parents describe many PIO, most related to the functional impact of lung disease on their child (and family), rather than the diagnosis of BPD itself. Most of these PIO are not primary outcomes in large neonatal trials nor collected in neonatal databases.

Gratitude, fragility and strength: Perspectives of adults born preterm about prematurity.

AIM: The aim of the study was to explore how young adults thought that being born preterm had affected their lives. METHODS: Adult participants of a research cohort were questioned about their perspectives. Answers were analysed using mixed methods. RESULTS: Forty-five participants evaluated their health at median score of 8/10. When asked about the meaning of being born preterm, 65% had positive self-centred answers, invoking two main themes: being stronger/'a fighter'/more resilient and being a survivor/chosen; 42% also reported negative themes, such as having health problems and a difficult start. All heard about their prematurity from their parents, 55% with positive child-centred or healthcare system-centred themes, 19% with neutral themes; 35% also heard negative parent-centred themes (tragic experience, guilt, mother's health). When asked which words were associated with prematurity, participants mainly chose positive words for themselves and their family, but more negative words for how the media and society depicted prematurity. Answers were not correlated with adverse objective health measures. CONCLUSION: Participants evaluated their health in a balanced fashion. Preterm-born adults often feel that they have experienced positive transformations as a result of their traumatic start. They often have feelings of gratitude and strength, independent of health problems.

Parental perspectives of outcomes following very preterm birth: Seeing the good, not just the bad.

AIM: To describe parental perspective on health and developmental outcomes of their preterm child in relation to level of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). METHODS: A parental survey about their children aged 15-36 months corrected age born ˂29 weeks' gestation investigated parental concerns and positive attributes. Parental responses in relation to their child's level of NDI were examined using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square for trend tests. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine parental responses were obtained for 163 children, including 44% with NDI. Vast majority of parents reported their children were developing well with good physical health. All parents, irrespective of NDI, reported their children were happy and had a positive personality. Appreciation of social interactions was higher for parents of children without versus with NDI (96% vs. 87%, p = 0.039). Parents of children with NDI were more likely to express concerns than those without NDI. Overall, development was the most common area of concern (45%), followed by the child's future (40%) and physical health (35%). CONCLUSION: Parents of preterm children report many positive points and concerns, some of which are not examined in neonatal follow-up data. These parental perspectives could be used to inform parents of preterm infants, both antenatally and in the neonatal unit.

Bereaved Parents: Insights for the Antenatal Consultation.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore experiences of extremely preterm infant loss in the delivery room and perspectives about antenatal consultation. STUDY DESIGN: Bereaved participants were interviewed, following a semi-structured protocol. Personal narratives were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach. RESULTS: In total, 13 participants, reflecting on 17 pregnancies, shared positive, healing and negative, harmful interactions with clinicians and institutions: feeling cared for or abandoned, doubted or believed, being treated rigidly or flexibly, and feeling that infant's life was valued or not. Participants stressed their need for personalized information, individualized approaches, and affective support. Their decision processes varied; some wanted different things for themselves than what they recommended for others. These interactions shaped their immediate experiences, long-term well-being, healing, and regrets. All had successful subsequent pregnancies; few returned to institutions where they felt poorly treated. CONCLUSION: Antenatal consultations can be strengthened by personalizing them, within a strong caregiver relationship and supportive institutional practices. KEY POINTS: · Personalized antenatal consultations should strive to balance cognitive and affective needs.. · Including perspectives from bereaved parents can strengthen antenatal consultations.. · Trusting provider-parent partnerships are pivotal for risk communication..

Next generation sequencing in neonatology: what does it mean for the next generation?

Rapid whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES), sometimes referred to as "next generation sequencing" (NGS) are now recommended by some experts as a first-line diagnostic test to diagnose infants with suspected monogenic conditions. Estimates of how often NGS leads to diagnoses or changes in management vary widely depending on the population being studied and the indications for testing. Finding a genetic variant that is classified as pathogenic may not necessarily equate with being able to predict the resultant phenotype or to give a reliable prognosis. Molecular diagnoses do not usually lead to changes in clinical management but they often end a family's diagnostic Odyssey and allow informed decisions about future reproductive choices. The likelihood that NGS will be beneficial for patients and families in the NICU remains uncertain. The goal of this paper is to highlight the implications of these ambiguities in interpreting the results of NGS. To do that, we will first review the types of cases that are admitted to NICUs and show why, at least in theory, NGS is unlikely to be useful for most NICU patients and families and may even be harmful for some, although it can help families in some cases. We then present a number of real cases in which NGS results were obtained and show that they often lead to unforeseen and unpredictable consequences. Finally, we will suggest ways to communicate with families about NGS testing and results in order to help them understand the meaning of NGS results and the uncertainty that surrounds them.

Community, Hope, and Resilience: Parental Perspectives on Peer Support in Neonatology.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the perspective of parents who participated in peer-to-peer support meetings with parents of children in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and veteran resource parents with previous NICU experience. STUDY DESIGN: During a longitudinal evaluation in a tertiary care NICU, participating parents were asked to evaluate meetings; with open-ended questions, they were asked about their perspectives. Results were analyzed using mixed methods. RESULTS: Forty-five NICU parents participated over a 10-week study period. They were followed longitudinally after attending at least 1 of the 10 meetings offered; 95% of parents (43 of 45) reported that the meeting was useful to them and gave an overall evaluation of 8.7 out of 10 (average). For each meeting, all the subjects on the checklist of the moderators (veteran resource parents) were discussed with new parents. When describing why and how the meetings were useful to them in their answers to open-ended questions, NICU parents reported 3 major themes: (1) decreasing isolation and being a community (73%), (2) hope and resilience (63%), and (3) getting practical "parent" information (32%). Sharing stories with parents who also had experienced loss, sadness, and grief, NICU parents trusted that it was possible to adapt and thrive. The meetings normalized parents' emotions (92%), decreased negative emotions (eg, anger, sadness, guilt), empowered them in their parental role, and helped them communicate with loved ones and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Peer support meetings are a unique and useful means to support parents. Future investigations will investigate whether and how this type of intervention can improve clinical outcomes.

Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.

CONTEXT: Partnership between patients and health-care professionals (HCPs) is a concept that needs a valid, practical measure to facilitate its use by patients and HCPs. OBJECTIVE: To co-construct a tool for measuring the degree of partnership between patients and HCPs. DESIGN: The CADICEE tool was developed in four steps: (1) generate key dimensions of patient partnership in clinical care; (2) co-construct the tool; (3) assess face and content validity from patients' and HCPs' viewpoints; and (4) assess the usability of the tool and explore its measurement performance. RESULTS: The CADICEE tool comprises 24 items under 7 dimensions: 1) relationship of Confidence or trust between the patient and the HCPs; 2) patient Autonomy; 3) patient participation in Decisions related to care; 4) shared Information on patient health status or care; 5) patient personal Context; 6) Empathy; and 7) recognition of Expertise. Assessment of the tool's usability and measurement performance showed, in a convenience sample of 246 patients and relatives, high face validity, acceptability and relevance for both patients and HCPs, as well as good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The CADICEE tool is developed in co-construction with patients to evaluate the degree of partnership in care desired by patients in their relationship with HCPs. The tool can be used in various clinical contexts and in different health-care settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients were involved in determining the importance of constructing this questionnaire. They co-constructed it, pre-tested it and were part of the entire questionnaire development process. Three patients participated in the writing of the article.

Mortality and Morbidity rounds in neonatology: Providers' experiences and perspectives.

AIM: To describe how Canadian level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) organise mortality and morbidity rounds (M&MR) and explore clinicians' perspectives. METHODS: This questionnaire study, including open-ended questions, examined the following domains: (1) M&MR format, (2) ethical issues and (3) limitations and perceived effectiveness. RESULTS: Sixteen out of twenty (80%) level III NICUs participated. All deaths and 64% of morbidities were discussed. M&MR occurred monthly (69%) with 3-5 patients discussed hourly (63%) and usually (75%) physician led. Wide variations of practice between centres existed for practical issues, such as administrative support and attendance. 44% of centres allowed nurses to participate. Goals reported by participants were also heterogeneous: reducing medical error (56%), educational (50%), improving communication (44%) and peer review (23%). Practical barriers were time (75%) and lack of resources/structure (25%). Four main themes were as follows: the role of M&MR, the ongoing blame culture, communication issues and the distinction between mortality and morbidity. CONCLUSION: Goals and format of M&MR vary widely. M&MR remains physician-centric, where the blame culture still endures. Neonatal M&MR models should be adapted to the modern NICU to ensure the M&MR stays relevant. It could also benefit from lessons learned in quality improvement.

Health perception by young adults born very preterm.

AIM: This study assessed the self-reported health perception and use of health care by adults born very preterm before 30 weeks of gestation. METHODS: The participants were part of a cross-sectional observational study that assessed the global health of young adults aged 18-29 years born very preterm in Quebec, Canada. Health perception was explored from 2011 to 2016 using the second Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36v2), and objective health measures were obtained. Further in-depth open-ended questions were asked in 2018. RESULTS: The 101 preterm subjects had similar perceptions of their health to 105 term-born controls, according to the SF-36v2, despite significantly more adverse health conditions. Their healthcare use was similar. However, the later in-depth questionnaire showed that 23% of 45 preterm subjects and 3% of 34 term-born subjects perceived their health as poorer than the general population. Major factors that could improve their respective health were lifestyle habits (74% vs. 81%) and eliminating specific adverse symptoms (52% vs. 27%). Only 10% of preterm individuals had been asked about their perinatal history by physicians. CONCLUSION: Adults born very preterm said their health was poorer than the general population and identified specific factors that should be addressed during routine health monitoring.

Communicating with parents of children with trisomy 13 or 18 who seek cardiac interventions.

This case report shares the story of a family who sought care elsewhere after their daughter was denied cardiac surgery in their home state because she had trisomy 18. This case report recommends case-by-case assessment of cardiac surgical interventions for children with trisomy 13 or 18 as informed by review of goals, assessment of comorbidities, and literature-informed practice. Coordinated care planning and interdisciplinary communication are relevant in cardiac surgical considerations for children with these underlying genetic conditions.

Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are common life-limiting conditions associated with major disabilities. Many parents have described conflictual relationships with clinicians, but positive and adverse experiences of families with healthcare providers have not been well described. AIM: (1) To investigate parental experiences with clinicians and (2) to provide practical recommendations and behaviors clinicians could emulate to avoid conflict. DESIGN: Participants were asked to describe their best and worse experiences, as well as supportive clinicians they met. The results were analyzed using mixed methods. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Parents of children with trisomy 13 and 18 who were part of online social support networks. A total of 503 invitations were sent, and 332 parents completed the questionnaire about 272 children. RESULTS: The majority of parents (72%) had met a supportive clinician. When describing clinicians who changed their lives, the overarching theme, present in 88% of answers, was trust. Parents trusted clinicians when they felt he or she cared and valued their child, their family, and made them feel like good parents (69%), had appropriate knowledge (66%), and supported them and gave them realistic hope (42%). Many (42%) parents did not want to make-or be part of-life-and-death decisions. Parents gave specific examples of supportive behaviors that can be adopted by clinicians. Parents also described adverse experiences, generally leading to conflicts and lack of trust. CONCLUSION: Realistic and compassionate support of parents living with children with trisomy 13 and 18 is possible. Adversarial interactions that lead to distrust and conflicts can be avoided. Many supportive behaviors that inspire trust can be emulated.

Moral Distress of Clinicians in Canadian Pediatric and Neonatal ICUs.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify moral distress in neonatal ICU and PICU clinicians and to identify associated factors. DESIGN: A national cross-sectional survey of clinicians working in an neonatal ICU or PICU. Moral distress was assessed with the Moral Distress Scale-Revised and by self-rating. Depersonalization was assessed on the subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Respondents reported their attendance at each of six hospital supports that may serve to mitigate moral distress in frontline staff. Analyses compared outcomes across respondent characteristics and hierarchical linear regression evaluated individual, ICU, hospital, and regional effects. SETTING: Eligible ICUs were PICUs and level-3 neonatal ICUs in Canada. SUBJECTS: Eligible participants had worked in the participating ICU for more than 3 months. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 54 eligible ICUs from 31 hospitals. Forty-nine Canadian neonatal ICUs and PICUs (91%) contributed 2,852 complete responses for a 45.2% response rate. Most respondents were nurses (64.9%) or from a neonatal ICU (66.5%). The median and interquartile range Moral Distress Scale-Revised were 79 (52-113); 997 respondents (34.2%) had Moral Distress Scale-Revised scores greater than or equal to 100, and 234 respondents (8.3%) strongly agreed that work caused them significant moral distress. Nurses had a median (interquartile range) Moral Distress Scale-Revised score of 85 (57-121), 19 points higher than physicians and 8 points higher than respiratory therapists (p < 0.0001). Moral Distress Scale-Revised scores increased from 53 (35-79) for those working in ICU less than 1 year to 83 (54-120) in those working in ICU more than 30 years (p < 0.0001); 22.5% reported high degrees of depersonalization, which was associated with moral distress (p < 0.0001). Variability in Moral Distress Scale-Revised scores was explained by individual-level (92%), hospital-level (5%), and ICU-level effects (1%). Frequency of participation in potentially mitigating hospital supports had small effects (< 10 points) on mean Moral Distress Scale-Revised scores. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress is common in clinicians working in ICUs for children. Addressing moral distress will require interventions tailored to individuals in higher-risk groups.

Peer support groups for families in Neonatology: Why and how to get started?

AIM: To describe the development of peer-to-peer support meetings between parents of children in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and veteran resource parents who had a previous NICU experience. METHODS: The study had two steps: a needs assessment and a feasibility pilot study. Parental perspectives were investigated using mixed methods. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three parents were participated. NICU parents (89%) wished to meet resource parents to discuss: their parental role, normalising their experience and emotions, adapting to their new reality, control, guilt, trust and coping. Practical aspects of the meetings were tested/finalised. Resource parent moderators reported that the presence of more than one moderator per meeting was essential. A checklist of topics to discuss was developed. Having a diversity of moderators (fathers, diagnoses other than prematurity, for example) was judged important. The name of the meeting had an impact on attendance: there were less participants when the word "support" was used. The best location (central, parents' kitchen) and optimal time/duration of meetings, selection of parent moderators and compensation were also determined. CONCLUSION: Peer support meetings moderated by resource parents provide a unique and useful means to support NICU parents. Future investigations will explore whether these meetings will improve clinical outcomes.

Should Extremely Premature Babies Get Ventilators During the COVID-19 Crisis?

In a crisis, societal needs take precedence over a patient's best interests. Triage guidelines, however, differ on whether limited resources should focus on maximizing lives or life-years. Choosing between these two approaches has implications for neonatology. Neonatal units have ventilators, some adaptable for adults. This raises the question of whether, in crisis conditions, guidelines for treating extremely premature babies should be altered to free-up ventilators. Some adults who need ventilators will have a survival rate higher than some extremely premature babies. But surviving babies will likely live longer, maximizing life-years. Empiric evidence demonstrates that these babies can derive significant survival benefits from ventilation when compared to adults. When "triaging" or choosing between patients, justice demands fair guidelines. Premature babies do not deserve special consideration; they deserve equal consideration. Solidarity is crucial but must consider needs specific to patient populations and avoid biases against people with disabilities and extremely premature babies.

Beyond a Seat at the Table: The Added Value of Family Stakeholders to Improve Care, Research, and Education in Neonatology.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze activities involving veteran resource parents and patients in a family partnership program; their perspectives were also explored. STUDY DESIGN: The multiple roles assumed by family stakeholders in neonatal initiatives were reviewed. Quality control questionnaires were distributed to resource parents and patients and providers who worked with them. Mixed methods were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Thirty resource parents and patients were involved in a total of 653 activities related to clinical care (n = 413), teaching (n = 31), and research (n = 209); 7 initiatives were described to illustrate the positive impact of family stakeholders on clinical care, teaching, and/or research. Resource parents and patients had different degrees and intensity of involvement: all were involved in low-risk initiatives and 9 in more complex activities. In the questionnaire, family stakeholders all described positive impacts associated with their participation and benefits to themselves, such as meaning making. Three resource parents reported traumatic memories that occurred during medical simulations. The majority of providers report that resource parents and patients improved their projects, but some also report this new collaboration is complex. CONCLUSIONS: Although stakeholder participation increasingly is recommended, practical knowledge and the impact of their participation is scarce. Having several resource parents and patients bring their contributions may be more valuable than a few "expert stakeholders." Recruiting and orienting resource parents and patients toward different types of activities should take into account the complexity and risks of the tasks. Family stakeholders are appreciated and have a positive impact on projects in which they are involved.

The therapeutic space and doctor-parent relationship in paediatrics: trainees' experiences and perspectives.

AIM: To explore paediatric trainees' experiences and perspectives regarding interactions and relationships between physicians and patients' parents. METHODS: Email survey was sent to AAP Section of Pediatric Trainees members. Trainees were asked about 40 interactions with parents as well as perceived benefits/risks and potential influences. Analysis of associations between variables and perspectives/experiences used chi-square and Fisher exact. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy surveys were completed. Respondents participated in a median of nine interactions (IQR 7-13; range 0-37): 99.7% participated in at least one; 52% in 5-10; 41% in >10. 50% reported refusing to participate in at least one interaction following parental request; 8% refused 5-10; 1% refused >10. Electronic communication/social media domain had highest refusals and most interactions respondents believed should never be allowed. 94% agreed that interactions may be beneficial to providers: 75% identified at least one benefit; 86% one risk. Respondents who are parents or female reported increased interactions. CONCLUSION: A variety of interactions with patient's parents are common amongst paediatric trainees, who identify risks and benefits. Disagreements relative to acceptability of certain interactions points to the need for additional research. A reflective educational approach, rather than a prescriptive one, may help trainees better manage these relationships.

Providing clarity around ethical discussion: development of a neonatal intervention score.

AIM: To develop a Neonatal Intervention Score (NIS) to describe the clinical trajectory of a neonate throughout their neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. METHODS: The NIS was developed by modifying the Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS) to reflect illness severity, dependency on life-sustaining interventions and overall life trajectory on a longitudinal basis, rather than illness burden. Validity for longitudinal use within the NICU was tested by calculating the score for 99 preterm babies born less than 28 weeks at predetermined time points throughout their admission to tertiary level care at two institutions. RESULTS: A total of 1333 NISs were analysed, ranging from 0 to 32.5 (mean 9.77, SD 5.4). Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) reached 0.8. NIS moderately correlated to both SNAPPE-II and SNAP-II (Spearman's rho = 0.47, p =< 0.001) within the first 24 hours. CONCLUSION: The NIS is a useful and reliable descriptive tool of relative illness severity and degree of medical interventions throughout a baby's admission. Integrating a longitudinal description of medical dependency of a patient may assist both clinical and ethical decision-making and empirical research by providing an objective account of a baby's clinical trajectory. Establishment of validity within individual institutions is required.