Immediate effect of caffeine on sympathetic nerve activity: why coffee is safe? A single-centre crossover study.

PURPOSES: Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response. METHODS: In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations. RESULTS: A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.

Sleep syncope: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Sleep syncope is defined as a form of vasovagal syncope which interrupts sleep. Long term follow-up has not been reported. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2013 we diagnosed vasovagal syncope in 1105 patients of whom 69 also had sleep syncope. We compared these 69 patients in the sleep syncope group to 118 patients with classical vasovagal syncope consecutively investigated between 1999 and 2003. We compared baseline demography, syncope history, tilt test results and follow-up findings. RESULTS: At baseline, age and gender distribution (mean ± standard deviation) of the classical VVS and sleep synocope groups were similar: 46 ± 21 vs. 47 ± 15 years (p = 0.53), and 55% versus 66% female (p = 0.28), respectively. Abdominal discomfort and vagotonia were more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 80% versus 8% and 33% versus 2% (p < 0.001). Childhood syncope and blood-needle phobia were also more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 58% versus 15% and 69% versus 19% (p < 0.001). Positive tilt test results were similar for the two groups (93% [classical VVS] vs. 91%; p = 0.56). Blood pressure, heart rate and stroke volume changed in a similar manner from baseline to syncope (p = 0.32, 0.34 and 0.18, respectively). Mean duration of follow-up for the classical VVS and sleep syncope groups, as recorded in the electronic records, were 17 (3-21) and 15 (7-27) years, respectively. Rates of mortality and of permanent pacemaker insertion were similar in the two groups: 16.2% (classical VVS) versus 7.6% (p = 0.09) and 3% (classical VVS) versus 3% (p = 0.9). Incidence of sleep episodes decreased from 1.9 ± 3 to 0.1 ± 0.3 episodes per year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sleep syncope is a subtype of vasovagal syncope with characteristic symptoms. Despite the severity of the sleep episodes, the prognosis is very good. Very few patients require permanent pacing, and nearly all respond to education and reassurance.

Different Types of Syncope Presenting to Clinic: Do We Miss Cardiac Syncope?

BACKGROUND: In the outpatient setting, differentiation of cardiac syncope (CS) from other more common forms of syncope is difficult, particularly in the elderly. We examined the frequency of the different types of syncope in a clinic population and estimated missed CS cases. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the relevant data for patients assessed in our Christchurch Hospital syncope clinic over a 5-year study period (1 January 2011-31 December 2015). Patients who were later found to have cardiac syncope (and were not initially diagnosed in our clinic) were counted as "missed" cases. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-nine (839) patients (median age 57, interquartile range: 35-73 years, 56% female) were assessed during the study period. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) was the most frequent diagnosis (42.8%) followed by drug-related postural hypotension (DRPH) (26.6%). Cardiac syncope was initially diagnosed in only 3.1%. Of 30 CS patients initially assessed in syncope clinic who later required pacing, 18 (2.1%) were missed CS. In this group, 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) was normal in 50% and the majority (n=10) were tilt-positive. The 2.5-year mortality was 5.7% (n=48) including three sudden unexpected cardiac deaths. CONCLUSION: Vasovagal syncope and DRPH were by far the most frequent diagnoses. Cardiac syncope was less frequent because patients were selected mainly from an outpatient population, not the emergency department. In a small number of patients, CS was missed for the following reasons: (1) coexistence of cardiac conduction system disease with VVS and DRPH in the elderly, and (2) insensitivity of 12-lead ECG, in-hospital telemetry and out-of-hospital Holter monitoring for detecting conduction system disease early in its development.

Sympathetic overactivity in dialysis patients-Underappreciated and clinically consequential.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain frustratingly common in dialysis patients. A dearth of established evidence-based treatment calls for alternative therapeutic avenues to be embraced. Sympathetic hyperactivity, predominantly due to afferent nerve signaling from the diseased native kidneys, has been established to be prognostic in the dialysis population for over 15 years. Despite this, tangible therapeutic interventions have, to date, been unsuccessful and the outlook for patients remains poor. This narrative review summarizes established experimental and clinical data, highlighting recent developments, and proposes why interventions to ameliorate sympathetic hyperactivity may well be beneficial for this high-risk population.

Introduction of portable bedside echocardiography to acute general medicine.

We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent portable bedside echocardiography under general medicine over a 15-month period. The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 16-95) (n = 201). Indications for scanning included syncope (27%), murmur (17%) and dyspnoea (14%); findings included valve abnormalities (46%), left ventricular hypertrophy (26%) and dilated left ventricle (15%). Bedside echocardiography is a useful extension of the physical examination but is operator-dependent, and its routine use in general medicine will depend on the availability of training, group reporting sessions and quality assurance.

Effectiveness of EDACS Versus ADAPT Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Practice.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: A 2-hour accelerated diagnostic pathway based on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score, ECG, and troponin measures (ADAPT-ADP) increased early discharge of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction presenting to the emergency department compared with standard care (from 11% to 19.3%). Observational studies suggest that an accelerated diagnostic pathway using the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS-ADP) may further increase this proportion. This trial tests for the existence and size of any beneficial effect of using the EDACS-ADP in routine clinical care. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of adults with suspected acute myocardial infarction, comparing the ADAPT-ADP and the EDACS-ADP. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged to outpatient care within 6 hours of attendance, without subsequent major adverse cardiac event within 30 days. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients were recruited, 279 in each arm. Sixty-six patients (11.8%) had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (ADAPT-ADP 29; EDACS-ADP 37); 11.1% more patients (95% confidence interval 2.8% to 19.4%) were identified as low risk in EDACS-ADP (41.6%) than in ADAPT-ADP (30.5%). No low-risk patients had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (0.0% [0.0% to 1.9%]). There was no difference in the primary outcome of proportion discharged within 6 hours (EDACS-ADP 32.3%; ADAPT-ADP 34.4%; difference -2.1% [-10.3% to 6.0%], P=.65). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the proportion of patients discharged early despite more patients being classified as low risk by the EDACS-ADP than the ADAPT-ADP. Both accelerated diagnostic pathways are effective strategies for chest pain assessment and resulted in an increased rate of early discharges compared with previously reported rates.

Human muscle sympathetic nerve responses to urocortin-2 in health and stable heart failure.

Sympatholytic and vasodilator drugs have been of major therapeutic benefit in patients with heart failure (HF). Urocortin-2 (Ucn2) is a small corticotrophin-related peptide distributed throughout the cardiovascular system which inhibits cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) and is also a powerful vasodilator. This study analysed the effects of a 60-min infusion of Ucn2 (25 µg) on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) recorded from the lower limb in eight healthy men and four men with stable HF. During Ucn2 infusion, mean arterial pressure fell to a nadir of 84 ± 2 compared to 95 ± 2 mmHg during placebo (P = 0.001) and heart rate increased to a maximum of 74 ± 1 compared to 64 ± 1 b.p.m. (P < 0.001). Total peripheral resistance fell by 23 ± 4% compared with an increase of 23 ± 4% (P < 0.001) and cardiac output increased by 22 ± 4 compared to 4 ± 4% (P = 0.001). The MSNA burst frequency increased by 9 ± 2 compared to 1 ± 2 burst/min (P = 0.005) and burst area/min by 133 ± 7 vs 107 ± 7% (P = 0.01). Burst incidence and baroreflex sensitivity were not significantly altered. Qualitatively similar changes were observed in stable HF patients. Ucn2-induced vasodilatation increased MSNA in humans, as opposed to the decrease in CSNA we observed in sheep. Therefore, if Ucn2 has a central inhibitory effect on MSNA, it was over-run by off-loading the cardiovagal baroreflex. Alternatively, CSNA may be less responsive to baroreflex off-loading than MSNA.

Low-dose B-type natriuretic peptide raises cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in sheep.

The reported effects of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) on sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) are variable, dependent on concomitant hemodynamic actions, and likely to be regionally differentiated. There are few reports of the effect of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) on SNA and none have measured cardiac SNA (CSNA) by direct microneurography. We measured the effects of low-dose ANP and BNP (2.4 pmol·kg(-1)·min(-1) infused for 120 min) on CSNA and hemodynamics in conscious sheep (n = 8). While there was a trend for mean arterial pressure and cardiac output to fall with both ANP and BNP, changes were not significant compared with vehicle control. However, BNP did significantly reduce systolic arterial (97 ± 4.2 vs. 107 ± 6.8 mmHg during control; P = 0.043) and pulse pressures (0.047) and increase heart rate (110 ± 6.7 vs. 96 ± 7.3 beats/min; P = 0.044). Trends for these hemodynamic parameters to change with ANP did not achieve statistical significance. ANP also had no significant effect on any CSNA parameters measured. In contrast, BNP induced a rise in both CSNA burst frequency (∼20 bursts/min higher than control, P = 0.011) and burst area (∼40% higher than control, P = 0.013). BNP-induced rises in burst incidence (bursts/100 beats), and burst area per 100 beats, however, were not significant. In conclusion, BNP infused at low doses that only had subtle effects on hemodynamics increased CSNA burst frequency and burst are per minute. This increase in CSNA may in large part be secondary to an increase in heart rate as CSNA burst incidence and burst area per 100 beats were not significantly increased. This study provides no evidence for inhibition of CSNA by natriuretic peptides.

Influence of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) haplotypes on nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and nortriptyline-induced postural hypotension in healthy volunteers.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: A single nucleotide polymorphism in ABCB1, which encodes P-glycoprotein, has retrospectively been associated with symptoms of nortriptyline-induced postural hypotension in depressed patients. This finding needs to be replicated in independent studies before recommendations regarding pharmacogenetic testing can be made. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: In a prospective study of healthy volunteers homozygous for ABCB1 (1236-2677-3435, TTT/TTT or CGC/CGC), a single dose of nortriptyline was administered, plasma exposure was determined and blood pressure and heart rate were monitored during posture change. No differences between ABCB1 haplotype groups were found in plasma exposure of nortriptyline and its active metabolites, E- and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline. The heart rate response to posture change was increased with nortriptyline, whereas there was no difference in blood pressure response. However, no differences between haplotype groups were observed except that the pre dose heart rate response to standing was greater in the TTT than CGC homozygotes. The association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and nortriptyline-induced postural hypotension found in a previous study could not be confirmed. The results raise the possibility of a predisposition in heart rate response in the TTT homozygotes rather than an effect of nortriptyline. AIMS To investigate the influence of ABCB1 (1236-2677-3435) polymorphisms on nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and nortriptyline-induced postural hypotension in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Genetic screening of 67 healthy volunteers identified eight CGC homozygotes and nine TTT homozygotes of ABCB1 (1236-2677-3435), who were administered a single dose of nortriptyline 25 mg. Plasma exposure of nortriptyline and its active metabolites, E- and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline, was determined over 72 h. Heart rate and blood pressure responses to posture change (active standing and passive head-up tilt) were measured continuously using finger plethysmography. RESULTS: There were no differences in plasma exposure between ABCB1 haplotype groups, as the geometric mean (95% CI) AUC(0,72 h) ratios were 0.98 (0.94, 1.03), 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) and 0.95 (0.80, 1.10) for nortriptyline, E- and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline, respectively. The pre dose heart rate response to standing was greater in the TTT than CGC homozygotes (mean (95% CI) difference 7.4 (1.5, 13.4) beats min(-1) , P = 0.02). At t(max) at 8 h post dose, nortriptyline increased the heart rate response to posture change in all subjects with mean (95% CI) Δ heart rate values of 7.4 (3.6, 11.3) beats min(-1) on active standing (P = 0.0009) and 4.8 (2.0, 7.6) beats min(-1) on head-up tilt (P = 0.002), but no difference was observed between haplotype groups. There was no difference in blood pressure response to posture change in either group. CONCLUSION: The association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and nortriptyline-induced postural hypotension found in the previous study could not be confirmed. The results raise the possibility of a predisposition in heart rate response in the TTT homozygotes rather than an effect of nortriptyline.

Sleep syncope-A systematic review.

Background: Sleep syncope is a subtype of vasovagal syncope in which patients experience syncope after awakening from their sleep. The aim was to investigate the association of clinical characteristics and gastrointestinal symptoms with syncope, as well as the body position in which symptoms began. Methods: A systematic search of studies was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE without language restrictions, from inception to 9 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported data on the proportion of patients who experienced symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea) associated with syncope. Results: Data were included for 116 patients in 13 studies. Patients were 46.9 ± 4.3 years and 61.4% were female. In 52.5% of patients, a supine body position at the time of syncope was reported. A history of phobias was reported by 67.6% of patients, and 96.5% of patients also had typical daytime vasovagal syncope. In the 5 studies reporting the results of head-up tilt testing (n = 77), 90.9% of patients had positive tests. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in the majority of patients with reported rates of 65.6% for upper gastrointestinal symptoms and 86.0% for lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion: Patients with sleep syncope patients are predominantly female with a history of daytime vasovagal syncope. Gastrointestinal symptoms are present in the majority of patients and is therefore an important feature of sleep syncope.

Dissection of carotid sinus hypersensitivity: the timing of vagal and vasodepressor effects and the effect of body position.

We assessed the timing of vagal and sympathetic factors that mediate hypotension during CSM (carotid sinus massage) in patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity. We hypothesized that a fall in cardiac output would precede vasodepression, and that vasodepression would be exaggerated by head-up tilt. We performed pulse contour analyses on blood pressure recordings during CSM in syncope patients during supine rest and head-up tilt. In a subset we simultaneously recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity supine. During supine rest, systolic blood pressure decreased from 150±7 to 107±7 mmHg (P<0.001) and heart rate from 64±2 to 39±3 beats/min (P<0.01). Cardiac output decreased with heart rate to nadir (66±6% of baseline), 3.1±0.4 s after onset of bradycardia. In contrast, total peripheral resistance reached nadir (77±3% of baseline) after 11±1 s. During head-up-tilt, systolic blood pressure fell from 149±10 to 90±11 mmHg and heart rate decreased from 73±4 to 60±7 beats/min. Compared with supine rest, cardiac output nadir was lower (60±8 compared with 83±4%, P<0.05), whereas total peripheral resistance nadir was similar (81±6 compared with 80±3%). The time to nadir from the onset of bradycardia did not differ from supine rest. At the onset of bradycardia there was an immediate withdrawal of muscle-sympathetic nerve activity while total peripheral resistance decay occurred much later (6-8 s). The haemodynamic changes following CSM have a distinct temporal pattern that is characterized by an initial fall in cardiac output (driven by heart rate), followed by a later fall in total peripheral resistance, even though sympathetic withdrawal is immediate. This pattern is independent of body position.

Urocortin 3 inhibits cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in conscious sheep.

There is an increasing body of evidence suggesting a role for the urocortin (Ucn) peptides in blood pressure regulation and in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Both Ucn1 and Ucn2 have recently been shown to inhibit cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) in sheep. However, there are few studies reporting the effects of Ucn3 on the sympathetic nervous system. Hence, this study performed in normal conscious sheep examines the effects of Ucn3 on CSNA. Intravenous Ucn3 (administered at doses of 25 and 100 µg) caused transient falls in arterial pressure (P = 0.025), more prolonged rises in heart rate (P < 0.001), and falls in stroke volume (P < 0.001) and peripheral resistance (P = 0.018). CSNA, measured as burst area and burst incidence, fell in a dose-dependent manner after Ucn3 bolus (all P < 0.001). CSNA burst frequency tended to be reduced after high-dose Ucn3. Ucn3 had no significant effect on plasma catecholamine levels. In conclusion, this study reports for the first time that Ucn3 induces potent inhibition of sympathetic traffic directed toward the heart. This provides further support for a role for Ucn3 in pressure and volume homeostasis and suggests that further investigation of potential therapeutic applications for Ucn3 in cardiovascular disease is warranted.

The history of diagnosing carotid sinus hypersensitivity: why are the current criteria too sensitive?

The carotid sinus syndrome and carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) are closely related disorders. The first is characterized by syncope triggered by manipulation of the carotid sinus in daily life (e.g. shaving). According to the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines, CSH is diagnosed when carotid sinus massage elicits ≥3 s asystole, a fall in systolic blood pressure of ≥50 mmHg, or both, with symptoms. The question is, however, whether symptoms can be expected when these criteria are met. Although they are widely accepted, we will show that their basis is primarily in arbitrary clinical observations and that in the original publications the link between classification and clinical symptoms was often dubious. The current criteria for CSH are thus too sensitive, explaining the reported high prevalence of CSH in the general older population. The review will conclude with suggesting a stricter set of criteria for CSH that should be evaluated in future studies.

Hemodynamic mechanisms underlying prolonged post-faint hypotension.

OBJECTIVE: During hypotension induced by tilt-table testing, low presyncopal blood pressure (BP) usually recovers within 1 min after tilt back. However, in some patients prolonged post faint hypotension (PPFH) is observed. We assessed the hemodynamics underlying PPFH in a retrospective study. METHODS: Seven patients (2 females, aged 31-72 years) experiencing PPFH were studied. PPFH was defined as a systolic BP below 85 mmHg for at least 2 min after tilt back. In 6 out of 7 presyncope was provoked by 0.4 mg sublingual NTG, administered in the 60° head-up tilt position following head-up tilt for 20 min. Continuous BP was monitored and stroke volume (SV) was computed from pressure pulsations. Cardiac output (CO) was calculated from SV × heart rate (HR); and total peripheral resistance (TPR) from mean BP/CO. Left ventricular contractility was estimated by dP/dt (max) of finger pressure pulse. RESULTS: Systolic BP (SYS), diastolic BP (DIAS) and HR during PPFH were lower compared to baseline: SYS 75 ± 14 versus 121 ± 18 mmHg, DIAS 49 ± 9 versus 71 ± 9 mmHg and HR 52 ± 14 versus 67 ± 12 beats/min (p < 0.05). Marked hypotension was associated with a 47% fall in CO 3.1 ± 0.6 versus 5.9 ± 1.3 L/min (p < 0.05) and decreases in dP/dt, 277 ± 77 versus 759 ± 160 mmHg/s (p < 0.05). The difference in TPR was not significant 1.1 ± 0.3 versus 1.0 ± 0.3 MU (p = 0.229). In four patients, we attempted to treat PPFH by 30° head-down tilt. This intervention increased SYS only slightly (to 89 ± 12 mmHg). INTERPRETATION: PPFH seems to be mediated by severe cardiac depression.

Pacing in vasovagal syncope: A physiological paradox?

The physiological principles underlying pacemaker treatment in patients with vasovagal syncope have never been reviewed. Current knowledge suggests that pacing the right heart is unlikely to correct blood pressure during a vasovagal reaction. In adults, the reason for this is that stroke volume is dictated by central blood volume contained in the cardiopulmonary vessels within the chest (ie, left ventricular preload). Preceding posture-triggered vasovagal syncope, there is a significant fall in central blood volume and therefore in stroke volume and cardiac output long before the onset of bradycardia. This explains why high rate cardiac pacing does not improve cardiac output or blood pressure during presyncope. Contradictory results between physiological theory and trial evidence underlying pacemaker treatment at present cannot be explained. Placebo effects during pacing for vasovagal syncope should be considered. More work is needed to solve the dilemma.

Sympatho-vagal responses in patients with sleep and typical vasovagal syncope.

Sleep syncope is a recently described form of vasovagal syncope that interrupts sleep. The pathophysiology of this condition is uncertain but a 'central' non-baroreflex-mediated trigger has been suggested. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that patients with sleep syncope have abnormal sympatho-vagal responses to non-baroreflex, but normal responses to baroreflex stimuli. We collected historical data from SS patients (patients with vasovagal syncope with sleep syncope; n=16) and NSS patients (patients with vasovagal syncope without sleep syncope; n=35), including demography, and triggers and symptoms during syncope. MBP (mean blood pressure), HR (heart rate) and MSNA (muscle sympathetic nerve activity) in SS patients were compared with NSS patients and matched controls (n=16) during HG (handgrip), CPTs (cold pressor tests), HUT (head-up tilting) and tilt-induced pre-syncope. Patients and controls were of similar age and gender distribution [SS patients, age 46.0+/-4 years (69% female); NSS patients, 47.3+/-4 years (63% female); controls, 43.7+/-5 years (69% female)]. Compared with NSS patients, SS patients reported more fainting episodes: (i) triggered by phobias (75 compared with 37%; P=0.001); (ii) while in the horizontal position (44 compared with 6%; P=0.001); and (iii) associated with abdominal symptoms (69 compared with 9%; P=0.001). Compared with controls, the MBP response to HG was attenuated in SS patients (P=0.016), and MSNA (burst frequency and incidence) responses to CPT were attenuated in both syncope groups (SS, P=0.011 and 0.003 respectively; NSS, P=0.021 and 0.049 respectively). MSNA responses to HUT did not differ. For both non-baroreflex and baroreflex responses, there were no differences in any of the MSNA indices between the syncope groups. Patients with vasovagal syncope, with or without sleep syncope, have very similar sympatho-vagal responses to both non-baroreflex and baroreflex stimuli. This is consistent with sleep syncope being a subform of vasovagal syncope. Attenuation of sympathetic responses to non-baroreflex pathways may be important in the mechanism of vasovagal syncope.

Adrenomedullin 2 increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in parallel to heart rate in normal conscious sheep.

Both adrenomedullin 2 (AM2) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) have been shown to be involved in regulating cardiovascular activity, but whether any interaction between these two systems exists remains to be determined. In this study, we examine the effects of intravenous AM2 infusions on SNA directed toward the heart (cardiac SNA (CSNA)) in healthy sheep studied in the conscious state. In response to AM2, arterial pressure was reduced (P = 0.005) with both heart rate (P < 0.001) and cardiac output (P < 0.001) increased compared with vehicle control response. CSNA burst frequency (bursts/min) and burst area/min both increased during infusion of AM2 (both P < 0.001). However, correcting CSNA indices for concurrent heart rate changes resulted in CSNA burst incidence (bursts/100 beats) and burst area incidence (area/100 beats) being not significantly different between AM2 and control treatments. There were no significant differences demonstrated in plasma epinephrine or norepinephrine levels between the two study days. In conclusion, AM2 administered systemically to normal conscious sheep increases both CSNA and heart rate. However, correction for heart rate responses abrogates the rise in CSNA. It remains unclear whether AM2's primary effect is to act via the central nervous system to directly stimulate CSNA with resultant increase in heart rate, or to induce a rise in heart rate by other mechanisms.