Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuropediatrics ; 53(5): 351-357, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35617966

RESUMO

This study aimed to determine the seropositivity of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab) and aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab) and outcomes in children with acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADSs). Children (6 months-15 years) with suspected ADS were enrolled and tested for MOG-Ab and AQP4-Ab prospectively over 18 months at a tertiary care hospital in North India. Children with proven nonimmune-mediated neurological disorders were enrolled as controls. Of 79 children with suspected ADS, 66 were enrolled. Among the enrolled children with ADS, acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (25) was the most common first clinical event followed by optic neuritis (ON) (20) and transverse myelitis (TM) (19; one child had ON and TM simultaneously [neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders [NMOSDs]]), while two children had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) apart from ON and TM. Fourteen (21.2%, confidence interval [CI] 11.3-31.1) tested positive for one antibody (12 [18.1%; 95% CI 10.5-25.5%] for MOG-Ab and 2 [3%; 95% CI 0-7.2%] for AQP4-Ab). None of the 62 controls tested positive for any antibody. The final diagnosis in those with the monophasic ADS was ADEM (21), ON (13), TM (16), and other CIS (1) while that in children with recurrent events was multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis (MDEM) (2), NMOSD (3), ADEM-ON (4), recurrent ON (4), and MS (2). Among those with the first event, 4/51 (7.8%; 95% CI 0.5-15.2%) were MOG-Ab positive and 2 AQP4-Ab positive, whereas 8/15 (53.3% [95% CI 28.1-78.6%]) with recurrent events (MDEM [2], ADEM-ON [4], recurrent ON [1], and recurrent TM [1]) were MOG-Ab positive. Hence, MOG-Abs are the most common antibodies detected in one in five children with pediatric ADS, especially in relapsing disease. AQP4-Abs are rare in children with ADS.


Assuntos
Aquaporinas , Encefalomielite , Mielite Transversa , Neuromielite Óptica , Neurite Óptica , Autoanticorpos , Encefalomielite/epidemiologia , Humanos , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito , Mielite Transversa/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Síndrome
2.
Indian J Med Res ; 155(1): 189-196, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35859443

RESUMO

Background & objectives: Data on neonatal COVID-19 are limited to the immediate postnatal period, with a primary focus on vertical transmission in inborn infants. This study was aimed to assess the characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 in outborn neonates. Methods: All neonates admitted to the paediatric emergency from August 1 to December 31, 2020, were included in the study. SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription- (RT)-PCR test was done on oro/nasopharyngeal specimens obtained at admission. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative neonates were compared and the diagnostic accuracy of a selective testing policy was assessed. Results: A total of 1225 neonates were admitted during the study period, of whom SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed in 969. The RT-PCR test was positive in 17 (1.8%). Mean (standard deviation) gestation and birth weight of SARS-CoV-2-infected neonates were 35.5 (3.2) wk and 2274 (695) g, respectively. Most neonates (11/17) with confirmed COVID-19 reported in the first two weeks of life. Respiratory distress (14/17) was the predominant manifestation. Five (5/17, 29.4%) SARS-CoV-2 infected neonates died. Neonates with COVID-19 were at a higher risk for all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-8.9, P=0.03]; however, mortality did not differ after adjusting for lethal malformation (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 0.7-8.7). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (95% CI) of selective testing policy for SARS-CoV-2 infection at admission was 52.9 (28.5-76.1), 83.3 (80.7-85.6), 82.8 (80.3-85.1), 3.17 (1.98-5.07), and 0.56 (0.34-0.93) per cent, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among the outborn neonates reporting to the paediatric emergency and tested for COVID-19 was observed to be low. The selective testing policy had poor diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID illness.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2
3.
World J Emerg Med ; 8(1): 55-60, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28123622

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was done to compare the admission Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as predictors of outcome in children with impaired consciousness. METHODS: In this observational study, children (5-12 years) with impaired consciousness of <7 days were included. Children with traumatic brain injury, on sedatives or neuromuscular blockade; with pre-existing cerebral palsy, mental retardation, degenerative brain disease, vision/hearing impairment; and seizure within last 1 hour were excluded. Primary outcomes: comparison of area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: comparison of AUC of ROC curve for mortality and poor outcome on Pediatric Overall Performance Category Scale at 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 63 children, 20 died during hospital stay. AUC for in-hospital mortality for GCS was 0.83 (CI 0.7 to 0.9) and FOUR score was 0.8 (CI 0.7 to 0.9) [difference between areas -0.0250 (95%CI 0.0192 to 0.0692), Z statistic 1.109, P=0.2674]. AUC for mortality at 3 months for GCS was 0.78 (CI 0.67 to 0.90) and FOUR score was 0.74 (CI 0.62 to 0.87) (P=0.1102) and AUC for poor functional outcome for GCS was 0.82 (CI 0.72 to 0.93) and FOUR score was 0.79 (CI 0.68 to 0.9) (P=0.2377), which were also comparable. Inter-rater reliability for GCS was 0.96 and for FOUR score 0.98. CONCLUSION: FOUR score was as good as GCS in prediction of in-hospital and 3-month mortality and functional outcome at 3 months. FOUR score had a good inter-rater reliability.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA