The Variable Definition of "Negative Appendicitis" Remains a Surgical Challenge.

AIM: Acute appendicitis (AA) is treated primarily surgically with histopathology being the gold standard for confirmation of appendicitis and reported rates of negative appendicectomies (NA) ranging between 3.2% and 19% worldwide and 15.9-20.6% in the UK. NA rates are frequently used to identify poor performing centers as part of a Model Health System and form an integral part of appendicitis scoring systems. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of negative appendicectomies within our institution and critically analyze the appropriateness of its use as a quality metric and its impact on clinical practice and research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data analysis from a prospective dataset of pediatric appendicitis patients between 2015 and 2021 in a tertiary center in the UK was performed. Detailed analysis of negative appendicectomies was performed and further stratified by two distinct age and gender groups looking at the incidence of NA and the classification of non-histologically normal appendix specimens. RESULTS: In our series, 819 patients met inclusion criteria, 736 (89.9%) had acute appendicitis. Our overall institutional negative appendicectomy rate was 10.1% (83 patients) with the breakdown as follows: 65 histologically normal appendix (7.9%), 10 Enterobius vermicularis, 3 eosinophilic appendicitis, 2 neoplasms, 1 isolated faecolith, 1 fibrous obliteration of the lumen, and 1 peri-appendiceal inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our negative appendicectomy rate is below established UK pediatric NA rates. This rate ranges from 7.9% to 10.1% depending on the definition of NA utilized. A single standard pathological definition for histological acute appendicitis is required when being used as a comparative quality metric. Centers engaged in clinical research should be aware of variations in NA definitions both in scoring systems and individual centers to avoid skewing derived results.

Thoracoscopic external traction suture elongation for the management of long-gap oesophageal atresia: a two-centre experience.

AIM: Van der Zee (VdZ) described a technique to elongate the oesophagus in long-gap oesophageal atresia (LGOA) by thoracoscopic placement of external traction sutures (TPETS). Here, we describe our experience of using this technique. METHOD: Retrospective review of all LGOA + / - distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula (dTOF) cases where TPETS was used in our institutions. Data are given as medians (IQR). RESULTS: From 01/05/2019 to 01/03/2023, ten LGOA patients were treated by the VdZ technique. Five had oesophageal atresia (Gross type A or B, Group 1) and five had OA with a dTOF (type C, Group 2) but with a long gap precluding primary anastomosis. Age of first traction procedure was Group 1 = 53 (29-55) days and Group 2 = 3 (1-49) days. Median number of traction procedures = 3; time between first procedure and final anastomosis was 6 days (4-7). Four cases were converted to thoracotomy at the third procedure. Three had anastomotic leaks managed conservatively. Follow-up was 12-52 months. All patients achieved oesophageal continuity and were orally fed; no patient required an oesophagostomy. CONCLUSION: In this series, TPETS in LGOA facilitated delayed primary anastomoses and replicated the good results previously described but, in addition, was successful in cases with dTOF. We believe traction suture placement and tensioning benefit from being performed thoracoscopically because of excellent visualisation and the fact that the tension does not change when the chest is closed. Surgical and anaesthetic planning and expertise are crucial. It is now our management of choice in OA patients with a long gap with or without a distal TOF.

Antegrade continence enema stoppers: a pilot study on patient preferences.

BACKGROUND: Severe constipation can have a major impact on a child's quality of life and that of their families. Forming an antegrade continence enema (ACE) can be a transformational intervention to manage severe symptoms. However, operations can also have unpredictable negative consequences such as stomal stenosis or leaks from the ACE site. AIM: To investigate whether the choice of an ACE stopper can increase patient satisfaction and compliance. METHODS: A service evaluation with a standardised questionnaire was completed to assess quality of life and explore factors that have an impact on the preference for which ACE stopper was used. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients completed the evaluation of all three ACE stopper devices. At least 75% of the children improved their stooling pattern with an overall satisfaction rate of 8.5 out of 10. More patients preferred a flexible stopper but no one device was strongly preferred over the others. CONCLUSION: The study shows that an ACE has a positive impact on quality of life. With regards to the choice of ACE stopper, results show that different stoppers suit different individuals, highlighting that there is a place for a choice. This is useful information for healthcare providers who wish to improve compliance and reduce the risk of complications in this patient group.

Complete Tubular Colonic Duplication ending in a Common Channel as a Recto vestibular Fistula: A Case Report and Literature Review of Management Options.

Colon duplication (CD) is a rare congenital abnormality with varied presentations. We present a neonatal case with complete tubular CD terminating uniquely as a common channel, a single rectovestibular fistula. We summarize surgical management options in CD as well as factors that will help to decide the best surgical treatment in individual cases.

A Sharp Lesson: Duodenal Perforation 2 Months after Ingestion of a Pin.

An 11-year-old female child presented 2 months after accidentally swallowing her hijab pin, with right-sided abdominal pain. An X-ray showed that the pin was located in her right upper quadrant, and at laparoscopy, it was found to have eroded through her duodenum into her liver. Ingested pins should always be removed if not passed spontaneously within the first few days.

Multilayered Flap Technique: A Method for Delayed Closure of Giant Omphalocele.

Giant omphalocele is a rare, large abdominal wall defect in which the intra-abdominal organs herniate through the umbilical cord and are covered by a sac. Surgical management of giant omphalocele is challenging, and optimal treatment remains controversial. Two generally accepted treatment options are staged closure and delayed closure. Delayed closure takes place after a period of conservative treatment promoting omphalocele sac epithelialization. We present 3 patients treated by a delayed closure technique for ventral hernia repair. In this technique, the epithelialized omphalocele sac and peritoneum are elevated as flaps, which are used to reconstruct the abdominal wall in multiple layers.

Medicated Manuka honey in conservative management of exomphalos major.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Manuka honey ointment and dressings in the conservative management of exomphalos major (EM). METHODS: A retrospective review of five patients with EM who underwent non-operative management with Manuka honey ointments and dressings was carried out to assess the time to complete epithelialisation, time to full feeds, hospital stay, adverse effects, complications and outcome. RESULTS: The skin epithelialisation over the EM sac was achieved in a median of 63 days (48-119). The median time to full enteral feed was 13 days (3-29). The median hospital stay was 66 days (21-121). No adverse effects were noted related to Manuka honey. Three patients had pulmonary hypoplasia requiring prolonged hospitalization; one of those died with respiratory complications at home after achieving complete epithelialisation. The follow-up was a median 16 months (6-22). Two patients did not require repair of the ventral hernia. One patient had ventral hernia repair at 16 months with excellent cosmesis. The remaining patient is awaiting repair. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of the use of medicated Manuka honey ointment and impregnated dressings in the conservative management of EM. This treatment is safe, efficacious and promotes wound healing with favorable outcome.

Core Outcome Set for Necrotizing Enterocolitis Treatment Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variability in outcome reporting in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) treatment trials hinders conducting meta-analyses and implementing novel treatments. We aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for NEC treatment trials including outcome measures most relevant to patients and physicians, from NEC diagnosis to adulthood. METHODS: Clinicians and/or researchers from low-middle- and high-income countries were approached based on their scientific contributions to NEC literature, and patients and parents through local organizations. We presented participants with 45 outcomes used in NEC research, identified through a systematic review. To achieve consensus, outcomes were rated on a scale of 1 to 9 in 3 online Delphi rounds, and discussed at a final consensus meeting. RESULTS: Seventy-one participants from 25 countries completed all Delphi rounds, including 15 patients and family representatives. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus in one of the stakeholder groups and were included in the consensus meeting, 6 outcomes reached consensus in both groups. Twenty-seven participants from both high- and low-middle-income countries attended the online consensus meeting, including family representatives and NEC patients. After discussion and a final vote, 5 outcomes reached consensus to be included: mortality, NEC-related mortality, short bowel syndrome, quality of life, and neurodevelopmental impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This NEC COS includes 5 predominantly long-term outcomes agreed upon by clinicians, patients, and family representatives. Use of this international COS will help standardize outcome selection in clinical trials, ensure these are relevant to those most affected by NEC care, and, ultimately, improve the care of infants with NEC.

Using Microbiology Culture in Pediatric Appendicitis to Risk Stratify Patients: A Cohort Study.

Background: We sought to investigate the value of intra-operative microbiology samples in pediatric appendicitis. Proposed benefits include tailoring post-operative antimicrobial management, risk-stratifying patients, and reducing post-operative intra-abdominal abscess formation. Patients and Methods: All cases of appendicitis managed with appendicectomy in a single center were collected from January 2015 to August 2020. Intra-operative microbiology samples were taken routinely. Post-operative outcomes were analyzed with reference to culture and sensitivity results. Histologic findings were further categorized as normal, simple, or complex. Results: Six hundred seventy-eight children had appendicectomies, and 608 had both microbiology and histology samples taken. Intra-abdominal fluid collection and subsequent intervention rates were 22% and 9%, respectively. There were more collections in those with a culture positive result (p < 0.001), and those growing each of three recognized organisms, Escherichia coli (p < 0.001), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.01), and Streptococcus anginosus group (p < 0.001). Intervention rate was higher in the culture-positive result group (p = 0.002) and the Streptococcus anginosus group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study shows an increased risk of developing a collection with the isolation of one of three key organisms (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group). Sersoal swabs are an effective and practical method of gathering information on organisms. Microbiologic yield was correlated to the severity of appendicitis. Isolation of Streptococcus anginosus increases the incidence of collections to 50%. This is useful to empower surgeons to prognosticate patients' potential outcomes based on both intra-operative, and microbiologic findings, and is useful in counseling patients and managing expectations. A prolonged course of antibiotic agents or higher dose may mitigate this risk.

Factors influencing enteral autonomy after autologous gastrointestinal reconstructive surgery: A two-centre UK perspective.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The implementation of multidisciplinary care and improvements in parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) have led to better outcomes and higher survivability. Autologous gastrointestinal reconstructive (AGIR) surgery can reduce the duration on PN and lead to earlier enteral autonomy (EA). Our aim was to investigate the effect of SBS aetiology and other predictors on the achievement of enteral autonomy following AGIR surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing AGIR surgery in two tertiary paediatric surgical units, between 2010 and 2021. Continuous data is presented as median (range). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 29 AGIR procedures (20 serial transverse enteroplasties (STEP), 9 longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring (LILT)) at an age of 6.6 months (1.5 - 104.5). EA rate was 44% at 13.6 months after surgery (1 - 32.8). AGIR procedures achieved an increase in small bowel length of 70% (pre-operative 46.5 vs 77 cm, p = 0.003). No difference was found between STEP and LILT (p = 0.84). Percentage of expected small bowel length (based on the child's weight) was a strong predictor of EA (bowel length >15% - EA 80% vs bowel length ≤15% - EA 17%, p = 0.008). A diagnosis of gastroschisis showed a negative non-significant correlation with the ability to achieve EA (25% vs 60%, p = 0.12). Overall survival rate was 96%. CONCLUSION: AGIR surgery is an important tool in the multidisciplinary management of children with SBS. Percentage of expected small length and aetiology of SBS are likely predictors of achievement of EA in patients undergoing AGIR surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: Retrospective Case-Series.

Iatrogenic Neonatal Esophageal Perforation: A European Multicentre Review on Management and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study and literature review was to review management and outcomes of neonatal esophageal perforation (NEP). METHODS: Protocol data were collected from four European Centers on gestational age, factors surrounding feeding tube insertion, management and outcomes. RESULTS: The 5-year study period (2014-2018) identified eight neonates with median gestational age of 26 + 4 weeks (23 + 4-39) and median birth weight 636 g (511-3500). All patients had NEP from enterogastric tube insertions, with the perforation occurring at median 1st day of life (range 0-25). Seven/eight patients were ventilated (two/seven-high frequency oscillation). NEP became apparent on first tube placement (n = 1), first change (n = 5), and after multiple changes (n = 2). Site of perforation was known in six (distal n = 3, proximal n = 2 and middle n = 1). Diagnosis was established by respiratory distress (n = 4), respiratory distress and sepsis (n = 2) and post-insertion chest X-ray (n = 2). Management in all patients included antibiotics and parenteral nutrition with two/eight receiving steroids and ranitidine, one/eight steroids only and one/eight ranitidine only. One neonate had a gastrostomy inserted, while in another an enterogastric tube was orally successfully re-inserted. Two neonates developed pleural effusion and/or mediastinal abscess requiring chest tube. Three neonates had significant morbidities (related to prematurity) and there was one death 10 days post-perforation (related to prematurity complications). CONCLUSIONS: NEP during NGT insertion is rare even in premature infants after evaluating data from four tertiary centers and reviewing the literature. In this small cohort, conservative management seems to be safe. A larger sample size will be necessary to answer questions on efficacy of antibiotics, antacids and NGT re-insertion time frame in NEP.

Outcome Reporting in Interventional Necrotizing Enterocolitis Studies: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) incidence, treatment strategies have failed to make major advancements towards improved NEC outcomes. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a lack of treatment efficacy studies potentially hamper these advancements. We aimed to analyze outcome reporting in recent interventional NEC studies. METHODS: We performed a systematic review identifying interventional studies on NEC between 1st of January 2016 and 1st of June 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Cochrane reviews. Systematic reviews, clinical trials and change-in-practice cohort studies reporting any therapeutic intervention for NEC patients (Bell's stage ≥ IIa) were eligible. We excluded studies on NEC diagnostics or prevention and non-English publications. Outcomes were categorized into five core areas and presented descriptively. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022302712). RESULTS: Out of 1.642 screened records, 65 were eligible for full-text review and 15 were finally included for data extraction. Median number of reported outcomes per article was six (range 1-19). We identified 66 unique outcomes, which were mapped to 53 outcome terms. Thirty-four out of the 53 of the outcome terms (64%) were only reported in a single article. Mortality was the most reported outcome (11/15 articles, 73%). Core area 'Adverse outcomes' contained the most outcome terms (n = 19), whereas 'Life impact' contained the least outcome terms (n = 4) and was represented in 3 articles (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a paucity of outcomes concerning 'Life impact' exist in interventional NEC studies. Development of a NEC core outcome set may improve consistency and patient-relevance in outcome reporting. STUDY TYPE: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Development of an international core outcome set for treatment trials in necrotizing enterocolitis-a study protocol.

AIM: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most lethal disease of the gastrointestinal tract of preterm infants. New and existing management strategies need clinical evaluation. Large heterogeneity exists in the selection, measurement, and reporting of outcome measures in NEC intervention studies. This hampers meta-analyses and the development of evidence-based management guidelines. We aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for NEC that includes the most relevant outcomes for patients and physicians, from moment of diagnosis into adulthood. This COS is designed for use in NEC treatment trials, in infants with confirmed NEC. METHODS: This study is designed according to COS-STAD (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development) recommendations and the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative Handbook. We obtained a waiver from the Ethics Review Board and prospectively registered this study with COMET (Study 1920). We will approach 125 clinicians and/or researchers from low-middle and high-income countries based on their scientific output (using SCIVAL, a bibliometric tool). Patients and parents will be approached through local patient organisations. Participants will be separated into three panels, to assess differences in priorities between former patients and parents (1. lay panel), clinicians and researchers involved in the neonatal period (2. neonatal panel) and after the neonatal period (3. post-neonatal panel). They will be presented with outcomes currently used in NEC research, identified through a systematic review, in a Delphi process. Eligible outcome domains are also identified from the patients and parents' perspectives. Using a consensus process, including three online Delphi rounds and a final face-to-face consensus meeting, the COS will be finalised and include outcomes deemed essential to all stakeholders: health care professionals, parents and patients' representatives. The final COS will be reported in accordance with the COS-Standards for reporting (COS-STAR) statement. CONCLUSIONS: Development of an international COS will help to improve homogeneity of outcome measure reporting in NEC, will enable adequate and efficient comparison of treatment strategies, and will help the interpretation and implementation of clinical trial results. This will contribute to high-quality evidence regarding the best treatment strategy for NEC in preterm infants.

Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series.

PURPOSE: To determine whether laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) has superseded percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) based on the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken for the period January 06-December 09. Demographic and clinical outcomes were recorded and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: 164 patients were studied (PEG, n = 107; LAG, n = 57). 93.5 % of PEG patients required two general anaesthetics compared with 8 % of LAG patients. Median time to using the gastrostomy was 24 (range 0-168) h in PEG and 0 (0-96) h in LAG patients (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 15/107 (14 %) of PEG and 2/57 (3.5 %) of LAG patients (p = 0.05). Re-operation rate following complications was 18/107 (16.8 %) for PEG and 3/57 (5.2 %) for LAG (p = 0.05). Minor complications arose in 41/107 (38 %) of PEG and 32/57 (56 %) of LAG (p = 0.05). Post-operative hospital stay was 2 (1-40) days for PEG and 2 (0-20) days for LAG (p = 0.01). The day-case rate was 0/107 for PEG and 5/57 (9 %) for LAG. There was no gastrostomy-related mortality in the series. CONCLUSION: LAG requires fewer anaesthetics, is associated with shorter time to feeding, shortened hospital stay and has a reduced risk of major complications. LAG is a very good alternative to the PEG in children.

A Review on Safety and Outcomes of Mucous Fistula Refeeding in Neonates.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) in neonates with short bowel syndrome is widely debated. Our purpose is to review MFR and outline methods, reported complications, and clinical outcomes (survival, weight gain, dependence on parenteral nutrition [PN], and time to enteral autonomy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE literature search and reference review from January 1980 to May 2020 for terms ("mucous fistula re-feeding" or "enteral re-feeding") and neonates. We included studies that utilized conventional MFR in the neonatal period. Non-English language articles were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 11 relevant articles. Internationally, there was no consensus on methods of MFR. A total of 197 neonates underwent MFR. Within a single study, four neonates developed major complications; however, the procedure was well tolerated without major complications in 10 of the 11 studies. A mortality of nine patients during MFR highlights the burden of disease within the study population; however, of these, only one was directly attributable to MFR. Minor complications were seldom quantified. Three studies demonstrated a higher rate of weight gain and shorter PN support versus controls. Neonates who underwent MFR had lower chance of anastomotic leak and quicker progression to full feed after reversal versus controls. The influence of microorganisms in MFR was only investigated in one study. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests benefits of MFR; however, an international consensus is yet to be reached on the optimal method. A large prospective study investigating the influence of MFR on the enteric system is required.

A single centre experience using internal traction sutures in managing long gap oesophageal atresia.

AIM: Thoracoscopically placed internal traction sutures (ITS) for the initial management of long gap oesophageal atresia (LGOA), not amenable to primary anastomosis, was first described in 2015. Here we describe our experience using ITS both thoracoscopically and at thoracotomy where the gap between upper and lower oesophagus is too wide for primary anastomosis. METHOD: The case notes of all infants treated with ITS for oesophageal atresia (01/10/2015 to 01/12/2019) were reviewed. Gaps considered too wide for an anastomosis had ITS placed between the two pouches as described by Patkowski in 2015. All patients were gastrostomy fed.  Patients returned to theatre with an expectation to complete the anastomosis or re-tighten the traction sutures. RESULTS: Seven patients (4 OA, 1 OA with proximal fistula, 2 OA/distal TOF) median birthweight 2.28 kg (1.2-3.6 kg) were managed using ITS. Median gap length 4.5 (3-9) vertebral bodies.  ITS were placed thoracoscopically in 5 cases and at thoracotomy in 2 at median 46 days (1-120) old. In all cases, ITS was associated with significant intra-thoracic adhesions. Five patients leaked from the traction sutures. Four patients had a delayed primary anastomosis performed at thoracotomy and 3 required a cervical oesophagostomy. The median length of stay was 159 days (98-282).  All patients started thoracoscopically eventually required thoracotomy. CONCLUSION: The use of ITS in our department was associated with significant complications, particularly intra-thoracic leaks and adhesions.  In our hands ITS did not improve the feasibility of thoracoscopic repair for LGOA and has been abandoned by us. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Series.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Broviac lines in infants less than 5kg: Prospective study of 100 consecutive procedures.

AIM: Ultrasound-guided (USG) percutaneous insertion of Broviac lines (cuffed tunnelled silastic central venous catheters, TCVC) has increasingly been adopted throughout the UK. However, vascular access remains a challenge in small babies and in some units is still performed by open cutdown. Our vascular access team, established in 2004, consists of consultant surgeons, anaesthetists and interventional radiologists, who provide all permanent vascular access by the USG technique. We reviewed the outcome in our last 100 patients less than 5 kg. METHOD: A prospective database of TCVC insertions in patients <5 kg weight recorded age, gestation, weight, diagnosis, type of catheter and complications within 28 days of insertion. A standardised technique of USG insertion is used by all operators. RESULTS: One-hundred patients <5 kg had TCVC inserted between 1/1/2018 and 31/3/2020. Median age 46(range0-316)days, gestation 36.5(23-42)weeks, weight 3(0.66 to 5)kg. INDICATION: parenteral nutrition(75), long term antibiotics(14), cardiac medication(6), chemotherapy(3), other(2). All were tunnelled silicone lines of single 2.7fr(51) and 4.2fr(46) or double lumen 7fr(3). Uncomplicated insertion in 94/100 cases. In 6 patients difficulties were encountered with cannulating the vein. In 4 cases an experienced colleague was called and managed to cannulate the vein; in 1 case a new successful attempt was made on the opposite internal jugular vein, and in 1 the femoral vein was used. No patient required an open cutdown. There were no cases of line sepsis requiring removal but 1 replacement was required for blockage within 28days. CONCLUSION: The USG approach in infants<5 kg is safe and can be used exclusively for venous access even in the most tiny babies. It is, however, a technically challenging procedure therefore we would recommend establishing a consultant delivered vascular access team to provide this service. Open venous cutdown in a tertiary children's hospital is no longer necessary for the insertion of TCVC and should be abandoned altogether. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level I Prognosis Study.

Exomphalos major: Conservative management using Manuka honey dressings and an outreach surgical nursing team.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists over the best dressing for conservative management of exomphalos major. Here we describe our experience of using Manuka Honey. METHODS: Our regimen involved covering the sac with Manuka honey (Advancis Medical™) wrapped with gauze and crepe bandage. Initially, dressings were changed 3 times a week and then twice weekly until full epithelialisation. Babies went home after reaching full feeds, with our outreach nurses continuing dressings in clinic until the parents were trained to do them alone. Only patients needing management of co-morbidities were transferred to our unit. Patients would be reviewed by video consultation. Data was prospectively collected. RESULTS: From 2011-2019, 24 consecutive patients (11:13 M:F; median gestation 37 weeks, birth weight 3.1 kg) with exomphalos major were managed with honey dressings. Fourteen babies had significant associated anomalies of which 10 died of problems unrelated to the exomphalos. Time to full feeds 6 (2-58) days; time to discharge 21(7-66) days if no associated anomalies; time to epithelialisation 73 (27-199) days. Dressings were well tolerated. Definitive closure occurred at 17(11-38) months and was uneventful. No patient required fundoplication and all patients were orally fed. Only one patient developed a clinically significant infection. CONCLUSION: This is the largest report of using Manuka honey for the management of exomphalos major. Benefits include early feeding, early discharge and a 'normalisation' of the neonatal period. Key to our success was the surgical outreach service supporting parents doing the dressings, first at the local hospital and then at home.

Comparison of two silver dressings for wound management in pediatric burns.

UNLABELLED: Purpose. Silver wound dressings are widely used in the treatment of burns. Dressings differ in material characteristics, various antimicrobial activities, and ease of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both dressing performance and amount of pain during the dressing changes of 2 silver dressings Urgotul SSD® (Laboratoires Urgo, Chenove, France), and Contreet Ag® (Coloplast, Minneapolis, MN) in children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with 2 groups of 20 burns treated with Urgotul SSD and Contreet Ag until the wounds were healed or grafted. Seventy dressing changes in the Contreet Ag group and 67 dressing changes in the Urgotul group were evaluated. Every dressing change was assessed regarding the dressing performance (exudate, adherence, bleeding, and dressing application/removal), and pain. RESULTS: Pain was "absent or slight" in 61 (92%) dressing changes with Urgotul SSD, and in 60 (85%) of the dressing changes with Contreet Ag. Dressing application in the Urgotul group was more often "very easy" (n = 33; 49%) or "easy" (n = 32; 48%) than in the Contreet Ag group, "very easy" (n = 25; 35%), and "easy" (n = 42; 60%). Contreet Ag had a greater ability to absorb exudate ("very good" n = 60; 85%, and "good" n = 11; 15%) than Urgotul SSD ("very good" n = 34; 51%, and "good" n = 13; 19%). CONCLUSION: Urgotul SSD and Contreet Ag are comparable regarding pain during dressing change. The dressings differ in their ability to absorb exudate and ease of application. Both dressings provided nearly painless wound management, and therefore were highly accepted by the nurses and especially the children being treated.