RESUMO
Histiocytoid Sweet syndrome (H-SS) is a histopathological variant of Sweet syndrome (SS) defined by cutaneous infiltration of immature myeloid cells morphologically resembling histiocytes. The association of H-SS with underlying malignancy, particularly myelodysplastic syndromes, is well-established. Myelodysplasia cutis (MDS-cutis) has been proposed to describe cases historically diagnosed as H-SS but characterized by shared clonality of the myeloid infiltrate in skin and bone marrow. Therefore, identifying patients who might have MDS-cutis is critical for the management of the associated hematologic malignancy. VEXAS syndrome, an adult-onset autoinflammatory disease, should also be included in the histopathologic differential diagnosis of H-SS, as it shares clinical and pathologic features with MDS-cutis. Through the presentation of two cases, we aim to highlight the defining features and key clinical implications of MDS-cutis and VEXAS syndrome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While the list of fusion-driven soft tissue neoplasms is expanding rapidly, their importance among cutaneous and superficial mesenchymal and adnexal neoplasms remains poorly understood. This challenge is especially evident in cases with ambiguous histopathology that are difficult to classify based on morphology. AIMS: Our goal was to investigate the benefits of next-generation sequencing in diagnosing complex cutaneous neoplasms. MATERIALS & METHODS: Departmental archives were searched for fusion-driven cutaneous neoplasms. Slides were retrieved and clinical information including follow-up was obtained. RESULTS: Fifteen cases occurred in eight female and seven male patients, with a median age of 26 years (range: 1-83) at diagnosis. Tumors involved the extremities (9), scalp (5), and head and neck (1). Predominant features included myoepithelial (5), nested spindled with clear cytoplasm (2), atypical adnexal/squamoid (2), small round blue cell (2), cellular spindled (3), and fibrohistiocytic morphology (1). Most frequently encountered fusions involved EWSR1 (6) fused to ERG (1), FLI1 (1), CREB1 (2), CREM (1), PBX3 (1), followed by PLAG1 (4) with LIFR (2), TRPS1 (1) and CHCHD7. Additional fusions encountered were YAP1::NUTM1, EML4::ALK, SS18::SSX1 (2), and a novel fusion: ACTB::ZMIZ2. Integration of histologic features and molecular findings led to final diagnoses of primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma (2), soft tissue myoepithelioma (4), cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (1), cutaneous adnexal carcinoma (1), porocarcinoma (1), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (1), synovial sarcoma (2), clear cell sarcoma (2), and angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (1). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our results show that fusion testing can be a helpful diagnostic tool, especially in cases with unusual or uncommon morphology in superficial sites. Furthermore, it can allow for the identification of potential therapeutic targets in some instances.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Criança , Adolescente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/patologia , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/genética , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem , Rearranjo GênicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Technology has revolutionized not only direct patient care but also diagnostic care processes. This study evaluates the transition from glass-slide microscopy to digital pathology (DP) at a multisite academic institution, using mixed methods to understand user perceptions of digitization and key productivity metrics of practice change. METHODS: Participants included dermatopathologists, pathology reporting specialists, and clinicians. Electronic surveys and individual or group interviews included questions related to technology comfort, trust in DP, and rationale for DP adoption. Case volumes and turnaround times were abstracted from the electronic health record from Qtr 4 2020 to Qtr 1 2023 (inclusive). Data were analyzed descriptively, while interviews were analyzed using methods of content analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four staff completed surveys and 22 participated in an interview. Case volumes and diagnostic turnaround time did not differ across the institution during or after implementation timelines (p = 0.084; p = 0.133, respectively). 82.5% (28/34) of staff agreed that DP improved the sign-out experience, with accessibility, ergonomics, and annotation features described as key factors. Clinicians reported positive perspectives of DP impact on patient safety and interdisciplinary collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that DP has a high acceptance rate, does not adversely impact productivity, and may improve patient safety and care collaboration.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Humanos , Dermatologia/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Dermatopatias/patologia , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Microscopia/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Patologia Clínica/métodos , TelepatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following transition to digital pathology for primary diagnosis at our institution, dermatology residents have reduced exposure to light microscopy. This study compares resident competency with light microscopy versus digital pathology following practice changes. METHODS: Twenty-one dermatology residents were administered a dermatopathology examination composed of 32 diagnoses evaluated using digital slides and 32 with light microscopy. Case difficulty was graded and balanced between modalities. Diagnostic accuracy was measured using the number of correct diagnoses for each modality. Participants were surveyed regarding their experience and preferences. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was higher with digital pathology than light microscopy (22/32 vs. 18/32, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy with digital pathology increased with years of training, but accuracy with light microscopy did not. Residents with previous light microscopy experience achieved an average score of 19/32 on glass, as compared with 10/32 for those without experience (P = 0.039). Digital pathology was preferred over light microscopy (18/21, 85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Trainees had better diagnostic proficiency with digital pathology and preferred this modality. Most practices at this time continue to use light microscopy. Therefore, we need to maintain proficiency in microscopy during training while concurrently preparing trainees for a digital future.
RESUMO
Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation (IEMP) is a rare, benign, self-resolving melanosis consisting of hyperpigmented macules typically on the face, trunk, and extremities that can occur in children and adolescents and often presents a diagnostic conundrum. We report a case involving an 8-year-old female whose previous clinical presentation was concerning for an atypical presentation of cutaneous mastocytosis or neurofibromatosis. The clinical and histopathologic evaluation was consistent with the diagnosis of IEMP, and no active intervention was pursued. Our accompanying literature review serves to better characterize this condition, highlight key diagnostic features, and emphasize the tendency for spontaneous resolution to avoid unnecessary treatments with limited clinical efficacy.
Assuntos
Hiperpigmentação , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Hiperpigmentação/diagnóstico , Hiperpigmentação/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Melanose/diagnóstico , Melanose/patologia , Mastocitose Cutânea/diagnóstico , Mastocitose Cutânea/patologiaRESUMO
Primary melanoma of the nipple (PMN) is exceedingly rare, with only single cases reported to date. We identified 10 patients with PMN: 5 females, 5 males, median age 55.5 years (range 29-66) at diagnosis of melanoma in situ (4 cases) or invasive melanoma (6 cases, Breslow depth 0.2 mm to 3.5 mm). Follow-up was available for all 10 patients (median 19 months, range 1-183). Nine patients had no evidence of disease; one patient died of disease (13.5 months) after presenting with a nodal metastasis. One case was exceptional, because the patient presented with a pigmented lesion that histopathologically exhibited co-existence of melanoma in situ and Paget disease, a challenging differential diagnosis due to immunohistochemical pitfalls in distinction between melanoma in situ and the pigmented variant of mammary Paget disease. Here we report the second largest series of PMN including a case of PMN colliding with mammary Paget disease, to raise awareness of these rare malignancies.