Bile Acid Diarrhea Is Associated With an Increased Incidence of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is an underrecognized and socially debilitating disease caused by high concentrations of bile acids in the colon. Bile acids directly and indirectly promote carcinogenesis. In this article, we investigated whether individuals with BAD have an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS: By using the Danish health registries, adult individuals with BAD were identified by International Classification of Diseases 10th revision code K90.8 or referral to the diagnostic 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test followed by prescription of a bile acid sequestrant within 365 days (n = 5,245). Age- and sex-matched individuals without BAD were included for comparison (n = 52,450). We analyzed the cumulative incidence of GI cancers after BAD diagnosis and the odds ratios (ORs) of GI cancer 8 and 15 years before BAD diagnosis/matching. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of GI cancer 6 years after BAD diagnosis/matching was 1.6% in the BAD group and 1.1% in controls ( P = 0.01). The ORs of total GI cancer 8 and 15 years before BAD diagnosis were 6.16 (5.08-7.48) and 5.19 (4.28-6.29), respectively. Furthermore, 47 individuals with BAD (0.9%) and 250 (0.5%) controls died of GI cancer. DISCUSSION: This nationwide cohort study indicates an association between BAD and GI cancers. We found both a higher incidence of GI cancer after BAD diagnosis compared with controls and increased OR of GI cancer before BAD diagnosis. Bearing in mind the underdiagnosis of BAD, the delay of BAD diagnosis, and the carcinogenic effect of bile acids, these findings warrant further investigations of the risk of GI cancer in individuals with BAD.

Evidence connecting old, new and neglected glucose-lowering drugs to bile acid-induced GLP-1 secretion: A review.

Bile acids are amphipathic water-soluble steroid-based molecules best known for their important lipid-solubilizing role in the assimilation of fat. Recently, bile acids have emerged as metabolic integrators with glucose-lowering potential. Among a variety of gluco-metabolic effects, bile acids have been demonstrated to modulate the secretion of the gut-derived incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), possibly via the transmembrane receptor Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 and the nuclear farnesoid X receptor, in intestinal L cells. The present article critically reviews current evidence connecting established glucose-lowering drugs to bile acid-induced GLP-1 secretion, and discusses whether bile acid-induced GLP-1 secretion may constitute a new basis for understanding how metformin, inhibitors of the apical sodium-dependent bile acids transporter, and bile acid sequestrants - old, new and neglected glucose-lowering drugs - improve glucose metabolism.

The Epidemiology of Bile Acid Diarrhea in Denmark.

Objective: Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is a socially debilitating disease with frequent bowel movements, urgency, and fecal incontinence as the main symptoms. It is caused by excessive bile acid levels in the colon and is most commonly treated with bile acid sequestrants. It is estimated that 1-2% of the population suffers from the disease, but only a fraction of these are properly diagnosed with the gold standard 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid (SeHCAT) test. Here, we use nationwide registries to describe the demographic characteristics of individuals suffering from BAD in Denmark. Methods: Since the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code for BAD was not used until 2021, we identified the BAD population by referral to SeHCAT testing followed by a prescription of a bile acid sequestrant (colestyramine, colestipol or colesevelam) within 365 days. The study period was from 2003 to 2021. Results: During the study period, a total of 5264 individuals with BAD were identified with large differences between the five regions in Denmark. The number of prescriptions of colestyramine and colesevelam, the number of SeHCAT tests, and the number of individuals diagnosed with BAD increased during the study period. The BAD population had more co-morbidities and more health care contacts as well as lower levels of education and income compared with age- and sex-matched controls from the general population. Conclusion: Using the Danish registries, we identified a BAD population, which seems to be inferior in health care and socio-economic parameters compared with the Danish general population.

Safety and efficacy of liraglutide versus colesevelam for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea: a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator, non-inferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Bile acid diarrhoea is an underdiagnosed disease estimated to affect 1-2% of the general population. Case reports indicate that the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide might be an effective treatment for bile acid diarrhoea. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator, double-dummy, non-inferiority clinical trial at the Center for Clinical Metabolic Research at Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark. Patients aged 18-75 years with 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT)-verified moderate-to-severe primary bile acid diarrhoea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive liraglutide (one daily subcutaneous injection uptitrated from 0·6-1·8 mg per day over 3 weeks) or colesevelam (three capsules of 625 mg twice daily), the standard of care, for 6 weeks following one run-in week with no treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing a reduction in daily stool frequency of 25% or greater after 6 weeks. Data from all participants were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. The non-inferiority limit was set to 15% in favour of colesevelam. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2018-003575-34) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2019, and Jan 31, 2021, 52 patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to liraglutide and 26 to colesevelam. 20 (77%) of 26 participants on liraglutide and 13 (50%) of 26 on colesevelam experienced a 25% or greater reduction in stool frequency, corresponding to a significant risk difference of -27% in favour of liraglutide (one-sided 95% CI -100 to -6). Liraglutide was therefore superior to colesevelam in reducing daily stool frequency. Mild nausea with a duration of 10-21 days was reported by six participants in the liraglutide group and by one participant in the colesevelam group. No other adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: The superiority of liraglutide compared with colesevelam in reducing stool frequency suggests consideration of liraglutide as a potential new treatment modality for bile acid diarrhoea, although larger confirmatory trials powered for superiority are warranted. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science under The A.P. Møller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Foundation.