Effects of hippocampus-sparing resections in the temporal lobe: Hippocampal atrophy is associated with a decline in memory performance.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with a nonlesional and nonepileptogenic hippocampus (HC), in order to preserve functionally intact brain tissue, the HC is not resected. However, some patients experience postoperative memory decline, possibly due to disruption of the extrahippocampal memory network and secondary hippocampal volume (HV) loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of hippocampal atrophy ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of the surgery and its relation to memory outcomes. METHODS: Hippocampal volume and verbal as well as visual memory performance were retrospectively examined in 55 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 30 ± 15 years, 25 female, 31 left) before and 5 months after surgery within the temporal lobe that spared the entire HC. HV was extracted based on prespecified templates, and resection volumes were also determined. RESULTS: HV loss was found both ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of surgery (P < .001). Postoperative left HV loss was a significant predictor of postoperative verbal memory deterioration after left-sided surgery (P < .01). Together with the preoperative verbal memory performance, postoperative left HV explained almost 60% of the variance (P < .0001). However, right HV was not a clear predictor of visual memory performance. Larger resection volumes were associated with smaller postoperative HV, irrespective of side of surgery (left: P < .05, right: P < .01). SIGNIFICANCE: A disruption of the memory network by any resection within the TL, especially within the language-dominant hemisphere, may lead to HC atrophy and memory decline. These findings may further improve the counseling of patients concerning their postoperative memory outcome before TL resections sparing the entire HC.

Developmental outcomes in children/adolescents and one adult with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and refractory epilepsy treated with everolimus.

This prospective observational study focuses on developmental outcomes in the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) with everolimus (EVO). Fourteen children/adolescents aged 1.7-13.07 and one adult aged 31 years, all with TSC and refractory epilepsy participated. All were treated with EVO for 3-70 months (md: 37). Development/adaptive functioning were evaluated at baseline with follow-up in 11 patients; all patients were assessed during the course of treatment. Our exploratory analyses included factors contributing to developmental impairment and change from baseline to last evaluation. The majority of patients showed severe developmental impairment (86%). Patients with a higher age at inclusion, duration of epilepsy, and number of previous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) showed lower developmental levels. Earlier onset of epilepsy and a higher number of current AEDs were associated with worse adaptive functioning. At their last examination, four patients were seizure-free (27%), and four experienced a reduction of seizures >50% (27%). With treatment, (slight) increase was seen in absolute values of developmental age (DA) regarding both development and adaptive functioning. Yet, when accounting for age, decrease was seen in both assessments. While developmental disorders were prominent, we observed an overall progression at a slower pace. Despite a positive effect on seizure occurrence, treatment with EVO did not reverse developmental problems in the observation period of this study.

Safety and retention rate of rufinamide in 300 patients: a single pediatric epilepsy center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Reports of studies evaluating rufinamide as an add-on therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy are restricted to a few publications. Prospective multicenter studies including children and adults have yielded important information about several types of epilepsies and syndromes. We evaluated the use of rufinamide in a single pediatric center with a large cohort and long-term follow-up period. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients taking rufinamide from November 2008 to March 2013. Response was defined by a seizure reduction of ≥50% compared to baseline. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with a median age of 9.1 years (range 0.4-29.6 years) were reviewed. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 1-37 months). Epilepsy etiology was classified as genetic (23.7%), structural/metabolic (41%), and unknown cause (35.3%). Overall, rufinamide treatment led to a median seizure frequency reduction of 59.2% from responders to baseline. Seizure reduction was greater in patients with genetic etiology compared to structural/metabolic (66.2% vs. 45.5% responders, p = 0.005). Rufinamide was discontinued in 110 (36.7%) of 300 patients: 63 (21%) due to unsatisfactory response, 47 (15.7%) due to side effects, and in 18 (6%) of those due to both. Most common adverse effects were sleepiness, vomiting, mood changes, nausea, and loss of appetite. Median time to loss of efficacy was 11.6 months (range 3-28 months). SIGNIFICANCE: Rufinamide provides satisfactory seizure reduction as an adjunctive treatment in refractory epilepsy. Results need to be interpreted in the setting of data acquisition, including inherent biases of retrospective studies. Patients with a known genetic etiology may have better responses than patients with structural/metabolic etiology.

Pattern and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Parents of pediatric patients with chronic conditions such as epilepsy increasingly opt for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, data on the pattern and reasons of CAM use in childhood epilepsy are scarce. The objectives of this study were as follows: first, to characterize CAM use among pediatric patients with epilepsy by assessing its spectrum, prevalence, costs, and frequency of use; second, to evaluate the influence of CAM use on compliance and satisfaction with conventional care as well as to explore parent-child neurologist communication concerning CAM; and third, to investigate predictors of CAM use. A postal survey was administered to all parents of pediatric outpatients with epilepsy aged 6 to 12, who have received treatment at the neuropediatric outpatient clinic of the University Children's Hospital Heidelberg between 2007 and 2009. One hundred thirty-two of the 297 distributed questionnaires were suitable for inclusion in statistical analysis (44.7%). Forty-nine participants indicated that their children used CAM during the previous year (37.1%). Thirty different types of CAM were used, with homeopathy (55.1%), osteopathy (24.5%), and kinesiology (16.3%) being the most commonly named. A mean of 86€ (0€-500€) and 3h (1 h-30 h) per month was committed to CAM treatment. Only 53% of the users informed their child neurologist of the additional CAM treatment, while 85.6% of all parents wished to discuss CAM options with their child neurologist. Seventy-five percent of users considered the CAM treatment effective. Among the participants most likely to seek CAM treatment are parents whose children show a long duration of epileptic symptoms, parents who make use of CAM treatment themselves, and parents who value a holistic and natural treatment approach. A substantial portion of pediatric patients with epilepsy receive CAM treatment. The high prevalence of use and significant level of financial and time resources spent on CAM indicate the high importance of these treatment options for parents. On the other hand, communication concerning CAM with the child neurologist is largely insufficient despite the wish to speak about CAM. Complementary and alternative medicine users' high compliance with conventional treatment and high perceived effectiveness of CAM support an integrative approach to CAM for pediatric patients with epilepsy. Our study implies that in addition to open parent-child neurologist communication, active inquiry on CAM treatments is necessary to enable informed decision making by parents and to establish the suitability of CAM treatment for the patient. Reliable predictors for CAM use, which allow for improved identification of patients with a high likelihood to receive CAM treatment, are the duration of the illness, use of CAM by the parents themselves, and the desire of the parents to receive a holistic and natural treatment for their child.

EEG-Findings during long-term treatment with everolimus in TSC-associated and therapy-resistant epilepsies in children.

AIM: This prospective observational study evaluated the long-term EEG changes in children treated with everolimus (EVO) for refractory TSC-associated epilepsy. Changes in EEG-abnormalities were related to developmental outcomes. METHODS: Thirteen children treated with EVO were examined for EEG-recorded seizures and interictal epileptic discharges (IED) during a 72-hour-video-EEG-monitoring, which was performed at baseline and repeated at follow-up intervals of at least 9 months. Antiseizure medication was left unchanged for at least 27 months. Changes in cognitive developmental parameters were related to reduction of seizures and IED at the last monitoring. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction of recorded seizures and IED during sleep at the first as well as the last follow-up recording. The reduction of IED was especially prominent during sleep. For patients who continued for more than one monitoring under EVO (n = 8), number of seizures further decreased. In patients with developmental examination (n = 9), we observed that only (nearly) full cessation of IED was related to acquisition of new skills. DISCUSSION: In children with TSC, EVO was effective in reducing recorded seizures and IED; long-term EVO treatment led to a more pronounced reduction and an improvement of nocturnal IED even when the patient was initially not seizure-free. Cessation of IED in children with developmental improvement may point to the importance of healthy sleep for cognition.

Long-term treatment with everolimus in TSC-associated therapy-resistant epilepsies.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with Everolimus (EVO) in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and therapy-resistant epilepsy in a compassionate use trial. METHODS: After a 3-month baseline, patients were treated with EVO. Treatment was divided into treatment phases each lasting at least 9 months. Patients started with one of three target serum levels. In case of insufficient seizure control, subsequent treatment phases with other target serum levels followed. The accompanying antiseizure medication (ASM) remained stable during the baseline phase and for at least the initial three treatment phases. We evaluated changes in seizure frequency and seizure-free days compared to baseline for each patient (Cox-Stuart-test). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were followed up for up to 10 years (minimum 0.6 years, median 5.8 years). Twelve patients (80%) experienced a significant reduction in seizure frequency or an increase in seizure-free days: Six (40%) patients became seizure-free and four patients (26.7%) remained seizure free for > 7 years, of which three required no additional ASM. All participants reported at least one adverse effect, the vast majority (92.5%) of which were mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with EVO was highly efficacious, safe and well tolerated. While EVO can be a therapeutic option for therapy-resistant epilepsy in TSC, it can take a long time for seizure relief to manifest.

Clobazam higher-evening differential dosing as an add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Clobazam treatment tailored to the timing of patient's seizures may improve seizure control. We aim to describe the safety and efficacy of higher-evening differential dose of clobazam as add-on therapy in patients with night-time/early morning seizures. METHOD: Differential dosing with higher evening dosing was started based on a high proportion of seizures (>80%) at nighttime (6p.m. to 6a.m.). Differential dosing was defined as providing more than 50% of the total daily dose of clobazam after 6p.m. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with clobazam differential dosing as an add-on therapy. The median age was 9.1 years, with 11 (40.7%) females and median of the first follow-up was 2.7 months. Patients with differential dosing tolerated a higher median total clobazam dose of 0.8mg/kg/d at first follow-up, as compared to 0.6mg/kg/d in controls. In differential dose, the median percentage of the total clobazam dose administered in the evening was 66.7%. Differential dose patients exhibited a median seizure reduction of 75% as compared to 50% in controls (p<0.005). Patients with generalized seizures benefited the most from differential dosing with a 77.5% median seizure reduction, as compared to 50% in controls (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Higher-evening differential dose of clobazam improved seizure control in patients with predominantly nighttime and early-morning seizures. Chronotherapy tailored to the patients' seizure susceptibility patterns may improve care in epilepsy patients as differential dosing may allow for higher overall treatment doses at times of greatest seizure susceptibility without increased side effects at other times.

Clobazam: effect on frequency of seizures and safety profile in different subgroups of children with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Clobazam has been used in clinical practice as an adjunctive treatment for diverse seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of clobazam in a large sample of patients with refractory epilepsy at a tertiary pediatric center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with clobazam between January 2001 and July 2013 who had a follow-up visit at least one month after starting clobazam. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline seizure frequency during the 3 months before the introduction of clobazam. We examined the relationship between dose range and response rate. RESULTS: Four-hundred twenty-five patients were prescribed clobazam, of whom 300 (median age 9.1 years, interquartile range 4.7-13.3 years) had follow-up data greater than 1 month. Median follow-up was 5 months (interquartile range 3-11 months). Response to treatment with clobazam was observed in 203 of 300 (67.7%) patients, of whom 84 (28%) became seizure-free. The median starting dose was 0.2 (interquartile range 0.13-0.33) mg/kg/day with a target dose of 0.48 (0.26-0.80) mg/kg/day. Twenty-seven (9%) patients discontinued clobazam, 16 (59.3%) because adverse effects, 10 (37%) because of a lack of efficacy, and one (3.7%) because of a combination of adverse effects and lack of efficacy. The most common adverse effects were tiredness in 44 of 300 (14.6%) and mood or behavioral changes in 23 (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Clobazam is a well-tolerated antiepileptic drug with good response rates in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.