RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the implementation challenges health providers might face with the use of digital health in outpatient asthma care. To qualitatively explore the experience of health providers with electronic medication monitoring (EMM) using an implementation science framework. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted interviews (n = 10) exploring health providers' experience with EMM with asthma patients from 5 primary care or specialty clinics. The EMM tracked albuterol and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, and health providers called parents whenever ICS adherence waned, or albuterol use increased. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and deductively analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: Health providers reported the intervention's primary advantage, compared with current asthma care, was the ability to monitor medication use at-home. Most felt the intervention improved care delivery. Nurses and medical assistants described a process of phone calls and checking alerts, that had varying levels of administrative burden and complexity. Health providers felt that sustained implementation of the intervention model would require additional employees to handle the administrative and clinical workload. Half of the interviewed providers were unsure if patient needs were met by the intervention, while some cited technology syncing issues, others liked the enhanced interactions for asthma education. CONCLUSION: Health providers reported positive experiences supporting parents and children with asthma using EMM but also highlighted intervention components that needed improvement or refinement to yield successful implementation in outpatient pediatric clinics. Recommendations for enhancing the intervention for a scaled-up implementation were discussed.
Assuntos
Asma , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Albuterol , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Eletrônica , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand the impact of the initial COVID-19 pandemic remote schooling period on self-reported wellness among adolescents in Chicago. METHODS: Students (n = 55) completed a 22-item wellness questionnaire before (February 2020) and shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak (April 2020). Precomparisons/postcomparisons (overall and by survey item) were evaluated using two-sided paired t-tests with an alpha level of 0.05. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate mean scores overall by demographic variables. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the following areas: Balance (Pre: 7.3, During: 6.4, p = 0.02), Education (Pre: 8.4, During 7.7, p = 0.03) and Friends (Pre:8.0, During: 6.3, p = 0.001). Overall wellness scores varied by demographic variables, though not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the onset of the pandemic impacted students' ability to effectively learn, as well as to maintain balance in their lives and social relationships. Comprehensive support is needed in these areas to promote adolescent wellness.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Chicago/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudantes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The transition from adolescence to young adulthood marks a developmental period in which responsibility for management of chronic conditions such as food allergy shifts from the caregiver to the young adult. Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis is most common among adolescents and young adults. However, colleges are currently not well positioned to provide integrated support for students with food allergies. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to explore the systems, structures, and policies that currently support students with food allergies at college, assess unmet needs, and develop pilot interventions through the use of patient-centered design processes. METHODS: Key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders in the campus management of food allergies (n = 26) between April and May 2016. Data were coded and assessed for relative frequencies of each code to determine challenges and potential solutions. RESULTS: The convergence of stakeholder-identified themes indicated that the transition to college for students with food allergy would be improved by providing support for: (1) Notification of others in the student's campus network about food allergy; (2) Establishing clearly defined roles/responsibilities; and (3) Increasing campus awareness of food allergy signs, symptoms, and lethality. To better provide comprehensive support for students, 5 interventions-collectively called Spotlight-were developed. CONCLUSION: The use of qualitative research methods, patient-centered design processes, and collaborations with diverse stakeholders-including pediatricians that care for adolescents-can provide a framework for designing coordinated systems and policies to provide comprehensive support to college students with food allergy. Next steps include rigorously testing implementation of the Spotlight intervention prototypes.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Universidades/organização & administração , Adolescente , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapêutico , Alérgenos/química , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/fisiopatologia , Anafilaxia/psicologia , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/fisiopatologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Participação dos Interessados , Estudantes/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Alergistas , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Psicologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Criança , Competência Clínica , Aconselhamento , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/psicologia , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Families in high-risk communities for COVID-19 transmission experienced a disproportionate burden during the pandemic. This study assessed these families' needs, changes in children's well-being, and perceptions related to the pandemic. METHODS: Four online surveys were administered January 2021 to September 2021 to parents of students, enrolled in parochial, kindergarten-eighth grade schools in Chicago neighborhoods with higher COVID-19 incidence rates by ZIP code, compared to the city average, and higher resource need. RESULTS: The response rate was 69.1% (n = 186 of 269) in the baseline survey; and other surveys were at 1 (n = 151), 3 (n = 145), and 5 months (n = 154). Of the sample, 83% of parents identified as Hispanic/Latinx with a mean age of 38.3 years (SD: 8.5). Approximately a quarter of parents reported difficulty paying cable and internet bills (26%) and paying utilities (25%). Parents reported children as happy (94% and 95%, p = .59) and hopeful (96% and 95%, p = .74) at 1-month (February to May 2021) and 5-month surveys (June to September 2021). Parents also reported fewer children were irritable (29% vs 19%, p = .03), felt lonely (17% vs 10%, p = .03), and felt isolated (28% vs 9%, p < .001) between those survey waves. The majority (67%) of parents felt that their child had no difficulty wearing a mask in public. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal study, Chicago parents rated children's well-being highly and reported a decrease in negative emotions over time. The areas of need identified may be particularly relevant for outreach and providing resources to Hispanic/Latino families in future emergencies or global health threats.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Saúde da Criança , Hispânico ou Latino , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Chicago/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pais/psicologia , Família , Saúde da Criança/etnologia , Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Hotspot de Doença , Internet , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Food allergy (FA) is an increasing public health concern in the United States, affecting approximately 8% of children and 11% of adults. The United States currently lacks clear requirements for the use of precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) on packaged foods, such as "may contain" or "made on shared equipment." This lack of specific governmental policy results in inconsistent labeling practices and confusion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand current knowledge and preferences for PAL statements among FA stakeholders. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to FA stakeholders. Descriptive statistics and associations from logistic regressions were used to assess respondents' knowledge of PAL policy, shopping habits, and preferences around PAL. RESULTS: Of 3008 respondents, 24.2% were able to correctly answer 4 questions surrounding PAL policies. When asked about their shopping habits, the majority of respondents never purchase products with a "May contain traces of allergen" label (85.5%) in comparison with never purchasing products with a "Good manufacturing practices used to segregate ingredients in a facility that also processes allergen" label (35.0%). Their top preferences for a PAL statement were "Not suitable for people with 'blank' allergy" (29.3%) and "May contain" (22.1%). Health care provider discussions around PAL varied and were strongly associated with purchasing behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FA consumers are not aware of PAL policies and make decisions based on the words in the PAL. They prefer having clearer, more specific, and consistent labeling on products, indicating that explicit PAL policies are needed to allow customers to easily identify safe foods.
Assuntos
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Alimentos , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive epidemiological profile detailing food allergy (FA) prevalence and related correlates among Medicaid-enrolled children. METHODS: The 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract person-level 100% files for 50 states and the District of Columbia were analyzed. The analytic sample of 23,825,160 included all children ages 0 to 19 years as of January 1, 2012 who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid in 2012. The prevalence of FA was measured using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and compared with other atopic conditions (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and asthma). Logistic regression was used to evaluate child characteristics associated with FA. RESULTS: The prevalence of FA among Medicaid-enrolled children was less than 1% (0.6%). State-level prevalence ranged from a high of 1.4% in Alaska to a low of 0.2% in Nevada. Race and ethnicity were associated with FA such that Asian, Black, and Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian children had a higher odds of FA, while Hispanic and Native American children had 15% and 24% lower odds of FA, respectively, compared with White children. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with estimates of parent-reported, physician-diagnosed FA in the general population, the claims-based prevalence of FA among Medicaid-enrolled children is substantially lower. Racial and ethnic differences are consistent with the general population. The findings signal a need to better understand reasons for these differences including awareness, access to care, and service utilization patterns in this population.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electronic medication monitoring (EMM) is a digital tool that can be used for tracking daily medication use. Previous studies of EMM in asthma management have been conducted in adults or have examined pediatric interventions that use EMM for less than 1 year. To understand how to improve EMM-enhanced interventions, it is necessary to explore the experiences of parents of children with asthma, recruited from outpatient practices, who completed a 12-month intervention trial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to use qualitative inquiry to answer the following questions: (1) how did using an EMM-enhanced intervention change parents'/caregivers' experiences of managing their child's asthma, and (2) what do parents recommend for improving the intervention in the future? METHODS: Parents were recruited from the intervention arm of a multicomponent health intervention enhanced by Bluetooth-enabled sensors placed on inhaler medications. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children aged 4-12 years with asthma. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and inductively analyzed using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Interview participants reflected an even mix of publicly and privately insured children and a diverse racial-ethnic demographic. Parents discussed 6 key themes related to their experience with the EMM-enhanced intervention for the management of their child's asthma: (1) compatibility with the family's lifestyle, (2) impact on asthma management, (3) impact on the child's health, (4) emotional impact of the intervention, (5) child's engagement in asthma management with the intervention, and (6) recommendations for future intervention design. Overall, parents reported that the 12-month EMM intervention was compatible with their daily lives, positively influenced their preventive and acute asthma management, and promoted their child's engagement in their own asthma management. While parents found the intervention acceptable and generally favorable, some parents identified compatibility issues for families with multiple caregivers and frustration when the technology malfunctioned. CONCLUSIONS: Parents generally viewed the intervention as a positive influence on the management of their child's asthma. However, our study also highlighted technology challenges related to having multiple caregivers, which will need to be addressed in future iterations for families. Attention must be paid to the needs of parents from low socioeconomic households, who may have more limited access to reliable internet or depend on other relatives for childcare. Understanding these family factors will help refine how a digital tool can be adopted into daily disease management of pediatric asthma.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although sensor-based monitoring of daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and short-acting ß-agonist medications may improve asthma outcomes, the effectiveness of these interventions in diverse pediatric populations remains unclear. METHODS: Caregiver and child dyads were randomly assigned to receive inhaler sensors that allowed for caregiver and clinician electronic monitoring of medications. End points included Asthma Control Test scores (≥19 indicated asthma control) and asthma health care use. Caregiver quality of life (QoL) and child ICS adherence were also assessed. Multilevel models were used to estimate adjusted changes from baseline. RESULTS: Dyads were assigned to the control (n = 127) or intervention (n = 125) arms. At the end line, the mean Asthma Control Test score increased from 19.1 (SE = 0.3) to 21.8 (SE = 0.4) among the intervention and from 19.4 (SE = 0.3) to 19.9 (SE = 0.4) among the control (Δintervention-control = 2.2; SE = 0.6; P < .01). Adjusted rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations among the intervention were significantly greater (incidence rate ratioemergency department = 2.2; SE = 0.5; P < .01; incidence rate ratiohospital = 3.4; SE = 1.4; P < .01) at endline than the control. Caregiver QoL was greater among the intervention at the endline (Δintervention-control = 0.3; SE = 0.2; P = .1) than the control. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that sensor-based inhaler monitoring with clinical feedback may improve asthma control and caregiver QoL within diverse populations. Higher health care use was observed among the intervention participants relative to the control, indicating further refinement is warranted.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Adesão à Medicação , Telemetria , Adolescente , Cuidadores/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Qualidade de Vida , SmartphoneRESUMO
Importance: Understanding youth well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic can help appropriately allocate resources and inform policies to support youth. Objective: To examine caregiver-reported changes in the psychological well-being of their children 3 to 4 months after the start of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, and to examine the association of caregiver-reported COVID-19 exposure and family stressors with caregiver perceptions of child psychological well-being. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used an anonymous survey distributed via email from June 24 to July 15, 2020, to 350â¯000 families of students attending public schools in Chicago, Illinois. The a priori hypotheses were that caregivers would report worsening in child psychological well-being during the closure period compared with preclosure and that exposure to COVID-19-related stressors would be associated with a higher probability of worsening child psychological well-being. Data were analyzed from September 10, 2020, to March 15, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were 7 mental health concerns and 5 positive adjustment characteristics reported by caregivers using a retrospective pre-post design. COVID-19 exposure and family stressors were also reported by caregivers. Results: Among 350â¯000 families invited to participate, 32â¯217 caregivers (10â¯827 [39.3%] White, 8320 [30.2%] Latinx, 6168 [22.4%] Black; 2223 [8.1%] with multiple or other races/ethnicities) completed the survey on behalf of 49â¯397 children in prekindergarten through 12th grade. Child-specific outcomes were reported for 40â¯723 to 40â¯852 children depending on the specific question. The frequency of caregiver endorsement of youth mental health concerns ranged from 0.1 percentage point (suicidal ideation or self-harm, reported by 191 caregivers [0.5%] preclosure vs 246 caregivers [0.6%] during closure; P < .001) to 28.3 percentage points (loneliness, reported by 1452 caregivers [3.6%] preclosure vs 13â¯019 caregivers [31.9%] during closure; P < .001) higher after the end of in-person instruction compared with preclosure. Frequency of caregiver endorsement of youth positive adjustment characteristics ranged from -13.4 percentage points (plans for the future, reported by 18â¯114 caregivers [44.3%] preclosure vs 12â¯601 caregivers [30.9%] during closure; P < .001) to -30.9 percentage points (positive peer relationships, reported by 24â¯666 caregivers [60.4%] preclosure vs 19â¯130 caregivers [46.8%] during closure; P < .001) lower after the end of in-person instruction. Significant differences in COVID-19 exposure were observed across racial/ethnic (F3,27â¯534 = 614.8; P < .001) and household income strata (F5,27â¯506 = 842.0; P < .001). After accounting for covariates, all mental health concerns increased in probability (eg, angry: odds ratio, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.48-1.62]; P < .001) and all the positive adjustment characteristics decreased in probability (eg, hopeful or positive: odds ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]; P < .001) as COVID-19 exposure and family stressors increased. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 and resulting exposure to stress were associated with worse youth psychological well-being, demonstrating the need for a comprehensive public health approach that prioritizes children's well-being and draws broad public attention to the mental health needs of youth.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cuidadores/psicologia , Saúde da Criança , Proteção da Criança , Pais/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Criança , Educação a Distância , Saúde da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Masculino , Saúde Mental/normas , Relações Pais-Filho , Distanciamento Físico , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Melhoria de Qualidade , SARS-CoV-2 , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe food allergy (FA)-related service utilization and identify factors associated with guideline-informed care among Medicaid-enrolled US children with FA. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We used the 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract files to identify children with an FA diagnosis. FA-related services including outpatient allergist visits, emergency department (ED) visits, epinephrine autoinjector prescription fills, and diagnostic testing were identified. Factors associated with services were assessed using logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves evaluated the time to guideline-informed care, and proportional hazard models determined associated socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: There were 64,276 Medicaid-enrolled children younger than 20 years who had at least 1 claim with an FA diagnosis in 2012. Minority children and those living in a high-poverty county were less likely to have visited an allergist for FA or received diagnostic testing but more likely to have an FA-related ED visit compared with White children and those not living in a high-poverty county. Survival analyses found that of children seen for FA-related primary care or an ED visit, rates of allergist follow-up visits were 21% and 17%, respectively, and rates of epinephrine autoinjector prescription fills were 39% and 41%. Significant associations with guideline-informed care were found by race/ethnicity, dense population, and high-poverty counties. CONCLUSIONS: Although guideline-informed FA care includes follow-up with an allergist and epinephrine autoinjector prescription, this study finds low probabilities of timely service utilization after medical visits, as well as socioeconomic disparities in care.