Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections.

BACKGROUND: Division of major vascular and biliary structures during major hepatectomies can be carried out either extrahepatically at the porta hepatic or intrahepatically during the parenchymal transection. In this retrospective study we test the hypothesis that the intrahepatic technique is associated with less early biliary complications. METHODS: 150 patients who underwent major hepatectomies were retrospectively allocated into an intrahepatic group (n = 100) and an extrahepatic group (n = 50) based on the technique of hilar division. The two groups were operated by two different surgical teams, each one favoring one of the two approaches for hilar dissection. Operative data (warm ischemic time, operative time, blood loss), biliary complications, morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed. RESULTS: In extrahepatic patients, operative time was longer (245 +/- 50 vs 214 +/- 38 min, p < 0.05) while the overall complication rate (55% vs 52%), hospital stay (13 +/- 7 vs 12 +/- 4 days), bile leak rate (22% vs 20%) and mortality (2% vs 2%) were similar compared to intrahepatic patients. However, most (57%) bile leaks in extrahepatic patients were grade II (leaks that required non-operative interventional treatment, while most (70%) leaks in the intrahepatic group were grade I (leaks that resolved and presented two injuries (4%) of the remaining bile ducts (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intrahepatic hilar division is as safe as extrahepatic hilar division in terms of intraoperative blood requirements, morbidity and mortality. The extrahepatic technique is associated with more severe bile leaks and biliary injuries.

Adjuvant systemic therapy protocol for Dukes' B2 and C resectable colon carcinoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in high risk patients with Dukes' B2 and C colon cancer utilizing 5-fluorouracil-based regimens have been ongoing since the 1960s. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of 5-FU and leucovorin with the combination of 5-FU and alfa-2b interferon (IFN) in patients who had undergone "curative" resection foronocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 322 patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the colon, Dukes' stage B2 and C, were entered in the study. They were randomized to A) leucovorin 20 mg/m2 rapid intravenous injection and 5-FU 425 mg/m2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days for six cycles or B) 5-FU 600 mg/m2 24-hour infusion for five days, then 600 mg/m2 IV once a week and IFN 5 MU subcutaneously three times a week for six months. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in either disease-free survival or overall survival. Toxicity was the same in the two groups with the exception of flu-like syndrome, which was universal in IFN-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between the two combinations in any patient subset. Toxicity was greater with the 5-FU+IFN combination because of the flu-like syndrome. These data do not support the use of IFN in combination with 5-FU as systemic adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced colon carcinoma.

Transdiaphragmatic approach facilitates resection of large (>12 cm) liver tumors.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Various (mostly transthoracic) techniques have been proposed to facilitate access to large tumors located in the upper part of the liver, close to the confluence of the major hepatic veins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a transdiaphragmatic mobilization technique for resection of such tumors. METHODS: Twenty-one patients, with tumors ranging from 12 to 22 cm in diameter, underwent liver resections using our technique of diaphragmatic splitting, with the intention of achieving adequate exposure of the inferior vena cava and the hepatocaval junction. RESULTS: The technique described provided, in all patients, an effective method to achieve the vascular control required for a safe liver resection. Median weight of the excised tumors was 1100 g (range, 817-2860 g). CONCLUSIONS: Large liver tumors (>12 cm) in the upper part of the liver may be approached through a standard bilateral subcostal incision, combined with splitting of the hemidiaphragm, without the need for any kind of thoracic incision.

Selective hepatic vascular exclusion versus Pringle maneuver in major liver resections: prospective study.

Selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE) and the Pringle maneuver are two methods used to control bleeding during hepatectomy. They are compared in a prospective randomized study, where 110 patients undergoing major liver resection were randomly allocated to the SHVE group or the Pringle group. Data regarding the intraoperative and postoperative courses of the patients are analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly decreased in the SHVE group, and postoperative liver function was better in that group. Although there was no difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative complications rate, patients offered the Pringle maneuver had a significantly longer hospital stay. The application of SHVE did not prolong the warm ischemia time or the total operating time. It is evident from the present study that SHVE performed by experienced surgeons is as safe as the Pringle maneuver and is well tolerated by the patients. It is much more effective than the Pringle maneuver for controlling intraoperative bleeding, and it is associated with better postoperative liver function and shorter hospital stay.