Investigation of treatment continuity, usefulness, and nocebo effect in switching from the original etanercept to its biosimilar in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A JET observational study in Japanese clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness and onset of nocebo effects after switching from the original etanercept (ETN) to a biosimilar (BS) in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan (13 sites). METHODS: A total of 165 patients (87.0% women, age = 57.88 ± 15.07 years, and disease duration = 10.32 ± 7.71 years), whose low disease activity was maintained with the original ETN for ≥12 weeks, and who agreed to switch treatment to its BS, were included. The end-points were disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the changes in DAS28-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate >12 weeks before switching and >12 weeks after switching (P = 0.132 and 0.334, respectively). The treatment continuation rate during the 52 weeks after switching to BS was 97.3%. During this period, BS was discontinued in only four patients, and no nocebo effects were suspected in these four patients. CONCLUSION: Switching from ETN to BS was effective even in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan, and no nocebo effects were observed. Sufficient explanations to patients by rheumatologists and the additional payment for drug costs between patients at hospital visits effectively improved the continuation rate without any nocebo effect.

Efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneously administered methotrexate including dose escalation in long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in a Japanese population.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered methotrexate (MTX) for Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: MTX-naïve patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 12-week administration of either 7.5 mg MTX subcutaneously (MJK101, a prefilled syringe for subcutaneous injection) or 8 mg MTX orally in Part 1 of the trial. The primary end point was a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 12. In the second part, all enrolled patients received MJK101 weekly for 52 weeks with doses starting from 7.5 to 15 mg with 2.5 mg increments with the option of self-administration of MJK101. RESULTS: The efficacy of MJK101 was comparable to oral MTX following 12 weeks of treatment at the starting doses. A numerically higher ACR20 response rate and fewer adverse events in particular gastrointestinal adverse events were observed. During long-term subcutaneous treatment, MJK101 was well tolerated across all tested doses. Patients clinically improved upon dose escalation. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneously applied MTX (MJK101) was efficient and well tolerated over a long-term treatment period in the Japanese population with doses up to 15 mg/week. Subcutaneous administration of MTX is a beneficial option for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Efficacy and safety of sodium RISedronate for glucocorticoid-induced OsTeoporosis with rheumaTOid arthritis (RISOTTO study): A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: No evidence has shown the efficacy of Sodium Risedronate (Risedronate) for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of Risedronate for GIO complicated with RA. METHODS: This was a six-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 95 patients with GIO complicated with RA from 19 centers. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (L-BMD). Secondary endpoints included changes in femoral neck and total hip BMD and bone turnover markers, as well as rheumatoid arthritis Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts. Incident of non-traumatic spine fractures and adverse events were tracked as safety endpoints. RESULTS: Increase in L-BMD was significantly greater in the Risedronate group compared to the Placebo group (Risedronate: 3.49% [95% CI: 1.92-5.05] vs Placebo: 0.12% [95% CI: -2.07 to 2.30], p < .0001). No significant difference was found in the femoral neck and total hip BMD. Although adverse events were observed in 28 patients, none were considered serious. Non-traumatic vertebral fractures were identified in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Risedronate was effective in increasing L-BMD and was well tolerated in patients with GIO complicated with RA.

Choice of the most appropriate biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for injection spacing: results from a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) is most appropriate for spacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have persistent stable symptoms. METHODS: In patients with sustained low disease activity (LDA) or better for ≥3 months who were treated with bDMARDs, the interval between bDMARD injections was extended 1.5 times, and treatment continuation rates at 104 weeks were calculated for each drug. Patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions and those who withdrew for reasons unrelated to the drugs were excluded. Whether patients could remain in LDA or better after injection spacing was investigated. The targeted drugs were an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (golimumab [GOL]) and 2 non-TNF inhibitors (tocilizumab [TCZ] and abatacept [ABT]). RESULTS: The spacing evaluation included 57, 93, and 40 patients who received GOL subcutaneous injection (SC), TCZ (SC in 21 and drip intravenous injection [DIV] in 72), and ABT (SC in 12 and DIV in 22), respectively. At 104 weeks, the number of patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions did not significantly differ among the drugs. At 104 weeks, the treatment continuation rate was 0.71 for TCZ SC, 0.70 for GOL, 0.69 for TCZ DIV, 0.55 for ABT SC, and 0.50 for ABT DIV. The continuation rate for ABT was significantly lower than those for GOL and TCZ. No significant difference in continuation rates was observed between SC and DIV. CONCLUSIONS: When the injection interval was extended, GOL and TCZ were superior to ABT in terms of continuation rate.

Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor peficitinib versus placebo in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase III study, patients with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or peficitinib 150 mg once daily with MTX for 52 weeks. Based on baseline randomisation, at week 12, non-responders receiving placebo were switched to peficitinib until the end of treatment; the remaining patients were switched to peficitinib at week 28. Primary efficacy variables were American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response rate at week 12/early termination (ET) and change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS) at week 28/ET. RESULTS: 519 patients were randomised and treated. Significantly more (p<0.001) peficitinib (58.6%, 100 mg; 64.4%, 150 mg) than placebo (21.8%) recipients achieved ACR20 response at week 12/ET. Significantly lower (p<0.001) mean changes from baseline in mTSS at week 28/ET occurred in peficitinib (1.62, 100 mg; 1.03, 150 mg) than placebo (3.37) recipients. Peficitinib was associated with haematological and biochemical parameter changes, and increased incidence of serious infections and herpes zoster-related disease. One death from suicide occurred in a patient in the placebo group after switching to peficitinib 100 mg. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX, peficitinib demonstrated significant superiority versus placebo in reducing RA symptoms and suppressing joint destruction. Peficitinib had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with no new safety signals compared with other JAK inhibitors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02305849.

Computer-Based Radiographic Quantification of Joint Space Narrowing Progression Using Sequential Hand Radiographs: Validation Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients from Multiple Institutions.

We have developed a refined computer-based method to detect joint space narrowing (JSN) progression with the joint space narrowing progression index (JSNPI) by superimposing sequential hand radiographs. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of a computer-based method using images obtained from multiple institutions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Sequential hand radiographs of 42 patients (37 females and 5 males) with RA from two institutions were analyzed by a computer-based method and visual scoring systems as a standard of reference. The JSNPI above the smallest detectable difference (SDD) defined JSN progression on the joint level. The sensitivity and specificity of the computer-based method for JSN progression was calculated using the SDD and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Out of 314 metacarpophalangeal joints, 34 joints progressed based on the SDD, while 11 joints widened. Twenty-one joints progressed in the computer-based method, 11 joints in the scoring systems, and 13 joints in both methods. Based on the SDD, we found lower sensitivity and higher specificity with 54.2 and 92.8%, respectively. At the most discriminant cutoff point according to the ROC curve, the sensitivity and specificity was 70.8 and 81.7%, respectively. The proposed computer-based method provides quantitative measurement of JSN progression using sequential hand radiographs and may be a useful tool in follow-up assessment of joint damage in RA patients.

Effectiveness of golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVES: Several biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are currently available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Increasing evidence indicates that second-line bDMARDs are effective for inadequate responders to first-line bDMARDs. However, all previous studies investigated the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as a first-line bDMARD, while investigated the efficacy of second-line bDMARDs after the use of tocilizumab (TCZ), a non-TNFi, as a first-line bDMARD. Thus, we investigated the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a second-line bDMARD after treatment with TCZ as a first-line bDMARD. METHODS: The final study population consisted of 26 patients (inadequate responders to TCZ; TCZ group) with moderate or high disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≥3.2) at week 24 of treatment with TCZ as a first-line bDMARD or whose DAS28-ESR score worsened after starting TCZ treatment. These patients could be followed for another 52 weeks or more after the subsequent switch to GLM treatment. For comparison, 19 patients treated with TNFi as a first-line bDMARD and inadequate response to TNFi (TNFi group) were included. RESULTS: The DAS28-ESR score at week 52 after the start of treatment with GLM improved significantly compared with baseline in the TCZ and TNFi groups. However, the TCZ group showed significantly better improvement. Patients in both groups had significantly improved treatment outcomes according to European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, but there was no statistically significant difference among them. The retention rate at week 52 after the start of treatment with GLM was significantly higher in the TCZ group than in the TNFi group (81% vs. 68%, respectively). In addition, no difference was found in the progression of bone destruction determined by the change in van der Heijde modified total Sharp scoring system scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GLM was an effective therapeutic option for inadequate responders to TCZ.

Performance of computer-based analysis using temporal subtraction to assess joint space narrowing progression in rheumatoid patients.

Our computer-based method can detect the chronological change in joint space width between baseline and follow-up images as the joint space difference index (JSDI). The aim of this study was to verify the sensitivity and specificity of our computer-based method in assessment of joint space narrowing progression in rheumatoid patients. Twenty-seven patients (24 women and 3 men) with rheumatoid arthritis underwent radiography of the bilateral hand at baseline and at 1 year. The joint space narrowing (JSN) of a total of 252 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and 229 carpal joints was assessed by our computer-based method, setting the Sharp/van der Heijde method as the gold standard. We constructed a receiver operating characteristic curve by using the Sharp/van der Heijde method as the gold standard and set the optimal cutoff on JSDI for MCP, carpal, and MCP/carpal joints. We then calculated the sensitivity and specificity for each cutoff in assessment of JSN progression. At the most discriminant cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity of the computer-based method for MCP joints was 78.6 versus 85.3 %, respectively (AUC = 0.837; P < 0.001). Carpal joints revealed a lower sensitivity and specificity with 64.7 and 86.8 % (AUC = 0.775; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity for MCP/carpal joints was 71.0 versus 83.6 %, respectively (AUC = 0.778; P < 0.001). The computer-based method presented a reliable assessment of JSN progression with high sensitivity and specificity and may be useful in follow-up assessment of the joint damage in rheumatoid patients.

One-year maintenance with routine assessment of patient index data 3-based remission may inhibit radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with routine clinical therapy: A retrospective comparison of radiographic outcome and its prognostic factors between maintained remissions with patient-reported outcome index and physician-oriented disease activity indices.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the maintenance of routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3) remission for one year (RAPID3-MR) may predict good radiographic outcomes. We also compared radiographic progression to prognostic factors among patients with RAPID3-MR, with the maintenance of clinical disease activity index remission for one year (CDAI-MR) or with the maintenance of 28 joint count disease activity score remission for one year (DAS28-MR). METHODS: Of 1220 patients with available clinical data, 92 with RAPID3-MR, 80 with RAPID3-NMR (not satisfying RAPID3-MR), 45 with CDAI-MR, and 75 with DAS28-MR were retrospectively investigated. CDAI and DAS28 for clinical outcomes and the modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for radiographic joint damage were investigated for at least one year. RESULTS: RAPID3, CDAI, DAS28, and their categories remained unchanged or significantly improved in RAPID3-MR patients but significantly deteriorated in RAPID3-NMR patients. The mean annual ΔmTSS was significantly lower in RAPID3-MR patients (0.12 ± 0.55) than in RAPID3-NMR patients (0.54 ± 1.27) (p = 0.025). There was no significant difference among RAPID3-MR patients, CDAI-MR patients (0.06 ± 0.85), and DAS28-MR patients (0.11 ± 0.89). The baseline mTSS (p = 0.038) and monotherapy with nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (p = 0.033) were good prognostic factors in RAPID3-MR patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-year RAPID3 remission maintenance may predict good radiographic outcomes.

The usefulness of a new triple combination treatment utilizing methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine, and bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Combination treatment with methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine as an alternative to treatment with TNF-inhibiting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis was investigated. METHODS: Twenty-six facilities allied with the Japan Association of Rheumatologists in Private Practice participated in this study. One hundred and twelve patients enrolled in this study, all of whom were within 3 years of diagnosis with rheumatoid arthritis for whom treatment with one DMARD or a combination of two DMARDs had failed (DAS28 > 3.2). Patients chose their own treatment. The triple DMARDs combination group was comprised of 72 patients; the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment group was comprised of 40 patients. RESULTS: DAS28 scores for the triple DMARDs combination group and the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment groups were 4.84 ± 0.96 and 5.23 ± 1.26, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. From the 6th month, average disease activities of both groups were reduced, and there was no difference between the two groups at 12 months (DAS28, 3.39 ± 1.43 and 3.05 ± 1.43, p = 0.39). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the degree of bone destruction between the two groups at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The triple DMARD combination therapy provided a new treatment option for those patients for whom treatment with biologics is difficult.

Inhibition of radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients in DAS28 remission using single- or combined with methotrexate non biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively investigated the inhibitory effect on radiographic joint damage (RJD) for non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (non-bioDMARD) monotherapy or methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the disease activity score with 28 joint counts with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28) remission. METHODS: Eighty-four patients (55 cases of monotherapy, 29 cases of MTX-combination therapy) in DAS28 remission (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) were investigated from 538 RA patients newly registered between February 2007 and August 2010. The patients were analyzed for radiological assessments using the modified total Sharp score/year (mTSS/y). RESULTS: The remission rates and ΔmTSS/y for each agent using monotherapy were 7.1% and 0.17 for sulfasalazine; 11.9% and 0.49 for bucillamine (BUC); and 23.9% and 2.06 for MTX. Those using combination therapy were 6.8% and 1.39 for MTX + BUC; 23.5% and -1.64 for MTX + leflunomide; and 8.0% and 0.31 for MTX + tacrolimus. The cumulative distribution in the single and combination therapy groups showed improvement of percentages in structural remission from baseline to 1-year treatment, 34.1% to 60.9% (P < 0.05) and from 0% to 56.7%(P < 0.0001), respectively. Baseline mTSS (r = 0.67, P < 0.0001), disease duration (r = 0.40, P < 0.01), swollen joint counts (r = 0.33, P < 0.05), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (r = 0.31, P < 0.05) were useful predictors of RJD for non-bioDMARD monotherapy, but not for combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory inhibition of RJD was observed in the DAS28 remission cases of monotherapy or MTX combination therapy with a non-bioDMARD.

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of iguratimod with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: an open-label extension of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain safety and efficacy data on combination treatment with iguratimod and methotrexate (MTX) in an open-label extension study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Following a 28-week, randomized, double-blind trial of adding iguratimod or placebo to stable MTX therapy, patients entered a 24-week extension. Patients randomized to the iguratimod + MTX group continued treatment. Patients treated with placebo + MTX switched to iguratimod + MTX [the (placebo/iguratimod) + MTX group]. RESULTS: In the iguratimod + MTX group, the rate of 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 52 (71.3%) was similar to that at week 24 (69.5%). ACR50, ACR70 and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 52 significantly improved compared with the values at week 24. In the (placebo/iguratimod + MTX) group, the switch to iguratimod treatment significantly improved ACR20 from 30.7% at week 24 to 72.1% at week 52. Frequent adverse events for 52 weeks in the iguratimod + MTX group were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract inflammation, stomatitis, lymphocyte decrease, AST increase, ALT increase and blood iron decrease. These adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in severity. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and tolerance of iguratimod + MTX therapy was maintained to 52 weeks in patients with active RA with inadequate response to MTX.

Concomitant iguratimod therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable doses of methotrexate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (T-614) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response to stable background methotrexate (MTX) alone. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial, a total of 253 patients were randomized at 2:1 ratio to either the iguratimod group or the placebo group. Iguratimod was orally administered at dosages of 25 mg/day for the first 4 weeks (25 mg once daily) and 50 mg/day for the subsequent 20 weeks (25 mg twice daily). MTX at dosage of 6 or 8 mg/week was administered to patients in both groups. RESULTS: The rate of 20 % improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 24 was 69.5 % in the iguratimod group compared with 30.7 % in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in the ACR50, ACR70, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, Disease Activity Score 28 <3.2, and rheumatoid factor were also observed. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were blood iron decrease, nasopharyngitis, and lymphocyte decrease. These AEs were mild or moderate in severity. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that iguratimod in combination with MTX was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile.

Oral and Intestinal Bacterial Substances Associated with Disease Activities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.

Intestinal bacterial compositions of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have been reported to be different from those of healthy people. Dysbiosis, imbalance of the microbiota, is widely known to cause gut barrier damage, resulting in an influx of bacteria and their substances into host bloodstreams in animal studies. However, few studies have investigated the effect of bacterial substances on the pathophysiology of RA. In this study, eighty-seven active RA patients who had inadequate responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or severe comorbidities were analyzed for correlations between many factors such as disease activities, disease biomarkers, intestinal bacterial counts, fecal and serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS), LPS-binding protein (LBP), endotoxin neutralizing capacity (ENC), and serum antibacterial substance IgG and IgA antibody levels by multiple regression analysis with consideration for demographic factors such as age, sex, smoking, and methotrexate treatment. Serum LBP levels, fecal LPS levels, total bacteria counts, serum anti-LPS from Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg-LPS) IgG antibody levels, and serum anti-Pg-LPS IgA antibody levels were selected for multiple regression analysis using Spearman's correlation analysis. Serum LBP levels were correlated with disease biomarker levels, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p < 0.001), and IL-6 (p = 0.001), and were inversely correlated with hemoglobin (p = 0.005). Anti-Pg-LPS IgG antibody levels were inversely correlated with activity indices such as patient global assessments using visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.002) and painVAS (p < 0.001). Total bacteria counts were correlated with ENC (p < 0.001), and inversely correlated with serum LPS (p < 0.001) and anti-Pg-LPS IgA antibody levels (p < 0.001). These results suggest that substances from oral and gut microbiota may influence disease activity in RA patients.

Tacrolimus-induced pulmonary injury in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) was approved in Japan in 2005 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients having inadequate response to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. As of May 2007, spontaneous reports identified twenty-seven cases of exacerbation or new development of interstitial pneumonia among RA patients given TAC in Japan. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of TAC-induced pulmonary injury (TIPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven RA patients diagnosed with de novo pulmonary injury or exacerbation of IP during treatment with TAC were identified. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data of ten of these cases were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline data for the ten patients were a mean age of 69.7 years; gender, 70% female; mean RA disease duration, 9.1 years; and pulmonary comorbidities, 90%. Six cases were classified as presumptive TAC-induced pulmonary injury (TIPI) and four as probable TIPI. Among the six presumptive cases, TIPI developed at an average of 84 days after initiation of treatment (n = 5) or four days after reinstitution of TAC (n = 1). Five cases were an exacerbation of pre-existing interstitial pneumonia and one was a de novo pulmonary injury. Radiological patterns of thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans of patients in the presumptive TIPI cases were hypersensitivity pneumonia like-pattern (n = 3), ground-glass opacity (n = 2), and organizing pneumonia-pattern (n = 1). All patients with presumptive TIPI were treated with high dosage glucocorticosteroids and one received concomitant immunosuppressants. Two of the six presumptive TIPI patients died. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologists should be aware of this rare but potentially life-threatening adverse event in RA patients receiving TAC.

Supplemental treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with natural milk antibodies against enteromicrobes and their toxins: results of an open-labelled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Environmental factors, particularly commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, may be involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether natural milk antibodies against a wide spectrum of pathogenic enteromicobes and their toxins modify the disease activity in RA. METHODS: Twenty patients with RA, whose disease activity was uncontrolled by authentic medications due to drug resistance, complications and/or risk factors were treated for 3 months with an oral administration of a whey protein concentrate (WPC) containing high levels of natural milk antibodies. Eighteen background-matched RA patients, not supplemented with milk antibody adjunct, were used as controls. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction of arthritis symptoms and improvement of intestinal disorders were observed only in the test group: effective in 8 (44%), possibly effective in 2 (12%) and not effective in 8 (44%) of 18 patients treated (2 patients withdrew) based on an ad hoc "evaluation point", the sum of variables that are improved more than 20% among the 8 core variables used for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria. This disease modifying effect of the WPC disappeared upon cessation of treatment, but was reappeared upon reintroduction of it. Importantly, 7 of 8 non-responders carry DR15 haplotype (DRB1-1501 and 1502), whereas only 1 of 7 responders was DR15 positive (risk ratio: 6.1). Furthermore, the pre-clinical serum anti-LPS and anti-type II collagen antibody levels in the responders were higher or tended to be higher than those in the non-responders, suggesting that there are 2 sub-types of RA based on an interaction between gastrointestinal pathogens and MHC class II haplotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The natural milk antibody preparation containing high levels antibodies against pathogenic enteromicrobes and their toxins seems to be effective in a certain RA subset, and deserves more attention as a potential adjunct in the treatment of RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000003128.

Weekly split-dose regimen for oral methotrexate reduced polyglutamation in red blood cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with single-dose regimen: Results from a multicentered randomized control trial.

AIMS: We compared the incidence of adverse events between single and divided-dose regimens of methotrexate (MTX) by using a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with insufficient control on MTX 8 mg/wk were randomly assigned into single-dose (39 patients) or triple dose (39 patients) groups. The MTX dose for all patients was gradually increased to 16 mg/wk. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of liver dysfunction during the observation period (20 weeks). RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline data and MTX dose at Week 20 between groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of liver dysfunction between groups (single dose, 3 [7.7%] patients vs. triple dose, 5 [13.2%] patients; P = .455). The incidence of adverse event increased in triple dose (single dose, 12 [30.8%] patients vs. triple dose, 20 [51.3%]), but the difference was not significant (P = .066). There was no significant difference in disease activity between groups, although MTX-triglutamate (PG3), MTX-PG4, and MTX-PG5 were significantly higher in the single dose group. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly split dosing reduced the polyglutamation of MTX. There was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between the 2 groups.

Effects of an oral administration of glucosamine-chondroitin-quercetin glucoside on the synovial fluid properties in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

The effects of an orally administered combination of a glucosamine-chondroitin-quercetin glucoside (GCQG) supplement on the synovial fluid properties of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were investigated from the clinical nutrition view point. In this study, forty-six OA and twenty-two RA patients were administered with the GCQG supplement orally for 3 months. Several parameters of the knee joints were monitored before and after supplementation. The OA patients showed a significant improvement in pain symptoms, daily activities (walking and climbing up and down stairs), and visual analogue scale, and changes in the synovial fluid properties with respect to the protein concentration, molecular size of hyaluronic acid, and chondroitin 6-sulphate concentration were also observed. However, no such effects were observed in the RA patients. These results suggest that the GCQG supplement exerted a special effect on improving the synovial fluid properties in OA patients.

Long-term efficacy of leflunomide on disease activity and inhibition of joint damage: retrospective comparison with methotrexate for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.

We retrospectively compared treatment impact with leflunomide (LEF) or methotrexate (MTX) on retarding joint damage and clinical symptom including a 28-joint-count Disease Activity Score/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) between two similar groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over an approximately 3-year treatment. One group included 29 patients treated with LEF alone (average dose 16.1 mg/day); the other group included 26 patients treated with MTX (average dose 7.4 mg/week) alone or combined with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. At baseline, mean disease duration was 7.1 and 6.9 years, and mean DAS28-ESR was 5.79 and 5.69, respectively. The average DAS28-ESR improvement of 1.750 (from 5.79 to 4.04) in the LEF-treated group was significantly greater than the effect of 1.007 (from 5.69 to 4.68) seen in the MTX group (P = 0.0455), with the same results being observed on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Annual changes observed in Larsen score in total joints were 0.030 in the LEF group and 0.085 in the MTX group: LEF retards joint damage significantly better than MTX (P = 0.003). This inhibitory effect was better in small joints (P = 0.004) than in middle and large joints (P = 0.075). A negative correlation was noticed between improved DAS28-ESR and the progression of joint damage in the LEF group (r = -0.7068, P < 0.0001), whereas there was no correlation in the MTX group (r = -0.0311, P = 0.882). In daily clinical practice, LEF showed significant clinical and radiological improvement compared with the standard MTX regimen in Japan.