Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 50
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Genet ; 60(3): 265-273, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763037

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) people have a higher incidence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) than unselected populations. Three BRCA-Jewish founder mutations (B-JFMs) comprise >90% of BRCA1/2 PVs in AJ people. Personal/family cancer history-based testing misses ≥50% of people with B-JFM. METHODS: We compared two population-based B-JFM screening programmes in Australia-using (1) an online tool (Sydney) and (2) in-person group sessions (Melbourne). RESULTS: Of 2167 Jewish people tested (Sydney n=594; Melbourne n=1573), 1.3% (n=28) have a B-JFM, only 2 of whom had a significant cancer family history (Manchester score ≥12). Pretest anxiety scores were normal (mean 9.9±3.5 (6-24)), with no significant post-result change (9.5±3.3). Decisional regret (mean 7.4±13.0 (0-100)), test-related distress (mean 0.8+/2.2 (0-30)) and positive experiences (reverse-scored) (mean 3.4±4.5 (1-20)) scores were low, with no significant differences between Sydney and Melbourne participants. Post-education knowledge was good overall (mean 11.8/15 (±2.9)) and significantly higher in Melbourne than Sydney. Post-result knowledge was the same (mean 11.7 (±2.4) vs 11.2 (±2.4)). Participants with a B-JFM had higher post-result anxiety and test-related distress and lower positive experiences, than those without a B-JFM, but scores were within the normal range. Family cancer history did not significantly affect knowledge or anxiety, or pretest perception of B-JFM or cancer risks. Most participants (93%) were satisfied/very satisfied with the programme. CONCLUSION: Both B-JFM screening programmes are highly acceptable to Australian Jewish communities. The programme enabled identification of several individuals who were previously unaware they have a B-JFM, many of whom would have been ineligible for current criteria-based testing in Australia.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Judeus/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Austrália , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Mutação
2.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 46(6): 926-938, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37088634

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are health professionals' clinical practices, views and self-rated competencies regarding the transfer of mosaic embryos? DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study using surveys. RESULTS: Data were collected from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand. Ninety-five responses were analysed and reported. The results show that most health professionals (n = 62) discussed the transfer of mosaic embryos for different reasons and raised concerns regarding various risks. Although many health professionals were unsure whether mosaic embryos should be transferred, they were more inclined to encourage transfer if the scenario involved segmental losses compared with mosaicism involving duplication of the entire chromosome (i.e. trisomy 21) (e.g. OR = 0.21, P < 0.001; OR = 2.78, P = 0.04). The majority of health professionals would inform patients about the mosaicism to facilitate informed decision making. The factor that health professionals identified as most important when discussing the transfer of mosaic embryos was the specific chromosome involved. Different self-rated competencies were found among health professionals with different backgrounds. Geneticists and genetic counsellors had the highest self-rated competencies. CONCLUSIONS: Most health professionals were willing to discuss the mosaicism in the embryo with patients to facilitate informed decision making. However, health professionals' uncertainty towards the transfer of mosaic embryos indicated a lack of a standardized transfer policy. In addition, obstetricians, gynaecologists and those with multiprofessional backgrounds showed deficiencies in several self-rated competencies, suggesting that education targeted to these groups is needed to optimize the quality of care of women considering transfer of mosaic embryos.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Blastocisto , Austrália , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Aneuploidia , Mosaicismo
3.
Horm Metab Res ; 55(6): 379-387, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295414

RESUMO

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature regarding cardiovascular outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients who are on long term thyroid stimulating hormone suppression. Searches were carried out using Prisma guidelines in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Scopus databases. Eligible papers were those which investigated discrete cardiovascular clinical outcomes in TSH suppressed patients and meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using Revman 5.4.1. We found a total of 195 879 DTC patients with median length to follow up of 8.6 years (range 5-18.8 years). Analysis showed DTC patients to be at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.40, 1.77), stroke (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09, 1.20) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.02, 4.07). However, there was no difference in risk of heart failure, ischemic heart disease or cardiovascular mortality. These findings suggest that degree of TSH suppression must be titrated to accommodate risk of cancer recurrence and cardiovascular morbidity.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Tireotropina
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 502, 2023 Jul 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research activities undertaken during University studies contribute to preparation of medical students for practice of evidence-based medicine. This study aimed to understand medical students' experiences, perceived research skills development and satisfaction associated with completion of mandatory research projects. METHODS: An online survey was sent to five cohorts of students (n = 1375) from years 2017-2021 at the completion of their research projects. Univariate analysis was conducted to understand students' perception of research skills development, followed by linear regression modeling to explore factors influencing satisfaction with their research project. Manifest content analysis employing a framework approach was used to analyse qualitative data from responses to open ended questions. RESULTS: Response rate was 42%, with 513 (89%) returned surveys being complete and included in analysis. Whilst 37% of students felt they had requisite research skills before undertaking the research project, 84% reported they had these skills after completing the project (χ2 = 8.99, P = 0.02). Mean satisfaction score of the students was 5.0/10 (+/- 2.5, median = 6 (IQR = 3.0-7.0) with 59% of students reporting satisfaction scores higher than the average. Higher satisfaction scores were reported by those who perceived that: research methods and teaching was useful in preparing them for conducting research; the research project helped them acquire new skills; the project resulted in peer-reviewed publication; and, who felt supported by their supervisors. Responses to open ended questions offered important insights into student experience and emphasised the importance of supportive supervisors and the need for a dedicated research block in the busy medical program. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of students reported positive outcomes from the mandatory research project. Student satisfaction can be improved by ensuring supportive research environments and high-quality supervision, and inclusion of dedicated research time in the medical curriculum.


Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Pesquisadores , Currículo , Satisfação Pessoal
5.
Hum Reprod ; 37(11): 2599-2610, 2022 10 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006036

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: What are the roles of individual and interpersonal factors in couples' decision-making regarding preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Couples' decision-making regarding PGT-M was associated with individual and interpersonal factors, that is the perceived consistency of information received, satisfaction with information, self-efficacy (individuals' beliefs in their ability to make decisions), actual knowledge about PGT-M and social support from the partner. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Various factors have been shown to be associated with decision-making regarding PGT-M. However, PGT-M is experienced at an individual level, and to date, no studies have investigated the roles of the above-mentioned individual and interpersonal factors. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a cross-sectional study with 279 participants. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups from May 2020 to November 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were women who had undergone or were considering PGT-M and their partners. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups to complete online questionnaires. Decisional regret, decisional satisfaction and decisional conflict were measured as outcome variables. Multiple linear regressions were performed to examine the association between factors and outcome variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to test the differences between participants who had undergone PGT-M and those who were considering PGT-M. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For couples who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was significantly negatively associated with perceived consistency of information received (ß = -0.26, P < 0.01), self-efficacy (ß = -0.25, P < 0.01) and actual knowledge about PGT-M (ß = -0.30, P < 0.001), while decisional satisfaction had positive association with satisfaction with information received (ß = 0.37, P < 0.001) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.24, P < 0.05). For couples who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with information received (ß = -0.56, P < 0.001). For females who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was negatively associated with social support from the partner (ß = -0.35, P < 0.05) in addition to perceived consistency of information received (ß = -0.24, P < 0.05). In this group, decisional satisfaction was positively associated with women's satisfaction with the information received (ß = 0.34, P < 0.01), social support from the partner (ß = 0.26, P < 0.05) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.25, P < 0.05). For females who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with the information received (ß = -0.43, P < 0.01) and social support from the partner (ß = -0.30, P < 0.05). This study also identified those aspects of PGT-M that couples felt most concerned about in relation to their decision-making, in particular safety issues such as short- or long-term health problems for the baby and potential harms to the embryos and the mother's health. The likelihood of getting pregnant and having a baby with a genetic condition being tested for were also important in couples' decision-making. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study assessed the concerns of couples about having a baby with a variety of genetic conditions. However, condition-specific issues might not be covered. Furthermore, social support from the partner was assessed among females only. Male participants' perceived social support from their partner and the association between mutual support and decision-making were not assessed due to the absence of dyadic data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Results highlight the importance of effective patient education on PGT-M and the need to provide high-quality and consistent information in the context of patient-centred care. Patients are likely to benefit from information that addresses their specific concerns in relation to PGT-M. From females' perspective, support from partners is essential, and partners should, therefore, be encouraged to participate in all stages of the decision-making process. Suggestions for future studies were made. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): B.M. was funded through a Senior Research Fellowship Level B (ID 1078523) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. L.C. was supported by a University International Postgraduate Award under the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. No other funding was received for this study. The authors report no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Assuntos
Emoções , Testes Genéticos , Gravidez , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Austrália , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 44(5): 839-852, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35183447

RESUMO

This systematic review reports on the needs and sources of support in patients' decision-making regarding the uptake of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Five databases were searched systematically to capture qualitative and quantitative studies. A total of 2336 studies were screened by title and abstract. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria and reported on 4047 participants. This systematic review shows that patients need information directly relevant to PGT treatment, and information on health care relating to treatment and alternative reproductive options. Information that is too detailed, excessive and contains a large volume of medical terminology can be a barrier to decision-making. Published research suggests that health professionals provide general information on PGT and discuss it in detail only when patients require more information about it. Additionally, studies have shown that patients receive decisional support through mass media, significant persons in their lives and health professionals, whereas referring obstetricians and gynaecologists provided relatively less help compared with other health professionals. This systematic review highlights the importance of developing decision aids that meet patients' decisional needs as indicated in previous studies and that use innovative formats to deliver information. Additionally, given rapid technical developments, a dearth of continuing professional education is available on PGT for clinicians to keep updated.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Humanos
7.
J Genet Couns ; 31(1): 120-129, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223688

RESUMO

Hereditary breast cancer is associated with known genetic changes: either variants that affect function in a few rare genes or an ever-increasing number of common genomic risk variants, which combine to produce a cumulative effect, known as a polygenic risk (PR) score. While the clinical validity and utility of PR scores are still being determined, the communication of PR is a new challenge for genetic health professionals. This study investigated how PR scores are discussed in the familial cancer clinic compared with a previous study assessing the communication of monogenic risk (MR) for breast cancer. Sixty-five PR consultations between genetic health professionals and women at familial risk of breast cancer were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using a methodology adapted from the MR study. Analysis of consultations shows that while there were similarities in communicating MR and PR, the complexity and novelty of the polygenic information influenced the style of counseling used by genetic health professionals toward a teaching model of genetic counseling, rather than a patient-centered approach. In particular, compared to MR consultations, in PR consultations significantly fewer counselees (a) were asked about their reasons for attending genetic counseling; or (b) had their information preferences, decision-making style, medical knowledge, understanding, or concerns checked. In conclusion, it is anticipated that PR scores will become part of standard clinical practice. Thus, it will be important for all genetic health professionals to be appropriately educated so that they can tailor their communication to meet patient needs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Comunicação , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético/psicologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
8.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 370, 2022 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562832

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical degree programs use scholarly activities to support development of basic research skills, critical evaluation of medical information and promotion of medical research. The University of Sydney Doctor of Medicine Program includes a compulsory research project. Medical student projects are supervised by academic staff and affiliates, including biomedical science researchers and clinician-academics. This study investigated research supervisors' observations of the barriers to and enablers of successful medical student research projects. METHODS: Research supervisors (n = 130) completed an anonymous, online survey after the completion of the research project. Survey questions targeted the research supervisors' perceptions of barriers to successful completion of projects and sources of support for their supervision of the student project. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and using manifest content analysis. Further quantitative investigation was made by cross-tabulation according to prior research supervision experience. RESULTS: Research supervisors reported that students needed both generic skills (75%) and research-based skills (71%) to successfully complete the project. The major barrier to successful research projects was the lack of protected time for research activities (61%). The assessment schedule with compulsory progress milestones enabled project completion (75%), and improved scientific presentation (90%) and writing (93%) skills. Supervisors requested further support for their students for statistics (75%), scientific writing (51%), and funding for projects (52%). Prior research supervision experience influenced the responses. Compared to novice supervisors, highly experienced supervisors were significantly more likely to want students to be allocated dedicated time for the project (P < 0.01) and reported higher rates of access to expert assistance in scientific writing, preparing ethics applications and research methodology. Novice supervisors reported higher rates of unexpected project delays and data acquisition problems (P < 0.05). Co-supervision was favoured by experienced supervisors but rejected by novice supervisors. CONCLUSIONS: Both generic and research-related skills were important for medical student research project success. Overall, protected research time, financial and other academic support were identified as factors that would improve the research project program. Prior research supervision experience influences perceptions of program barriers and enablers. These findings will inform future support needs for projects and research supervisor training for the research supervision role.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Pesquisadores
9.
Genet Med ; 23(12): 2316-2323, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341522

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior of women choosing to receive (receivers) or decline (decliners) their breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS). METHODS: Women either unaffected or affected by breast cancer and from families with no identified pathogenic variant in a breast cancer risk gene were invited to receive their PRS. All participants completed a questionnaire at study enrollment. Receivers completed questionnaires at two weeks and 12 months after receiving their PRS, and decliners a second questionnaire at 12 months post study enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 208 participants, 165 (79%) received their PRS. Among receivers, there were no changes in anxiety or distress following testing. However, compared to women with a low PRS, those with a high PRS reported greater genetic testing-specific distress, perceived risk, decisional regret, and less genetic testing-positive response. At 12 months, breast screening and uptake of risk-reducing strategies were consistent with current Australian guidelines of breast cancer risk management. Reasons for declining PRS included being unable to attend the appointment in person and concerns over potential emotional response. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the study provide insight into women's responses to receiving PRS and highlight the issues that need to be addressed in the associated model of genetic counseling.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Austrália , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 120, 2021 Jan 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As immunisation program launches have previously demonstrated, it is essential that careful planning occurs now to ensure the readiness of the public for a COVID-19 vaccine. As part of that process, this study aimed to understand the public perceptions regarding a future COVID-19 vaccine in Australia. METHODS: A national cross-sectional online survey of 1420 Australian adults (18 years and older) was undertaken between 18 and 24 March 2020. The statistical analysis of the data included univariate and multivariable logistic regression model analysis. RESULTS: Respondents generally held positive views towards vaccination. Eighty percent (n = 1143) agreed with the statement that getting myself vaccinated for COVID-19 would be a good way to protect myself against infection. Females (n = 614, 83%) were more likely to agree with the statement than males (n = 529, 78%) (aOR = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8); P = 0.03), while 91% of those aged 70 years and above agreed compared to 76% of 18-29-year-olds (aOR = 2.3 (95% CI:1.2-4.1); P = 0.008). Agreement was also higher for those with a self-reported chronic disease (aOR = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-2.0); P = 0.04) and among those who held private health insurance (aOR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3); P < 0.001). Beyond individual perceptions, 78% stated that their decision to vaccinate would be supported by family and friends. CONCLUSION: This study presents an early indication of public perceptions towards a future COVID-19 vaccine and represents a starting point for mapping vaccine perceptions. To support an effective launch of these new vaccines, governments need to use this time to understand the communities concerns and to identify the strategies that will support engagement.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Hered Cancer Clin Pract ; 19(1): 24, 2021 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836815

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This nationwide study assessed the impact of nationally agreed cancer genetics guidelines on use of BRCA1/2 germline testing, risk management advice given by health professionals to women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and uptake of such advice by patients. METHODS: Clinic files of 883 women who had initial proband screens for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants at 12 familial cancer clinics between July 2008-July 2009 (i.e. before guideline release), July 2010-July 2011 and July 2012-July 2013 (both after guideline release) were audited to determine reason given for genetic testing. Separately, the clinic files of 599 female carriers without a personal history of breast/ovarian cancer who underwent BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing and received their results pre- and post-guideline were audited to ascertain the risk management advice given by health professionals. Carriers included in this audit were invited to participate in a telephone interview to assess uptake of advice, and 329 agreed to participate. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in the percentages of tested patients meeting at least one published indication for genetic testing - 79, 77 and 78% of files met criteria before guideline, and two-, and four-years post-guideline, respectively (χ = 0.25, p = 0.88). Rates of documentation of post-test risk management advice as per guidelines increased significantly from pre- to post-guideline for 6/9 risk management strategies. The strategies with the highest compliance amongst carriers or awareness post-release of guidelines were annual magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography in women 30-50 years (97%) and annual mammography in women > 50 years (92%). Of women aged over 40 years, 41% had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. Amongst women aged > 40 years, 75% had a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Amongst women who had not had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, only 6% took risk-reducing medication. Fear of side-effects was cited as the main reasons for not taking these medicines by 73% of women. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines did not change the percentages of tested patients meeting genetic testing criteria but improved documentation of risk management advice by health professionals. Effective approaches to enhance compliance with guidelines are needed to improve risk management and quality of care.

12.
Clin Genet ; 97(3): 492-501, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833054

RESUMO

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are increasingly being implemented to assess breast cancer risk. This study aimed to assess and determine factors associated with uptake of PRS among women at increased risk of breast cancer for whom genetic testing to date had been uninformative. Participants were recruited from the Variants in Practice study from which breast cancer PRS had been calculated. Four hundred women were notified by letter of the availability of their PRS and invited to complete a self-administered survey comprising several validated scales. Considering non-participants, uptake of PRS was between 61.8% and 42.1%. Multivariate logistic regression identified that women were more likely to receive their PRS if they reported greater benefits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, P = .011) and fewer barriers to receiving their PRS (OR = 0.80, P = .007), had completed higher level education (OR = 3.32, P = .004), and did not have daughters (0.29, P = .006). Uptake of breast cancer PRS varied according to several testing- and patient-related factors. Knowledge of these factors will facilitate the implementation of polygenic testing in clinical practice and support informed decision making by patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos , Herança Multifatorial/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 805, 2019 Sep 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31521116

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early Childhood Education Centre (ECEC) staff are strongly recommended to receive several immunizations including influenza and pertussis. However, evidence regarding the uptake is either old or lacking across all Australian States/Territories. This study aimed to explore the attitudes and barriers around ECEC staff vaccination and the immunisation policy/practices employed at their workplaces. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was undertaken of staff members (administrators and childcare center staff) in early 2017. We compared the individual's knowledge, attitude and practices as well as the centre's policy and practice variables between the vaccinated and unvaccinated respondents. A logistic model was used to identify the factors associated with uptake of the different vaccines. RESULTS: A total of 575 ECEC staff completed the survey. Sixty percent reported being aware of the recommendations about staff immunisation. While participants did acknowledge that they could spread diseases if unvaccinated (86%), 30% could not recall receiving a dTpa in the last 10 years. Private centres were less likely to provide free or onsite vaccination compared to other categories of centres. Less than half reported receiving any encouragement to get the influenza vaccine and only 33% reported that their centre provides onsite influenza vaccination. Regarding the introduction of mandatory policies, 69% stated that they would support a policy. CONCLUSION: Employers should consider supporting methods to maximize vaccination of their employees including providing free onsite vaccination. Participants were open to idea of mandatory vaccination; however, this needs to be explored further to determine how vaccine costs and access issues could be resolved.


Assuntos
Creches , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Percepção , Professores Escolares/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Austrália , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacina contra Coqueluche/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/economia , Local de Trabalho
14.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(5): 1951-1960, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30327877

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility of an online communication skills training intervention to increase cultural competence amongst oncology nurses working with individuals from minority backgrounds. METHODS: The intervention provided examples of communication strategies using vignette-based, professionally produced videos, developed through an iterative process with input from a large multidisciplinary team. Fifty-three oncology nurses completed all three questionnaires at baseline, within 2 weeks and then 3 months after accessing the programme. RESULTS: The online intervention was well received by the majority of participants, and was endorsed as clearly presented, informative, relevant and useful by more than 90% of participants. Eighty-seven percent of participants reported increased confidence in communicating with patients via an interpreter, and 93% agreed that skills they gained would be useful in providing better patient care. Participants reported significant improvements in practice while interacting with people with limited English proficiency 2 weeks and 3 months after accessing the website (X2 = 13.66, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This online communication training programme can now be tested for its utility in improving patient care for oncology nurses working with patients from minority backgrounds.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Educação em Enfermagem/métodos , Enfermagem Oncológica/educação , Enfermagem Oncológica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Competência Cultural/educação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários , Enfermeiros Clínicos/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários
15.
Breast J ; 25(1): 34-40, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30525267

RESUMO

This study aims to determine the attitudes and barriers of Australian oncology health professionals towards using tamoxifen as a breast cancer risk-reducing medication (RRM). Our target group was health professionals involved in breast cancer risk assessment or treatment. Members of relevant medical organizations in Australia and New Zealand were invited to participate in a web-based survey assessing: their attitudes towards tamoxifen as a RRM; which health professionals they felt were responsible for initiating and monitoring women on RRM and their views on workforce issues related to RRM prescription. There were 100 respondents, including 33 genetic health professionals, 32 medical oncologists and 20 surgeons. Respondents perceived tamoxifen to be effective as a RRM (99%). However, only 41% of prescribing health professionals (n = 64) had ever prescribed tamoxifen as a RRM. Overall, survey respondents felt that the initiation of RRM was the role of specialists. Assessing a patient's risk of breast cancer was reported to be the role of cancer geneticists/familial cancer clinicians (74%) and medical oncologists (66%). Discussion about the use of RRM was reported to be the role of these same groups (84% and 85% respectively). Medical oncologists (83%) and breast physicians (70%) were most frequently considered to be responsible for initiating the prescription and monitoring women once commenced on RRM (72% and 71% respectively). Oncology health professionals express confidence in the effectiveness of tamoxifen as a RRM despite reporting low prescription rates. Findings demonstrate that these oncology health professionals felt that initiation of RRM was the role of cancer specialists, despite preventative medicine being seen as a primary care activity. If uptake among at-risk women increases, this will put a significant burden on cancer services and GPs will need to take on a greater role in the delivery of RRM.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Oncologistas , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Nova Zelândia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos
16.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 499, 2018 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558569

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Access to information about prenatal screening is important particularly in light of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). This study aimed to develop and examine the acceptability of a low literacy decision aid (DA) about Down syndrome screening among pregnant women with varying education levels and GPs. METHODS: We developed a DA booklet providing information about first-trimester combined testing, maternal serum screening, and NIPT. GPs and women participated in a telephone interview to examine the acceptability of the DA and measure screening knowledge before and after reading the DA. The knowledge measure was designed to assess whether women had understood the gist of the information presented in the decision aid. It comprised conceptual questions (e.g. screening tells you the chance of having a baby with Down syndrome) and numeric questions (e.g. the accuracy of different screening tests). RESULTS: Twenty-nine women and 18 GPs participated. Regardless of education level, most women found the booklet 'very' clearly presented (n = 22, 76%), and 'very' informative (n = 23, 80%). Overall, women's conceptual and numeric knowledge improved after exposure to the DA, from 4% having adequate knowledge to 69%. Women's knowledge of NIPT also improved after receiving the decision aid, irrespective of education. Most GPs found it 'very' clearly presented (n = 13, 72%), and that it would 'very much' facilitate decision-making (n = 16, 89%). CONCLUSIONS: The DA was found to be acceptable to women as well as GPs. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the decision aid compared to standard information is an important next step. Strategies are needed on how to implement the tool in practice.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Letramento em Saúde/métodos , Folhetos , Gestantes/educação , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Acesso à Informação , Adulto , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Materiais de Ensino
17.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 491, 2017 Jul 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28720130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 'common variant, common disease' model predicts that a significant component of hereditary breast cancer unexplained by pathogenic variants in moderate or high-penetrance genes is due to the cumulative effect of common risk variants in DNA (polygenic risk). Assessing a woman's breast cancer risk by testing for common risk variants can provide useful information for women who would otherwise receive uninformative results by traditional monogenic testing. Despite increasing support for the utility of common risk variants in hereditary breast cancer, research findings have not yet been integrated into clinical practice. Translational research is therefore critical to ensure results are effectively communicated, and that women do not experience undue adverse psychological outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective study, 400 women with a personal and/or high risk family history of breast cancer will be recruited from six familial cancer centers (FCCs) in Australia. Eligible women will be invited to attend a FCC and receive their personal polygenic risk result for breast cancer. Genetic health professionals participating in the study will receive training on the return of polygenic risk information and a training manual and visual aids will be developed to facilitate patient communication. Participants will complete up to three self-administered questionnaires over a 12-months period to assess the short-and long-term psychological and behavioral outcomes of receiving or not receiving their personal polygenic risk result. DISCUSSION: This is the world's first study to assess the psychological and behavioral impact of offering polygenic risk information to women from families at high risk of breast cancer. Findings from this research will provide the basis for the development of a new service model to provide polygenic risk information in familial cancer clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on 27th April 2017 with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Group (Registration no: ACTRN12617000594325; clinical trial URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372743 ).


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Aconselhamento Genético/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 53(7): 711-714, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27862541

RESUMO

AIM: The uptake of influenza vaccination in children with high-risk medical conditions continues to be low in Australia and internationally. We aimed to determine Australian paediatricians' beliefs and practices around the influenza vaccination of children. METHODS: This was conducted as a cross sectional survey of paediatricians from two tertiary paediatric hospitals in Sydney. RESULTS: There were 101 participants. Influenza vaccination was not prioritised compared with other vaccines and clinical issues, with fewer than half of respondents strongly agreeing that influenza vaccination was useful. Paediatricians' knowledge of guidelines and recommendations in this area was suboptimal. Interventions thought most likely to improve vaccine coverage included better education of doctors, greater vaccine availability in outpatient clinics and automated reminder systems. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of influenza vaccine on the standard Australian immunisation schedule may be required to improve vaccine coverage in high-risk children.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Pediatras/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 213, 2016 05 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27193512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migrant travellers who return to their country of origin to visit family and friends (VFR) are less likely to seek travel-related medical care and are less likely to adhere to recommended medications and travel precautions. Through this study, we aimed to get an understanding of the views of stakeholders from community migrant centres and primary care providers on barriers for migrants, particularly from non-English speaking backgrounds, in accessing travel health advice and the strategies that could be used to engage them. METHODS: A qualitative study involving 20 semi-structured interviews was undertaken in Sydney, Australia between January 2013 and September 2014. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Language barriers, a lower perceived risk of travel-related infections and the financial costs of seeking pre-travel health care were nominated as being the key barriers impacting on the uptake of pre-travel health advice and precautions. To overcome pre-existing language barriers, participants advocated for the use of bilingual community educators, community radio, ethnic newspapers and posters in the dissemination of pre-travel health information. CONCLUSIONS: Travel is a major vector of importation of infectious diseases into Australia, and VFR travellers are at high risk of infection. Collaboration between the Government, primary care physicians, migrant community groups and migrants themselves is crucial if we are to be successful in reducing travel-related risks among this subgroup of travellers.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Migrantes/psicologia , Viagem/psicologia , Adulto , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos , Adulto Jovem
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 16: 84, 2016 Mar 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26961353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently the uptake of the influenza vaccine amongst Australian hospital staff remains low. While some staff members choose not to receive the vaccine, others may feel decisional conflict around whether to receive the vaccine or not. Having access to information that is personalized to the staff members' concerns may alleviate this conflict. Our study aimed to explore the attitudes of hospital staff towards an online decision aid (DA), which focuses on influenza and the vaccine. We were also interested to examine whether they accepted the new tool and whether they had any suggestions for improvements. METHODS: Forty-one semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a range of hospital staff from two major public hospitals in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia in 2013. Emails and posters were used to inform staff members about the study. Thematic analysis was performed to explore the attitudes of hospital staff towards the DA. RESULTS: Our participants were well aware of the time/location of the staff vaccination clinics, however very few reported attending or receiving any educational material about the disease or the vaccine. Amongst those who did receive material, they felt that the messages were "dumbed down". There was a mostly positive response to the DA from participants, however they felt that unless it was included as part of mandatory training or orientation, it would be difficult to get staff to use the tool. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have established that education is an important component of an influenza vaccination program. We believe that the decision aid offers an alternative approach to delivering balanced information to staff members, which may reduce workload burdens on administrators and drive up rates.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA