RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lower extremity angiography is one of the most prevalent vascular procedures performed, generally via the contralateral common femoral artery. The use of retrograde pedal artery access to perform angiography has long been reserved as a "bail-out" technique to help cross chronic total occlusions that were not amenable from an antegrade approach. Recently, there have been reports and discussions involving increased utilization of pedal access for primary revascularization. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of pedal access as a primary approach and to propose a novel evaluation of distal perfusion changes associated with interventions using direct pressure measurements. METHODS: A retrospective observational study evaluating all patients who underwent lower extremity angiography via retrograde pedal access between December 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, within a single health-care system spanning 3 hospitals was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural indications, and details were all recorded. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained and recorded upon initial pedal access and post intervention with a pressure transducer connected directly to the access sheath. Outcomes were analyzed with paired t-test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight angiograms using primary pedal access for endovascular intervention were performed during the study period. Most patients were African American (75%) females (57.1%) with hypertension (89.3%), hyperlipidemia (78.6%), diabetes (85.7%), coronary artery disease (64.3%), and current tobacco users (57.1%). The most prevalent indication for angiography was nonhealing wounds (67.9%). Pedal access was mostly achieved via the anterior tibial artery (79%). Sixty-three vessels were treated during the 28 angiograms (averaging 2.3 vessels per angiogram), most commonly the superficial femoral (27%), anterior tibial (25%), and popliteal (22%) arteries. Balloon angioplasty with or without stenting (98.5%) was predominately performed with an overall technical success rate of 94%. The mean preintervention and postintervention pressures were 36.5 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD] 25.7) and 83.4 mm Hg (SD 19.5), respectively. The mean change in pressure after intervention was 46.9 mm Hg (SD 23.3) (Table 3). There was a statistically significant difference detected between preintervention and postintervention pressure (P < 0.001) (Figure 1). There were no major amputations or adverse cardiovascular events at a mean first follow-up duration of 89 days. Six of the total 28 patients (21.4%) underwent repeat endovascular intervention on the ipsilateral extremity within a median of 45 (interquartile range 22.5-62.3) days. CONCLUSIONS: Primary pedal access is a viable option for performing lower extremity angiographic interventions. A significant increase in pedal artery pressure can be observed after angiographic intervention from retrograde pedal artery access. Further studies are necessary to define the clinical prognostic importance of these findings in relation to wound healing rates.
Assuntos
Extremidade Inferior , Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Fatores de Tempo , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Pressão ArterialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure. METHODS: We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1 year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90 days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1 year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.
Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Cicatrização , Humanos , Amputação Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Salvamento de Membro , Reoperação , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Estimativa de Kaplan-MeierRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite societal guidelines that peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) should not be the first-line therapy for intermittent claudication, a significant number of patients will undergo PVI for claudication within 6 months of diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of early PVI for claudication with subsequent interventions. METHODS: We evaluated 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of claudication from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was late intervention, defined as any femoropopliteal PVI performed >6 months after the claudication diagnosis (through June 30, 2021). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of late PVI for claudication patients with early (≤6 months) PVI vs those without early PVI. A hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with late PVIs. RESULTS: A total of 187,442 patients had a new diagnosis of claudication during the study period, of whom 6069 (3.2%) had undergone early PVI. After a median follow-up of 4.39 years (interquartile range, 3.62-5.17 years), 22.5% of the early PVI patients had undergone late PVI vs 3.6% of those without early PVI (P < .001). Patients treated by high use physicians of early PVI (≥2 standard deviations; physician outliers) were more likely to have received late PVI than were patients treated by standard use physician of early PVI (9.8% vs 3.9%; P < .001). Patients who had undergone early PVI (16.4% vs 7.8%) and patients treated by outlier physicians (9.7% vs 8.0%) were more likely to have developed CLTI (P < .001 for both). After adjustment, the patient factors associated with late PVI included receipt of early PVI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.42-7.40) and Black race (vs White; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). The only physician factor associated with late PVI was a majority of practice in an ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory, with an increasing proportion of ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory services associated with significantly increased rates of late PVI (quartile 4 vs quartile 1; aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.41-1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Early PVI after the diagnosis of claudication was associated with higher late PVI rates compared with early nonoperative management. High use physicians of early PVI for claudication performed more late PVIs than did their peers, especially those primarily delivering care in high reimbursement settings. The appropriateness of early PVI for claudication needs critical evaluation, as do the incentives surrounding the delivery of these interventions in ambulatory intervention suites.
Assuntos
Claudicação Intermitente , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas , Idoso , Humanos , Isquemia Crônica Crítica de Membro , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite societal guidelines that peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) should not be the first-line therapy for intermittent claudication, a significant number of patients will undergo PVI for claudication within 6 months of diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of early PVI for claudication with subsequent interventions. METHODS: We evaluated 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of claudication from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was late intervention, defined as any femoropopliteal PVI performed >6 months after the claudication diagnosis (through June 30, 2021). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of late PVI for claudication patients with early (≤6 months) PVI vs those without early PVI. A hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with late PVIs. RESULTS: A total of 187,442 patients had a new diagnosis of claudication during the study period, of whom 6069 (3.2%) had undergone early PVI. After a median follow-up of 4.39 years (interquartile range, 3.62-5.17 years), 22.5% of the early PVI patients had undergone late PVI vs 3.6% of those without early PVI (P < .001). Patients treated by high use physicians of early PVI (≥2 standard deviations; physician outliers) were more likely to have received late PVI than were patients treated by standard use physician of early PVI (9.8% vs 3.9%; P < .001). Patients who had undergone early PVI (16.4% vs 7.8%) and patients treated by outlier physicians (9.7% vs 8.0%) were more likely to have developed CLTI (P < .001 for both). After adjustment, the patient factors associated with late PVI included receipt of early PVI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.42-7.40) and Black race (vs White; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). The only physician factor associated with late PVI was a majority of practice in an ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory, with an increasing proportion of ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory services associated with significantly increased rates of late PVI (quartile 4 vs quartile 1; aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.41-1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Early PVI after the diagnosis of claudication was associated with higher late PVI rates compared with early nonoperative management. High use physicians of early PVI for claudication performed more late PVIs than did their peers, especially those primarily delivering care in high reimbursement settings. The appropriateness of early PVI for claudication needs critical evaluation, as do the incentives surrounding the delivery of these interventions in ambulatory intervention suites.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia Crônica Crítica de Membro , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Medicare , Salvamento de Membro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) is a rare autoimmune, connective tissue disorder. Perioral fibrosis is a local cutaneous complication, negatively impacting functional capabilities and aesthetic satisfaction. Fat grafting has been postulated to aid in the management of SSc fibrosis thanks to stem cell enrichment. This technique's success has been demonstrated using different graft origin sites and different injection targets. We aim to demonstrate our SSc patients' success using abdominal fat and perioral target. METHODS: We queried our records for patients with preexisting SSc who underwent incisional release and fat grafting for perioral fibrosis from 2018 to 2021. For perioral release, a semisharp cannula was tunneled under the vermilion border into the vermilion and along the skin. For grafting, cannulas were used to infiltrate the fat with a retrograde filling technique in a radial-fanning manner. Their autoimmune diagnosis, anesthetic risk assessment, systemic disease complications, and degree of presenting symptoms were reviewed along with their postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2021, 16 patients diagnosed with SSc were treated with incisional release and fat grafting for the management of perioral fibrosis. Of the SSc patients, 8 presented with limited SSc, and 8 presented with diffuse SSc. The mean patient age was 54.31 years. All SSc patients presented with functional symptoms with the most common concern (n = 9) being "decreased mouth opening." Other common complaints were "difficulty eating" (n = 3) or "difficulty drinking" (n = 2). Some patients (n = 11) also presented with cosmetic concerns with "perioral rhytids" being the most common (n = 6). The mean number of systemic complications, at the time of presentation, was 3.06. The mean anesthetic risk assessment was 2.44. The average amount of fat grafted intraoperatively was 14.89 mL. Two patients with SSc required regrafting. For one patient, this was part of the original treatment plan and for the other due to fat resorption. Patients who followed up reported improved functionality and were pleased aesthetically. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with perioral fibrosis due to SSc can benefit from autologous fat grafting. Incisional release in combination with fat grafting can enhance procedure outcomes. This technique provides beneficial functional and aesthetic outcomes. Patients with both diffuse and limited disease are appropriate candidates for this procedure.
Assuntos
Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/complicações , Fibrose , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/cirurgia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Pele/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite limited evidence supporting atherectomy alone over stenting/angioplasty as the index peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), the use of atherectomy has rapidly increased in recent years. We previously identified a wide distribution of atherectomy practice patterns among US physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of index atherectomy with reintervention. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries who underwent elective first-time femoropopliteal PVI for claudication between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Subsequent PVI reinterventions were examined through June 30, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare rates of PVI reinterventions for patients who received index atherectomy versus nonatherectomy procedures. Reintervention rates were also described for physicians by their overall atherectomy use (by quartile). A hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate patient and physician-level characteristics associated with reinterventions. RESULTS: A total of 15,246 patients underwent an index PVI for claudication in 2019, of which 59.7% were atherectomy. After a median of 603 days (interquartile range, 77-784 days) of follow-up, 41.2% of patients underwent a PVI reintervention, including 48.9% of patients who underwent index atherectomy versus 29.8% of patients who underwent index nonatherectomy (P < .001). Patients treated by high physician users of atherectomy (quartile 4) received more reinterventions than patients treated by standard physician users (quartiles 1-3) (56.8% vs 39.6%; P < .001). After adjustment, patient factors association with PVI reintervention included receipt of index atherectomy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.46), Black race (vs White; aHR; 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34), diabetes (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21), and urban residence (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22). Physician factors associated with reintervention included male sex (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.04), high-volume PVI practices (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37), and physicians with a high use of index atherectomy (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74). Vascular surgeons had a lower risk of PVI reintervention than cardiologists (vs vascular; aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), radiologists (aHR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.83), and other specialties (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.11). The location of services delivered was not associated with reintervention (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of atherectomy as an index PVI for claudication is associated with higher PVI reintervention rates compared with nonatherectomy procedures. Similarly, high physician users of atherectomy perform more PVI reinterventions than their peers. The appropriateness of using atherectomy for initial treatment of claudication needs critical reevaluation.
Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica , Idoso , Aterectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/etiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/cirurgia , Masculino , Medicare , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/etiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in medical care and surgical techniques, major amputation continues to be associated with risks for morbidity and mortality. Palliative care programs may help alleviate symptoms and align patients' goals and the care they receive with their treatment plan. Access to specialty palliative medicine among vascular surgery patients is limited. Here, we aim to describe utilization and impact of formal palliative care consultation for patients receiving major amputations. METHODS: This is a retrospective, secondary data analysis project examining the records of patients who received major amputations by the vascular surgery team between 2016 and 2021. Demographics, operative, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome variable was palliative care consultation during index admission (the admission in which the patient received their first major amputation). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and code status at the time of death, if death occurred during the index admission, location of death, and discharge destination. RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 292 patients (39% female, 53% Black, mean age 63), who received a lower extremity major amputation. Most patients (65%) underwent amputation for limb ischemia. One-year mortality after first major amputation was 29%. Average length of stay was 20 days. Thirty-five (12%) patients received a palliative care consultation during the hospitalization in which they received their first major amputation. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive a palliative care consult during their index admission if they had undergone a thorough knee amputation (OR = 2.89, P = 0.039) or acute limb ischemia (OR = 4.25, P = 0.005). A formal palliative care consult was associated with lower likelihood of in-hospital death and increased likelihood of discharge to hospice (OR = 0.248, P = 0.0167, OR = 1.283, P < 0.001).There were no statistically significant differences in the code status of patients who received a palliative care consultation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large academic medical center, palliative medicine consultation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among patients with advanced vascular disease and major limb amputation. These data will hopefully stimulate much needed prospective research to develop and test tools to identify patients in need and derive evidence about the impact of palliative care services.
Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Tempo de Internação , Resultado do Tratamento , Amputação Cirúrgica , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguíneaAssuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Embolia Pulmonar , Trombocitopenia , Trombose , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Fragmentos de Peptídeos , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/terapia , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Finding a perfect epidermal transplant remains a holy grail of burn surgery. The epidermis is a site of stem cells that allows for the epithelial regeneration. The use of CEA for the treatment of major burns was first reported in 1981. CEA requires specialized skills; thus, reports from different burn-centers have shown mixed results. Comparing our modern data with past data shows how this field has advanced while maintaining institutional control. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted between 01/01/1988-12/31/2021 for massive burns that were managed with CEA. Patients were divided into pre-defined groups: G1(early-era)=1988-1999, G2(pre-modern-era)=2000-2010, and G3(modern-era)=2011-2021. We compared demographics, %TBSA, presence of inhalation-injury, LOS, complications, and mortality. We treated 52 patients with CEA during the study period. In the modern-era, we found 11 patients; in the pre-modern-era, 10; and in the early-era, 31. Injury characteristics, including %TBSA and the presence of inhalation-injury, were not significantly different between the groups. We observed lower mortality rates in G1 and G3 (G1:20% vs. G2:42% vs. G3:27%, p<0.05), although the predicted mortality was not significantly different between the groups (G1:50% vs. G2:47% vs. G3:49%, NS). Patients in G1 also had a shorter hospital LOS, in days, (G1:90 vs. G2:127 vs. G3:205, p<0.05). Finally, the surface-area grafted per patient was the highest in G2 (G1:2,000cm2 vs. G2:4,187cm2 vs. G3:4,090cm2, p<0.01). CEA has not gained popularity despite proven positive outcomes. Our retrospective analysis showed that CEA should be considered as a treatment option for patients with large burns, given proper training and infrastructure.
RESUMO
Pneumoperitoneum is the abnormal presence of free air in the peritoneal cavity. Oftentimes, it is a surgical emergency requiring exploratory laparotomy as most cases of pneumoperitoneum are due to perforated hollow viscus. However, not all pneumoperitoneum cases are surgical; nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum can arise from thoracic, abdominal, gynecologic, and other causes. We present a case of a 35-year-old male who developed a non-surgical pneumoperitoneum in the setting of drug overdose. The patient underwent robot-assisted diagnostic laparoscopy without findings of perforation or other pathology. Resolution of pneumoperitoneum was evidenced on follow-up computed tomography scan. This case emphasizes the importance of diagnostic laparoscopy in the setting of a confusing clinical picture and the feasibility of utilizing the robotic approach in hemodynamically stable patients.
RESUMO
Burn patients require changing wound care routines dependent on wound characteristics and operative interventions. Order discrepancies on electronic medical systems and poor communication between providers leads to incorrect wound care treatment which can be harmful to the complex burn patient. By dedicating a daily wound care discussion for each patient involving integral components of the team: physician, charge nurse, and wound care technicians, enhanced communication amongst team members and improved patient care was noted. A single-center burn unit conducted pre- and postintervention survey of nursing staff measuring various components of wound care. The time spent on the wound care discussions were measured daily. Additional time required to conduct the rounds were minimal with nurse reported increased clarification in patient care without additional work burden. Thus, focused wound care meetings assist with communication between providers, clarification of wound care needs, and avoidance of errors without increasing strain on the team.
Assuntos
Queimaduras , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente , Humanos , Unidades de Queimados , Queimaduras/terapia , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) and renal arteriovenous fistula are rare vascular pathologies with reported incidences of 0.3% to 1.0% and 0.04% in the general population, respectively. We describe a 61-year-old Caucasian man who presented to the hospital with symptoms of right flank pain. Imaging demonstrated a right RAA with concurrent hilar RAA and renal arteriovenous fistula. He ultimately underwent an open right nephrectomy, ligation of the fistula, and bovine patch repair of the aortic defect.
RESUMO
Reports of calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arteriolopathy associated with acral and gastrointestinal involvement are rare. We describe a 36-year-old white woman with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis after failed kidney and pancreas transplantation who developed dry gangrene of bilateral digits, osteomyelitis, and small bowel ischemia within several months of each presentation. She had multiple débridements of a septic right ankle. Computed tomography angiography showed severe vascular calcification and pneumatosis intestinalis. She underwent intestinal resection for gangrenous small bowel. A multidisciplinary approach with aggressive medical and surgical management may improve survival. Our case and the literature confirm the high morbidity of patients with calciphylaxis and vascular complications. Careful follow-up remains necessary for diagnosis and management to prevent complication, infection, and death.
RESUMO
Most bacteria use an indirect pathway to generate aminoacylated glutamine and/or asparagine tRNAs. Clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with increased rates of error in gene translation (mistranslation) involving the indirect tRNA-aminoacylation pathway have increased tolerance to the first-line antibiotic rifampicin. Here, we identify that the aminoglycoside kasugamycin can specifically decrease mistranslation due to the indirect tRNA pathway. Kasugamycin but not the aminoglycoside streptomycin, can limit emergence of rifampicin resistance in vitro and increases mycobacterial susceptibility to rifampicin both in vitro and in a murine model of infection. Moreover, despite parenteral administration of kasugamycin being unable to achieve the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration, kasugamycin alone was able to significantly restrict growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. These data suggest that pharmacologically reducing mistranslation may be a novel mechanism for targeting bacterial adaptation.
Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Biossíntese de Proteínas/efeitos dos fármacos , Rifampina/farmacologia , Aminoacilação , Aminoglicosídeos/administração & dosagem , Aminoglicosídeos/farmacocinética , Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Edeína/farmacologia , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Camundongos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Especificidade de Órgãos , RNA de Transferência/metabolismo , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Estreptomicina/administração & dosagem , Estreptomicina/farmacocinética , Estreptomicina/farmacologia , Estreptomicina/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Tuberculose/patologiaRESUMO
Many mammalian species naturally undergo hibernation, a process that is associated with drastic changes in metabolism and systemic physiology. Their ability to retain an undamaged central nervous system during severely reduced cerebral blood flow has been studied for possible therapeutic application in human ischemic stroke. By inducing a less extreme 'hibernation-like' state, it has been hypothesized that similar neuroprotective effects reduce ischemia-mediated tissue damage in stroke patients. This manuscript includes reviews and evaluations of: (1) true hibernation, (2) hibernation-like state and its neuroprotective characteristics, (3) the preclinical and clinical methods for induction of artificial hibernation (i.e., therapeutic hypothermia, phenothiazine drugs, and ethanol), and (4) the mechanisms by which cerebral ischemia leads to tissue damage and how the above-mentioned induction methods function to inhibit those processes.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Hibernação/fisiologia , Neuroproteção/fisiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Animais , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Hibernação/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Neuroproteção/efeitos dos fármacos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been shown to result in excellent relief of symptoms and improved quality of life (QOL) despite a high radiographically identified recurrence rate. Because there is no uniform definition of PEH recurrence, it is difficult to compare studies reporting on this. This study attempts to introduce consistency to the definition of PEH recurrence based on correlation of symptoms and radiographic findings. METHODS: This is an analysis of data derived from an ongoing prospective study. From April 2009 to December 2012, we enrolled 101 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic PEH repair with bioprosthesis buttressed over a primary cruroplasty. A validated gastroesophageal reflux disease-specific QOL tool was administered to patients before, and at 2 and 12 months postoperatively. Upper gastrointestinal barium contrast examination (UGI) was performed at 1 year. RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 13 were not available for follow-up, 58 reached the 1-year milestone for interval UGI, and 1 patient required reoperation for symptomatic recurrent PEH. There was no relationship between total QOL score and radiographic recurrent hernia (RRH); however, significant deterioration in many symptoms was seen in RRH > 2 cm. Based on these findings, we defined recurrence as RRH > 2 cm and calculated our recurrence rate as 28% (n = 16). CONCLUSION: Our analysis of symptom scores after laparoscopic PEH repair suggests that significant worsening occurs with RRH > 2 cm. Given that there is no consistent description of recurrent PEH, we suggest this as a possible standardized definition. Overall, patients with recurrent PEHs continue to experience excellent QOL and rarely require reoperation.