Implementation and first outcomes of a novel standard operating procedure for preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography screening in course of atrial arrhythmia ablation.

AIMS: Preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) screening for left atrial (LA) thrombi is the standard of care in many centres performing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, TEE imposes procedural risks for patients and is often challenging to implement in daily practice, besides causing patient discomfort. At our centre, a novel standard operating procedure (SOP) was implemented, aiming to identify patients that can be exempt from TEE screening. We aimed to assess whether this screening approach may reduce preprocedural TEEs without imposing patients of higher risks for cerebrovascular events (CVEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 1874 consecutive patients treated by catheter ablation of LA arrhythmias between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed. A cohort of 937 patients, where decision to perform TEE screening was based on a new SOP (considering rhythm at admission, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and sufficient anticoagulation), was compared to a matched cohort receiving TEE before every procedure. Number of performed TEEs and incidences of CVEs were compared. Implementation of the new SOP led to a 67% reduction in TEEs performed (old SOP: 933 vs. new SOP: 305). No significant differences between the groups were detected regarding transitory ischaemic attack (old SOP: 5 vs. new SOP: 3; P = 0.48) and stroke (no events). No solid thrombi were detected during TEE screening. CONCLUSION: The number of preprocedural screening TEEs before AF ablation procedures can be safely reduced by applying risk stratification based on rhythm at admission and CHA2DS2-VASc score, if anticoagulation was performed properly.

Optimizing ablation duration using dormant conduction to reveal incomplete isolation with the second generation cryoballoon: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacy of cryoballoon ablation depends on balloon-tissue contact and ablation duration. Prolonged duration may increase extracardiac complications. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal additional ablation duration after acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to three groups according to additional ablation duration (90, 120, or 150 seconds) after acute PVI (time-to-isolation). Primary outcome was reconnection/dormant conduction (DC) after a 30 minutes waiting period. If present, additional 240 seconds ablations were performed. Ablations without time-to-isolation <90 seconds, esophageal temperature <18°C or decreased phrenic nerve capture were aborted. Patients were followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Seventy-five study patients (60 ± 11 years, 48 male) were included. Reconnection/DC per vein significantly decreased (22%, 6% and 4%) while aborted ablations remained stable (respectively 4, 5, and 7%) among the 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups. A shorter cryo-application time, longer time-to-isolation, higher balloon temperature and unsuccessful ablations predicted reconnection/DC. Freedom of atrial fibrillation was, respectively, 52, 56, and 72% in 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups ( P = 0.27), while repeated procedures significantly decreased from 36% to 4% ( P = 0.041) in the longer duration group compared to shorter duration group (150 seconds vs 90 seconds group). In multivariate Cox-regression only reconnection/DC predicted recurrence. CONCLUSION: Prolonging ablation duration after time-to-isolation significantly decreased reconnection/DC and repeated procedures, while recurrences and complications rates were similar. In a time-to-isolation approach, an additional ablation of 150 seconds ablation is the most appropriate.

Impact of left atrial box surface ratio on the recurrence after ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) is a well-known substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance. Isolation of the posterior wall between the pulmonary veins (box lesion) may improve ablation success. Box lesion surface area size varies depending on the individual anatomy. This retrospective study evaluates the influence of box lesion surface area as a ratio of total LA surface area (box surface ratio) on arrhythmia recurrence. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients with persistent AF (63 ± 11 years, 53 men) undergoing computed tomography (CT) imaging and ablation procedure consisting of a first box lesion were included in this study. Box lesion surface area was measured on electroanatomical maps and total LA surface area was derived from CT. Patients were followed with 24-h electrocardiography and exercise tests at 3, 6, and 12 months after AF ablation. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as any AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) beyond 3 months without antiarrhythmic drugs. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 13 (interquartile range = 10-17) months, 42 (60%) patients had AF/AT recurrence. Multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis showed that a larger box surface ratio protected against recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.690-0.955; P = 0.012). Left atrial volume index (HR = 1.01 [0.990-1.024, P = 0.427] and a history of mitral valve surgery (HR = 2.90; 95% CI = 0.970-8.693; P = 0.057) were not associated with AF recurrence in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: A larger box lesion surface area as a ratio of total LA surface area is protective for AF/AT recurrence after ablation for persistent AF.

Validation of a prediction model for early reconnection after cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND: We previously developed an early reconnection/dormant conduction (ERC) prediction model for cryoballoon ablation to avoid a 30-min waiting period with adenosine infusion. We now aimed to validate this model based on time to isolation, number of unsuccessful cryo-applications, and nadir balloon temperature. METHODS: Consecutive atrial fibrillation patients who underwent their first cryoballoon ablation in 2018-2019 at the Leiden University Medical Center were included. Model performance at the previous and at a new optimal cutoff value was determined. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included (85.57% paroxysmal AF, 139 male, median age 61 years (IQR 53-69)). ERC was found in 35 of 201 included patients (17.41%) and in 41 of 774 veins (5.30%). In the present study population, the previous cutoff value of - 6.7 provided a sensitivity of 37.84% (previously 70%) and a specificity of 89.07% (previously 86%). Shifting the cutoff value to - 7.2 in both study populations resulted in a sensitivity of 72.50% and 72.97% and a specificity of 78.22% and 78.63% in data from the previous and present study respectively. Negative predictive values were 96.55% and 98.11%. Applying the model on the 101 patients of the present study with all necessary data for all veins resulted in 43 out of 101 patients (43%) not requiring a 30-min waiting period with adenosine testing. Two patients (2%) with ERC would have been missed when applying the model. CONCLUSIONS: The previously established ERC prediction model performs well, recommending its use for centers routinely using adenosine testing following PVI.

Predicting early reconnection after cryoballoon ablation with procedural and biophysical parameters.

BACKGROUND: Predicting early reconnection/dormant conduction (ERC) immediately after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can avoid a waiting period with adenosine testing. OBJECTIVE: To identify procedural and biophysical parameters predicting ERC. METHODS: Consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing a first cryoballoon ablation (Arctic Front Advance) between 2014 and 2017 were included. ERC was defined as manifest or dormant pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection with adenosine 30 minutes after PVI. Time to isolation (TTI), balloon temperatures (BT), and thawing times were evaluated as potential predictors for ERC. Based on a multivariable model, cut-off-values were defined and a formula was constructed to be used in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients (60 ± 10 years, 96 male, 95% paroxysmal AF) were included. ERC was found in 40 (29%) patients (ERC group) and in 53 of 575 (9%) veins. Procedural and total ablation time and the number of unsuccessful freezes were significantly longer/higher in the ERC group compared to the non-ERC group (150 ± 40 vs 125 ± 34 minutes; 24 ± 5 vs 17 ± 4 minutes, and 38% vs 24%, respectively (P = .028). Multivariable analysis showed that a higher nadir balloon temperature (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17 [1.09-1.23, P < .001), a higher number of unsuccessful freezes (HR 1.69 [1.15-2.49], P = .008) and a longer TTI (HR 1.02 [1.01-1.03], P < .001) were independently associated with ERC, leading to the following formula: 0.02 × TTI + 0.5 × number of unsuccessful freezes + 0.2 × nadir BT with a cut-off value of ≤-6.7 to refrain from a waiting period with adenosine testing. CONCLUSION: Three easily available parameters were associated with ERC. Using these parameters during ablation can help to avoid a 30-minute waiting period and adenosine testing.

Incidence and Clinical Significance of Cerebral Embolism During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With Duty-Cycled Phased-Radiofrequency Versus Cooled-Radiofrequency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to randomly compare the incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism (ACE) between the second-generation pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC Gold) and the irrigated Thermocool catheter. BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the PVAC is associated with ACE. The PVAC Gold was designed to avoid this complication. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to PVI with the PVAC Gold or Thermocool catheter. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in the days before and after ablation and repeated after 3 months in case of a new lesion. Monitoring for microembolic signals (MES) was performed by using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Parameters of coagulation were determined before, during, and after ablation. Neuropsychological tests and questionnaires were applied 10 days before and 3 months after ablation. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the study (mean age 61 ± 9 years; 43 male subjects; CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category] score 1.6 ± 1.2; international normalized ratio 2.7 ± 0.5; activated clotting time 374 ± 24 s; p > 0.05 for all parameters). Procedural duration was shorter in the PVAC Gold group (140 ± 34 vs. 207 ± 44 min; p < 0.001). Eight (23%; 7 infarcts) patients in the PVAC Gold group exhibited a new ACE, compared with 2 (6%; no infarcts) patients in the Thermocool group (p = 0.042). Median number of MES was higher in the PVAC Gold group (1,111 [interquartile range, 715-2,234] vs. 787 [interquartile range, 532-1,053]; p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups regarding coagulation and neuropsychological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: PVI with the new PVAC Gold was associated with a higher incidence of ACE/cerebral infarcts and number of MES. Both catheters induced a comparable procoagulant state. Because there were no measurable differences in neuropsychological status, the clinical significance of ACE remains unclear. (Cerebral Embolism [CE] in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation [AF] [CE-AF]; NCT01361295).

The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation currently referred for catheter ablation is increasing. However, the number of trained operators and the capacity of many electrophysiology labs are limited. Accordingly, a steeper learning curve and technical advances for efficient and safe ablation are desirable. During the last decades several catheter-based ablation devices have been developed and adapted to improve not only lesion durability, but also safety profiles, to shorten procedure time and to reduce radiation exposure. The goal of this review is to summarise the reported incidence of complications, considering device-related specific aspects for point-by-point, multi-electrode and balloon-based devices for pulmonary vein isolation. Recent technical and procedural developments aimed at reducing procedural risks and complications rates will be reviewed. In addition, the impact of technical advances on procedural outcome, procedural length and radiation exposure will be discussed.

Effect of Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking on Radiation Exposure during Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Comparison of Four ablation systems.

BACKGROUND: A novel non-fluoroscopic catheter tracking system (Mediguide) can be used in combination with a 3D mapping system for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the benefit on radiation exposure of the Mediguide system compared to other ablation systems is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive 73 patients (51 men; 59±11 years; 60 paroxysmal AF) undergoing pulmonary vein isolation by the same operator. Radiation time, radiation effective dose, procedure time, AF recurrence after ablation, and procedure-related complications were compared among 4 different ablation systems. RESULTS: Mediguide was used in 16 patients (group A), CARTO™ in 17 (group B), Cryoballoon in 30 (group C), and Multi-electrode Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter (PVAC) in 10 (group D). Although procedure time was shorter in patients with Cryoballoon (median 110 [interquartile range 99-120] min) and PVAC (123 [112-146] min) compared to those with Mediguide (181 [168-214] min) and CARTO (179 [160-195] min) (P<0.001), radiation exposure time and effective dose were decreased in patients with Mediguide compared to the other ablation systems (A: 5 [3-6] min; B: 14 [11-16] min; C: 14 [11-18] min; D: 20 [16-24] min, P<0.001 and A: 1.1 [0.8-2.0] mSv; B: 2.5 [1.3-3.8] mSv; C: 2.0 [1.4-2.5] mSv; D: 1.7 [1.4-3.6] mSv, P=0.015, respectively). AF recurrence rates and procedure-related complications were comparable among the 4 groups. CONCLUSION: The Mediguide system reduces radiation exposure compared to other ablation systems without increasing AF recurrence or procedure-related complications.