The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in DLBCL: From Early-Stage to Refractory Disease.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Historically, radiation therapy (RT) served as the primary treatment modality for patients with localized disease. While still an option for select patients who are not candidates for systemic therapy, RT is currently used most frequently as a consolidation treatment after chemoimmunotherapy. Consolidation RT is most commonly recommended after an abbreviated course of systemic therapy in patients who have bulky disease or multiple risk factors, or in the setting of a partial response. Consolidation RT is also appropriate in some patients with advanced DLBCL, including those presenting with bulky disease (≥7.5 cm). While many patients achieve sustained remissions after first-line therapy, up to 50% of patients with DLBCL will eventually relapse. The most common salvage options include second-line chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. RT can be used in both settings to optimize clinical outcomes. This includes consolidation RT in patients with localized presentations or bulky disease in the setting of ASCT and bridging RT in select patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. RT is also a valuable modality in any patient with symptomatic disease requiring palliation.

Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. With the implementation of lung cancer screening, the number and proportion of patients diagnosed with early-stage disease are anticipated to increase. Surgery is currently the standard of care for patients with operable stage I NSCLC. However, promising outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with inoperable disease has led to interest in directly comparing SBRT and surgery in operable patients. Unfortunately, early randomized trials comparing surgery and SBRT closed early because of poor accrual. In this article, the nuances of surgery and SBRT for early-stage NSCLC are reviewed. Furthermore, retrospective and prospective analyses of SBRT in early-stage NSCLC are discussed, and active randomized trials comparing these 2 approaches are described. Cancer 2018;124:667-78. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Smoking history predicts for increased risk of second primary lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the most important risk factor for the development of lung cancer. The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of smoking on the development of second primary lung cancers (SPLCs) and other clinical outcomes after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC at the study institution from 1995 through 2008 were identified. Rates of SPLC were analyzed based on smoking status and pack-year exposure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for SPLC. Overall survival, local control, distant metastases, and postoperative mortality were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 1484 patients were identified, including 98 never-smokers. The incidence of SPLC at 3 years, 5 years, and 8 years was 5%, 8%, and 16%, respectively. Only 1 never-smoker developed an SPLC. On multivariate analysis, which was restricted to ever-smokers with pack-years as a continuous variable, smoking history was found to be the only independent risk factor for SPLC (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.16 [P = .031]), corresponding to an 8% increased risk per 10 pack-year exposure. There were no differences in rates of local control or distant metastases based on smoking status. There was a trend toward lower postoperative mortality in never-smokers compared with ever-smokers (0% vs 3.3%; P = .069). Overall survival was found to be significantly worse for current smokers compared with former and never-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: SPLCs are rare in never-smokers. Increasing tobacco exposure is associated with a higher risk of SPLC in patients with a history of smoking. Current smokers have an increased risk of mortality whereas former and never-smokers have comparable survival.

Improving outcomes in advanced DLBCL: systemic approaches and radiotherapy.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately half of patients will present with advanced (stage III/IV) disease. The cornerstone of treatment is a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, most commonly R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone). Efforts to improve upon R-CHOP-including more chemotherapy cycles, dose-dense chemotherapy, alternative drug combinations, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant, and maintenance rituximab-have generally proved unsuccessful. There is a growing body of retrospective and prospective data, however, suggesting a benefit for consolidation radiation therapy (RT) in select patients with advanced DLBCL. Consolidation RT has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with advanced DLBCL generally, and in specific instances including initially bulky disease, bone involvement, or in the setting of a partial response to systemic therapy. In these settings consolidation RT is highly efficacious at achieving local disease control and improving overall outcomes.

Optimizing Management of the Central Nervous System in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes and patterns of failure, specifically in regards to the central nervous system (CNS), in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens. Methods and Materials: All adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning regimens treated from 1995 to 2020 at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated. Various patient, disease, and treatment-related factors were collected, including CNS prophylaxis and treatment interventions. Clinical outcomes, including freedom from CNS relapse, were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients with and without CNS disease at presentation. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients with ALL were included the analysis (myeloablative, 110; nonmyeloablative, 5). Of the 110 patients undergoing a myeloablative regimen, most (n = 100) did not have CNS disease before transplant. For this subgroup, peritransplant intrathecal chemotherapy was administered in 76% (median of 4 cycles) and 10 received a radiation boost to the CNS (cranial irradiation, 5; craniospinal, 5). Only 4 failed in the CNS after transplant, none of whom received a CNS boost, with freedom from CNS relapse at 5 years of 95% (95% confidence interval (CI), 84-98%). Freedom from CNS relapse was not improved with a radiation therapy boost to the CNS (100% vs 94%, P = .59). Overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality at 5 years were 50%, 42%, and 36%, respectively. Among the 10 patients with CNS disease before transplant, 10 of 10 received intrathecal chemotherapy and 7 received a radiation boost to the CNS (cranial irradiation, 1; craniospinal, 6) and none subsequently failed in the CNS. A nonmyeloablative HSCT was pursued for 5 patients because of advanced age or comorbidities. None of these patients had prior CNS disease or received a CNS or testicular boost, and none failed in the CNS after transplant. Conclusions: A CNS boost may not be necessary in patients with high-risk ALL without CNS disease undergoing a myeloablative HSCT using a TBI-based regimen. Favorable outcomes were observed with a low-dose craniospinal boost in patients with CNS disease.

Divergent Interpretations of Imaging After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Conflicting information from health care providers contributes to anxiety among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate discordant interpretations of follow-up imaging studies after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between radiologists and radiation oncologists. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2007 to 2018 at Duke University Medical Center were included. Radiology interpretations of follow-up computed tomography (CT) chest or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans and the corresponding radiation oncology interpretations in follow-up notes from the medical record were assessed. Based on language used, interpretations were scored as concerning for progression (Progression), neutral differential listed (Neutral Differential), or favor stability/postradiation changes (Stable). Neutral Differential required that malignancy was specifically listed as a possibility in the differential. Encounters were categorized as discordant when either radiology or radiation oncology interpreted the surveillance imaging as Progression when the other interpreted the imaging study as Stable or Neutral Differential. The incidence of discordant interpretations was the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 139 patients were treated with SBRT and had available follow-up CT or PET-CT imaging for the analysis. Median follow-up was 61 months and the median number of follow-up encounters per patient was 3. Of 534 encounters evaluated, 25 (4.7%) had overtly discordant interpretations of imaging studies. This most commonly arose when radiology felt the imaging study showed Progression but radiation oncology favored Stable or Neutral Differential (24/25, 96%). No patient or treatment variables were found to be significantly associated with discordant interpretations on univariate analysis including type of scan (CT 22/489, 4.5%; PET-CT 3/45, 7%; P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance imaging after lung SBRT is often interpreted differently by radiologists and radiation oncologists, but overt discordance was relatively low at our institution. Providers should be aware of differences in interpretation patterns that may contribute to increased patient distress.

Long-term outcomes with reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy and a stereotactic radiosurgery boost for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Treatment approaches are historically associated with neurotoxicity, particularly with high-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). We hypothesized that reduced dose-WBRT (rd-WBRT) followed by a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) boost could provide durable disease control without significant adverse effects. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed PCNSL patients treated with rd-WBRT plus an SRS boost at Duke University between 2008 and 2021. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: We identified 23 patients with pathologically confirmed PCNSL. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years (Q1Q3: 52-74) and median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 80 (Q1Q3: 70-80). Median follow-up was 21 months. Median doses for rd-WBRT and SRS were 23.4 Gy (Q1Q3: 23.4-23.4) and 12 Gy (Q1Q3: 12-12.5), respectively. The cumulative incidence of intracranial progression at 2 years was 23% (95% CI: 8-42). Six patients (26%) developed distant radiographic progression while 2 patients (9%) developed both distant and local progression. Ten patients (44%) were alive without progression at last follow-up. By Kaplan-Meier estimate, the 2-year OS was 69% (95% CI: 46-84). There were no reported grade 3 + radiation-induced toxicities. Conclusions: The combination of rd-WBRT with an SRS boost appears well-tolerated with durable intracranial control. This approach may represent a treatment option for select patients, such as those with progressive or refractory disease. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and determine whether this approach could be incorporated into consolidation strategies.

Combined-modality therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: maintaining high cure rates while minimizing risks.

Multiple randomized studies have demonstrated that chemotherapy, most commonly ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine), followed by consolidation radiation therapy is the most effective treatment program for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. With a combined-modality approach, the great majority of patients are cured of their disease. It is also apparent that both chemotherapy and radiation therapy can increase the risk of complications in the decades following treatment, with second cancers and cardiac disease being the most common. Most studies,evaluating such risks primarily include patients treated in decades past with what are now considered outdated approaches, including high-dose, wide-field radiation therapy. The treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma has evolved significantly, particularly in regard to radiation therapy. In combination with chemotherapy, much lower doses and smaller fields are employed, with success equivalent to that achieved using older methods. Many studies have shown a significant decline in both the rates of second cancers and the risk of cardiac disease with low-dose radiation confined to the original extent of disease. In favorable patients, as few as 2 cycles of ABVD have been shown to be effective. The current combined-modality approach seeks to maintain high cure rates but minimize risks by optimizing both chemotherapy and radiation therapy

The Effect of Various Dose Normalization Strategies When Implementing Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation Dose Calculation for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning.

PURPOSE: To explore implications of various plan normalizations when implementing a linear Boltzmann transport equation solver dose calculation algorithm (LBTE) for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-seven plans originally calculated with a convolution-superposition algorithm (CS) were recalculated with LBTE and normalized in 3 ways: prescription covering 95% of planning target volume (PTV), 99% of internal target volume (ITV), and keeping the original planned PTV coverage. Effect on delivered dose after implementing the new algorithm was quantified using change in total monitor units for each renormalization strategy. Treatment planning system-reported changes in PTV, ITV, and organ at risk (OAR) doses were also quantified, along with the feasibility of LBTE plans to meet institutional OAR planning objectives. RESULTS: LBTE renormalization resulted in monitor unit increases of 7.0 ± 8.8%, 0.31 ± 5.8%, and 7.9 ± 8.6% when normalizing to the PTV D95%, ITV D99%, and planned coverage, respectively. When normalizing to PTV D95%, the LBTE reported increased PTV and ITV D1% (Gy) relative to CS (median, 3.4% and 3.2%, respectively), and normalizing to ITV D99% showed a median 1.9% decrease. For LBTE plans, reported OAR doses were increased when normalizing to PTV D95% or planned coverage (median chest wall V30 Gy [cc] increase of 0.85 and 1.7 cc, respectively) and normalizing to ITV D99% resulted in decreased dose (median chest wall V30 Gy [cc] decrease of 1.8 cc). LBTE plans normalized to PTV D95% showed inferior ability to meet the OAR objectives, but reoptimizing kept the objectives manageable while maintaining PTV coverage. CONCLUSIONS: When transitioning from CS to LBTE dose calculation for lung SBRT, maintaining a PTV coverage-based normalization generally results in increased dose delivered relative to CS and increased reported target and OAR dose. In cases where PTV normalization results in unacceptably high doses to targets or OARs, normalizing based on ITV coverage can be considered to maintain similar target dose as CS.

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival Benefit of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a nomogram that predicts overall survival (OS) for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with biopsy-proven T1-T2N0 NCSLC treated with SABR (30-70 Gy in 1-10 fractions with biologically effective dose ≥100 Gy10) or observation between 2004 and 2015 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were identified. Propensity score was used to match SABR and observation cohorts on prognostic demographic and clinicopathologic factors identified by logistic regression. Using backward selection, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard was identified predicting 2- and 5-year OS via a nomogram. Model prediction accuracy was assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and integrated area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22,073 adults met inclusion criteria and 4418 matched pairs (total n = 8836) were identified for nomogram development. The factors most strongly associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis included younger age (HR 0.82 by decade, P < .001), female sex (HR 0.81, P < .001), lower comorbidity index (HR 0.65 for 0 vs. ≥3, P < .001), smaller tumor size (HR 0.60 for ≤3 cm vs. 5.1-7 cm, P < .001), adenocarcinoma histology (P < .001), and receipt of SABR (P < .001). Interaction between SABR and histology was significantly associated with OS (P = .017). Relative to adenocarcinoma, patients with squamous cell carcinoma who were observed (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.33-1.56) or treated with SABR (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35) had significantly worse OS. The nomogram demonstrated fair accuracy for predicting OS, with an integrated time-dependent AUC of 0.694 over the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This nomogram estimates OS at 2 and 5 years based on whether medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC patients receive SABR or elect for observation. Incorporation of other variables not captured within the NCDB may improve the model accuracy.

Hyperpolarized 129Xe Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Functional Avoidance Treatment Planning in Thoracic Radiation Therapy: A Comparison of Ventilation- and Gas Exchange-Guided Treatment Plans.

PURPOSE: To present a methodology to use pulmonary gas exchange maps to guide functional avoidance treatment planning in radiation therapy (RT) and evaluate its efficacy compared with ventilation-guided treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Before receiving conventional RT for non-small cell lung cancer, 11 patients underwent hyperpolarized 129Xe gas exchange magnetic resonance imaging to map the distribution of xenon in its gas phase (ventilation) and transiently bound to red blood cells in the alveolar capillaries (gas exchange). Both ventilation and gas exchange maps were independently used to guide development of new functional avoidance treatment plans for every patient, while adhering to institutional dose-volume constraints for normal tissues and target coverage. Furthermore, dose-volume histogram (DVH)-based reoptimizations of the clinical plan, with reductions in mean lung dose (MLD) equal to the functional avoidance plans, were created to serve as the control group. To evaluate each plan (regardless of type), gas exchange maps, representing end-to-end lung function, were used to calculate gas exchange-weighted MLD (fMLD), gas exchange-weighted volume receiving ≥20 Gy (fV20), and mean dose in the highest gas exchanging 33% and 50% volumes of lung (MLD-f33% and MLD-f50%). Using each clinically approved plan as a baseline, the reductions in functional metrics were compared for ventilation-optimization, gas exchange optimization, and DVH-based reoptimization. Statistical significance was determined using the Freidman test, with subsequent subdivision when indicated by P values less than .10 and post hoc testing with Wilcoxon signed rank tests to determine significant differences (P < .05). Toxicity modeling was performed using an established function-based model to estimate clinical significance of the results. RESULTS: Compared with DVH-based reoptimization of the clinically approved plans, gas exchange-guided functional avoidance planning more effectively reduced the gas exchange-weighted metrics fMLD (average ± SD, -78 ± 79 cGy, compared with -45 ± 34 cGy; P = .03), MLD-f33% (-135 ± 136 cGy, compared with -52 ± 47 cGy; P = .004), and MLD-f50% (-96 ± 95 cGy, compared with -47 ± 40 cGy; P = .01). Comparing the 2 functional planning types, Gas Exchange-Guided planning more effectively reduced MLD-f33% compared with ventilation-guided planning (-64 ± 95; P = .009). For some patients, Gas Exchange-Guided functional avoidance plans demonstrated clinically significant reductions in model-predicted toxicity, more so than the accompanying ventilation-guided plans and DVH-based reoptimizations. CONCLUSION: Gas Exchange-Guided planning effectively reduced dose to high gas exchanging regions of lung while maintaining clinically acceptable plan quality. In many patients, ventilation-guided planning incidentally reduced dose to higher gas exchange regions, to a lesser extent. This methodology enables future prospective trials to examine patient outcomes.

Effective Pain Control With Very Low Dose Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Uncomplicated Osseous Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Osteolytic lesions are present in 75% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and frequently require palliation with radiation therapy (RT). Prior case series of patients with MM with bone pain undergoing palliative RT suggests doses ≥12 Gy (equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions, EQD2) provide excellent bone pain relief. However, recent advances in care and novel biologic agents have significantly improved overall survival and quality of life for patients with MM. We hypothesized that lower-dose RT (LDRT, EQD2 <12 Gy) offers an effective alternative to higher-dose RT (HDRT, EQD2 ≥12 Gy) for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bone lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with MM treated with RT for uncomplicated, painful bone lesions and stratified by EQD2 ≥/< 12 Gy. Clinical pain response (CPR) rates, acute and late toxicity, pain response duration, and retreatment rates between LDRT and HDRT groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with 70 treated lesions were included: 24 patients (48 lesions) treated with HDRT and 11 patients (22 lesions) with LDRT. Median follow-up was 14 and 16.89 months for HDRT and LDRT, respectively. The median dose of HDRT treatment was 20 Gy versus 4 Gy in the LDRT group. The CPR rate was 98% for HDRT and 95% for LDRT. There was no significant difference in any-grade acute toxicity between the HDRT and LDRT cohorts (24.5% vs 9.1%, Χ2 P = .20). Pain recurred in 10% of lesions (12% HDRT vs 9.5% LDRT). Median duration of pain response did not significantly differ between cohorts (P = .91). Five lesions were retreated, 2 (9.5%) in the LDRT cohort, and 3 (6.3%) in the HDRT cohort. CONCLUSION: In this study, LDRT effectively palliated painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions with acceptable CPR and duration of palliation. These data support prospective comparisons of LDRT versus HDRT for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions.

Primary Mediastinal (Thymic) Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Fidelity of Diagnosis Using WHO Criteria.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is challenging because it is a clinicopathologic entity that shares characteristics with other lymphomas and lacks pathognomonic features. We sought to investigate the fidelity between a working diagnosis of PMBCL at our institution and the clinicopathologic criteria established within the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records and archived tissue of patients treated for stage I-II PMBCL from 1998 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed for clinical and pathologic conformity with current WHO criteria. Disease was characterized as definitely PMBCL if all of the following were present: anterior mediastinal mass with or without lymph node involvement, no extranodal disease, B-cell antigen expression, Epstein-Barr virus negativity, and at least one supportive feature: female gender under age 40, bulky primary tumor, CD30 weakly positive, compartmentalizing alveolar fibrosis, lack of surface immunoglobulin expression, and MUM1 or CD23 positivity. Disease without supportive features or other pathologic findings more suggestive of other entities was characterized as equivocal for PMBCL. Lack of an anterior mediastinal mass, presence of distant lymph node involvement or extranodal disease, lack of B-cell antigen expression, or Epstein-Barr virus positivity were characterized as definitely not PMBCL. Clinical management and outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 63 patients treated for presumed stage I-II PMBCL, 58 (92%) met the criteria for PMBCL. The most common reason for a discordant diagnosis was lack of an anterior mediastinal mass (n = 3). Two additional patients were characterized as having disease equivocal for PMBCL. In retrospect, one patient most likely had a mediastinal gray zone lymphoma due to CD15 positivity and another diffuse large B cell, not otherwise specified, at pathologic review. Five-year progression-free and overall survival were 67% (95% confidence interval, 54-77) and 81% (95% confidence interval, 68-89), respectively, for all patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of the clinicopathologic criteria of PMBCL, most patients (92%) who were treated for stage I-II PMBCL at our institution appear to have been accurately diagnosed.

Radiogenomic Analysis of Locally Advanced Lung Cancer Based on CT Imaging and Intratreatment Changes in Cell-Free DNA.

The radiologic appearance of locally advanced lung cancer may be linked to molecular changes of the disease during treatment, but characteristics of this phenomenon are poorly understood. Radiomics, liquid biopsy of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) encode tumor-specific radiogenomic expression patterns that can be probed to study this problem. Preliminary findings are reported from a radiogenomic analysis of CT imaging, cfDNA, and ctDNA in 24 patients (median age, 64 years; range, 49-74 years) with stage III lung cancer undergoing chemoradiation on a prospective pilot study (NCT00921739) between September 2009 and September 2014. Unsupervised clustering of radiomic signatures resulted in two clusters that were associated with ctDNA TP53 mutations (P = .03) and changes in cfDNA concentration after 2 weeks of chemoradiation (P = .02). The radiomic features dissimilarity (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; P = .05), joint entropy (HR = 0.56; P = .04), sum entropy (HR = 0.53; P = .02), and normalized inverse difference (HR = 1.77; P = .05) were associated with overall survival. These results suggest heterogeneous and low-attenuating disease without a detectable ctDNA TP53 mutation was associated with early surges of cfDNA concentration in response to therapy and a generally better prognosis. Keywords: CT-Quantitative, Radiation Therapy, Lung, Computer Applications-3D, Oncology, Tumor Response, Outcomes Analysis Clinical trial registration no. NCT00921739 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Recumbent Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to describe preliminary dosimetric and clinical results of a recumbent total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) technique and compare this to a conventional standing TSEBT technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A customized treatment platform with recessed side wheels was constructed and commissioned for patients to be treated in a recumbent position. Dosimetric and clinical information was collected for patients treated with this new recumbent technique in addition to that of a cohort of patients treated contemporaneously using the conventional standing method. Dose delivery and clinical outcomes were compared for patients treated with the recumbent and standing techniques. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2019, 27 patients were treated with TSEBT with the recumbent (n = 13) or conventional standing technique (n = 14) at our institution. Measured dose at 15 body sites could be directly compared. Of these, 10 showed no significant difference between the two techniques while five sites showed significant differences in median measured dose, including the top of left shoulder, right biceps, bend of left elbow, upper back, and medial right thigh (P < .003). Measured dose was significantly higher with the standing technique at these sites with the exception of the upper back. Rates of complete response (25% vs 23%), partial response (50% vs 69%), and stable disease (17% vs 8%) were similar between the standing and recumbent cohorts, respectively (P = .78). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed, commissioned, and implemented a floor-based, recumbent technique that allows for treatment of patients who would otherwise not be eligible for TSEBT. Dosimetric and clinical measurements suggest that this technique is a viable alternative to the standing method.

Synergy between early-incorporation immunotherapy and extracranial radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Combining radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy (IT) may enhance outcomes for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, data on the immunomodulatory effects of extracranial RT remains limited. This retrospective database analysis examined real-world practice patterns, predictors of survival, and comparative effectiveness of extracranial radioimmunotherapy (RT + IT) versus early-incorporation immunotherapy (eIT) in patients with mNSCLC. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mNSCLC between 2004-2016 treated with eIT or RT + IT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Practice patterns were assessed using Cochrane-Armitrage trend test. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching was performed to account for baseline imbalances. Biologically effective doses (BED) were stratified based on the median (39 Gy10). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was defined as above median BED in ≤5 fractions. RESULTS: eIT utilization increased from 0.3% in 2010 to 13.2% in 2016 (P<0.0001). Rates of RT + eIT increased from 38.8% in 2010 to 49.1% in 2016 among those who received eIT (P<0.0001). Compared to eIT alone, RT + eIT demonstrated worse median OS (11.2 vs. 13.2 months) while SBRT + eIT demonstrated improved median OS (25 vs. 13.2 months) (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in OS based on sequencing of eIT relative to RT (log-rank P=0.4415) or irradiated site (log-rank P=0.1606). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with improved OS included chemotherapy (HR 0.86, P=0.0058), treatment at academic facilities (HR 0.83, P<0.0001), and SBRT (HR 0.60, P=0.0009); after propensity-score multivariate analysis, SBRT alone showed improved OS (HR 0.28, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of RT + eIT in mNSCLC is increasing. SBRT + eIT was associated with improved OS on propensity-score matched analysis. There were no significant differences in OS based on RT + eIT sequencing or site irradiated. Whether these observations reflect patient selection or possible immunomodulatory benefits of RT is unclear and warrants further study.

Outcomes in Patients With 4 to 10 Brain Metastases Treated With Dose-Adapted Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness and safety of single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery using a volume-adapted dosing strategy in patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases were eligible for this prospective trial. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were local recurrence, distant brain failure, neurologic death, and rate of adverse events. Exploratory objectives were neurocognition, quality of life, dosimetric data, salvage rate, and radionecrosis. Dose was prescribed in a single fraction per RTOG 90-05 or as 5 Gy × 5 fractions for lesions ≥3 cm diameter, lesions involving critical structures, or single-fraction brain V12Gy >20 mL. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated with median age of 61 years, Karnofsky performance status 90, and 6 brain metastases. Twenty-two patients survived longer than expected from the time of protocol SRS, with 1 living patient who has not reached that milestone. Median overall survival was 8.1 months with a 1-year overall survival of 35.7%. The 1-year local recurrence rate was 5% (10 of 204 of evaluable lesions) in 12.5% (4 of 32) of the patients. Distant brain failure was observed in 19 of 32 patients with a 1-year rate of 35.8%. Grade 1-2 headache was the most common complaint, with no grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events. Radionecrosis was observed in only 5 lesions, with a 1-year rate of 1.5%. Rate of neurologic death was 20%. Neurocognition and quality of life did not significantly change 3 months after SRS compared with pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that volume-adapted dosing single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective and safe treatment for patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases.

Radiation therapy in the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: still relevant?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States. Historically, radiation therapy (RT) was the primary treatment for patients with localized disease. Several randomized trials have demonstrated that the addition of systemic therapy improves outcomes. Additional randomized trials have shown that the combination of RT and systemic therapy is superior to systemic therapy alone. The role of RT in advanced-stage DLBCL has not been firmly established, but some prospective phase III trials, as well as retrospective studies, suggest a benefit for advanced disease also. For patients with relapsed or primary refractory disease, autologous stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice. Here too, consolidation RT appears to improve outcomes compared with autologous stem cell transplant alone. Finally, for patients with advanced DLBCL who are no longer responsive to systemic therapy, RT may provide rapid and durable palliation of local lymphoma-related symptoms.

Knowledge Models as Teaching Aid for Training Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning: A Lung Cancer Case Study.

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) employs knowledge models that often behave as a black-box to the majority of users and are not designed to improve the skill level of users. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility that AI can serve as an effective teaching aid to train individuals to develop optimal intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Methods and Materials: The training program is composed of a host of training cases and a tutoring system that consists of a front-end visualization module powered by knowledge models and a scoring system. The current tutoring system includes a beam angle prediction model and a dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction model. The scoring system consists of physician chosen criteria for clinical plan evaluation as well as specially designed criteria for learning guidance. The training program includes six lung/mediastinum IMRT patients: one benchmark case and five training cases. A plan for the benchmark case is completed by each trainee entirely independently pre- and post-training. Five training cases cover a wide spectrum of complexity from easy (2), intermediate (1) to hard (2). Five trainees completed the training program with the help of one trainer. Plans designed by the trainees were evaluated by both the scoring system and a radiation oncologist to quantify planning quality. Results: For the benchmark case, trainees scored an average of 21.6% of the total max points pre-training and improved to an average of 51.8% post-training. In comparison, the benchmark case's clinical plans score an average of 54.1% of the total max points. Two of the five trainees' post-training plans on the benchmark case were rated as comparable to the clinically delivered plans by the physician and all five were noticeably improved by the physician's standards. The total training time for each trainee ranged between 9 and 12 h. Conclusion: This first attempt at a knowledge model based training program brought unexperienced planners to a level close to experienced planners in fewer than 2 days. The proposed tutoring system can serve as an important component in an AI ecosystem that will enable clinical practitioners to effectively and confidently use KBP.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Inoperable Stage IIB Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Patterns of Care and Comparative Effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze practice patterns and perform comparative effectiveness of definitive radiotherapy techniques for inoperable stage IIB (American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with T3N0M0 or T1-2N1M0 NCSLC between 2004 and 2015 who received definitive radiotherapy were identified. Cases were divided as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stratified by systemic therapy (ST). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the effect of covariates on overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis by tumor size, chest wall invasion, multifocality, and ST use was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS. RESULTS: A total of 10,081 subjects met inclusion criteria: 4401 T3N0M0 (66.5% CFRT, 11.0% HFRT, and 22.5% SBRT) and 5680 T1-2N1M0 (92.5% CFRT and 7.5% HFRT). For T3N0M0 NSCLC, SBRT utilization increased from 3.7% in 2006% to 35.4% in 2015. Subjects treated with SBRT were more likely to have smaller tumors, multifocal tumors, or adenocarcinoma histology. SBRT resulted in similar or superior OS compared with CFRT for tumors > 5 cm, tumors invading the chest wall, or multifocal tumors. SBRT was significantly associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.715; P < .001). For T1-2N1M0 NSCLC, patients treated with HFRT were significantly older and less likely to receive ST; nevertheless, there was no difference in OS between HFRT and CFRT on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: CFRT + ST is utilized most frequently to treat stage IIB NSCLC in the United States when surgery is not performed, though it is decreasing. SBRT utilization for T3N0M0 NSCLC is increasing and was associated with improved OS.