Case report: Epicardial ligation of the left atrial appendage in a patient with an inaccessible left atrial cavity.

It has been shown that endocardial occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is equally effective in preventing embolic events compared to oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. An 82-year-old female patient was admitted for LAA occlusion for repetitive GI bleeding. She had high CHADSVASC Score and HASBLED with long persistent atrial fibrillation with many comorbities. The preprocedural transesophageal echo revealed a great mass in the left atrium (Picture 1). Cardiac surgery was denied, we performed an epicardial only ligation for closing the LAA. For this approach we performed an epicardial puncture and contrast injection within the pericardial space to delineate the LAA. An epicardial wire with a suction mechanism at its distal end was attached to the anterior lobe of the LAA. Using this epicardial wire the snare could be advanced over the appendage and closed down. Complete exclusion of the LAA was achieved. There were no procedural complications and the patient is doing well after 3 months.

Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, specialized chest pain units (CPUs) were implemented across Germany ensuring structured diagnostics in acute chest pain. This study aims to analyze the management of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients in such certified CPUs. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 13,902 patients enrolled in the German CPU registry and analyzed for the diagnosis of PE including patient characteristics, critical time intervals, diagnostic workup, treatment, and prognosis. PE patients were compared to the overall CPU patient cohort. Only patients with a complete 3-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Overall, 1.1% of all CPU patients were diagnosed with PE. Chest pain and dyspnea were the leading symptoms. Patients with PE were older, presented with higher heart rates, and more frequently exhibited signs of heart failure, despite a normal left ventricular function. PE patients showed significantly longer time delays between symptom onset and the first medical contact, while PE patients with chest pain presented earlier than PE patients with dyspnea only. Whereas more PE patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit, in-CPU mortality and event rates over 3 months were low. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study suggests a certain risk for underdiagnosis and consecutive potential undertreatment of PE patients in German Cardiac Society (GCS)-certified CPUs, which is thought to result from an anticipated focus on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Public awareness for PE beyond chest pain should be improved. Certified CPUs should be urged to implement strategic pathways for a better simultaneous diagnostic workup of differential diagnosis beyond ACS.

Concomitant epicardial left atrial appendage ligation and left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: Safety, feasibility and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: We present initial results of patients undergoing a combined procedure of epicardial LAA ligation in addition to left atrial ablation for AF. METHODS: 9 patients were included for additional use of LARIAT as an individual treatment approach for AF. First an epicardial LAA ligation was performed, in the same procedure left atrial ablations consisting of PVI and additional substrate based modifying ablations were performed. Follow-up at 3 months and 12 months was performed. RESULTS: There was only 1 minor procedural complication (11%) involving epicardial bleeding and 2 late adverse events of pericardial tamponade and stroke. At the final follow-up (median 20 months) 7 patients were in stable sinus rhythm (78%) and 2 pts had reduced AF burden. CONCLUSION: Concomitant epicardial LAA ligation and ablation is feasible in selected patients with a reasonable risk profile. More prospective data are required to validate the safety and efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of a self-expanding versus a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the preferred treatment option for older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Differences in the properties of available TAVR systems can affect clinical outcomes. Among patients undergoing TAVR, we compared the self-expanding ACURATE neo TAVR system with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 TAVR system with regard to early safety and efficacy. METHODS: In this randomised non-inferiority trial, patients (aged ≥75 years) undergoing transfemoral TAVR for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, and who were deemed to be at increased surgical risk, were recruited at 20 tertiary heart valve centres in Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment with the ACURATE neo or the SAPIEN 3 with a computer-based randomly permuted block scheme, stratified by study centre and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) category. The primary composite safety and efficacy endpoint comprised all-cause death, any stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, major vascular complications, coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3), rehospitalisation for valve-related symptoms or congestive heart failure, valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, or prosthetic valve stenosis within 30 days of the procedure. Endpoint assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Non-inferiority of ACURATE neo compared with SAPIEN 3 was assessed in the intention-to-treat population on the basis of a risk-difference margin of 7·7% for the primary composite endpoint, with a one-sided α of 0·05. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03011346) and is ongoing but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2017, and Feb 2, 2019, up to 5132 patients were screened and 739 (mean age 82·8 years [SD 4·1]; median STS-PROM score 3·5% [IQR 2·6-5·0]) were enrolled. 30-day follow-up was available for 367 (99%) of 372 patients allocated to the ACURATE neo group, and 364 (99%) of 367 allocated to the SAPIEN 3 group. Within 30 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 87 (24%) patients in the ACURATE neo and in 60 (16%) in the SAPIEN 3 group; thus, non-inferiority of the ACURATE neo was not met (absolute risk difference 7·1% [upper 95% confidence limit 12·0%], p=0·42). Secondary analysis of the primary endpoint suggested superiority of the SAPIEN 3 device over the ACURATE neo device (95% CI for risk difference -1·3 to -12·9, p=0·0156). The ACURATE neo and SAPIEN 3 groups did not differ in incidence of all-cause death (nine patients [2%] vs three [1%]) and stroke (seven [2%] vs 11 [3%]); whereas acute kidney injury (11 [3%] vs three [1%]) and moderate or severe prosthetic aortic regurgitation (34 [9%] vs ten [3%]) were more common in the ACURATE neo group. INTERPRETATION: TAVR with the self-expanding ACURATE neo did not meet non-inferiority compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 device in terms of early safety and clinical efficacy outcomes. An early composite safety and efficacy endpoint was useful in discriminating the performance of different TAVR systems. FUNDING: Boston Scientific (USA).

Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Regimes in a Multicenter Cohort of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair Patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent comorbidity in patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Recent studies show a deleterious outcome of patients with concomitant AF after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR). This underlines the essential need for additional strategies that ameliorate the prognosis of these patients. Fundamental data on AF characteristics and treatment regimes in this special cohort of patients are lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 542 consecutive patients with severe MR undergoing TMVR in three tertiary heart centers with special focus on AF type and underlying treatment strategies. RESULTS: The prevalence of concomitant AF was 73.3%, and AF did not affect the procedural success or the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The patients with AF were more frequently >75 years, had more tricuspid regurgitation, and less coronary artery disease than non-AF patients. The distribution of AF types was 32% paroxysmal AF, 27% persistent AF, and 41% permanent AF. Except for a higher degree in severe tricuspid regurgitation and a higher likelihood of male sex, no substantial differences were observed while comparing permanent and nonpermanent AF patients. The predominant treatment regime was rate control (57%), with only beta blockers (BB) in the majority of persistent and permanent AF patients, while additional digitalis or a pacemaker was used infrequently. Rhythm control was mainly achieved with BB alone in paroxysmal AF patients and with additional antiarrhythmic drugs in the majority of persistent AF patients. Interventional rhythm control therapy was performed in 2.5% and 30.9% of paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, respectively. The guideline-adherent use of oral anticoagulants was comparable and high in both groups (91.9% in nonpermanent vs. 90.1% in permanent AF). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to provide necessary information for the understanding of the current clinical practice in dealing with TMVR patients. Since evidence suggests that AF is not a benign concomitant disease, further investigations are needed to assess the prognostic impact of these different AF treatment strategies.

Degree of valve calcification in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Findings from the multicenter EASE-IT TF registry.

AIMS: We aimed to assess whether the level of aortic root calcification is associated with BAV performance/omission during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to explore related outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: EASE-IT TF was a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of patients undergoing TF-TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN 3, with or without BAV predilation. Valvular calcification was quantified from pre-procedural multi-slice computed tomography images and compared between BAV and no BAV patients. Data for 178 patients (55 BAV; 123 no BAV) were analyzed. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of regional/leaflet sector calcification volumes, maximum asymmetry between the different leaflet sectors, or total calcification scores. Overall, a greater-than-average leaflet calcification volume was independently predictive of ≥mild PVL (OR: 5.116; 95% CI: 1.042-38.35) and the need for post-dilation (OR: 3.592; 95% CI: 1.173-12.14). The latter effect was abated in patients with BAV (OR: 1.837; 95% CI: 0.223-18.00) and intensified in those without BAV (OR: 5.575; 95% CI: 1.114-38.74). No other BAV-dependent effects of calcification on outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of transfemoral valve implantations, calcification does not appear to be the main driving factor in the decision to perform/omit BAV. Predilation may be valuable for reducing post-dilation requirements in patients only with a greater degree of leaflet calcification.

Coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Standard-dose and low-dose imaging with a high-resolution whole-heart CT scanner.

OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality, observer confidence, radiation exposure in the standard-dose (SD-CCTA) and low-dose (LD-CCTA) protocols of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: CCTA was performed in 303 patients using a CT scanner with 16-cm coverage (111 scans during sinus rhythm (SR); 192 during AF). LD-CCTA was used in 218 patients; SD-CCTA in 85 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD). Image quality and observer confidence were evaluated on 5-point scales. Radiation doses were recorded. RESULTS: Image quality was superior in the SD-CCTA compared to the LD-CCTA (SR 1.45±0.40; AF 1.72±0.46; vs. SR 1.83±0.48; AF 1.92±0.50; p < 0.001). Observers were more confident with SD-CCTA than with LD-CCTA (SR 1.38±0.33; AF 1.61±0.43; vs. SR 1.70±0.45; AF 1.82±0.50; p < 0.001). Radiation doses in AF were significantly higher than in the SR (LD-CCTA, 1.68±0.71 mSv; SD-CCTA, 3.72±1.95 mSv; vs. LD-CCTA, 1.3 ±0.52 mSv; SD-CCTA, 2.67±1.47 mSv; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using a low-dose protocol in AF, radiation exposure can be decreased by 50 % at the expense of 20 % impaired image quality. A low-dose CCTA protocol can be considered in young patients, whereas the standard-dose protocol is recommended for older patients and those suspected of having CAD. KEY POINTS: • Whole-heart CT allows visualization of the coronary arteries in atrial fibrillation. • Low-dose CT decreases radiation exposure by 50%, image quality by 20%. • Standard-dose CT seems advantageous when concomitant coronary artery disease is suspected.

Influence of experience on procedure steps, safety, and functional results in edge to edge mitral valve repair-a single center study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effects of experience on the Mitraclip® procedure steps as well as procedure safety and functional results. BACKGROUND: MR has proven deleterious in heart failure. Mitraclip® therapy evolved an important option in patients with severely reduced left ventricular function (LVEF). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 126 consecutive patients were grouped in three groups and investigated in a prospective observational study. We evaluated the duration of procedural steps, safety endpoints, and functional results. RESULTS: The median logistic EuroScore was 32% (7-40%). Ninety-five percent of patients were in NYHA-stage ≥III and 51% had a LVEF <30%. Groups were homogeneous as to their baseline NYHA status and right heart catheterization data. Echocardiography data are comparable, albeit with a decreasing effective regurgitant orifice area (0.44 ± 0.21 group I vs. 0.34 ± 0.22 group III, P = 0.02). Frailty was less frequent and baseline 6 min walking test results improved from group I to group III. Duration of a first clip placement decreased from 106 ± 50 to 50 ± 21 min (P < 0.001). Total procedure time decreased from 221 ± 70 to 144 ± 68 (P < 0.001). The number of clips implanted increased from 66 to 79 (P = 0.02). MitraClip® implantation was effective in either group but the combined safety endpoint was reached less frequent in group III (P = 0.01). There was no difference in MACCE rate, 30 day- or intrahospital-mortality between groups. CONCLUSION: Safety and duration of procedure steps improved substantially with experience. MR reduction was sustained from the beginning without further improvement. Patient selection is a key factor for success. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Left ventricular ejection fraction of < 20%: Too bad for MitraClip© ?

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate whether the percutaneous mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction with the MitraClip® system in end-stage heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <20% also effects beneficial outcome or whether the underlying myogenic problem is leading and therefore of prognostic relevance. BACKROUND: The interventional treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) with the MitraClip® system could improve the clinical and hemodynamic outcome in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, a total of 147 patients with FMR were treated with MitraClip® at our institution. The cohort was divided into two groups: LVEF ≥ 20% (N = 126) and <20% (N = 21). Follow-up assessments included exercise capacity, 6-min walk test, probrain natriuretic peptide-measurement (ProBNP), echocardiography and right heart catheterization. Only three patients with an LVEF ≥ 20% and one patient with an LVEF < 20% were lost for follow-up. RESULTS: In the vast majority of patients, a reduction from severe to mild MR was demonstrated with no difference between both groups (P = 0.422). At follow-up, both subgroups experienced similar improvements in exercise capacity and hemodynamics. Patients with an LVEF < 20% were on average 5.8 years younger, while mortality rates were comparable in both groups (P = 0.760). CONCLUSION: By careful selection, even patients in the end stage of advanced LV dysfunction as the result of the underlying myogenic problem and the additional harmful effects of the high volume loading due to the FMR can exhibit significant clinical and hemodynamic improvement after MitraClip© therapy.

Impact of right and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on perioperative outcome and long-term survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to determine the impact of right- and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction on perioperative outcome and long-term survival after TAVR. METHODS: Study population consisted of 702 TAVRs between 2009 and 2014, 345 by TF, 357 by TA route. RV and LV function were determined by TAPSE and LVEF measurement during baseline echocardiography. Patients were divided according to TAPSE (>18 mm/14-18 mm/<14 mm) and LVEF (>50%/30-50%/<30%) tertiles. Outcome at day-30 and Kaplan-Meier 4-year survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Impaired RV and LV-function did not adversely affect mortality, stroke, bleeding, and vascular-complications at 30 days. Patients with TAPSE < 14 mm displayed elevated rate of renal failure requiring dialysis (11%; P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival was adversely affected by RV-systolic dysfunction RVSD (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that impaired RVSD but not LVSD was an independent determinant for late mortality (hazard ratio TAPSE 14-18 mm: 1.53; P = 0.02; TAPSE <14 mm: 2.12; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative mortality and risk of stroke after TAVR are not adversely affected by preexisting RV or LV dysfunction. Long-term survival is impaired in patients with RVSD. RVSD but not LVSD is an independent risk factor for late mortality. TAVR should be the preferred therapy for patients with RVSD and LVSD, especially when patient is suitable for TF.

Gender based differences in drug eluting stent implantation - data from the German ALKK registry suggest underuse of DES in elderly women.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest there are gender based differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease, with women receiving evidence based therapy less frequently than suggested by current guidelines. The aim of our study was to evaluate gender based differences in the use of DES. METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data from 100704 stent implantations in the PCI registry of the ALKK between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS: The usage of DES increased from 16.0 to 43.9%. Although women had smaller vessel sizes, they received DES less often compared to men (28.2 vs. 31.3%), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.97) at the age of 75, and an adjusted odds ratio of 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.84-0.94) at the age of 80. CONCLUSION: Despite having smaller vessels than men, women were treated less often with DES. These findings apply to women above the age of 75 years. These findings support previous reports, that elderly women with coronary artery disease are treated differently to men.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Cerebral Lesions after the MitraClip® Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Clinically silent brain injury detected with cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well known after various cardiovascular interventions. Thus far, only one study has examined the periprocedural risk of cerebral ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve reconstruction. The study aim was to examine the incidence and clinical impact of cerebral embolic events in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip® system. METHODS: Thirteen eligible high-risk patients without contraindications for MRI underwent MitraClip treatment at the authors' institution. Neurological testing with the assessment of global cognitive function was performed three days before and two days after the procedure. All patients underwent cerebral diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) two days after the procedure. RESULTS: In nine patients, post-interventional MRI revealed newly acquired microembolic cerebral lesions. At follow up MRI scans recorded at 307 ± 270 days after the procedure, ischemic scars were not detectable in any patient. Two patients with five or more new cerebral lesions in DW-MRI showed a significant decline in their test scores. CONCLUSIONS: The MitraClip procedure results in acute cerebral lesions in the vast majority of patients. All lesions seen on DWI post-procedure resolved completely, but the number of lesions may have had an impact on cognitive function.

Drug Coated Balloon Is Less Effective for Treatment of DES In-Stent Restenosis Both in Native Coronary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From a Bicenter Registry.

BACKGROUND: The paclitaxel drug coated balloon (DCB) is an established treatment for bare metal stent (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in native coronary arteries. The evidence of DCB-application for drug eluting stent (DES) ISR both in native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is limited. Aim of our study was to compare the differential efficacy of DCB for treatment of BMS- and DES-ISR in native coronary vessels and SVGs. METHODS AND RESULTS: N = 135 DCB-treated patients with available follow up (FU) angiography were included in this retrospective study. Patients received treatment between April 2009 and March 2013 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Germany. DCB was applied in BMS-ISR (n = 65; 48%) and DES-ISR (n = 70; 52%). DCB-treated lesions were located in native coronary arteries (n = 110; 81%; BMS-ISR: n = 58; 53%; DES-ISR: n = 52; 47%) and SVGs (n = 25; 19%; BMS-ISR: n = 7, 28%; DES-ISR: n = 18, 72%). Median FU was 12 months. Endpoints were binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Binary restenosis (29% vs. 57%; P < 0.01) and TLR (18% vs. 46%; P < 0.01) were significantly more frequent in DES-ISR versus BMS-ISR. In SVGs, TLR was required in 72% (DES-ISR) versus 14% (BMS-ISR); P = 0.02. In the Kaplan-Meier-analysis freedom from both endpoints was significantly decreased in the DES-lesions both in the total population (binary restenosis P < 0.01; TLR P < 0.01) and native coronaries (binary restenosis P = 0.02; TLR P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: DCB treatment is less effective in DES-ISR than in BMS-ISR. The diminished efficacy of DCB treatment is even more pronounced in DES-ISR located within degenerated SVGs.

Balloon expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral route with or without pre-dilation of the aortic valve - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (EASE-IT TF).

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral route (TF-TAVI) is commonly performed as a treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients at high surgical risk. Pre-deployment balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has generally been considered an essential step for preparing the valve landing zone for receipt of the prosthesis. However, there is little evidence supporting the clinical value of BAV, while several associated complications have been documented. This has provoked several groups to evaluate the feasibility and safety of omitting BAV form the TF-TAVI procedure (direct TF-TAVI), with encouraging results. However, studies comparing the clinical outcomes of direct TF-TAVI to standard TF-TAVI are lacking. METHODS: EASE-IT TF is a prospective, observational, two-armed, multicentre registry designed to gather data on procedural aspects, adverse events and survival rates associated with direct TF-TAVI using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable prosthesis. DISCUSSION: EASE-IT-TF data will be analysed firstly to determine the risks and benefits associated with direct TF-TAVI vs. standard TF-TAVI, and secondly to identify associations between patient variables and specific outcomes. This may assist identification of patients who stand to benefit from direct TF-TAVI, therefore contributing to clinical reductions in TF-TAVI-associated morbidity and mortality rates in high-risk AS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinictrials.gov: NCT02760771.

Hemodynamic Improvement at Three Months after MitraClip® Treatment in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is common in patients with advanced heart failure and impaired left ventricular function. The study aim was to examine functional and hemodynamic effects at three months after MitraClip® implantation in high-risk surgical patients with FMR. METHODS: A group of 93 patients was rejected for surgical treatment by heart-team decisions due to an inacceptable risk for conventional mitral valve surgery. Between October 2011 and May 2015, 89 of these patients (96%) were treated successfully with MitraClip implantation. A subsequent complete follow up was performed over three months in 32 patients with FMR, including pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) measurements, six-minute walk test, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization. RESULTS: The patients (mean age 73 ± 7 years) presented with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 32 ± 13%, and mitral regurgitation (MR) grade ≥3 in 30 of 32 cases (93%). All patients suffered from severe FMR and were highly symptomatic (NYHA functional class III or IV). The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 33%. MitraClip implantation resulted in a significant clinical improvement and reverse cardiac remodelling with a decrease in LV end-diastolic and LV endsystolic diameters, while LVEF was unchanged. In addition, a statistically relevant reduction of systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressures (PAPsystolic -7.2 mmHg, p = 0.011; PAPdiastolic -4.5 mmHg, p = 0.003; and PAPmean -5.3 mmHg, p = 0.007) were measured, while the cardiac index (+0.3 l/min/m2, p <0.001) and cardiac output (+0.5 l/min, p <0.001) were increased significantly. The 30-day mortality was 8.6% (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Among the study population, MitraClip implantation led to clinical improvement, reverse cardiac remodeling, and a sustained hemodynamic benefit during the three-month follow up period.

Acute safety and efficacy of a novel multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: "Single shot" ablation devices to treat symptomatic atrial fibrillation have been engineered over the last years. Safety and efficacy also includes subclinical complications only detected with esophageal endoscopy or cerebral MRI in asymptomatic patients. We studied the acute efficacy and safety profile of a novel multipolar irrigated RF ablation catheter (nMARQ™). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the novel ablation device. Patient baseline and procedural characteristics were documented. Efficacy of PVI was identified using only the nMARQ™ catheter. All patients underwent postablation endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus to document thermal damage and cerebral MRI (diffusion weight imaging, attenuated diffusion coefficient-map) to document incidence and number of silent cerebral lesions (SCL). Effective PVI was achieved in 98% of targeted PVs in a mean procedure time of 133 minutes. A mean of 4.8, 60-second RF applications, per PV was needed for effective PVI. No clinical procedure-associated complications were noted. Esophageal temperature increase >40.5 °C was noted in 22 (51%) patients and 14 of these had thermal esophageal lesions on endoscopic evaluation. A total of 26 SCLs were noted in 14 patients (33%; 1.9/patient; mean diameter of 2.3 mm, 88% of lesions were ≤3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: PVI using the novel irrigated RF multipolar ablation device (nMARQ™) appears to be acutely effective. No clinical complications were identified. A high incidence of SCL (33%) and thermal esophageal lesions (33%) bears caution and further studies on long-term efficacy and safety are needed.

Exchanging Catheters Over a Single Transseptal Sheath During Left Atrial Ablation is Associated with a Higher Risk for Silent Cerebral Events.

BACKGROUND: Silent cerebral events (SCE) have been identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Procedural determinants influencing the risk for SCE still remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Comparing the risk for SCE depending on exchanges of catheters (ExCath) over a single transseptal sheath. METHODS: 88 Patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only ablation using either single-tip or balloon-based technique underwent pre- and post-ablation cerebral MRI. Ablations were either performed with double transseptal access and without exchanging catheters over the transseptal sheaths (group 1: no ExCath) or after a single transseptal access and exchanges of therapeutic and diagnostic catheters (group 2: ExCath). Differences in regard to SCE rates were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors related to the risk for SCE. RESULTS: Included patients underwent PVI using single tip irrigated radiofrequency in 41, endoscopic laser balloon in 27 and cryoballoon in 20 cases. Overall SCE were identified in 23 (26%) patients. In group 1 (no ExCath; N=46) 6 patients (13%) and in group 2 (N=42) 17 patients (40%) had documented SCE (p=0.007). The applied ablation technology did not affect SCE rate. In multivariate analysis age (OR 1.1, p=0.03) and catheter exchanges over a single transseptal sheath (OR 12.1, p=0.007) were the only independent predictors of a higher risk for SCE. CONCLUSIONS: Exchanging catheters over a single transseptal access to perform left atrial ablation is associated with a significantly higher incidence of SCE compared to an ablation technique using different transseptal accesses for therapeutic and diagnostic catheters.

Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary administration of an abciximab bolus during a primary percutaneous coronary intervention results in a high local drug concentration, improved perfusion, and reduction of infarct size compared with intravenous bolus application. However, the safety and efficacy of intracoronary versus standard intravenous bolus application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing this intervention has not been tested in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS: The AIDA STEMI trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients presenting with STEMI in the previous 12 h with no contraindications for abciximab were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by a central web-based randomisation system to intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus (0·25 mg/kg bodyweight) during percutaneous coronary intervention with a subsequent 12 h intravenous infusion 0·125 µg/kg per min (maximum 10 µg/min). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent infarction, or new congestive heart failure within 90 days of randomisation. Secondary endpoints were the time to occurrence of the primary endpoint, each individual component of that endpoint, early ST-segment resolution, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, and enzymatic infarct size. A masked central committee adjudicated the primary outcome and its components. Treatment allocation was not concealed from patients and investigators. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00712101. FINDINGS: Between July, 2008, and April, 2011, 2065 patients were randomly assigned intracoronary abciximab (n=1032) or intravenous abciximab (n=1033). Intracoronary, as compared with intravenous abciximab, resulted in a similar rate of the primary composite clinical endpoint at 90 days in 1876 analysable patients (7·0%vs 7·6%; odds ratio [OR] 0·91; 95% CI 0·64-1·28; p=0·58). The incidence of death (4·5%vs 3·6%; 1·24; 0·78-1·97; p=0·36) and reinfarction (1·8%vs 1·8%; 1·0; 0·51-1·96; p=0·99) did not differ between the treatment groups, whereas less patients in the intracoronary group had new congestive heart failure (2·4%vs 4·1%; 0·57; 0·33-0·97; p=0·04). None of the secondary endpoints or safety measures differed significantly between groups. INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, intracoronary as compared to intravenous abciximab did not result in a difference in the combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure. Since intracoronary abciximab bolus administration is safe and might be related to reduced rates of congestive heart failure the intracoronary route might be preferred if abciximab is indicated. FUNDING: Lilly, Germany. University of Leipzig-Heart Centre. University of Leipzig, Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).