Discrepancies in hidradenitis suppurativa lesion characterization by providers and patients.

BACKGROUND: The hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical response (HiSCR) has come under scrutiny as several HS clinical trials failed to meet primary endpoints with high placebo responses. This may be due to limitations of the tool and raters' ability to accurately characterize and count lesions, rather than lack of efficacy of the studied drug. Due to HS lesion complexity and potential differences in rater training, it was hypothesized that there would be discrepancies in how providers characterize and count lesions for HS clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how HS providers and patients name and count HS lesions and to identify discrepancies among providers to initiate the development of consensus-driven guidance for HS rater training. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to the members of HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). Respondents were asked to classify lesion images composed of multiple and different morphology types and answer questions regarding inclusion of associated dermatological conditions. RESULTS: Forty-seven HISTORIC members responded (29 providers; 18 patients). There was variability in how respondents classified HS lesions. Of 12 questions containing images, four had ≥50% of respondents choosing the same answer. With an image of a lesion composed of different morphologies, 45% of providers counted it as a single lesion and 45% counted it as multiple distinct lesions. With an image of multiple interconnected draining tunnels, 7% of providers classified it as a single draining tunnel while 79% categorized it as multiple draining tunnels with the number estimated by visual inspection. There was also variability in deciding whether lesions occurring in associated conditions should be considered separately or included in HS lesion counts. Patient responses were also variable. CONCLUSIONS: The result of the current study reaffirms the gap in how providers characterize and count HS lesions for clinical trials and the need to develop consensus-driven rater training related to HS outcome measures.

Comprehensive Review of Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate Fibers and Strips for Soil Stabilization.

The waste management of plastic has become a pressing environmental issue, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) being one of the major contributors. To address this challenge, the utilization of recycled PET fibers and strips in geotechnical engineering applications for soil stabilization has gained considerable attention. This review aims to provide a comprehensive study of the geotechnical engineering properties of recycled-PET-reinforced soils. The review examines various factors influencing the performance of PET-reinforced soils, including PET percent content, fiber length, and aspect ratio. It evaluates the mechanical properties, like shear strength, compressibility, bearing capacity, hydraulic behavior, and durability of recycled-PET-reinforced soils. The findings reveal PET reinforcement enhances shear strength, reduces settlement, and increases the bearing capacity and stability of the soil. However, it is observed that the incorporation of recycled PET fibers and strips does not lead to a significant impact on the dry density of the soil. Finally, an environmental and cost comparison analysis of recycled PET fibers and strips was conducted. This review serves as a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners involved in the field, offering insights into the geotechnical properties of PET-reinforced soils and outlining future research directions to maximize their effectiveness and sustainability.

The genetic cause of neurodevelopmental disorders in 30 consanguineous families.

Objective: This study aims to clinically and genetically assess 30 unrelated consanguineous Pakistani families from various ethnic backgrounds, all exhibiting features of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Methods: We conducted clinical, genetic, biochemical, and molecular analyses on 30 consanguineous families with NDDs enrolled from various regions of Pakistan. The likely molecular causes of primary microcephaly and NDDs were identified. Detailed clinical investigations and molecular diagnoses were performed using whole exome sequencing (WES) of the proband, followed by Sanger sequencing for validation and segregation in the available family members of the affected families. Results: WES identified likely disease-causing homozygous variants in 30 unrelated consanguineous families. Six families presented newly described variants in known NDD-related genes: ABAT (c.1439 T > G; p.Phe480Cys) [OMIM613163], SLC12A6 (c.2865_2865insT; p.Glu955Asnfs*5) [OMIM 218000], SHANK3 (c.1305-3_1,305-2delTT; p.Gln29-_Gly305del) [OMIM 606232], BCKDK (c.356_356insC; p.Gly119Alafs*24) [OMIM 614923], DDHD2 (c.2065G > T; p.Asp689Tyr) [OMIM 615033], ERCC2 (c.1255G > A; p.Glu419Lys) [OMIM 610756]. Additionally, 12 families had previously reported disease-causing variants associated with different types of NDDs: ATRX (c.109C > T; p.Arg37*) [OMIM 309580], GPR56 [ADGRG1] (c.1423C > T; p.Arg475*) [OMIM 606854], NAGLU (c.1694G > A; p.Arg565Gln) [OMIM 252920], DOLK (c.3G > A; p.Met1Ile) [OMIM 610768], GPT2 (c.815C > T; p.Ser272Leu) [OMIM 616281], DYNC1I2 (c.607 + 1G > A; p.?) [OMIM 618492], FBXL3 (c.885delT; p.Leu295Phefs25*) [OMIM 606220], LINGO1 (c.869G > A; p.Arg290His) [OMIM 618103], and ASPM (c.3978G > A; Trp1326*, c.9557C > G; p.Ser3186*, c.6994C > T; p.Arg2332*) [OMIM 608716]. All the identified variants showed segregation compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance. Conclusion: In the present study, we observed a high frequency of ASPM variants in the genetic analysis of 30 consanguineous families exhibiting features of NDDs, particularly those associated with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly. These findings contribute to studies on genotype-phenotype correlation, genetic counseling for families, and a deeper understanding of human brain function and development.

Energy-based Devices for Hair Loss.

Treatment options for hair loss have traditionally been limited to topical and systemic therapies. Systemic therapies for inflammatory hair disorders are often immunosuppressive, and systemic treatment of androgenetic hair loss can cause undesired effects on sexual and reproductive health. Topical agents have a favorable side effect profile compared with systemic therapies, but many topicals have poor transcutaneous absorption, limiting their concentration and action at follicular targets in the dermis.