Efficacy of a Remote Train-the-Trainer Model for Wheelchair Skills Training Administered by Clinicians: A Cohort Study With Pre- vs Posttraining Comparisons.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that remote training improves trainer confidence and when these trainers train others the capacity and confidence of the trainees improves. DESIGN: Cohort study with pre- vs posttraining comparisons. SETTING: Four spinal cord injury model systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 7 clinician trainers and 19 able-bodied trainees (N=26). INTERVENTIONS: Part 1 focused on trainer skill acquisition with self-study of the Wheelchair Skills Program Manual and instructional videos focused on motor learning, spotting, and 10 intermediate and advanced wheelchair skills. Trainers practiced in pairs, receiving asynchronous feedback on video recordings from a remote instructor. Part 2 included additional video modules targeted at "how to" assess and train others in 4 wheelchair skills: gets over obstacle, ascends low curb, ascends high curb with caregiver assistance, and performs stationary wheelie. Upon completion, the trainers each provided 1:1 in-person training for 2-3 trainees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trainer confidence was assessed using the Self-Efficacy on Assessing, Training, and Spotting Test for Manual Wheelchairs. Trainee capacity ("Can you do it?") and confidence ("How confident are you?") were evaluated using the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). RESULTS: Trainer confidence increased for assessment (P=.003) and training (P=.002) but not spotting (P=.056). Trainee 4-item median (interquartile range) WST-Q scores significantly increased with training for capacity (13% [6-31] to 88% [75-88], P<.001) and confidence (13% [0-31] to 88% [81-100], P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote training improves trainers' confidence with respect to wheelchair skills testing and training and the wheelchair skills capacity and confidence of their trainees.

Evaluation of pediatric-specific resources to support utilization of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program by the users of the resources: a descriptive qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Children's ability to engage in meaningful activities is positively influenced by their ability to move independently. Preliminary evidence in children suggests that wheelchair skills training improves wheelchair skills, which are important for independent mobility. The Wheelchair Skills Training Program is a standardized program to teach wheelchair skills. However, it is underutilized in pediatric rehabilitation settings. To increase its utilization, 3 pediatric-specific Wheelchair Skills Training Program resources related to indoor skills were developed (i.e., a storybook, four instructional posters, and a training workbook). This study aimed to describe occupational therapists' (OTs) and pediatric manual wheelchair users' (PMWUs) perceived satisfaction with the storybook, instructional posters and training workbook, and to explore their perceptions regarding the usability, relevance, and feasibility of these resources in pediatric rehabilitation settings. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Convenience samples of OTs and PMWUs were recruited in a rehabilitation center and affiliated schools. A focus group with OTs and semi-structured interviews with PMWUs were conducted by videoconference to obtain participants' feedback on the resource prototypes and suggestions for improvement. Data were deductively analyzed using the Framework method. RESULTS: Eight OTs and 5 PMWUs expressed general satisfaction with the resources, describing them as usable, relevant, and feasible to integrate into wheelchair skills training with novice wheelchair users and younger children. All OTs and 3 PMWUs expressed the desire to use the resources for wheelchair skills training. Two PMWUs perceived the resources were not relevant to them because they already mastered the skills. The participants suggested minor modifications for improving the resources (e.g., more action in the story, increased precision of illustrations related to the characters' position in the wheelchair). CONCLUSION: OTs and PMWUs were satisfied with the resources, perceiving them to be applicable for training wheelchair skills among young children and novice wheelchair users. The resources represent a concrete solution to facilitate the use of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program in pediatric rehabilitation settings. Additional resources are needed to better reach older and more experienced PMWUs (i.e., of intermediate and advanced skill levels).

Relationships Between Wheelchair Services Received and Wheelchair User Outcomes in Less-Resourced Settings: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Kenya and the Philippines.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationships between wheelchair services received during wheelchair provision and positive outcomes for users of wheelchairs. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. SETTING: Urban and periurban communities in Kenya and the Philippines. PARTICIPANTS: Adult basic manual wheelchair users (N=852), about half of whom reported having received some wheelchair services with the provision of their current wheelchairs. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed a survey that included questions related to demographic, clinical, and wheelchair characteristics. The survey also included questions about the past receipt of 13 wheelchair services and 4 positive outcomes for users of wheelchairs. The relationships between individual services received and positive outcomes were assessed using logistic regression analyses. In addition to assessing individual services and outcomes, we analyzed a composite service score (the total number of services received) and a composite outcome score (≥3 positive outcomes). RESULTS: The top 3 individual services from the perspective of relationships with the composite outcome score were "provider did training" (P=.0009), "provider assessed wheelchair fit while user propelled the wheelchair" (P=.002), and "peer group training received" (P=.033). The composite service score was significantly related to "daily wheelchair use" (P<.0001), "outdoor unassisted wheelchair use" (P<.0001), "high performance of activities of daily living" (P=.046) and the composite outcome score (P=.005), but not to the "absence of serious falls" (P=.73). CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of wheelchair services is associated with positive outcomes for users of wheelchairs, but such relationships do not exist for all services and outcomes. These findings are highly relevant to ongoing efforts to optimize wheelchair service delivery.

Extent to Which Caregivers Enhance the Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Confidence of Power Wheelchair Users: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that caregivers enhance the wheelchair skills capacity and confidence of the power wheelchair users to whom they provide assistance, and to describe the nature of that assistance. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. SETTING: Rehabilitation centers and communities. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=152) included caregivers (n=76) and wheelchair users (n=76). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Version 4.3 of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire (WST-Q). For each of the 30 individual skills, we recorded data about the wheelchair user alone and in combination (blended) with the caregiver. RESULTS: The mean total WST capacity scores ± SD for the wheelchair users alone and blended were 78.1%±9.3% and 92.4%±6.1%, respectively, with a mean difference of 14.3%±8.7% (P<.0001). The mean WST-Q capacity scores ± SD were 77.0%±10.6% and 93.2%±6.4%, respectively, with a mean difference of 16.3%±9.8% (P<.0001). The mean WST-Q confidence scores ± SD were 75.5%±12.7% and 92.8%±6.8%, respectively, with a mean difference of 17.5%±11.7% (P<.0001). The mean differences corresponded to relative improvements of 18.3%, 21.0%, and 22.9%, respectively. The nature and benefits of the caregivers' assistance could be summarized in 7 themes (eg, caregiver provides verbal support [cueing, coaching, reporting about the environment]). CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers significantly enhance the wheelchair skills capacity and confidence of the power wheelchair users to whom they provide assistance, and they do so in a variety of ways. These findings have significance for wheelchair skills assessment and training.

Getting a Manual Wheelchair Over a Threshold Using the Momentum Method: A Descriptive Study of Common Errors.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) document the success of learners' attempts to overcome a threshold in a manual wheelchair while using the momentum method; (2) describe the frequency and nature of any errors observed; and (3) compare the characteristics of participants who were or were not successful on their first attempts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. SETTING: Indoor obstacle course in a rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Able-bodied students (N=214) learning the threshold skill. INTERVENTION: Participants attempted to get over the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) threshold (2cm high, 1.5m wide, and 10cm in the line of progression) in a manual wheelchair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: From each participant's video recording of the first attempt, we assigned a WST score for the skill and described any errors noted. RESULTS: The WST scores for the first attempts were "pass" for 16 (7.5%), "pass with difficulty" for 100 (46.7%), and "fail" for 98 (45.8%). Eventually, requiring up to 6 attempts, 203 participants (94.9%) were successful (pass or pass with difficulty). Twenty-six different error types were identified. With the use of logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio of failing on the first attempt for women versus men was 2.71 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-6.00) (P=.0138). CONCLUSIONS: Only about half of able-bodied people learning the threshold skill using the momentum method are successful on their first attempts, although almost all are successful with further practice and feedback. During the first attempts, there are a wide variety of errors, primarily in the popping phase of the skill. Those who are successful on their first attempts are more likely to be men. These findings have implications for the assessment and training of the threshold skill.

Perspectives of basic wheelchair users on improving their access to wheelchair services in Kenya and Philippines: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The United Nations has called for countries to improve access to mobility devices when needed. The World Health Organization has published guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings. Yet little is known about the extent to which appropriate wheelchairs are available and provided according to international guidelines. This study's purpose was to describe wheelchair users' experiences receiving services and acquiring wheelchair skills in urban and peri-urban areas of Kenya and the Philippines. METHODS: Local researchers in Nairobi and Manila interviewed 48 adult basic wheelchair users, with even distribution of those who had and had not received wheelchair services along with their wheelchair. Recordings were transcribed in the local language and translated into English. The study team coded transcripts for predetermined and emergent themes, using Atlas-ti software. A qualitative content analysis approach was taken with the WHO service delivery process as an organizing framework. RESULTS: Wheelchair users frequently described past experiences with ill-fitting wheelchairs and little formal training to use wheelchairs effectively. Through exposure to multiple wheelchairs and self-advocacy, they learned to select wheelchairs suitable for their needs. Maintenance and repair services were often in short supply. Participants attributed shorter duration of wheelchair use to lack of repair. Peer support networks emerged as an important source of knowledge, resources and emotional support. Most participants acknowledged that they received wheelchairs that would have been difficult or impossible for them to pay for, and despite challenges, they were grateful to have some means of mobility. Four themes emerged as critical for understanding the implementation of wheelchair services: barriers in the physical environment, the need for having multiple chairs to improve access, perceived social stigma, and the importance of peer support. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to provide wheelchairs services efficiently, at scale, in an environment facilitating physical access and peer support, and reduced social stigma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable since this was a descriptive study.

Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Skills Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of group wheelchair skills training to elicit improvements in wheelchair skills. DESIGN: Randomized double-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (N=114). INTERVENTION: Six 90-minute group Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) classes or two 1-hour active control sessions with 6 to 10 people per group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline (t1) and 1-month follow-up (t2) Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) (Version 4.2) for capacity and performance and Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed by 79 participants (WSTP: n=36, active control: n=43). No differences were found between missing and complete cases. Many users were highly skilled at baseline with a WST-Q capacity interquartile range of 77% to 97%. There were no differences between groups at baseline in WST-Q measures or demographics. Compared with the active control group, the WSTP group improved in WST-Q capacity advanced score (P=.02) but not in WST-Q capacity or WST-Q performance total scores (P=.068 and P=.873, respectively). The average GAS score (0% at t1) for the WSTP group at t2 was 65.6%±34.8%. Higher GAS scores and WST-Q capacity scores were found for those who attended more classes and had lower baseline skills. CONCLUSIONS: Group training can improve advanced wheelchair skills capacity and facilitate achievement of individually set goals. Lower skill levels at baseline and increased attendance were correlated with greater improvement.

Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the wheelchair skills capacity and performance of experienced manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study involving within-subject comparisons. SETTING: Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users with SCI (N=117). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: WST and WST-Q version 4.2 as well as measures for Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, Ability to Participate, Satisfaction, and Pain Interference. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) values for WST capacity, WST-Q capacity, and WST-Q performance were 81.0% (69.0%-90.0%), 88.0% (77.0%-97.0%), and 76.0% (66.3%-84.0%). The total WST capacity scores correlated significantly with the total WST-Q capacity scores (r=.76; P<.01) and WST-Q performance scores (r=.55; P<.01). The total WST-Q capacity and WST-Q performance scores were correlated significantly (r=.63; P<.001). Success rates were <75% for 10 of the 32 (31%) individual skills on the WST and 6 of the 32 (19%) individual skills on the WST-Q. Regression models for the total WST and WST-Q measures identified statistically significant predictors including age, sex, body mass index, and/or level of injury. The WST and WST-Q measures correlated significantly with the Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, or Pain Interference measures. CONCLUSIONS: Many people with SCI are unable to or do not perform some of the wheelchair skills that would allow them to participate more fully. More wheelchair skills training may enhance participation and quality of life of adults with SCI. The WST and WST-Q exhibit good content, construct, and concurrent validity.

Effectiveness of a Wheelchair Skills Training Program for Powered Wheelchair Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that powered wheelchair users who receive the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) improve their wheelchair skills in comparison with a control group that receives standard care, and secondarily to assess goal achievement, satisfaction with training, retention, injury rate, confidence with wheelchair use, and participation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation centers and communities. PARTICIPANTS: Powered wheelchair users (N=116). INTERVENTION: Five 30-minute WSTP training sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments were done at baseline (t1), posttraining (t2), and 3 months posttraining (t3) using the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q version 4.1), Goal Attainment Score (GAS), Satisfaction Questionnaire, injury rate, Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for Power Wheelchair Users (WheelCon), and Life Space Assessment (LSA). RESULTS: There was no significant t2-t1 difference between the groups for WST-Q capacity scores (P=.600), but the difference for WST-Q performance scores was significant (P=.016) with a relative (t2/t1 × 100%) improvement of the median score for the intervention group of 10.8%. The mean GAS ± SD for the intervention group after training was 92.8%±11.4%, and satisfaction with training was high. The WST-Q gain was not retained at t3. There was no clinically significant difference between the groups in injury rate and no statistically significant differences in WheelCon or LSA scores at t3. CONCLUSIONS: Powered wheelchair users who receive formal wheelchair skills training demonstrate modest, transient posttraining improvements in their WST-Q performance scores, have substantial improvements on individualized goals, and are positive about training.

Manual wheelchair propulsion by people with hemiplegia: within-participant comparisons of forward versus backward techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that people with hemiplegia using arms and legs to propel their wheelchairs perform better backward than forward and prefer the backward direction. DESIGN: Within-participant cross-sectional design. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=18) with hemiplegia caused by stroke, a sample of convenience. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. INTERVENTION: Participants each performed 9 skills from the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST 4.1)-4 low-rolling-resistance skills (rolls 10m, turns 90° while moving, rolls 2m across 5° side slope, descends 5cm level change) and 5 high-rolling-resistance skills (ascends 5° incline, rolls 2m on soft surface, gets over 15-cm pothole, gets over 2-cm threshold, ascends 5cm level change)-in both the forward and backward directions, in random order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total percentage capacity scores from the modified WST 4.1, success rates for individual skills, and responses from an orally administered questionnaire regarding direction preferences. RESULTS: The mean ± SD total WST 4.1 capacity scores were 53%±26% in the forward direction and 76%±30% in the backward direction (P<.001). For the 4 low-rolling-resistance skills, there were no clinically significant differences (≥20%) between forward and backward success rates. For the 5 high-rolling-resistance skills, the success rates were 33% to 50% higher in the backward direction. Participants preferred the forward direction for low-rolling-resistance skills and the backward direction for high-rolling-resistance skills. CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair skills that involve high rolling resistance are performed more successfully in the backward than the forward direction, and participants prefer the backward direction for such skills. These findings have implications for wheelchair selection and skills training.

Wheelchair propulsion test: development and measurement properties of a new test for manual wheelchair users.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess some of the measurement properties of a simple and inexpensive test that can be used to evaluate the wheelchair mobility of manual wheelchair users. DESIGN: The initial phase of the study was developmental and descriptive. For the assessment of reliability and validity, correlations and comparisons were carried out using within-participant and subgroup comparisons. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=58), a sample of convenience. INTERVENTION: The Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) consists of wheeling 10m while time is recorded with a stopwatch, and the number of cycles and propulsion methods are recorded by observation. The WPT was administered once to each participant. Participants in subgroups involved in the assessment of reliability, construct, and concurrent validity had an additional WPT on the same occasion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Derived measures-speed (m/s), push frequency (cycles per second) and effectiveness (meters per cycle)-from the WPT and, for concurrent validity, an instrumented rear wheel. RESULTS: Regarding intra- and interrater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .72 to .96. Content validity was qualitatively good. For construct validity, on univariate or multivariate analyses, we found statistically significant relations between WPT measures and age, sex, duration of wheelchair use, type of wheelchair frame, and rolling surface. For concurrent validity, the WPT and instrumented wheel variables were highly correlated (r range, .92-.99), and there were no clinically significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: The WPT appears to be a simple and inexpensive test with good measurement properties that can be used for people who use hand and/or foot propulsion. However, further study is needed before widespread implementation can be recommended.

Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the subjective reported scooter-skill scores of new mobility scooter users and to identify significant correlations with other characteristics and measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre study using a cross-sectional design. Participants (N = 22) completed the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire (WST-Q) Version 4.3 for scooter users. It measures the users' perceived capacity (what the user can do), performance (what the user actually does), and confidence (or self-efficacy). Their scooter skills were also rated objectively with the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST). They completed standardised measures of cognition, hearing, vision, life space mobility, visual attention and task switching, and confidence negotiating the social environment using their scooters. RESULTS: Mean total WST-Q capacity scores were 83% and performance scores were 25%. WST-Q capacity scores had significant positive correlations with WST-Q performance (r = 0.321) and confidence scores (r = 0.787), WST capacity scores (r = 0.488), and confidence negotiating the social environment (WheelCon) (r = 0.463). WST-Q capacity scores were significantly negatively correlated with Trail Making B scores (r = -0.591) and age (r = -0.531). CONCLUSIONS: The correlations between WST-Q scores and other variables are similar to those found in other studies among users of scooters and other mobility devices. The gap between capacity and performance scores highlights the needs for additional skills training in this population of novice scooter users.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIn implementing scooter training for new scooter users, attention should be paid to building community-based skills for navigating both the physical and the social environment.Scooter users' age and their driving capabilities need to be taken into account when developing and delivering the training.

A Remote-Learning Course can improve the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence of wheelchair service providers: an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence of wheelchair service providers, and to determine the participants' views on the Course. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study, with pre-post comparisons. To meet the objectives of the six-week Course, the curriculum included self-study and weekly one-hour remote meetings. Participants submitted their Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) (Version 5.3.1) "performance" and "confidence" scores before and after the Course. Participants also completed a Course Evaluation Form after the Course. RESULTS: The 121 participants were almost all from the rehabilitation professions, with a median of 6 years of experience. The mean (SD) WST-Q performance scores rose from 53.4% (17.8) pre-Course to 69.2% (13.8) post-Course, a 29.6% relative improvement (p < 0.0001). The mean (SD) WST-Q confidence scores rose from 53.5% (17.9) to 69.5% (14.3), a 29.9% relative improvement (p < 0.0001). Correlations between performance and confidence were highly significant (p < 0.0001). The Course Evaluation indicated that most participants found the Course useful, relevant, understandable, enjoyable, "just right" in duration, and most stated that they would recommend the Course to others. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is room for improvement, a Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence scores of wheelchair service providers by almost 30%, and participants were generally positive about the Course.

A Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence scores of wheelchair service providers by almost 30%.Participants were generally positive about the Course.

Wheelchair Skills Test in simulated versus community settings: a mixed-methods crossover study of experienced motorized mobility scooter users.

PURPOSE: The Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) is commonly conducted in a simulated setting. Although the WST can be done in the community setting, its usefulness in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the WST in the simulated versus community settings, and to explore participants' perceptions of performing in each environment. METHODS: For this mixed-methods study, we studied 20 motorized mobility scooter users who had used their devices for ≥ 3 months. Each participant completed the WST Version 4.3 twice in random order - once in a simulated setting and once in their community within a two-week period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after completion of the WST in both environments. A self-report version of the WST (WST-Q) was also completed that measured perceived capacity, frequency of skill performance, and confidence. RESULTS: The mean (SD) total WST score in the simulated setting was 88.9% (8.6) and 92.7% (7.8) in the community setting. The two WST scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.306, p = 0.190). Community-setting WST scores were moderately correlated with WST-Q confidence scores. Simulated-setting scores were moderately correlated with WST-Q frequency scores. Although most participants preferred performing the WST in their communities due to convenience and familiarity, they perceived the simulated setting to be reflective of their community settings. CONCLUSION: Despite challenges, community-based testing may provide a better reflection of everyday performance for scooter users than testing in a simulated environment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWheelchair Skills Test (WST) scores obtained from conducting the assessment in the community may be different from those obtained from conducting the assessment in a simulated setting.Since the WST conducted in the community likely provides different information from the WST conducted in the lab, clinicians should carefully consider which environment to access wheelchair skills in.In an urban, community setting, all WST skills were able to be found within a one block radius of participants' homes.

International research priorities on the role of cognition in power mobility device use: In pursuit of informed clinical practices and knowledge translation.

Cognition is an important factor affecting power mobility device (PMD) use. However, a gap in knowledge on the role of cognition in PMD use limits evidence of best practices for screening, assessment, and training. The overall goal of this research activity was to identify strategic research priorities to delineate the next steps in research. Following the Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process (CP3), a 1.5-day meeting was held with an interdisciplinary and international team of assistive technology users, clinicians, service providers, and researchers with expertise in PMD use and cognition. Our four-stage process included: knowledge synthesis; identification and prioritization of challenges; identification, consolidation, and prioritization of solutions; and action planning. Five of 14 challenges for research on cognition and PMD use were prioritized, and five solutions (of the 100 generated) perceived to be the most impactful were selected as the focus for the remainder of the meeting. The resulting prioritized solutions included, improving knowledge translation of existing and new evidence, profiling and addressing individualized needs, creating and evaluating training tools, development of practice guidelines, and validating and developing evaluation tools or toolkit. Preliminary action planning facilitated discussion of potential future projects, initiated new research collaborations and partnerships, and provided a foundation to build a program of research for investigating the role of cognition in PMD use.

Qualitative experiences of new motorised mobility scooter users relevant to their scooter skills: a secondary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of new motorised mobility scooter users from the perspectives of the assessment and training of scooter skills. DESIGN: Descriptive secondary analysis of qualitative data. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 20 New users of motorised mobility scooters. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Directed qualitative analysis of up to four semi-structured interviews over the course of the first year of scooter use, to identify themes and sub-themes that could inform recommendations regarding assessment and training protocols. RESULTS: We identified two themes. The first related to potential new content. As one example of the sub-themes, there were many excerpts that dealt with the use of skills in various combinations and permutations that were used to carry out activities during everyday life and participate in society. These excerpts suggested the importance of training skills in combination to facilitate skill transfer (or generalizability). The second theme is related to enhancements of existing content. As one example of the sub-themes, there were several excerpts that dealt with scooter security. These excerpts led to the recommendation that removing and inserting the scooter key should be added to the assessment criteria for the "turns power on and off" skill of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and its questionnaire version (WST-Q). CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of scooter users over the first year of receiving a scooter appear to be relevant to the assessment and training of scooter skills and suggest themes for further study. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02696213 IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe experiences of new scooter users are highly relevant to the assessment and training of scooter skills.These experiences suggest both potential new content and enhancements of existing content to the Wheelchair Skills Program Manual.