Absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the semen of men recovering from COVID-19 infection: An exploratory study and review of literature.

The effect of COVID-19 on the male reproductive tract has been sparsely studied. This exploratory study was designed to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the semen of men recovering from COVID-19. A systematic literature review was also performed as per PRISMA guidelines to gather perspective on this topic. The prospective study included men 21 years and older recovering from COVID-19 with nasopharyngeal swab negative for SARS-CoV-2 or at least two weeks from the last COVID RT-PCR positivity. After clinical evaluation, freshly ejaculated semen sample by masturbation was collected in a sterile container. Samples were processed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Twenty-one patients were contacted for the study, 11 of which consented to provide a semen sample. The mean age of the cohort was 29.72 ± 4.52 years. None of the patients gave a history of epididymo-orchitis or sexual dysfunction at the time of assessment. None of the semen samples demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR. Median duration of semen sample collection from the COVID positivity was 44 days (Range 19-59 days). Detailed literature review revealed that SARS-CoV-2 is not found in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. We conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is not found in the semen of patients recovering from COVID-19.

Respiratory viral infections other than SARS CoV-2 among the North Indian patients presenting with acute respiratory illness during the first COVID-19 wave.

Acute respiratory infections due to viral or bacterial etiology can cause 60 deaths per one lakh population. Viral etiology is more common as compared to bacterial, but lack of definite diagnosis leads to increased usage of empirical antibiotics. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a need to identify co-infections especially in severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) patients to identify it as one of the cofactors for increased severity of illness and to identify the causative agents in COVID-19 negative individuals. The SARS CoV-2 real time PCR was carried out using ICMR approved kits and the other respiratory viruses were detected using the multiplex commercially available real time  kit. A total of 186 patients presenting with either SARI (89.8%) or influenza like illness (10.2%) were included in the study. Out of these, 43 (23.1%) were positive for SARS CoV-2 RNA and 2 (4.6%) patients with SARI showed concomitant infection with either human rhinovirus or human respiratory syncytial virus . Out of 143 patients negative for SARS CoV-2, 35 (24.5%) were positive for one or more microbial infections and 28 (19.6%) infected with other respiratory viral infection most common being human rhinovirus. The results suggest that viral coinfections are significantly higher among COVID-19 negative individuals (24.5% vs 4.6%) presenting with respiratory illness as compared to COVID-19 positive individuals possibly due to viral interference and competitive advantage of SARS-CoV-2 in modulating the host immunity. Further detailed research is required for the understanding of mechanisms of viral co-infection.