RESUMO
Anxious depression represents a subtype of major depressive disorder and is associated with increased suicidality, severity, chronicity and lower treatment response. Only a few studies have investigated the differences between anxious depressed (aMDD) and non-anxious depressed (naMDD) patients regarding treatment dosage, serum-concentration and drug-specific treatment response. In our naturalistic and prospective study, we investigated whether the effectiveness of therapy including antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, tricyclics and combinations) in aMDD patients differs significantly from that in naMDD patients. In a sample of 346 patients, we calculated the anxiety somatization factor (ASF) and defined treatment response as a reduction (≥50%) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-21 score after 7 weeks of pharmacological treatment. We did not observe an association between therapy response and the baseline ASF-scores, or differences in therapy outcomes between aMDD and naMDD patients. However, non-responders had higher ASF-scores, and at week 7 aMDD patients displayed a worse therapy outcome than naMDD patients. In subgroup analyses for different antidepressant drugs, venlafaxine-treated aMDD patients showed a significantly worse outcome at week 7. Future prospective, randomized-controlled studies should address the question of a worse therapy outcome in aMDD patients for different psychopharmaceuticals individually.
Assuntos
Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Antidepressivos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with increased cardiac morbidity. Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) as well as lower interoceptive accuracy (IAc) have been observed in MDD as possible sympathomimetic mechanisms related to insula activity. The salience network (SN) anchored by the insula has been posited as a crucial functional network for cardiac sensations and the default mode network (DMN) for MDD. This study aimed to investigate the relation between insula-centered and depression-related brain networks, IAc and HRV in patients with depression as a possible mechanism by which MDD increases cardiac morbidity. METHODS: 30 depressed inpatients and 30 healthy subjects (derived from the population-based "Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression" cohort study, STAAB) all over 50 years were examined. HRV and IAc were assessed via electrocardiogram and a heartbeat perception task prior to a 3 T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Seed-to-voxel resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analysis was conducted with six seeds in the insula and two seeds in the DMN. RESULTS: Depressed patients on the one hand showed decreased FC between insula cortex and frontal as well occipital cortical brain regions compared to controls. Depressed patients on the other hand exhibited higher FC between the medial prefrontal cortex and the insula cortex compared to controls. However, depressed patients did not differ in HRV nor in IAc compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Thus, differences in insula-related brain networks in depression in our study were not mirrored by differences in HRV and IAc. Future research is needed to define the mechanism by which depression increases cardiac morbidity.