Can the DEX/CRH test or markers of oxidative stress distinguish work-related stress from major depressive disorder and normal controls?

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis hyperactivity measured by the combined dexamethasone-CRH test (DEX-CRH test) has been found in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), whereas hypoactivity has been found in patients with work-related stress. We aimed to investigate the DEX-CRH test as a biomarker to distinguish between MDD and work-related stress (exhaustion disorder - ED). We hypothesized that there would be lower cortisol and ACTH response in participants with ED compared to MDD and healthy controls (HC). Also, we explored if the cortisol response of those patients interacted with robust markers of oxidative stress. Thirty inpatients with MDD and 23 outpatients with ED were recruited. Plasma cortisol and ACTH were sampled during a DEX-CRH test. The main outcome measure, area under the curve (AUC) for cortisol and ACTH, was compa-red between MDD vs. ED participants and a historical HC group. Secondary markers of oxidative stress urinary 8-oxodG and 8-oxoGuo; quality of sleep and psychometrics were obtained. Cortisol concentrations were higher in MDD and ED participants compared to HC, and no differences in AUC cortisol and ACTH were found between ED vs. MDD. Compared to ED, MDD participants had higher stress symptom severity and a lower sense of well-being. No differences in oxidative stress markers or quality of sleep between the groups were found. The result indicates that the patients with ED, like patients with MDD, are non-suppressors in DEX-CRH test and not hypocortisolemic as suggested.

GIP receptor antagonism eliminates paradoxical growth hormone secretion in some patients with acromegaly.

CONTEXT: About 30% of patients with active acromegaly experience paradoxically increased growth hormone (GH) secretion during the diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is implicated in this paradoxical secretion. OBJECTIVE: We used the GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 to test the hypothesis that GIP mediates this paradoxical response when GIPR is abundantly expressed in somatotropinomas. DESIGN, PATIENTS, SETTING, INTERVENTIONS: 25 treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly were enrolled. Each patient underwent one OGTT during simultaneous placebo infusion and one OGTT during a GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and regularly after infusions to measure GH. We assessed pituitary adenoma size by magnetic resonance imaging and GIPR expression by immunohistochemistry on resected somatotropinomas. For mechanistic confirmation, we applied in vitro and ex vivo approaches. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The effect of GIP(3-30)NH2 on paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT as a measure of GIP involvement. RESULTS: In four of seven patients with paradoxical GH secretion, GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion completely abolished the paradoxical response (P = 0.0003). Somatotrophs were available from three of four of these patients, all showing abundant GIPR expression. Adenoma size did not differ between patients with and without paradoxical GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Of 25 patients with acromegaly, seven had paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT, and pharmaceutical GIPR blockade abolished this secretion in four. Corresponding somatotroph adenomas abundantly expressed GIPR, suggesting a therapeutic target in this subpopulation of patients. In vitro and ex vivo analyses confirmed the role of GIP and the effects of the antagonist.

[Pituitary insufficiency following head trauma]. / Hypofyseinsufficiens efter hovedtraumer.

Brain injury following head trauma is a potential cause of acquired hypopituitarism, although regarded as uncommon. Consequently, such patients do not routinely undergo neuroendocrine evaluation. Recent data suggest hypopituitarism to be more common than previously stated, with a prevalence of at least 25% in long-term survivors. As untreated hypopituitarism is likely to delay recovery and rehabilitation, this calls for a change in the current management of patients suffering traumatic brain injury. In this article, we will review current knowledge in this field.