RESUMO
Importance: Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that has been associated with high costs and adverse long-term outcomes. Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted intervention is effective for the prevention of AKI after coronary angiography or PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: A stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in Alberta, Canada, that included all invasive cardiologists at 3 cardiac catheterization laboratories who were randomized to various start dates for the intervention between January 2018 and September 2019. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older who underwent nonemergency coronary angiography, PCI, or both; who were not undergoing dialysis; and who had a predicted AKI risk of greater than 5%. Thirty-four physicians performed 7820 procedures among 7106 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Participant follow-up ended in November 2020. Interventions: During the intervention period, cardiologists received educational outreach, computerized clinical decision support on contrast volume and hemodynamic-guided intravenous fluid targets, and audit and feedback. During the control (preintervention) period, cardiologists provided usual care and did not receive the intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was AKI. There were 12 secondary outcomes, including contrast volume, intravenous fluid administration, and major adverse cardiovascular and kidney events. The analyses were conducted using time-adjusted models. Results: Of the 34 participating cardiologists who were divided into 8 clusters by practice group and center, the intervention group included 31 who performed 4327 procedures among 4032 patients (mean age, 70.3 [SD, 10.7] years; 1384 were women [32.0%]) and the control group included 34 who performed 3493 procedures among 3251 patients (mean age, 70.2 [SD, 10.8] years; 1151 were women [33.0%]). The incidence of AKI was 7.2% (310 events after 4327 procedures) during the intervention period and 8.6% (299 events after 3493 procedures) during the control period (between-group difference, -2.3% [95% CI, -0.6% to -4.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.93]; P = .01). Of 12 prespecified secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference. The proportion of procedures in which excessive contrast volumes were used was reduced to 38.1% during the intervention period from 51.7% during the control period (between-group difference, -12.0% [95% CI, -14.4% to -9.4%]; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.90]; P = .002). The proportion of procedures in eligible patients in whom insufficient intravenous fluid was given was reduced to 60.8% during the intervention period from 75.1% during the control period (between-group difference, -15.8% [95% CI, -19.7% to -12.0%]; OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87]; P = .002). There were no significant between-group differences in major adverse cardiovascular events or major adverse kidney events. Conclusions and Relevance: Among cardiologists randomized to an intervention including clinical decision support with audit and feedback, patients undergoing coronary procedures during the intervention period were less likely to develop AKI compared with those treated during the control period, with a time-adjusted absolute risk reduction of 2.3%. Whether this intervention would show efficacy outside this study setting requires further investigation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03453996.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Meios de Contraste , Angiografia Coronária , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Retroalimentação , Auditoria Médica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Perceived social support is known to be an important predictor of health outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study investigates patterns of longitudinal trajectories of patient-reported perceived social support in individuals with ACS. METHODS: Data are from 3013 patients from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry who had their first cardiac catheterization between 2004 and 2011. Perceived social support was assessed using the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS) 2 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years post catheterization. Group-based trajectory analysis based on longitudinal multiple imputation model was used to identify distinct subgroups of trajectories of perceived social support over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Three distinct social support trajectory subgroups were identified, namely: "High" social support group (60%), "Intermediate" social support group (30%), and "Low" social support subgroup (10%). Being female (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = [1.18-2.36]), depression (OR = 8.10; 95% CI = [4.27-15.36]) and smoking (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = [1.23-2.35]) were predictors of the differences among these trajectory subgroups. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of ACS patients showed increased or fairly stable trajectories of social support, about 10% of the cohort reported declining social support. These findings can inform targeted psycho-social interventions to improve their perceived social support and health outcomes.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/psicologia , Doença das Coronárias/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Autorrelato , Apoio Social , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Alberta , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Estudos de Coortes , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Depressão/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surveys of patients suggest many want to be actively involved in treatment decisions for acute coronary syndromes. However, patient experiences of their engagement and participation in early phase decision-making have not been well described. METHODS: We performed a patient led qualitative study to explore patient experiences with decision-making processes when admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Trained patient-researchers conducted the study via a three-phase approach using focus groups and semi-structured interviews and employing grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Twenty patients discharged within one year of a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome participated in the study. Several common themes emerged. First, patients characterized the admission and early treatment of ACS as a rapidly unfolding process where they had little control. Participants felt they played a passive role in early phase decision-making. Furthermore, participants described feeling reduced capacity for decision-making owing to fear and mental stress from acute illness, and therefore most but not all participants were relieved that expert clinicians made decisions for them. Finally, once past the emergent phase of care, participants wanted to retake a more active role in their treatment and follow-up plans. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted with ACS often do not take an active role in initial clinical decisions, and are satisfied to allow the medical team to direct early phase care. These results provide important insight relevant to designing patient-centered interventions in ACS and other urgent care situations.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Tomada de Decisões , Participação do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gender differences exist in the presentation and outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Our study objective was to compare gender differences in prevalence, co-morbidities, and revascularization treatment in CAD patients with chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis using the Canadian Multicenter CTO Registry, which included 1,690 consecutive CTO patients identified at coronary angiography and a control group of 7,682 non-CTO patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of women in the CTO group was significantly lower compared to the control group (19% vs. 30%, P < 0.001). Within the overall CTO group, women were significantly older than men (70 ± 12 vs. 66 ± 11 years, P < 0.001) with more comorbidities, including hypertension and heart failure. Rates of PCI in the CTO group were similar between gender (10%), however, women with CTO were treated significantly less by CABG compared to men (19% vs. 27%, P = 0.003). Moreover, compared to male patients, significantly fewer women undergoing CABG had revascularization of the CTO artery (84% vs. 93%, P = 0.03). Multivariable analysis indicated that female gender (along with age, chronic renal failure, prior MI and cerebro-vascular disease) were independent predictors for not receiving CABG treatment for CTO. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender differences exist in CTO patients with both lower prevalence of CTOs at angiography and lower revascularization rates of CTOs by CABG. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It is unclear, however, how depressive symptoms change over time and the impact of these changes on long-term functional outcomes. We examined the association between different trajectories of depressive symptoms over 1 year and change in functional status over 30 months among patients undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 350 patients aged 60 and older undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization (October 2003-February 2007). A dynamic measure of significant depressive symptoms (i.e., Geriatric Depression Scale score 5+) capturing change over 12 months was derived that categorized patients into the following groups: (i) no clinically important depressive symptoms (at baseline, 6 and 12 months); (ii) baseline-only symptoms (at baseline but not at 6 and 12 months); (iii) new onset symptoms (not at baseline but present at either 6 or 12 months); and, (iv) persistent symptoms (at baseline and at either 6 or 12 month assessment). Primary outcomes were mean change in Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) instrumental (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (BADL) scores (range 0-14 for each) across baseline (pre-procedure) and 6, 12, and 30 months post-procedure visits. RESULTS: Estimates for the symptom categories were 71 % (none), 9 % (baseline only), 8 % (new onset) and 12 % (persistent). In adjusted models, patients with persistent symptoms showed a significant decrease in mean IADL and BADL scores from baseline to 6 months (-1.32 [95 % CI -1.78 to -0.86] and -0.63 [-0.97 to -0.30], respectively) and from 12 to 30 months (-0.79 [-1.27 to -0.31] and -1.00 [-1.35 to -0.65], respectively). New onset symptoms were associated with a significant decrease in mean IADL scores at 6 months and from 6 to 12 months. Patients with no depressive symptoms showed little change in scores whereas those with baseline only symptoms showed significant improvement in mean IADL at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent depressive symptoms were at greatest risk for worse functional status 30 months following coronary interventions. Proactive screening and follow-up for depression in this population offers prognostic value and may facilitate the implementation of targeted interventions.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/psicologia , Depressão/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Vida Independente/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Morbidity due to cardiovascular disease is high among First Nations people. The extent to which this may be related to the likelihood of coronary angiography is unclear. We examined the likelihood of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction (MI) among First Nations and non-First Nations patients. METHODS: Our study included adults with incident acute MI between 1997 and 2008 in Alberta. We determined the likelihood of angiography among First Nations and non-First Nations patients, adjusted for important confounders, using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. RESULTS: Of the 46,764 people with acute MI, 1043 (2.2%) were First Nations. First Nations patients were less likely to receive angiography within 1 day after acute MI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87). Among First Nations and non-First Nations patients who underwent angiography (64.9%), there was no difference in the likelihood of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.25). First Nations people had worse survival if they received medical management alone (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.77) or if they underwent PCI (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.80), whereas survival was similar among First Nations and non-First Nations patients who received CABG. INTERPRETATION: First Nations people were less likely to undergo angiography after acute MI and experienced worse long-term survival compared with non-First Nations people. Efforts to improve access to angiography for First Nations people may improve outcomes.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etnologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nationally, symptomatic heart failure affects 1.5-2% of Canadians, incurs $3 billion in hospital costs annually and the global burden is expected to double in the next 1-2 decades. The current one-year mortality rate after diagnosis of heart failure remains high at >25%. Consequently, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed for this debilitating condition. METHODS/DESIGN: The objective of the Alberta HEART program (http://albertaheartresearch.ca) is to develop novel diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic approaches to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We hypothesize that novel imaging techniques and biomarkers will aid in describing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Furthermore, the development of new diagnostic criteria will allow us to: 1) better define risk factors associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; 2) elucidate clinical, cellular and molecular mechanisms involved with the development and progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; 3) design and test new therapeutic strategies for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Additionally, Alberta HEART provides training and education for enhancing translational medicine, knowledge translation and clinical practice in heart failure. This is a prospective observational cohort study of patients with, or at risk for, heart failure. Patients will have sequential testing including quality of life and clinical outcomes over 12 months. After that time, study participants will be passively followed via linkage to external administrative databases. Clinical outcomes of interest include death, hospitalization, emergency department visits, physician resource use and/or heart transplant. Patients will be followed for a total of 5 years. DISCUSSION: Alberta HEART has the primary objective to define new diagnostic criteria for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. New criteria will allow for targeted therapies, diagnostic tests and further understanding of the patients, both at-risk for and with heart failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02052804.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Alberta/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/sangue , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Volume Sistólico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular EsquerdaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with ACS often present to community hospitals without on-site cardiac catheterization and revascularization therapies. Transfer to specialized cardiac procedural centers is necessary to provide access to these procedures. We evaluated process of care within a regional care model by comparing cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates and outcomes in ACS patients presenting to community and interventional hospitals. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 6154 patients with ACS admitted to Southern Alberta hospitals (where a distinct regional care model for ACS exists) between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009. We compared cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates during index hospitalization among patients admitted to community and interventional hospitals. Thirty day and 1-year survival were also evaluated. RESULTS: Catheterization was performed more often in patients presenting to community hospitals compared to the interventional facility (respectively 69.5% and 51.4%, p < 0.0001). Catheterization within 72 hours of admission occurred in 48% of patients presenting to the interventional center and in 68.3% of community patients (P < 0.0001). In patients undergoing catheterization, revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) was also performed more frequently in the community group (74.5% vs 56.1%, P < 0.0001). Risk adjusted mortality rates were the same for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization regardless of hospital of initial presentation. CONCLUSION: ACS patients presenting to community centers associated with a regional care model had effective access to cardiac catheterization and revascularization. These findings support the importance of regional initiatives and processes of care that facilitate access to cardiac catheterization for all ACS patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Regionalização da Saúde , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Masculino , Revascularização Miocárdica , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an efficacious yet underused treatment for patients with coronary artery disease. The objective of this study was to determine the association between CR completion and mortality and resource use. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 5886 subjects (20.8% female; mean age, 60.6 years) who had undergone angiography and were referred for CR in Calgary, AB, Canada, between 1996 and 2009. Outcomes of interest included freedom from emergency room visits, hospitalization, and survival in CR completers versus noncompleters, adjusted for clinical covariates, treatment strategy, and coronary anatomy. Hazard ratios for events for CR completers versus noncompleters were also constructed. A propensity model was used to match completers to noncompleters on baseline characteristics, and each outcome was compared between propensity-matched groups. Of the subjects referred for CR, 2900 (49.3%) completed the program, and an additional 554 subjects started but did not complete CR. CR completion was associated with a lower risk of death, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.70). CR completion was also associated with a decreased risk of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84) and cardiac hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.83) but not with emergency room visits. Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated a persistent association between CR completion and reduced mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among those coronary artery disease patients referred, CR completion is associated with improved survival and decreased hospitalization. There is a need to explore reasons for nonattendance and to test interventions to improve attendance after referral.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/reabilitação , Cooperação do Paciente , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The long-term incidence of heart failure (HF) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or unstable angina (UA) patients is uncertain. We examined the 1-year incidence of HF and its association with mortality among patients surviving their first acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study of patients, aged ≥20 years, with no prior HF, hospitalized for the first time with ACS between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2008, in Alberta, Canada, and followed up for 1 year. Index HF was defined as HF that developed as a complication during the index ACS hospitalization, and post-discharge HF, as HF developing after discharge from the index ACS hospitalization. Among 9,406 STEMI, 11,008 NSTEMI, and 4,910 UA patients, 13.6%, 14.8%, and 5.2% had index HF, respectively (P < .01). At 1-year, cumulative HF rates were 23.4% in STEMI, 25.4% in NSTEMI, and 16% in UA patients. Among hospital survivors, 1-year mortality rate was 13.9% in patients with index HF, 10.6% in patients with postdischarge HF, and 2.4% in patients with no HF. In multivariable analysis, both index HF (adjusted hazard ratio 3.2, 95% CI 2.7-3.7) and postdischarge HF (adjusted hazard ratio 4.6, 95% CI 3.9-5.4) were associated with 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the incidence of HF among STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA patients. The increased mortality risk associated with index HF and postdischarge HF suggests a need for vigilant follow-up of all ACS patients for prompt detection and treatment of HF.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unknown if baseline angiographic findings can be used to estimate residual risk of patients with chronic stable angina treated with both optimal medical therapy (OMT) and protocol-assigned or symptom-driven percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were adjudicated in 2,275 COURAGE patients. The number of vessels diseased (VD) was defined as the number of major coronary arteries with ≥50% diameter stenosis. Proximal left anterior descending, either isolated or in combination with other disease, was also evaluated. Depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was defined as ≤50%. Cox regression analyses included these anatomical factors as well as interaction terms for initial treatment assignment (OMT or OMT + PCI). RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention and proximal left anterior descending did not influence any outcome. Death was predicted by low LVEF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.86, CI 1.34-2.59, P < .001) and VD (HR 1.45, CI 1.20-1.75, P < .001). Myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were predicted only by VD (HR 1.53, CI 1.30-1.81 and HR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.44, P = .007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of OMT and irrespective of protocol-assigned or clinically driven PCI, LVEF and angiographic burden of disease at baseline retain prognostic power and reflect residual risk for secondary ischemic events.
Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/terapia , Vasos Coronários/anatomia & histologia , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Angina Pectoris/complicações , Angina Pectoris/mortalidade , Angiografia Coronária , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Análise de Regressão , Medição de Risco , Volume Sistólico , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with early mortality after percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures, but its prognostic relevance to long-term clinical outcomes remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study of 14782 adults who received coronary angiography in the province of Alberta, Canada, between 2004 and 2006. AKI was identified on the basis of changes in serum creatinine concentration within 7 days of the procedure according to AKI Network criteria. The associations between AKI and long-term outcomes, including mortality, end-stage renal disease, and cardiovascular and renal hospitalizations, were studied with the use of Cox regression of multiple failure times. The adjusted risk of death increased with increasing severity of AKI; compared with no AKI, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 2.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.69 to 2.36) with stage 1 AKI and 3.72 (95% confidence interval, 2.92 to 4.76) with stage 2 or 3 AKI. The adjusted risk of end-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy also increased according to the severity of AKI (hazard ratio, 4.15 [95% confidence interval, 2.32 to 7.42] and 11.74 [95% confidence interval, 6.38 to 21.59], respectively), as did the risks of subsequent hospitalizations for heart failure and acute renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: These findings inform the controversy surrounding AKI after angiography, demonstrating that it is a significant risk factor for long-term mortality, end-stage renal disease, and hospitalization for cardiovascular and renal events after coronary angiography.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Creatinina/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: People of South Asian (SA) ancestry are susceptible to coronary artery disease (CAD). Although studies suggest that SA with CAD has a worse prognosis compared with Europeans, it is unknown whether corresponding differences in functional status and quality-of-life (QOL) measures exist. Accordingly, we compared symptoms, function, and QOL in SA and European Canadians with CAD using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). METHODS: Using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease, an outcomes registry that captures patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada, we identified 635 SA and 18,934 European patients with angiographic CAD from January 1995 to December 2006 who reported health status outcomes using the SAQ at 1 year after the index catheterization. To obtain comparable clinical variables among SA and Europeans, we used a propensity score-matching technique. RESULTS: One-year adjusted mean (SD) scores were significantly lower in SA compared with European Canadians for most SAQ domains: exertional capacity (75 [23] vs 80 [23], P = .011), anginal stability (77 [28] vs 77 [27], P = .627), anginal frequency (86 [23] vs 88 [20], P < .001), treatment satisfaction (86 [19] vs 89 [16], P < .001), and SAQ QOL (71 [24] vs 76 [21], P < .001). These results could not be accounted for by differences in baseline QOL scores or changes in health status from baseline to 1 year. CONCLUSION: South Asian Canadians with established CAD have significantly worse health status outcomes at 1 year after angiography compared with European Canadians. Further studies are warranted to improve functional outcomes in SA with CAD.
Assuntos
Povo Asiático , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etnologia , Nível de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Alberta/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is variation in cardiac catheterization utilization across jurisdictions. Previous work from Alberta, Canada, showed no evidence of a plateau in the yield of high-risk disease at cardiac catheterization rates as high as 600 per 100,000 population suggesting that the optimal rate is higher. This work aims 1) To determine if a previously demonstrated linear relationship between the yield of high-risk coronary disease and cardiac catheterization rates persists with contemporary data and 2) to explore whether the linear relationship exists in other jurisdictions. METHODS: Detailed clinical information on all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in 3 Canadian provinces was available through the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart (APPROACH) disease and partner initiatives in British Columbia and Nova Scotia. Population rates of catheterization and high-risk coronary disease detection for each health region in these three provinces, and age-adjusted rates produced using direct standardization. A mixed effects regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between catheterization rate and high-risk coronary disease detection. RESULTS: In the contemporary Alberta data, we found a linear relationship between the population catheterization rate and the high-risk yield. Although the yield was slightly less in time period 2 (2002-2006) than in time period 1(1995-2001), there was no statistical evidence of a plateau. The linear relationship between catheterization rate and high-risk yield was similarly demonstrated in British Columbia and Nova Scotia and appears to extend, without a plateau in yield, to rates over 800 procedures per 100,000 population. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a consistent finding, over time and across jurisdictions, of linearly increasing detection of high-risk CAD as population rates of cardiac catheterization increase. This internationally-relevant finding can inform country-level planning of invasive cardiac care services.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Programas Médicos Regionais/normas , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendências , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Vigilância da População , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Experience surveys provide an opportunity for patients to give their feedback about health care processes and services. Unfortunately, the most current surveys have been designed as "one-size fits-all" tools, and thus, do not take into account items pertaining to specific clinical groups. The objective of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the specific aspects of care deemed important to cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: Individual semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with a cohort of patients who had previously underwent cardiac surgery. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using a phenomenological approach, a thematic analysis was used to generate a list of themes and subthemes deemed important by participants. RESULTS: Eight interviews were conducted in July and August 2019. Participants included 7 men and 1 woman, ranging from 55 to 84 years of age. Five key themes emerged from the data: (1) overall experience; (2) communication; (3) the physical hospital environment; (4) care needs and ongoing management; and (5) person-centred care. Our interviews revealed that participants had many overwhelmingly positive experiences with care. Through reports of their own experiences, participants highlighted important areas that might be improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm and expand upon those highlighted in quantitative research by our group. Findings and knowledge derived from this study might be used to inform quality improvement activities. These might also play a key role in the development of a patient experience survey, specifically for those who undergo cardiac surgery; thus addressing a potential limitation of surveys currently in use.
CONTEXTE: Les sondages sur l'expérience offrent l'occasion aux patients de transmettre leur point de vue au sujet des services et des processus de soins de santé. Malheureusement, la plupart des sondages actuels sont conçus comme des outils universels, et ne prenent donc pas en considération certains aspects propres à des groupes cliniques précis. L'objectif de cette étude est de mieux cerner les aspects précis des soins qui sont jugés importants par les patients qui ont subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des entretiens téléphoniques individuels semi-structurés ont été menés avec une cohorte de patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque. Les entretiens ont été enregistrés et retranscrits. Une analyse thématique utilisant une approche phénoménologique a été effectuée pour générer une liste de thèmes et de sous-thèmes jugés importants par les participants. RÉSULTATS: Huit entretiens ont été réalisés en juillet et en août 2019. Les participants regroupaient sept hommes et une femme, âgés de 55 à 84 ans. Les données recueillies ont permis de cerner cinq thèmes clés : 1) expérience globale; 2) communication; 3) environnement physique à l'hôpital; 4) besoins en matière de soins et prise en charge continue; et 5) soins axés sur le patient. Nos entretiens ont révélé que les participants avaient eu plusieurs expériences de soins extrêmement positives. En relatant leurs propres expériences, les participants ont souligné d'importants aspects qui pourraient être améliorés. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats confirment ceux des recherches quantitatives effectuées par notre groupe, et viennent les étayer. Les données et les résultats générés par cette étude pourraient être utilisés pour mettre au point des mesures visant l'amélioration de la qualité. Ils pourraient également jouer un rôle important dans la création d'un sondage sur l'expérience des patients, et plus précisément l'expérience des patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque, et ainsi remédier aux limites possibles des sondages utilisés à l'heure actuelle.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusions (CTO) occur in nearly 20% of coronary angiograms. CTO revascularization, either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), is infrequently performed, approximately one-third of cases. Long-term outcomes are unknown. The objective of the study was to determine whether early CTO revascularization of patients, either by CABG or PCI, was associated with improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: One thousand six hundred twenty-four patients from the Canadian CTO registry were followed for at least 9.75 years. Revascularization was performed according to routine clinical practice. Patients were grouped according to CTO revascularization status (PCI or CABG of CTO vessel, CTO revasc) or no CTO revasc (medical therapy only, or PCI/CABG of non-CTO vessels only), within 3 months of initial angiogram. Patients were followed for mortality, revascularization procedures (PCI and CABG), and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. RESULTS: Early CTO revasc was performed in 28.2% of patients (17.5% CABG, 10.7% PCI). The CTO revasc group was younger, with more males and generally fewer comorbidities. There was a significantly lower mortality probability at 10 years in the CTO revascularization group (22.7% [95% CI, 19.0%-26.9%]) compared with the no CTO revasc group (36.6% [95% CI, 33.8%-39.5%]). At 10 years, revascularization rates (14.0% versus 22.8%) and acute coronary syndrome hospitalization rates (10.0% versus 16.6%) were significantly lower in the CTO revasc group. Baseline-adjusted analysis showed CTO revasc was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.84]). In both landmark and time varying analyses, association with lower mortality was particularly robust for CTO revascularization by CABG (hazard ratio 0.56 and 0.60, respectively), with a marginally significant result for PCI in the time varying analysis (hazard ratio 0.711 [95% CI, 0.51-0.998]). CONCLUSIONS: Early CTO revascularization was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality, revascularization rates, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome at 10 years, and mainly driven by outcomes in patients with CABG.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Canadá , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To determine whether acute kidney injury results in later long-term decline in kidney function we measured changes in kidney function over a 3-year period in adults undergoing coronary angiography who had serum creatinine measurements as part of their clinical care. Acute kidney injury was categorized by the magnitude of increase in serum creatinine (mild (50-99% or >or=0.3 mg/dl) and moderate or severe (>or=100%)) within 7 days of coronary angiography. Compared to patients without acute kidney injury, the adjusted odds of a sustained decline in kidney function at 3 months following angiography increased more than 4-fold for patients with mild to more than 17-fold for those with moderate or severe acute kidney injury. Among those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate after angiography less than 90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), the subsequent adjusted mean rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate during long-term follow-up (all normalized to 1.73 m(2) per year) was 0.2 ml/min in patients without acute kidney injury, 0.8 ml/min following mild injury, and 2.8 ml/min following moderate to severe acute kidney injury. Thus, acute kidney injury following coronary angiography is associated with a sustained loss and a larger rate of future decline in kidney function.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Creatina/sangue , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease, it remains unclear whether an initial management strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intensive pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle intervention (optimal medical therapy) is superior to optimal medical therapy alone in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial involving 2287 patients who had objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and significant coronary artery disease at 50 U.S. and Canadian centers. Between 1999 and 2004, we assigned 1149 patients to undergo PCI with optimal medical therapy (PCI group) and 1138 to receive optimal medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). The primary outcome was death from any cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction during a follow-up period of 2.5 to 7.0 years (median, 4.6). RESULTS: There were 211 primary events in the PCI group and 202 events in the medical-therapy group. The 4.6-year cumulative primary-event rates were 19.0% in the PCI group and 18.5% in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio for the PCI group, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.27; P=0.62). There were no significant differences between the PCI group and the medical-therapy group in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (20.0% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.27; P=0.62); hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (12.4% vs. 11.8%; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.37; P=0.56); or myocardial infarction (13.2% vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.43; P=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: As an initial management strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease, PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007657 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/terapia , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During daytime working hours, outcomes may be worse when percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed later in the day because of operator fatigue and differences in process of care. METHODS: Using the APPROACH database, we analyzed 2,492 consecutive nonurgent PCI procedures performed during working hours. Patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes were excluded. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether PCI was started in the morning (7:00 am-12:00 pm, n = 1,446) or after noon (12:01 pm-6:00 pm, n = 1,037). Outcomes included procedural complications; target vessel revascularization (TVR); and death at 7 days, 30 days, and 1 year. RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI in the afternoon were more likely to have heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV or atypical angina symptoms; more likely to be inpatients; less likely to have stable angina; and less likely to receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Patients undergoing PCI in the afternoon had significantly higher unadjusted rates of the composite of death and TVR at 7 days (0.9% vs 0.3%, P = .04) and 30 days (2.0% vs 1.0%, P = .04) and death at 1 year (2.2% vs 1.1%, P = .03) compared with PCI performed in the morning. After multivariate adjustment, the differences in the composite of death and TVR at 30 days and at 1 year were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing nonurgent PCI during working hours after noon had higher rates of TVR in the first 30 days and death at 1 year. Further study is required to determine whether patient characteristics, operator fatigue, differences in process of care, or a combination of these factors accounts for the difference in outcomes.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Alberta/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We developed and validated laboratory test-based risk scores (i.e., lab risk scores) to reclassify mortality risk among patients undergoing their first coronary catheterization. METHODS: Patients were catheterized between 2009 and 2015 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada (n = 14 135, derivation cohort), and in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (n = 12 143, validation cohort). Logistic regression with group LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) penalty was used to select quintiles of the last laboratory tests (red blood cell count, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, red cell distribution width, platelet count, total white blood cell count, plasma sodium, potassium, chloride, CO2, international normalized ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate) performed <30 days before catheterization and by age and sex that were significantly associated with death ≤60 and >60 days after catheterization. Follow-up was until 2016. Risk scores were developed from significant tests, internally validated in Calgary among bootstrap samples and externally validated in Edmonton after recalibration using coefficients developed in Calgary. Interaction tests were performed, and net reclassification improvement vs conventional demographic and clinical risk factors was determined. RESULTS: Lab risk scores were strongly associated with mortality (29-40× for top vs bottom quintile, P for trends <0.01), had good discrimination and were well calibrated in Calgary (C = 0.80-0.85, slope = 0.99-1.01) and Edmonton (C = 0.80-0.82; slope = 1.02-1.05)-similar to demographic and clinical risk factors alone. Associations were attenuated by several comorbidities; however, scores appropriately reclassified 11%-20% of deaths (both follow-up periods) and 6%-9% of survivors (>60 days) after catheterization vs demographic and clinical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In 2 populations of patients undergoing their first coronary catheterization, risk scores based on simple laboratory tests were as powerful as a combination of demographic and clinical risk factors in predicting mortality. Lab risk scores should be used for patients undergoing coronary catheterization.