Comparison of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and evaporative light scattering detections for the determination of Poloxamer 188 in itraconazole injectable formulation.

A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for Poloxamer 188 using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) was developed and two different detection mechanisms, evaporative light scattering (ELSD) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), were compared for their quantification capabilities in itraconazole formulation. Both detection techniques coupled with SEC separation were highly effective for the determination of Poloxamer 188, which is difficult to analyze by other common HPLC methods. As expected, ESI-MS detection provided sensitivity and selectivity superior to ELSD. But since the analyte is an excipient in the formulation, high sensitivity was not required and ELSD's simplicity and ruggedness made it more appropriate for routine analysis of this formulation.

Itraconazole suspension for intravenous injection: determination of the real component of complete refractive index for particle sizing by static light scattering.

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of real refractive indices, using different itraconazole suspensions, on the associated particle size distributions. Instrumental particle size measurement remains the practical option for determining the particle size distribution of a suspension. In this study, the suspension particle size distribution was measured by static light scattering, which requires knowledge of both the real and imaginary components of the complete refractive index. The real refractive indices of micronized itraconazole raw material, as well as vacuum-dried itraconazole suspension samples obtained from different formulations, polymorphs, manufacturing methods and particle size distributions, were determined using the Becke line method. Identical samples were analyzed by two contract laboratories in order to assess consistency. For the static light scattering equipment used in this study, the complete relative refractive index (RRI = n(particte) / n(dispersant) - ik) input required for software calculation is denoted by a refractive index kernel (RRI input) comprising a relative real component and an imaginary component. The reported real refractive indices for the itraconazole raw material as well as vacuum dried itraconazole suspension samples were different, ranging from 1.608 to 1.65 (selected kernel range of 120A010I to 124A010I). The imaginary component of itraconazole suspension was determined in a previous study to be 010I. The average real refractive index was calculated to be 1.62 (122A010I). The particle size distributions obtained using 120A010I and 124A010I were in good agreement with one generated using 122A010I. Therefore, itraconazole suspensions that were produced using different manufacturing methods/formulations or exhibited different particle size distributions/polymorphic forms may use 122A010I in determining particle size distribution. The particle size distributions determined using RRI input outside the range of 120A010I to 124A010I may not be reliable. However, it is recommended that similar investigations be conducted for other drug suspensions on a case-by-case basis.