Response to DA-EPOCH-R is associated with activation of 'fitter' cytotoxic T-cells in patients with newly diagnosed double and triple hit high-grade B-cell lymphoma.

Not available.

Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: when, where, and for who?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immunotherapy is transforming treatment of multiple myeloma patients in all stages of their disease. This review will discuss recent developments in immunotherapy in multiple myeloma with a focus on antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and T-cell-redirection strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: CD38-targeting antibodies have single agent activity in multiple myeloma, and especially when combined with other drugs, are improving the clinical outcome of patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Also the SLAMF7-targeting antibody, elotuzumab, improves the survival of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients, when it is combined with either lenalidomide or pomalidomide. Several novel immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies, are active in patients who developed resistance to all currently available antimultiple myeloma drugs, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and CD38 antibodies. These new immunotherapeutic agents frequently target B-cell maturation antigen, which is highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma cells. However, other targets, such as GPRC5D, are also being investigated. SUMMARY: Immunotherapy is incorporated into first-line and relapse regimens, and is improving the survival of both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.

Preclinical activity of allogeneic SLAMF7-specific CAR T-cells (UCARTCS1) in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Autologous BCMA-specific CAR T-cell therapies have substantial activity in multiple myeloma (MM). However, due to logistical limitations and BCMAlow relapses, there is a need for alternatives. UCARTCS1 cells are 'off-the-shelf' allogeneic CAR T-cells derived from healthy donors targeting SLAMF7 (CS1), which is highly expressed in MM cells. In this study, we evaluated the preclinical activity of UCARTCS1 in MM cell lines, in bone marrow (BM) samples obtained from MM patients and in an MM mouse model. METHODS: Luciferase-transduced MM cell lines were incubated with UCARTCS1 cells or control (non-transduced, SLAMF7/TCRαß double knock-out) T-cells at different effector to target ratios for 24 hours. MM cell lysis was assessed by bioluminescence. Anti-MM activity of UCARTCS1 was also evaluated in 29 BM samples obtained from newly diagnosed patients (n=10), daratumumab-naïve relapsed/refractory patients (n=10) and daratumumab-refractory patients (n=9) in 24-hour flow cytometry-based cytotoxicity assays. Finally, UCARTCS1 activity was assessed in mouse xenograft models. RESULTS: UCARTCS1 cells induced potent CAR-mediated, and dose-dependent lysis of both MM cell lines and primary MM cells. There was no difference in ex vivo activity of UCARTCS1 between heavily pretreated and newly diagnosed patients. In addition, efficacy of UCARTCS1 was not affected by SLAMF7 expression level on MM cells, proportion of tumor cells, or frequency of regulatory T-cells in BM samples obtained from MM patients. UCARTCS1 treatment eliminated SLAMF7+ non-malignant immune cells in a dose-dependent manner, however lysis of normal cells was less pronounced compared to that of MM cells. Additionally, durable anti-MM responses were observed with UCARTCS1 in an MM xenograft model. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that UCARTCS1 has potent anti-MM activity against MM cell lines and primary MM cells, as well as in an MM xenograft model and support the evaluation of UCARTCS1 in patients with advanced MM.

Distinct peripheral T-cell and NK-cell profiles in HGBL-MYC/BCL2 vs patients with DLBCL NOS.

ABSTRACT: Patients with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (HGBL-MYC/BCL2) respond poorly to immunochemotherapy compared with patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS) without a MYC rearrangement. This suggests a negative impact of lymphoma-intrinsic MYC on the immune system. To investigate this, we compared circulating T cells and natural killer (NK) cells of patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2 (n = 66), patients with DLBCL NOS (n = 53), and age-matched healthy donors (HDs; n = 16) by flow cytometry and performed proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity assays. Compared with HDs, both lymphoma subtypes displayed similar frequencies of CD8+ T cells but decreased CD4+ T cells. Regulatory T-cell (Treg) frequencies were reduced only in patients with DLBCL NOS. Activated (HLA-DR+/CD38+) T cells, PD-1+CD4+ T cells, and PD-1+Tregs were increased in both lymphoma subtypes, but PD-1+CD8+ T cells were increased only in HGBL-MYC/BCL2. Patients with DLBCL NOS, but not patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2, exhibited higher frequencies of senescent T cells than HDs. Functional assays showed no overt differences between both lymphoma groups and HDs. Deeper analyses revealed that PD-1+ T cells of patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2 were exhausted with impaired cytokine production and degranulation. Patients with DLBCL NOS, but not patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2, exhibited higher frequencies of NK cells expressing inhibiting receptor NKG2A. Both lymphoma subtypes exhibited lower TIM-3+- and DNAM-1+-expressing NK cells. Although NK cells of patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2 showed less degranulation, they were not defective in cytotoxicity. In conclusion, our results demonstrate an increased exhaustion in circulating T cells of patients with HGBL-MYC/BCL2. Nonetheless, the overall intact peripheral T-cell and NK-cell functions in these patients emphasize the importance of investigating potential immune evasion in the microenvironment of MYC-rearranged lymphomas.

Should all newly diagnosed MM patients receive CD38 antibody-based treatment?

CD38 antibodies were first evaluated in extensively pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, there are 3 CD38 antibody-based regimens approved for the treatment of both transplant-eligible (daratumumab plus bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone [D-VTd]) and transplant-ineligible (daratumumab plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone [D-Rd] or daratumumab plus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone [D-VMP]) patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). The phase 3 studies that evaluated these regimens uniformly showed that the addition of daratumumab to backbone regimens improved the depth of response, which translated into improved progression-free survival and also overall survival in 2 of the studies. Importantly, elderly patients age 75 years or older benefit from these regimens, indicating that these regimens have an acceptable safety profile. Although the number of patients with high-risk cytogenetics was relatively small, these patients also experienced benefit from the addition of daratumumab to standard-of-care regimens, but poor risk conferred by the cytogenetic aberrations is not completely abrogated. Altogether, daratumumab-based regimens have high anti-MM activity and a favorable toxicity profile and therefore represent new standards of care for patients with NDMM.