The burning rate of energetic films of nanostructured porous silicon.

A systematic study of nanoenergetic films consisting of nanostructured porous silicon impregnated with sodium perchlorate is carried out. The explosive properties of these films are investigated as a function of thickness, porosity, and confinement. The films' burning rates are investigated using fiber-optic velocity probes, demonstrating that flame-front velocities vary between approximately 1 and 500 m s(-1) and are very sensitive to the films' structural characteristics. Analysis of the flame profile by high-speed video is also presented, suggesting that the reaction type is a deflagration rather than a detonation. A strong plume of flame is emitted from the surface, indicating the potential for this material to perform useful work either as an initiator or as a propellant. The shape of the flame front transitioned from an inverted V at thin-film thicknesses to a neat square-shaped front once the material became self-confining at 50 µm.

Prevention of the adverse photic effects of peripheral light-focusing using UV-blocking contact lenses.

PURPOSE: Peripheral light-focusing (PLF) is an occult form of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) hazardous to the human eye. In PLF, obliquely incident light is refracted from the peripheral cornea to concentrated sites inside the anterior segment. In the current study, the directionality of this phenomenon for UVR and whether PLF is established in outdoor settings exposed to sunlight were investigated. The protection provided by a UV-blocking contact lens was also evaluated. METHODS: UVA and UVB sensors were placed on the nasal limbus of an anatomically based model eye. The temporal limbus was exposed to a UV light source placed at various angles behind the frontal plane. PLF was quantified with the sensor output. The ensemble was mounted in the orbit of a mannequin head and exposed to sunlight in three insolation environments within the region of Sydney, Australia. PLF for UVA and UVB was determined with no eyewear or with sunglasses and commercially available soft contact lenses, with and without UV-blocking capability. RESULTS: The intensity of UVA peaked at approximately 120 degrees incidence, the level at which the UVB response was also at its maximum. The intensification of UVA was up to x18.3. The intensity of PLF for UVA and UVB was reduced by an order of magnitude by a UV-blocking contact lens, whereas a clear contact lenses had a much lesser effect. Only the UV-blocking contact lens achieved a significant effect on UVA and UVB irradiance in the urban, beach, and mountain locales (P < 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The results identify another type of sunlight hazard: the peripheral focusing of obliquely incident light. UVR from albedo (reflected ambient light) is capable of establishing PLF in the anterior segment, but this can be shielded by UV-blocking soft contact lenses. Sunglasses may be unable to shield oblique rays, unless side protection is incorporated. Contact lenses can offer UVR protection against all angles of incidence, including the peak-response angle. They can also protect the eye in settings in which the wearing of sunglasses is not feasible or convenient.

Peripheral light focusing as a potential mechanism for phakic dysphotopsia and lens phototoxicity.

Our aim was to examine secondary image formation in the anterior segment caused by peripheral light focusing (PLF) in the human cornea, and in particular the crystalline lens. Non-sequential ray-tracing (OptiCAD) was applied to an anatomically based human eye model, which incorporates a gradient index crystalline lens. For analysis of the limbal effect, we varied the incident angle from 100 to 122 degrees, while for the crystalline lens effect, the incident angle was varied from 60 to 90 degrees. The corneal shapes studied included central radii from 7.4 to 8.2 mm with a range of shape factors. In each case, we computed the peak and average intensities, and the area of exposure at the limbus or lens periphery. The computation was repeated with a previous model eye for comparison. For the limbal effect, a peak intensity gain of x22.5 was found at an incident angle of 104 degrees which compares well with previous results. The average intensity gain at this angle was x7.5 over an area of 0.23 mm2. Steeper corneal curvature produced a greater PLF effect. For the crystalline lens effect, maximum UVA (365 nm) intensity gain peaked at x8.6 at 84 degrees with average intensity gain of x2.3. The area of UVA exposure peaked at 4.7 mm2 at 70 degrees. A relatively wide range (30 degrees ) of incident angles produced peak PLF gains of x3 or more in the lens. Significant focusing of light is directed to the nasal limbus, and to a lesser extent to the crystalline lens over a broad range of incident angles. PLF in the nasal cornea is reduced by an order of magnitude when a UV-blocking soft contact lens is used. The concentration levels and intraocular sites of PLF action on UV and visible light suggest a new mechanism of phakic dysphotopsia and lens phototoxicity.