RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women and recognized risk factors explain 25%-47% of cases. Organic solvents are used widely in the workplace and exposure may increase the risk of developing breast cancer, yet there are insufficient data to confirm this hypothesis. We sought to determine whether past occupational exposures to selected organic solvents were associated with the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Montréal, Canada. METHODS: From a population-based case-control study (2008-2011), using in-depth interviews we elicited information on risk factors and lifetime occupational histories. Industrial hygienists and chemists translated job descriptions into specific chemical and physical exposures. We assessed 11 individual solvents and four solvent groups. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for metrics of past exposures to selected solvents. Exposure metrics included any previous exposure, average frequency in hours per week, duration in years, and average cumulative concentration weighted by hours per workweek exposed. RESULTS: We enrolled 695 cases and 608 controls. We found increased ORs for average cumulative concentration of exposure to mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.28), chlorinated alkanes (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.23, 5.68), toluene (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.59), and a group of organic solvents with reactive metabolites (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.24). Positive associations were found across all exposure metrics and were higher among women with estrogen-positive/progesterone-negative tumors. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest occupational exposure to certain organic solvents may increase the risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic, studies demonstrated that healthcare workers (HCWs) were at increased risk of infection. Few modifiable risks were identified. It is largely unknown how these evolved over time. METHODS: A prospective case-referent study was established and nested within a cohort study of Canadian HCWs. Cases of Covid-19, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, were matched with up to four referents on job, province, gender, and date of first vaccination. Cases and referents completed a questionnaire reporting exposures and experiences in the 21 days before case date. Participants were recruited from October 2020 to March 2022. Workplace factors were examined by mixed-effects logistic regression allowing for competing exposures. A sensitivity analysis was limited to those for whom family/community transmission seemed unlikely. RESULTS: 533 cases were matched with 1697 referents. Among unvaccinated HCWs, the risk of infection was increased if they worked hands-on with patients with Covid-19, on a ward designated for care of infected patients, or handled objects used by infected patients. Sensitivity analysis identified work in residential institutions and geriatric wards as high risk for unvaccinated HCWs. Later, with almost universal HCW vaccination, risk from working with infected patients was much reduced but cases were more likely than referents to report being unable to access an N95 mask or that decontaminated N95 masks were reused. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, after a rocky start, the risks of Covid-19 infection from work in health care are now largely contained in Canada but with need for continued vigilance.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Canadá , Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs (ANPs) occurs mainly through dermal contact. Our study was set up to assess the potential exposure of hospital sanitation (HS) personnel, for whom almost no data are available, through contamination of surfaces they regularly touch. METHODS: In the oncology departments of two hospitals around Montreal, surface wipe samples of 120-2000 cm2 were taken at 10 sites cleaned by the HS personnel and five other sites frequently touched by nursing and pharmacy personnel. A few hand wipe samples were collected to explore skin contamination. Wipes were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry for 10 ANPs. RESULTS: Overall, 60.9% of 212 surface samples presented at least one ANP above the limits of detection (LOD). Cyclophosphamide and gemcitabine were most often detected (52% and 31% of samples respectively), followed by 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (15% each). Highest concentrations of five ANPs were found in outpatient clinics on toilet floors (5-fluorouracil, 49 ng/cm2; irinotecan, 3.6 ng/cm2), a perfusion pump (cyclophosphamide, 19.6 ng/cm2) and on a cytotoxic waste bin cover (gemcitabine, 4.97 ng/cm2). Floors in patient rooms had highest levels of cytarabine (0.12 ng/cm2) and methotrexate (6.38 ng/cm2). Hand wipes were positive for two of 12 samples taken on HS personnel, seven of 18 samples on nurses, and two of 14 samples on pharmacy personnel. CONCLUSIONS: A notable proportion of surfaces showed measurable levels of ANPs, with highest concentrations found on surfaces cleaned by HS personnel, who would benefit from appropriate preventive training. As potential sources of worker exposure, several hospital surfaces need to be regularly monitored to evaluate environmental contamination and efficacy of cleaning.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/análise , Citarabina/análise , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/análise , Docetaxel/análise , Feminino , Fluoruracila/análise , Mãos , Hospitais , Humanos , Ifosfamida/análise , Irinotecano/análise , Masculino , Metotrexato/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/análise , Saneamento , Pele/química , Vinorelbina/análise , GencitabinaRESUMO
Silicone passive samplers were assessed for measuring personal exposure to 37 flame retardants at three Québec e-waste recycling facilities. Silicone brooches (n = 45), wristbands (n = 28), and armbands (n = 9) worn during a â¼8 h work shift accumulated detectable amounts of 95-100% of the target compounds. Brooch concentrations were significantly correlated with those from active air samplers from which we conclude that the brooches could be used to approximate inhalation exposure and other exposures related to air concentrations such as dermal exposure. The generic sampling rate of the brooch (19 ± 11 m3 day-1 dm-2) was 13 and 22 times greater than estimated for home and office environments, respectively, likely because of the dusty work environment and greater movement of e-waste workers. BDE-209 concentrations in brooches and wristbands were moderately and significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with levels in blood plasma; organophosphorus esters in brooches and wristbands were weakly and insignificantly correlated with their metabolite biomarkers in post-shift spot urine samples. Silicone brooches and wristbands deployed over a single shift in a dusty occupational setting can be useful for indicating the internal exposure to compounds with relatively long biological half-lives, but their use for compounds with relatively short half-lives is not clear and may require either a longer deployment time or an integrated biomarker measure.
Assuntos
Resíduo Eletrônico , Retardadores de Chama , Exposição Ocupacional , Monitoramento Ambiental , Retardadores de Chama/análise , Humanos , Organofosfatos , Quebeque , SiliconesRESUMO
Vulnerabilities in workers performing electronics recycling (e-recycling) in the informal sector worldwide have been well documented. However, the growing e-recycling industry in the formal sector still brings many challenges to protect the health of workers and their environment. This commentary aims to draw attention to the overlooked vulnerabilities faced by the workers of the e-recycling industry formal sector in high-income countries and discuss the potential impact on health inequalities experienced by these workers. Expanding the definition of vulnerability, not limited to the biological susceptibility to chemical and physical exposures, the demographic characteristics of workers in the e-recycling formal sector often reveal social groups known to be disadvantaged regarding occupational exposures and health effects, including young workers, immigrant or ethnic minorities, and workers with mental or physical health issues or disabilities. Overlapping structural vulnerabilities of the e-recycling industry stem from its newness, its working conditions, its conditions of employment, and the sociodemographic characteristics of its workforce. This phenomenon in high-income countries is not restricted to the e-recycling industry alone. It is rather a symptom of more generalized macro socioeconomical phenomena. The present challenges are in line with the new gig and green economies and changes in the global market, and their consequences on the solid waste sector. Continued efforts to strengthen the inclusion of social aspects of health into the complex interaction of the structural vulnerabilities met by e-recycling workers will be essential to anticipate and prevent health issues in this essential but still emerging workforce.
Assuntos
Eletrônica , Indústrias , Saúde Ocupacional/tendências , Reciclagem , Populações Vulneráveis , Países Desenvolvidos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Exposição OcupacionalRESUMO
Exposure to occupational carcinogens is often overlooked as a contributor to the burden of cancer. To estimate the proportion of cancer cases attributable to occupational exposure in Canada in 2011, exposure prevalence and levels of 44 carcinogens were informed by data from the Canadian carcinogen exposure surveillance project (CAREX Canada). These were used with Canadian Census (between 1961 and 2011) and Labour Force Survey (annual surveys between 1976 and 2013) data to estimate the number of workers ever exposed to occupational carcinogens. Risk estimates of the association between each carcinogen and cancer site were selected mainly from published literature reviews. Population attributable risks were estimated using Levin's equation and applied to the 2011 cancer statistics from the Canadian Cancer Registry. It is estimated that 15.5 million Canadians alive in 2011 were exposed, during at least one year between 1961 and 2001, to at least one carcinogen in the workplace. Overall, we estimated that in 2011, between 3.9% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.1%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 3.3%-8.7%) of all incident cases of cancer were due to occupational exposure, corresponding to lower and upper numbers of 7700-21,800 cases. Five of the cancer sites - mesothelioma, non-melanoma skin cancer, lung, female breast, and urinary bladder - account for a total of 7600 to 21,200 cancers attributable to occupational exposures such as solar radiation, asbestos, diesel engine exhaust, crystalline silica, and night shift work. Our study highlights cancer sites and occupational exposures that need recognition and efforts by all stakeholders to avoid preventable cancers in the future.
Assuntos
Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Amianto/toxicidade , Neoplasias da Mama , Canadá/epidemiologia , Censos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Dióxido de Silício/toxicidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We estimated the proportion and number of female breast cancer cases in Canada attributable to night shift work, a probable cause of breast cancer. METHODS: Levin's equation was used to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) among Canadian women who ever worked night/rotating shifts from 1961 to 2000, accounting for labor turnover and survival to the year 2011. The calculated PAFs were applied to 2011 Canadian breast cancer incidence statistics to obtain the number of attributable cases. RESULTS: Approximately 1.5 million women ever worked night/rotating shifts during 1961-2000 and survived to 2011. The PAFs ranged from 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-6.2) to 5.2% (95% CI: 3.7-13.6), and 470 to 1200 incident breast cancer cases in 2011 were likely due to shift work, of which 38% would have been diagnosed among women in health-related occupations. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to increase the certainty of this association, but current evidence supports workplace-based prevention.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Jornada de Trabalho em Turnos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Tolerância ao Trabalho ProgramadoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) and number of incident and fatal lung cancers in Canada from occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust (DEE). METHODS: DEE exposure prevalence and level estimates were used with Canadian Census and Labour Force Survey data to model the exposed population across the risk exposure period (REP, 1961-2001). Relative risks of lung cancer were calculated based on a meta-regression selected from the literature. PAFs were calculated using Levin's equation and applied to the 2011 lung cancer statistics obtained from the Canadian Cancer Registry. RESULTS: We estimated that 2.4% (95% CI 1.6% to 6.6%) of lung cancers in Canada are attributable to occupational DEE exposure, corresponding to approximately 560 (95% CI 380 to 1570) incident and 460 (95% CI 310 to 1270) fatal lung cancers in 2011. Overall, 1.6 million individuals alive in 2011 were occupationally exposed to DEE during the REP, 97% of whom were male. Occupations with the highest burden were underground miners, truck drivers and mechanics. Half of the attributable lung cancers occurred among workers with low exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the burden of lung cancer attributable to occupational DEE exposure in Canada. Our results underscore a large potential for prevention, and a large public health impact from occupational exposure to low levels of DEE.
Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Gasolina/toxicidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Emissões de Veículos/toxicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is scant information as to whether traffic-related air pollution is associated with the incidence of breast cancer. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ultrafine particles (UFPs, <0.1µm), are two pollutants that capture intra-urban variations in traffic-related air pollution and may also be associated with incidence. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, case-control study of street-level concentrations of NO2 and UFPs and incident postmenopausal breast cancer in Montreal, Canada. Incident cases were identified between 2008 and 2011 from all but one hospital that treated breast cancer in the Montreal area. Population controls were identified from provincial electoral lists of Montreal residents and frequency-matched to cases using 5-year age groups. Concentrations of NO2 and UFPs were estimated using two separate land-use regression models. Exposures were assigned to residential locations at the time of recruitment, and we identified residential histories of women who had lived in these residences for 10 years or more. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression models adjusting for individual-level and ecological covariates. We assessed the functional form of NO2 and UFP exposures using natural cubic splines. RESULTS: We found that the functional form of the response functions between incident postmenopausal breast cancer and concentrations of NO2 and UFPs were consistent with linearity. For NO2, we found increasing risks of breast cancer for all subjects combined and stronger associations when analyses were restricted to those women who had lived at their current address for 10 years or more. Specifically, the OR, adjusted for personal covariates, per increase in the interquartile range (IQR=3.75 ppb) of NO2 was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.92-1.27). For women living in their homes for 10 years or more, the adjusted OR was 1.17 (95%CI: 0.93-1.46; IQR=3.84 ppb); for those not living at that home 10 years before the study, it was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.64, 1.36; IQR=3.65 ppb). For UFPs, the ORs were lower than for NO2, with little evidence of association in any of the models or sub-analyses and little variability in the ORs (about 1.02 for an IQR of ~3500cm-3). On the other hand, we found higher ORs amongst cases with positive oestrogen and progesterone receptor status; namely for NO2, the OR was 1.13 (95%CI: 0.94-1.35) and for UFPs it was 1.05 (95%CI: 0.96-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that exposure to ambient NO2 and UFPs may increase the risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer especially amongst cases with positive oestrogen and progesterone receptor status.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Exposição Ambiental , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Pós-Menopausa , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional , Tamanho da Partícula , Quebeque/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the inclusion of data from cases would bias a job-exposure matrix (JEM), we evaluated whether exposures were systematically different between cases and controls from a large historical case-control study. METHODS: Data included 10â 381 jobs assessed for occupational exposure to 294 agents within a lung cancer case-control study. For each sex, 1 JEM was developed from case jobs, and 1 from control jobs: with occupation (four-digit occupational codes), time period (1945-1959, 1960-1984, 1985-1995) and agent axes. We estimated concordance in exposure status (defined as probability of exposure threshold ≥5%) and exposure metrics of probability and intensity of exposure, between the 2 JEMs. RESULTS: Of all hypothetical occupation-period-agent combinations, most had no or few observations. Among males there were 8136 common cells (24-occupational codes, 3-periods, 226-agents), containing sufficient observations for comparison with 92% concordance in exposure status; discordance was equally likely to be towards cases or controls. Females had 1710 common cells (9-occupational codes, 3-periods, 114-agents) with 93% concordance in exposure status; discordant cells were more likely to reflect greater exposure among cases. Among concordantly exposed cells, probability and intensity of exposures were highly correlated between the case JEM and control JEM (Kendall τ>0.50), and absolute differences were small (median difference in probability <1.5%, median ratio in intensity=1.00) for both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the case JEM and control JEM was high, suggesting that aggregating the case and control information in our study into a single JEM is justifiable given the benefits of increased sample size.
Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Ocupações/classificação , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Viés , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Quebeque , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In the wake of sustainable development, green jobs are developing rapidly, changing the work environment. However a green job is not automatically a safe job. The aim of the study was to define green jobs, and to establish a preliminary risk assessment of chemical substances and biological agents for workers in Quebec. An operational definition was developed, along with criteria and sustainable development principles to discriminate green jobs from regular jobs. The potential toxicity or hazard associated with their chemical and biological exposures was assessed, and the workers' exposure appraised using an expert assessment method. A control banding approach was then used to assess risks for workers in selected green jobs. A double entry model allowed us to set priorities in terms of chemical or biological risk. Among jobs that present the highest risk potential, several are related to waste management. The developed method is flexible and could be adapted to better appraise the risks that workers are facing or to propose control measures.
Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Ocupações , Medição de Risco/métodos , Humanos , Quebeque , Gerenciamento de Resíduos , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the associations between occupational injury compensations and exposure to summer outdoor temperatures in Quebec (Canada). METHODS: The relationship between 374,078 injuries compensated by the Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) (between May and September, 2003-2010) and maximum daily outdoor temperatures was modelled using generalised linear models with negative binomial distributions. Pooled effect sizes for all 16 health regions of Quebec were estimated with random-effect models for meta-analyses for all compensations and by sex, age group, mechanism of injury, industrial sector and occupations (manual vs other) within each sector. Time lags and cumulative effect of temperatures were also explored. RESULTS: The relationship between daily counts of compensations and maximum daily temperatures reached statistical significance for three health regions. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of daily compensations per 1°C increase was 1.002 (95% CI 1.002 to 1.003) for all health regions combined. Statistically significant positive associations were observed for men, workers aged less than 45â years, various industrial sectors with both indoor and outdoor activities, and for slips/trips/falls, contact with object/equipment and exposure to harmful substances/environment. Manual occupations were not systematically at higher risk than non-manual and mixed ones. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to quantify the association between work-related injury compensations and exposure to summer temperatures according to physical demands of the occupation and this warrants further investigations. In the context of global warming, results can be used to estimate future impacts of summer outdoor temperatures on workers, as well as to plan preventive interventions.
Assuntos
Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , Indústrias , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etiologia , Ocupações , Estações do Ano , Trabalho , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque , Fatores Sexuais , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Local de Trabalho , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Predicted rise in global mean temperature and intensification of heat waves associated with climate change present an increasing challenge for occupational health and safety. Although important scientific knowledge has been gathered on the health effects of heat, very few studies have focused on quantifying the association between outdoor heat and mortality or morbidity among workers. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between occupational heat-related illnesses and exposure to summer outdoor temperatures. METHODS: We modeled 259 heat-related illnesses compensated by the Workers׳ Compensation Board of Quebec between May and September, from 1998 to 2010, with maximum daily summer outdoor temperatures in 16 health regions of Quebec (Canada) using generalized linear models with negative binomial distributions, and estimated the pooled effect sizes for all regions combined, by sex and age groups, and for different time lags with random-effect models for meta-analyses. RESULTS: The mean daily compensation count was 0.13 for all regions of Quebec combined. The relationship between daily counts of compensations and maximum daily temperatures was log-linear; the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of daily heat-related compensations per 1 °C increase in daily maximum temperatures was 1.419 (95% CI 1.326 to 1.520). Associations were similar for men and women and by age groups. Increases in daily maximum temperatures at lags 1 and 2 and for two and three-day lag averages were also associated with increases in daily counts of compensations (IRRs of 1.206 to 1.471 for every 1 °C increase in temperature). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to quantify the association between occupational heat-related illnesses and exposure to summer temperatures in Canada. The model (risk function) developed in this study could be useful to improve the assessment of future impacts of predicted summer outdoor temperatures on workers and vulnerable groups, particularly in colder temperate zones.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Estresse por Calor/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Temperatura , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque/epidemiologiaRESUMO
We investigated the availability and use of workplace mental health (MH) supports during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Canadian cohort of healthcare workers (HCW) and measured anxiety and depression by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) completed at four contacts 2020-2022. Reports were available for 4400 HCW working with patients. Half the HCWs had a clinically significant HADS score at one or more contacts Access to MH supports increased during the pandemic, with 94% reporting access to some workplace support by 2022: 47% had made use of at least one support. 25% of those with high HADS scores used no support. Older women and men with depressive conditions were less likely to report use. Reported use of an Employee Assistance Program was associated with a reduction in HADS scores in the following months.
Assuntos
Ansiedade , COVID-19 , Depressão , Pessoal de Saúde , Local de Trabalho , Humanos , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos de Coortes , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes in risk of infection and mental distress in healthcare workers (HCWs) relative to the community as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed. METHODS: HCWs in Alberta, Canada, recruited to an interprovincial cohort, were asked consent to link to Alberta's administrative health database (AHDB) and to information on COVID-19 immunization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Those consenting were matched to records of up to five community referents (CRs). Physician diagnoses of COVID-19 were identified in the AHDB from the start of the pandemic to 31 March 2022. Physician consultations for mental health (MH) conditions (anxiety, stress/adjustment reaction, depressive) were identified from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022. Risks for HCW relative to CR were estimated by fitting wave-specific hazard ratios. RESULTS: Eighty percent (3050/3812) of HCWs consented to be linked to the AHDB; 97% (2959/3050) were matched to 14,546 CRs. HCWs were at greater risk of COVID-19 overall, with first infection defined from either PCR tests (OR=1.96, 95%CI 1.76-2.17) or physician records (OR=1.33, 95%CI 1.21-1.45). They were also at increased risk for each of the three MH diagnoses. In analyses adjusted for confounding, risk of COVID-19 infection was higher than for CRs early in the pandemic and during the fifth (Omicron) wave. The excess risk of stress/adjustment reactions (OR=1.52, 95%CI 1.35-1.71) and depressive conditions (OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.24-1.55) increased with successive waves during the epidemic, peaking in the fourth wave. CONCLUSION: HCWs were at increased risk of both COVID-19 and mental ill-health with the excess risk continuing late in the pandemic.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Étudier l'évolution du risque d'infection et de problèmes de santé mentale (PSM) chez les travailleurs de la santé (TdS), comparé à la population générale, au cours de la pandémie de COVID-19. MéTHODES: Certains TdS de l'Alberta (Canada) participant à une cohorte interprovinciale, ont consenti à ce que la base administrative de santé de l'Alberta (AHDB) nous transmette leurs données de vaccination contre la COVID-19 et de tests d'amplification des acides nucléiques (TAAN). Ceux ayant consenti ont été appariés à un maximum de cinq témoins de population générale. Les diagnostics médicaux (par médecins) de COVID-19 ont été identifiés dans l'AHDB du début de la pandémie jusqu'au 31 mars 2022. Les consultations médicales pour PSM (anxiété, stress/troubles de l'adaptation, dépression) ont été identifiées entre le 1er avril 2017 et le 31 mars 2022. Les rapports de cotes (RC) comparant les TdS aux témoins de la population générale ont été estimés pour chaque vague d'infection. RéSULTATS: Quatre-vingts pourcent (80 %; 3050/3812) des TdS ont donné leur consentement à ce que leurs données nous soient transmises par l'AHDB; 97 % d'entre eux (2959/3050) ont été appariés à 14 546 témoins. Dans l'ensemble, les TdS étaient plus à risque de COVID-19, avec une première infection identifiée soit par les TANN (RC=1,96, IC de 95% 1,76-2,17), soit via les dossiers médicaux (RC=1,33, IC de 95% 1,21-1,45). Ils étaient également plus à risque pour chacun des trois problèmes de SM. Le risque de COVID-19 ajustés pour les facteurs de confusion était plus élevé que chez les témoins au début de la pandémie et durant la cinquième vague (variant Omicron). Les excès de risque de stress/troubles de l'adaptation (RC=1,52, IC de 95% 1,35-1,71) et de dépression (RC=1,39, IC de 95% 1,24-1,55) ont augmenté au fil des vagues de l'épidémie, avec un pic à la quatrième vague. CONCLUSION: Les TdS étaient plus à risque d'infection de COVID-19 et de troubles de santé mentale avec cet excès de risque se prolongeant plus tard dans la pandémie.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Alberta/epidemiologia , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify determinants of mental health in healthcare workers (HCW) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cohort of Canadian HCW completed four questionnaires giving details of work with patients, ratings of workplace supports, a mental health questionnaire, and substance use. Principal components were extracted from 23 rating scales. Risk factors were examined by Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 4854 (97.8%) of 4964 participants completed ratings and mental health questionnaires. Healthcare workers working with patients with COVID-19 had high anxiety and depression scores. One of three extracted components, 'poor support,' was related to work with infected patients and to anxiety, depression, and substance use. Availability of online support was associated with feelings of better support and less mental ill-health. CONCLUSIONS: Work with infected patients and perceived poor workplace support were related to anxiety and depression during the pandemic.
Assuntos
Ansiedade , COVID-19 , Depressão , Pessoal de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Local de Trabalho , Humanos , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Apoio Social , Saúde Mental , Estudos de Coortes , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , PandemiasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers (HCWs) from an interprovincial Canadian cohort gave serial blood samples to identify factors associated with anti-receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) IgG response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. METHODS: Members of the HCW cohort donated blood samples four months after their first SARS-CoV-2 immunization and again at 7, 10 and 13 months. Date and type of immunizations and dates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected at each of four contacts, together with information on immunologically-compromising conditions and current therapies. Blood samples were analyzed centrally for anti-RBD IgG and anti-nucleocapsid IgG (Abbott Architect, Abbott Diagnostics). Records of immunization and SARS-CoV-2 testing from public health agencies were used to assess the impact of reporting errors on estimates from the random-effects multivariable model fitted to the data. RESULTS: 2752 of 4567 vaccinated cohort participants agreed to donate at least one blood sample. Modelling of anti-RBD IgG titer from 8903 samples showed an increase in IgG with each vaccine dose and with first infection. A decrease in IgG titer was found with the number of months since vaccination or infection, with the sharpest decline after the third dose. An immunization regime that included mRNA1273 (Moderna) resulted in higher anti-RBD IgG. Participants reporting multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis or taking selective immunosuppressants, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors and antineoplastic agents had lower anti-RBD IgG. Supplementary analyses showed higher anti-RBD IgG in those reporting side-effects of vaccination, no relation of anti-RBD IgG to obesity and lower titers in women immunized in early or mid-pregnancy. Sensitivity analysis results suggested no important bias in the self-report data. CONCLUSION: Creation of a prospective cohort was central to the credibility of results presented here. Serial serology assessments, with longitudinal analysis, provided effect estimates with enhanced accuracy and a clearer understanding of medical and other factors affecting response to vaccination.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Teste para COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiologia , Anticorpos Antivirais , Pessoal de Saúde , Imunoglobulina GRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The possible role of short asbestos fibers in the development of asbestos-related diseases and availability of lung fiber burden data prompted this study on the relationships between fiber characteristics and asbestos-related diseases among compensated workers. METHODS: Data collected between 1988 and 2007 for compensation purposes were used; lung asbestos fibers content of 123 Quebec workers are described according to socio-demographic characteristics, job histories and diseases (asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung cancer). RESULTS: Most workers (85%) presented chrysotile fibers in their lungs, and respectively 76%, 64%, and 43% had tremolite, amosite, and crocidolite. Half of the total fibers were short, 30% were thin fibers and 20% corresponded to the World Health Organization definition of fibers (length ≥ 5 µm, diameter ≥ 0.2 and <3 µm). Chrysotile fibers were still observed in the lungs of workers 30 years or more after last exposure. CONCLUSION: Our findings stress the relevance of considering several dimensional criteria to characterize health risks associated with asbestos inhalation.
Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/química , Amianto/química , Asbestose/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Mesotelioma/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Amianto/efeitos adversos , Amianto/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Indústrias , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fibras Minerais/efeitos adversos , Fibras Minerais/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , QuebequeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We estimated the extent of exposure to occupational carcinogens in Quebec, Canada, to help raise awareness of occupational cancers. METHODS: Proportions of workers exposed to 21 recognized and 17 probable carcinogens (according to Quebec occupational health regulation and the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] classification) were extracted from various sources: workplace monitoring data, research projects, a population survey, radiation protection data, exposure estimates from the Carcinogen Exposure Canada (CAREX Canada) Project database, and published exposure data. These proportions were applied to Quebec labor force data. RESULTS: Among the 38 studied, carcinogens with the largest proportions of exposed workers were solar radiation (6.6% of workers), night shift work/rotating shift work including nights (6.0%), diesel exhaust fumes (4.4%), wood dust (2.9%) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (2.0%). More than 15 carcinogens were identified in several industrial sectors, and up to 100,000 young workers are employed in these sectors. CONCLUSION: Although crude, estimates obtained with different data sources allow identification of research and intervention priorities for cancer in Quebec.
Assuntos
Carcinógenos , Indústrias , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Carcinógenos/análise , Bases de Dados Factuais , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Saúde Ocupacional , Quebeque , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Electronic waste recycling (e-recycling) involves manual operations that expose workers to toxic metals. We aim to describe occupational health and safety practices and workers' exposures to metals in the Canadian formal e-recycling industry, and to estimate the health risk associated with multiple exposures. This cross-sectional study documented practices through observations and questionnaires, and assessed metal exposures using personal air samples and biomarkers. Health risks were estimated relative to recognised occupational exposure guidelines, and using an additive approach for consideration of multiple exposures. Six e-recycling and one commercial recycling facilities were investigated, and the metal exposures of 99 workers (23 women) were measured. In most facilities, dust control was inadequate and personal protective equipment was improperly worn. In e-recycling, lead was detected in all air samples and in most blood samples, up to 48 µg/m3 and 136 µg/l, respectively. Other quantified metals included beryllium, mercury, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chrome, cobalt, copper, indium, manganese, nickel and yttrium. When handling cathode ray tube screens, workers were 4.9 times and 8.5 times more likely to be exposed to lead and yttrium, respectively, than workers who were not assigned to a specific type of electronics. Overall, exposures were largely associated with facility size and airborne dust concentration. The additive hazard indices for airborne exposures raised concerns for kidney disorders, for peripheral and central nervous systems, and for the male reproductive system. Minimizing airborne dust through collective control methods and adequately using personal protection should reduce metal exposures and associated health risks in this growing industry.