[Off-label drugs in childhood psoriasis]. / Prescriptions hors AMM (autorisation de mise sur le marché) dans le psoriasis de l'enfant.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis affects 0.5% of children in Europe, with moderate to severe clinical forms in 15-35% of cases warranting the use of systemic treatments. Few treatments are licensed for childhood psoriasis. In this study, we analyzed the frequency of such prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was based on 3 retrospective cohort trials conducted in France between 2012 and 2018: χ-Psocar (313 children with psoriasis seen in hospitals), PsoLib (207 children seen in a private practice), and BiPe (134 children on biotherapies). Our evaluation was centered on off-label use. To avoid duplicates between cohorts, analysis focused on each cohort independently. RESULTS: In the χ-Psocar study, in 34.8% of cases, use of at least one off-label treatment, mainly topical vitamin D (36.0%), and systemic treatments (methotrexate and cyclosporine) was noted, on account of either the clinical type of psoriasis (13.7%) or patient age (24.6%). In the PsoLib study, in 41.5% of cases, at least one off-label treatment was noted, mainly combined calcipotriol-betamethasone (24.2%), ciclopirox shampoo (7.2%) and systemic treatments (n=20). The main reason was patient age (41.5%). In the BiPe study, in 97.0% of cases, at least one off-label treatment was noted. These prescriptions mainly concerned a combination of calcipotriol-betamethasone (68.7%) and tacrolimus (11.2%) along with systemic treatment comprising methotrexate, cyclosporin, methoxsalen or apremilast (n=125), but also biotherapies (n=85). The biotherapies were used off-label since at that time they had not yet been granted marketing authorisation. DISCUSSION: This study focused on 3 cohorts of children with psoriasis seen either in private practice or in a hospital setting, and it involved all types of treatment. Off-label prescriptions ranged from one-third to almost 100% of the children, depending on the individual cohorts. The prescribed drugs were topical treatments, conventional systemic drugs and biotherapies. Off-label prescription is not strictly prohibited in France provided it is within a well-defined regulatory framework. Where there is a rich bibliography, confident recommendations may be made. Unfortunately, in childhood psoriasis, the literature and recommendations are very limited, leaving prescribers with considerable individual responsibilities. Review of the license concerning children with psoriasis, a push to conduct therapeutic studies and the drafting of recommendations all appear necessary.

The impact of psoriasis on professional life: PsoPRO, a French national survey.

BACKGROUND: The physical, social and mental burden of psoriasis is well known, but its occupational impact has been less investigated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of psoriasis on the working life of patients compared with the general population. METHODS: A national survey compared people with and without psoriasis using online questionnaires. In addition to the demographic, medical and professional characteristics, data on recent absenteeism and presenteeism were captured using the validated WPAI-PSO questionnaire. RESULTS: The patient sample comprised 714 with psoriasis (PsO), including 81 treated with systemic therapies (PsoST), and 84 with associated psoriatic arthritis (PsO + PsA). The control sample comprised 604 active subjects representative of the French population. Compared to controls, the impact of the disease on working life was no greater in PsO patients. Conversely, unemployment within the past 5 years and mean number of sick leaves within the previous year were more frequent in PsO + PsA. In patients with active psoriasis skin lesions, all aspects of the WPAI questionnaire were negatively impacted in PsoST and PsO + PsA patients, but not in PsO patients: Levels of absenteeism were 3.3% in controls, 5.6% in PsO (NS), 8.3% in PsoST (P < 0.05) and 13.0% in Ps0 + PsA (P < 0.05); impairment in presenteeism reached 27.0%, 21.2% (NS), 43.5% (P < 0.05) and 53.2% (P < 0.05), respectively, while overall work impairment was 27.9%, 22.2% (NS), 46.3% (P < 0.05) and 57.6% (P < 0.05), respectively. Nevertheless, a higher proportion of PsoST and PsO + PsA patients reported that work was more important than any other activity in their life. CONCLUSION: The occupational impact of psoriasis is important and significant in patients who receive systemic therapy or have concurrent PsA but minimal or absent in other psoriasis patients. The findings show that psoriasis patients have a high level of motivation to work.

[Psoriatic arthritis in France, from infants to the elderly: Findings from two cross-sectional, multicenter studies]. / Rhumatisme psoriasique en France, du nourrisson à la personne âgée : données de deux études transversales multicentriques.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis affects 20-30% of patients with psoriasis. Few epidemiological data are available in France about its prevalence and its association with skin lesions and comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: To assess the epidemiological aspects and the risk factors for psoriatic arthritis in children and adults in France. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in France in children (χ-Psocar, 23 pediatric dermatology centers belonging to the SFDP, 1 year) and adults (Resopsocar, 29 dermatology centers belonging to GEM RESOPSO, 4 months) to study the link between psoriasis and cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen children (males: 47.6%; mean age: 9.4 yrs) and 1,954 adults (males: 56.0%; mean age: 48.5 yrs) with psoriasis were included, with 4.2% of the children and 21.0% of the adults presenting psoriatic arthritis. Prevalence increased with age: 2.2% of children, 14.2% of adolescents, and over 20% after 40 years. It decreased after the age of 70 years (19.4%). Regardless of age, arthritis was not associated with gender. In the children's group, rheumatism was associated with nail involvement (P=0.04) and disease severity (P=0.0004). Adult rheumatism was associated with generalized plaque psoriasis (P=0.002), disease severity (P<0.0001), and obesity (P<0.0001). Localized plaque psoriasis was less often associated with arthritis (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These two cross-sectional studies conducted in 2267 patients in France yielded information on the prevalence of joint involvement from infants to elderly subjects. It is the first study conducted in a single population to provide data for the whole population. Prevalence gradually increases with age, without gender difference, before decreasing in old age. We confirm the association of nail involvement in the first years of life, and of obesity in adults.

Psoriasis in the elderly: epidemiological and clinical aspects, and evaluation of patients with very late onset psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Age of the patients and age of onset of psoriasis may have an impact on the disease. There is little information about psoriasis in elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated epidemiological, clinical aspects, comorbidities and treatments of psoriasis in the elderly (>70 years) patients, and in patients with very late onset psoriasis (onset ≥ 70 years). METHODS: This observational multicentre non-interventional study of adults with psoriasis was conducted in 29 departments of dermatology in France. A total of 2210 adults with psoriasis were included. RESULTS: A total of 212 (9.5%) patients were elderly. This group had a higher frequency of females (P = 0.005), a later onset of the disease (P < 0.0001), a lower frequency of familial (P < 0.0001) and plaque psoriasis (P < 0.0001), but higher frequency of guttate and inverse psoriasis (P ≤ 0.005). Hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent in this group (P < 0.0001), but not tobacco (P < 0.0001). Systemic and biological therapies were used less frequently in the elderly group (P < 0.0001). Fifty-eight (2.7%) patients had late onset psoriasis. Patients with very late onset psoriasis were more frequently women (P = 0.02) and older (P < 0.0001), among elderly group. They had significantly less frequently familial (P < 0.0001) and plaque psoriasis (P < 0.0001), and were less often on systemic treatment including biological. Frequencies of comorbidities were not statically different but patients with 'early' onset psoriasis have a tendency (P < 0.5) to have higher frequencies of obesity, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and MACE. CONCLUSION: This study highlights phenotypic features of psoriasis in elderly and in very late onset psoriasis. The management of these fragile patients remains poorly codified and needs further investigation.

Clinical relevance of immunogenicity of biologics in psoriasis: implications for treatment strategies.

Biological drugs such as the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis, but some have the potential to induce an unwanted immune response. This immunogenicity may be associated with low trough drug levels, reduced clinical efficacy, reduced drug survival and an increased risk for adverse events. This article presents a literature review of the evidence on immunogenicity of biologics used in the treatment of psoriasis and considers the implications for therapeutic decision-making in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

[Definition and psychopathology of chronic hand dermatitis]. / Définition et psychopathologie de la dermite chronique des mains.

Psychopathology in patients with DCM is as complex as its clinical forms where the factors are numerous and often intricate. It combines psychophysiological, psychopathological factors, behavioral disorders which can be the cause or the consequence of DCM but also the negative impact on quality of life and the simplest daily activities. DCM affects the quality of life of every patient, regardless of the severity. Women are more affected by the DCM that man older age, male sex, atopy and the existence of a contact sensitization are independent risk factors of severity. Depression may affect up to 10 % of patients, should involve greater attention from dermatologists and general practitioners. Health authorities and all health actors should be aware of interactions between secondary cognitive troubles or inherent to DCM and efforts required in terms of preventive measures. Thus, the presence of psychiatric comorbidity is more common in patients with chronic dermatoses. Today it is considered that the emotional environment, built by the mother - child relationship must be optimal, otherwise the mental stability of body image may be compromised. Diminished self-esteem, affects less well managed and somatic expression of emotional content. Recently, a surprising study showed that most patients with refractory occupational dermatitis were not able to recognize the warning sign of flare or the role of psychological factors in the formation and maintenance of the dermatose. In fact, they rejected their personal responsibility in the occurrence of the new flare. To address this public health problem, health authorities, trainers and caregivers should be aware of the cognitive impact of DCM in these patients and interactions with current means of prevention. The role of obsessive-compulsive washing as part of an anxiety disorder or personality disorder is most likely a contributing or maintaining factor systematically underestimated in the pathogenesis of DCM and in the therapeutic management.

[Management of chronic hand eczema]. / Prise en charge de l'eczéma chronique des mains.

The management of hand eczema, more readily called chronic hand dermatitis, is complex. This heaviness is related not only to the disease itself by its different clinical forms but also the multiplicity and diversity of etiological factors, triggering / maintaining or aggravating factors. The repeated therapeutic failures are ransom of incorrect information about the disease and its environment, a lack of clarity in the prescription and duration of treatment in general too short. The reference treatment is high potency topical steroids with or without occlusion for 4-8 weeks followed by alitretinoin 30 mg / day for at least 3-6 months with a monthly lipid and liver monitoring and mandatory monthly pregnancy test in women of childbearing. Associated measures and patient education are the cornerstones of successful treatment. Other alternative treatments such as phototherapy, methotrexate, cyclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil etc. can be considered in case of resistance or for clearing followed by topical treatments.

Childhood-onset psoriasis: association with future cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is associated with higher prevalences of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities in adults but the relationship of age at onset and those prevalences is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the childhood onset of psoriasis (COP) is correlated with the frequency of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities in adulthood. METHODS: This noninterventional, cross-sectional, multicentre study of adults with psoriasis was conducted in 29 dermatology centres in France. Data on sex, age at onset of psoriasis and its clinical characteristics, and cardiovascular risk factors, including weight, body mass index, waist circumference, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and personal/familial major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were systematically recorded. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred and one patients with psoriasis (male: 56%; mean age: 49 years; 25% with COP) were included consecutively in the study. Univariate analysis showed that COP was associated with lower frequencies of obesity, high waist circumference, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, familial cardiovascular disease, MACE and metabolic syndrome, but more frequent active smoking. Multivariate analysis retained age as being associated with frequency of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, and sex with smoking, but not age at the onset of psoriasis. Psoriasis severity was associated with higher frequencies of obesity and psoriatic arthritis. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that COP does not seem to be an additional risk factor for higher frequencies of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities during adulthood.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of an optimized avulsion technique with onyster® (40% urea ointment with plastic dressing) ointment compared to bifonazole-urea ointment for removal of the clinically infected nail in toenail onychomycosis: a randomized evaluator-blinded controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Toenail onychomycosis is highly prevalent, with 14-28% of people aged 60 or over suffering from the disease. Use of a topical antifungal alone in toenail onychomycosis is associated with low cure rates. This may be due to limited penetration of the topical antifungal through the diseased nail. The objective of the present study was to compare two treatment modalities to obtain diseased nail chemical avulsion in toenail onychomycosis. METHODS: In this European, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, active-controlled study, male or female adult patients with distal-lateral or lateral subungual dermatophyte onychomycosis on at least 12.5% of the great toenail were randomized either to a 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing group (n = 53) or to a bifonazole-urea ointment group (n = 52). The ointments were applied daily for a maximum of 3 weeks according to the summary of product characteristics. After assessment of infected nail debridement, topical antifungal treatment with bifonazole cream was applied daily in both groups for 8 weeks. 102 patients were evaluated, i.e. 51 in the 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing group and 51 in the bifonazole-urea group. The primary end point was complete removal of the nail plate at day 21 (D21). Secondary end points were: complete cure and mycological cure evaluated at D105. Ease of use and local tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Complete removal of the clinically infected target nail plate area, assessed by blinded evaluators, was significantly higher in the 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing group (61.2%) than in the control group (39.2%), showing the superiority of 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing (p = 0.028). The same results were observed in the per-protocol population (63.0 vs. 36.6%; p = 0.014). Complete removal of the infected area assessed by the investigator at D21 showed a significantly higher success rate in patients treated with 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing (86.3%) as compared to patients treated with bifonazole-urea (60.8%), confirming the superiority of 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing (p = 0.004). At D105, the complete cure of onychomycosis, a criterion combining clinical and mycological assessments, showed a success rate of 27.7% for 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing versus 20.8% for the control group. No statistical difference was observed between the two treatment groups. The number of patients with at least one adverse event was twice as high in the bifonazole-urea group in comparison to the 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing group. Overall assessment of local tolerability by the investigator was considered good/very good in 98.0% of the 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing patients versus 90.4% of the bifonazole-urea patients, at D21, with no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows the superiority of 40% urea ointment with plastic dressing to bifonazole-urea ointment for complete removal of the infected target nail assessed by blinded evaluators and by the investigators. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of preliminary chemical nail avulsion on the efficacy of topical treatment of onychomycosis as assessed by complete cure at 1 year.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of a sequential therapy with RV4104A ointment, ciclopiroxolamine cream and ciclopirox film-forming solution with amorolfine nail lacquer alone in dermatophytic onychomycosis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of topical antifungals is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a sequential(SEQ) treatment with chemical nail avulsion and topical antifungals to amorolfine nail lacquer in dermatophytic onychomycosis. METHODS: This was a randomized,parallel-group, controlled study comparing a 36-week SEQ treatment with chemical nail avulsion with RV4104A ointment(class I medical device containing 40% urea) followed by ciclopirox cream for 8 weeks and ciclopirox nail lacquer for 25 weeks (SEQ group) to amorolfine nail lacquer for 36 weeks (AMO group). Patients had to have a big toenail onychomycosis,sparing the matrix. The primary efficacy criterion was complete cure at week 48. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were randomized. The complete cure rate at week 48 was significantly higher in the SEQ group than in the AMO group (36.6 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.001). Clinical cure at week 48 was observed in 53.5% of patients in the SEQ group versus 17% in the AMO group (p < 0.01). The cost of cure per patient was 50% lower with SEQ treatment (EUR 33) compared with amorolfine(EUR 76). CONCLUSION: A treatment of onychomycosis comprising chemical avulsion of the pathological nail, ciclopirox cream and nail lacquer is significantly more effective than amorolfine nail lacquer.

Significant delay in the introduction of systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a prospective multicentre observational study in outpatients from hospital dermatology departments in France.

BACKGROUND: There is a low rate of systemic treatment usage in moderate to severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present study was to assess the time period between lack of control of moderate to severe psoriasis with topical treatment or phototherapy as perceived by patients and the medical decision to introduce a systemic treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective multicentre study, which included patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. A standardized questionnaire was completed by physicians and patients at the time the decision was taken to introduce a systemic treatment. The primary outcome was the duration of uncontrolled psoriasis, as estimated by the patient, prior to the introduction of systemic treatment. Factors associated with a delay in systemic treatment defined as > 2 years of uncontrolled psoriasis were assessed. The agreement between patients and physicians on the duration of uncontrolled psoriasis was estimated. RESULTS: The study included 142 patients. The mean age was 48 years, the mean Psoriasis Area and Severity index (PASI) was 18·5 and the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was 12. The median duration of uncontrolled psoriasis estimated by patients and physicians was 3 years and 2 years, respectively. Factors associated with a delay in the introduction of systemic treatment as assessed by patients were fewer than three physician visits since psoriasis was uncontrolled [odds ratio (OR) 3·05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·29-7·21], Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale < 10 (OR 2·83; 95% CI 1·19-6·71), continuous psoriasis evolution (OR 2·67; 95% CI 1·12-6·42), low consumption of topical treatment (OR 2·35; 95% CI 1·03-5·34). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant delay in the introduction of systemic treatment in moderate to severe psoriasis. Patients with low level anxiety and limited use of healthcare resources appear to be at higher risk of experiencing long delays.

Are we giving patients enough information on how to use topical treatments? Analysis of 767 prescriptions in psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Unclear instructions probably contribute to the suboptimal efficacy and adherence to topical agents in psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the quality of prescriptions for topical therapy in psoriasis and to determine factors associated with high-quality prescription writing. METHODS: We made a systematic analysis of 767 topical prescriptions written by dermatologists and general practitioners (GPs). The following parameters were recorded: writing mode (electronic vs. hand written), indication of formulation, frequency of administration, duration of treatment, indication of areas to be treated, and indication of amount of product to be used. We considered prescriptions of high quality to be those including at least four of the five prospectively defined quality parameters. RESULTS: Only 35·7% of prescriptions fulfilled the definition of a high-quality prescription. Quality of prescription writing was significantly influenced by two factors: electronic writing [odds ratio (OR) 3·04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2·2-4·21; P < 10(-4) ] and specialty of the prescriber, dermatologists writing higher quality prescriptions compared with GPs (OR 1·61, 95% CI 1·54-2·14; P < 10(-4) ). CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of topical prescriptions are not adequately written and do not include the required information to help patients manage their topical treatment in psoriasis correctly. The quality of topical prescriptions could be improved by making the use of electronic prescriptions widespread and by the development of aids for easy evaluation of the right amount of topical treatment to be applied according to body surface area involved.

[Guide for therapeutic education program in psoriasis]. / Élaboration d'un référentiel d'éducation thérapeutique dans le psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease which can cause significant impairment of quality of life, absenteeism at work and significant psychological distress. This justifies the elaboration of a multidisciplinary education program for patients. The objective of this work was to develop the content of a therapeutic education program in psoriasis, which may serve as a basis for teams wishing to develop psoriasis therapeutic education in their community. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 15 health professionals (dermatologists, dermatology nurses, and psychologist) and four psoriasis patients representatives of the psoriasis patient association (Association pour la lutte contre le psoriasis) participated in the development of this program. Health professionals all had an experience in therapeutic patient education in psoriasis through prior participation in a multicenter open pilot study, evaluating a therapeutic education program in psoriasis. Based on the previous experience, preparatory work in subteams was initiated to prepare draft objectives and content of the program. A two-day meeting was then organized to discuss in depth content of the therapeutic education program and elaborate recommendations. The meeting structure combined subteam work and plenary sessions. The following program was elaborated: two individual sessions and three group sessions. The groups have worked for two days, according to a predefined pattern: interview guide of educational diagnostic, content of collective workshops and knowledge questionnaire. All these documents were validated in plenary session. The methodology used for the development of this program followed the recommendations of the HAS in the field of chronic disease. RESULTS: In the end, were retained three collective workshops, preceded by a consultation of individual educational diagnosis and knowledge questionnaire followed by an evaluation session at the end of the program. The interview guide for educational diagnosis and the knowledge basis questionnaire have been defined. Three themes of group workshops were defined: (1) understanding the disease, (2) understanding the mechanism of onset of disease and treatments available, (3) how to live with psoriasis in everyday life. For each workshop, were defined learning objectives, skills to acquire and how to get there. DISCUSSION: We describe here a framework of educational therapy program in psoriasis comprising educational objectives, skills to acquire, basic disease knowledge, suitable for patients with psoriasis. The content was tailored to patient language and knowledge based on feedback from participating patients. The list of skills may be adapted to patient's individual needs. This program serves primarily as a working basis for the caregiver, to standardize practices in terms of therapeutic education in psoriasis in France.

Efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment as second-line treatment for children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: evidence from a randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial vs. fluticasone 0.005% ointment.

Tacrolimus 0.03% ointment is licensed for second-line treatment of children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Although data are available from clinical trials, no study has enrolled only second-line patients. This double-blind, non-inferiority study compared tacrolimus 0.03% and fluticasone 0.005% ointments in children with moderate-to-severe AD, who had responded insufficiently to conventional therapies. Children (aged 2-15 yr) were randomized to tacrolimus ointment (n = 240) or fluticasone ointment (n = 239), twice daily until clearance or for a maximum of 3 wk and, if lesions remained, once daily for up to 3 wk further. Primary end-point was week 3 response rate (improvement of >or=60% in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index and not withdrawn for lack of efficacy). Secondary end-points included pruritus and sleep quality, global assessment of clinical response, incidence of new flares and safety. Response rates were 86.3% with tacrolimus ointment and 91.5% with fluticasone. Lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was -11.8%, exceeding the non-inferiority limit of -15% and meeting the primary end-point. Moderate or better improvement on the physicians' global assessment occurred in 93.6% and 92.4% of patients in the tacrolimus ointment and fluticasone arms, respectively, while median pruritus scores improved by 84.0% and 91.5%. Sleep quality improved by approximately 92% in both treatment arms. After day 21, new flare-up occurred in 5.5% and 11.3% of patients receiving tacrolimus ointment and fluticasone, respectively; mean times to new flares were 6.5 +/- 5.0 and 8.6 +/- 5.2 days. Adverse events were similar between the two arms, with the exception of application-site skin burning sensation in the tacrolimus ointment group. In conclusion, efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment as second-line treatment was not inferior to that of fluticasone 0.005% ointment, with similar benefits on global disease improvement and quality of sleep.

Superiority of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment compared with fluticasone 0.005% in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis of the face: results from a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: No specific data are available on tacrolimus ointment as a second-line treatment in adults with facial eczema. OBJECTIVES: To compare tacrolimus 0.1% and fluticasone 0.005% ointments in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) of the face in whom conventional treatment was ineffective or poorly tolerated. METHODS: Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment of facial AD with twice-daily tacrolimus ointment (n = 288) or fluticasone ointment (n = 280) for 3 weeks or until clearance. After day 21, patients could continue without the study treatment, apply the same ointment once daily, or switch to the other medication twice daily, depending on lesion clearance and patient/physician satisfaction. The primary endpoint was the day-21 response [> or = 60% reduction in the modified Local Eczema and Severity Index (mLEASI) score]. Secondary endpoints included facial erythema and pruritus, global clinical response, treatment switching at day 21 and safety. RESULTS Response with tacrolimus ointment (93%) was superior to that with fluticasone (88%; P = 0.026). Improvements in mLEASI components were also greater with tacrolimus ointment. Facial erythema and pruritus improved in both groups. Global clinical response was rated 'marked improvement' or better in 88% and 79% of patients in the tacrolimus ointment and fluticasone groups, respectively. At day 21, 9% of patients switched from fluticasone to tacrolimus ointment, while 4.5% switched from tacrolimus ointment to fluticasone. Adverse events were more frequent with tacrolimus ointment as a result of the higher incidence of application-site skin burning sensation. Safety of both drugs was in line with their respective summary of product characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment has superior efficacy to fluticasone 0.005% ointment for twice-daily treatment of adults with moderate to severe facial AD in whom conventional therapy was inadequately effective or not tolerated. Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment is a safe and effective second-line treatment for the control of moderate to severe AD of the face.

Proactive treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment.

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) using low dose, intermittent, topical anti-inflammatory agents may control acute disease and prevent relapses. This 12-month, European, multicentre, randomized study investigated whether the proactive use of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied twice weekly can keep AD in remission and reduce the incidence of disease exacerbations (DE). METHODS: During the initial open-label period, 257 adults with AD applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks to affected areas. When an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of

Proactive treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment.

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) using low dose, intermittent, topical anti-inflammatory agents may control acute disease and prevent relapses. This 12-month, European, multicentre, randomized study investigated whether the proactive use of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied twice weekly can keep AD in remission and reduce the incidence of disease exacerbations (DE). METHODS: During the initial open-label period, 257 adults with AD applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks to affected areas. When an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of < or =2 was achieved, the patient entered the disease control period (DCP) and was randomized to either proactive tacrolimus (n = 116) or vehicle ointment (n = 108) twice weekly for 12 months. Exacerbations were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment b.i.d. until an IGA < or =2 was regained, then randomized treatment was restarted. The primary endpoint was the number of DEs during the DCP that required a substantial therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: Proactive tacrolimus 0.1% ointment application significantly reduced the number of DEs requiring substantial therapeutic intervention (median difference 2; P < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test), the percentage of DE treatment days (median difference: 15.2%; P < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test) and increased the time to first DE (median 142 vs 15 days; P < 0.001; stratified log-rank test). The adverse event profile was similar for the two treatment approaches. CONCLUSION: A 12-month, twice weekly proactive tacrolimus ointment application was an effective treatment in most study patients which prevented, delayed and reduced the occurrence of AD exacerbations.

Once weekly administration of etanercept 50 mg is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial with open-label extension.

BACKGROUND: In previous studies, etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (BIW) or 50 mg BIW significantly reduced disease severity in patients with plaque psoriasis and demonstrated a favourable safety profile. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept 50 mg administered once weekly (QW) compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 24 weeks. METHODS: This study was conducted in two parts: (i) a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase, in which patients received etanercept 50 mg QW or placebo QW; and (ii) a 12-week, open-label extension phase, in which all patients received etanercept 50 mg QW. Primary endpoint was a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included percentage PASI improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients were analysed in the double-blind phase; 126 patients entered the open-label phase. At week 12, significantly more patients receiving etanercept 50 mg QW (37.5%) achieved PASI 75 response than patients receiving placebo (2.2%; P < 0.0001). At week 24, 71.1% in the etanercept-etanercept group and 44.4% in the placebo-etanercept group achieved PASI 75. Mean percentage of PASI improvement from baseline was 55.4% with etanercept vs. 9.4% worsening with placebo at week 12 (P < 0.0001), with 77.4% and 57.7% improvement in the etanercept-etanercept and placebo-etanercept groups at week 24. A PGA score of 0-1 (clear-almost clear) was achieved by 64% and 42% in the etanercept-etanercept and placebo-etanercept groups at week 24, respectively. Etanercept 50 mg QW was well tolerated. No deaths, serious infections, opportunistic infections (including tuberculosis), demyelinating disorders, malignancies or new safety signals were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly three-quarters of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving etanercept 50 mg QW achieved significant improvement in disease severity over 24 weeks. This study also showed a favourable tolerability and safety profile with etanercept 50 mg QW.