Vaccination recommendations for the adult immunosuppressed patient: A systematic review and comprehensive field synopsis.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed patients are at risk of severe viral infections-related complications. National and international vaccination guidelines have been developed to decrease the mortality risk associated with these infections. However, a summary of these guidelines and the value of immunisation in this population is missing. OBJECTIVES: To summarize specific guidelines regarding vaccination in immunosuppressed patients. METHODS: We performed a literature search based on last update vaccine guidelines in immunosuppressed adult patients published between 1/1/2005-1/31/2016 in English or French language using PubMed, Cochrane and Embase, as well as relevant medical society websites. RESULTS: Of the 389 citations identified, 12 guidelines were selected Three additional guidelines were selected by searching on the websites from medical societies of each specialty. 15 guidelines were included, involving 19 medical societies issued from the US (n = 6), international collaboration (n = 3), UK (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Australia (n = 1), France (n = 1), and Germany (n = 1). These guidelines provide recommendations on vaccination in asplenic patients (n = 5), cancer patients (n = 4), HIV patients (n = 5), hematopoietic stem cell recipients (n = 4), inflammatory bowel diseases patients (n = 5), psoriasis patients (n = 4), primary immunocompromised patients (n = 3), inflammatory rheumatic diseases patients (n = 6), and solid organ transplant recipients (n = 5). All guidelines recommended pneumococcal and injectable influenza vaccines. Other inactivated vaccines were recommended only in high risk patients. Live vaccines were usually contraindicated in patients under immunosuppressive therapy and/or in HIV patients with a CD4 count under 200/mm3. CONCLUSION: Pneumococcal and injectable influenza are the two essential vaccines recommended in all immunocompromised patients. Other inactivated vaccines are only indicated in high risk patients. Live vaccines are usually contraindicated.

Quantification of Demodex folliculorum by PCR in rosacea and its relationship to skin innate immune activation.

The aim of this study is to quantify D. folliculorum colonisation in rosacea subtypes and age-matched controls and to determine the relationship between D. folliculorum load, rosacea subtype and skin innate immune system activation markers. We set up a multicentre, cross-sectional, prospective study in which 98 adults were included: 50 with facial rosacea, including 18 with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR), and 32 with papulopustular rosacea (PPR) and 48 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Non-invasive facial samples were taken to quantify D. folliculorum infestation by quantitative PCR and evaluate inflammatory and immune markers. Analysis of the skin samples show that D. folliculorum was detected more frequently in rosacea patients than age-matched controls (96% vs 74%, P < 0.01). D. folliculorum density was 5.7 times higher in rosacea patients than in healthy volunteers. Skin sample analysis showed a higher expression of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines (Il-8, Il-1b, TNF-a) and inflammasome-related genes (NALP-3 and CASP-1) in rosacea, especially PPR. Overexpression of LL-37 and VEGF, as well as CD45RO, MPO and CD163, was observed, indicating broad immune system activation in patients with rosacea. In conclusion, D. folliculorum density is highly increased in patients with rosacea, irrespective of rosacea subtype. There appears to be an inverse relationship between D. folliculorum density and inflammation markers in the skin of rosacea patients, with clear differences between rosacea subtypes.

Large scale study of epidermal recovery after stratum corneum removal: dynamics of genomic response.

The stratum corneum (SC) is a superficial skin compartment that protects the body from the outside environment. Any disturbance of this function induces cascading steps of molecular and cellular repair in the whole epidermis. The aim of this study was to investigate epidermal gene expression following SC removal by tape stripping. Twenty-nine healthy male volunteers were included (27 +/- 4 years old). Tape stripping was processed on one inner forearm, the other unstripped forearm served as a control. Epidermis samples were collected at 2, 6, 19, 30 and 72 h after tape stripping. Trans-epidermal water loss measurements were performed at each step to monitor barrier restoration. Total RNA was extracted from collected epidermis samples and analysed by using DermArray cDNA microarrays. Among 4000 genes under investigation, we found that the expression of 370 genes varied significantly at least once during the time following stripping. Using an original clustering method, the modulated genes were gathered into eight groups. A functional characterization of the clusters enabled us to get a dynamic and global view of the main molecular processes taking place during epidermal recovery.

Methotrexate Versus Cyclosporine in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is currently used to treat atopic dermatitis but has never been assessed versus cyclosporine in adults. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of methotrexate versus cyclosporine in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either oral methotrexate (15 mg/wk) or cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg/d) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was a patient achieving 50% improvement in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index (SCORAD 50) at week 8. When the primary end point was not achieved, methotrexate was increased to 25 mg and cyclosporine to 5 mg during the next 16 weeks. The secondary end points were a patient achieving a 50% reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Intensity index (EASI 50) and SCORAD 50 at each visit (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00809172). RESULTS: A total of 97 patients received methotrexate 15 mg (n = 50) or cyclosporine 2.5 mg (n = 47). Regarding the primary end point at week 8, methotrexate was inferior to cyclosporine because the proportion of patients with SCORAD 50 was 8% (4 of 50) in the methotrexate arm versus 42% (18 of 43) in the cyclosporine arm. The difference in percentages for the 2 treatment groups (2-sided 90% CI) was -34% (-48% to -20%). At week 8, methotrexate and cyclosporine dosages were increased in 56% and 49% of the patients, respectively. Regarding EASI 50, the noninferiority end point was reached at week 20 in 92% (22 of 24) of patients in the methotrexate arm and 87% (26 of 30) of patients in the cyclosporine arm. The treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with cyclosporine (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate 15 mg/wk was inferior to cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg/d at week 8. Increasing the doses of methotrexate to 25 mg/wk induced a significant improvement versus cyclosporine at week 20.

Once-daily rupatadine improves the symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international, dose-ranging study investigated the effect of treatment with rupatadine 5, 10 and 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks on symptoms and interference with daily activities and sleep in 12-65 years-old patients with moderate-to-severe chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). Rupatadine 10 and 20 mg significantly reduced pruritus severity by 62.05% and 71.87% respectively, from baseline, over a period of 4 weeks compared to reduction with placebo by 46.59% (p < 0.05). Linear trends were noted for reductions in mean number of wheals and interference with daily activities and sleep with rupatadine 10 and 20 mg over the 4-week treatment period. The two most frequently reported AEs were somnolence (2.90% for placebo, 4.29% for 5 mg-, 5.41% for 10 mg- and 21.43% for 20 mg-rupatadine-treated group) and headache (4.35% for placebo, 2.86% for 5 mg-, 4.05% for 10 mg- and 4.29% for 20 mg-rupatadine-treated group). These findings suggest that rupatadine 10 and 20 mg is a fast-acting, efficacious and safe treatment for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe CIU. Rupatadine decreased pruritus severity, in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

Clinical Experience Acquired with Raptiva (CLEAR) trial in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from extended treatment in an international, Phase III, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-treatment (FT) CLEAR trial period demonstrated the efficacy/safety of efalizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including refractory or contraindicated patients unsuitable for other systemic treatments. This study assessed the efficacy/safety of open-label extended treatment (up to 24 weeks' continuous treatment) in patients not achieving > or =75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at week 12 of the FT period. Time to relapse after treatment cessation, and efficacy/safety of 12 weeks' open-label re-treatment in patients achieving PASI-75 at week 12 FT were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PASI-75 at week 12 FT were observed without treatment until relapse, then re-treated with open-label efalizumab (1.0 mg/kg/week for 12 weeks). Others received open-label extended treatment without intervening observation. RESULTS: Among efalizumab-treated patients (n = 308) who had < 75% PASI improvement at week 12 FT, extended treatment led to PASI-75 in 26.6%. Among patients with between > or = 50 and < 75% PASI improvement at week 12 FT (n = 118), 47.5% improved to PASI-75 with extended treatment. For patients achieving PASI-75 at week 12 FT (n = 164), median time to relapse was 58 days. Re-treatment after relapse led to mean PASI improvement of 62.3% from study baseline (n = 145). Safety results were consistent with previous studies, with no new safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate additional benefit of continuing efalizumab. Re-treatment re-established disease control in patients with PASI-75 who relapsed following treatment cessation. The safety profile remained consistent with that seen at 12 weeks.

Modulation of gene expression induced in human epidermis by environmental stress in vivo.

Environmental insults on the skin induce biologic responses through the modulation of expression of genes implicated in different cell functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the modulation of gene expression profile in human epidermis in vivo following different stresses. We determined the modulations of gene expression using cDNA macroarray in the epidermis of 28 healthy volunteers, following mild and physiologic insults, including: (1), tape stripping; (2) application of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate; (3) daily application of vaseline; and (4), exposure to one minimal erythema dose of solar-simulated radiation. The analysis was performed 19 h after treatment. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method was used to confirm our results. We showed that: (1) the intensity of gene modulation was variable among the volunteers following the same skin stress; (2) the nature and intensity of skin treatment modified the pattern of gene expression; and (3) some genes were modulated only by specific stress, some others are modulated irrespective of the stress. GADD45, Bax, SAS, and granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 were overexpressed exclusively following solar-simulated radiation, whereas tape stripping led to the modulation of genes implicated in different pathways (inflammation, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, detoxification, etc.). Concerning common gene modulation, MRP8 and MRP14 were highly upregulated in human skin epidermis after solar-simulated radiation, vaseline application or tape stripping, and to a lower extent after sodium dodecyl sulfate. Such upregulation of the MRP 8/14 genes was confirmed at the protein level in an ex-vivo skin culture model following tape stripping and solar-simulated radiation. Together, these results suggest that MRP8 and MRP14 may be general, yet highly sensitive, markers for a great variety of skin stresses and that they are implicated in several epidermal repair pathways.

Calcitriol ointment and clobetasol propionate cream: a new regimen for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

For psoriasis therapy, topical derivatives of vitamin D3 represent a versatile option: they can be used either alone or in combination with other agents such as topical corticosteroids. In this two-phase parallel-group study, the naturally occurring vitamin D3 analogue, calcitriol, was compared with the vitamin D analogue calcipotriol in 125 patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. The proposed treatment regimen was an initial bitherapy for 2 or 4 weeks, with clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream, a super potent topical corticosteroid applied in the morning and either calcitriol 3 mug/g ointment or calcipotriol 50 mug/g ointment applied in the evening, followed by monotherapy with either calcitriol or calcipotriol applied twice daily until endpoint week 12. Efficacy evaluations (global assessment of improvement, PASI and body surface area (BSA) affected) showed no significant differences between the two regimen groups at the primary endpoints (week 2 and week 12) or at any interim points. At week 2 the investigator's global assessment showed clinical success (psoriasis markedly improved, almost clear or clear) for more than 50% of the patients in both groups and for 48 (79%) and 56 (88%) patients, respectively in the calcitriol and calcipotriol regimen group at week 12. Least-square means analysis of PASI indicated the calcitriol regimen to be equivalent to the calcipotriol regimen. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to cutaneous safety or to incidence of adverse events. The present study shows that for the treatment of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis calcitriol 3 mug/g ointment can provide a safe and effective alternative to calcipotriol 50 mug/g ointment while being administered within a regimen based on a bitherapy with corticosteroids followed by a vitamin D3 maintenance monotherapy.

The use of lymecycline in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris: a comparison of the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens.

We compared the efficacy and safety of lymecycline 300 mg od vs lymecycline 150 mg bid or placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe acne. 271 patients received either oral lymecycline 300 mg od + placebo od, lymecycline 150 mg bid, or placebo bid, for 12 weeks. Reduction in inflammatory lesion counts at week 12 was the primary efficacy variable (global improvement was a primary efficacy parameter vs placebo) and safety was assessed by adverse events. Lymecycline 300 mg od was non-inferior to lymecycline 150 mg bid at all time points and superior to placebo throughout the study. Drug-related adverse events were similar for all treatment groups. Lymecycline 300 mg od is as effective and safe as lymecycline 150 mg bid in the treatment of moderate to severe acne. This new, once daily formulation could potentially contribute towards improved compliance rates with oral tetracyclines.

Physicians' response to a letter to confirm diagnosis in a genetic study of psoriasis.

Context. Phenotyping of diseases is essential for genetic studies. In common diseases like psoriasis, the co-operation of family practitioners is helpful to confirm the phenotype of the patients. A genetic study was initiated in France by Généthon in 1996 in order to localise and identify genes for susceptibility to psoriasis. We used an unusual means to confirm psoriasis diagnosis: letters sent to patients' practitioners. Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of this means, and analyse the factors influencing the response rate of patients' physicians to a letter designed to confirm a diagnosis of psoriasis. Design. In the cases of putative psoriasis diagnosis (evaluated by systematic phone calls to the patients by a dermatologist), and with the agreement of the patients, a letter was sent to the patient's referent physician. We evaluated response rate to the letter. Results. 533 letters concerning 762 patients were sent to 456 physicians. The global response rate was 56.5%. The characteristics which modified the response rate were: the quality of the letter sent and some physicians' characteristics: dermatologists versus GPs, hospital versus private practice, and size of the town in which the physician had his practice. Conclusions. The use of letters to physicians as a means of phenotyping patients' diseases is an efficient method of confirming clinical diagnosis and should be used more frequently to confirm clinical diagnosis in large genetic studies. Some parameters such as ease of reply to the letter, whether the physician was a GP or a specialist, and the type of practice increased the response rate.

Onset of psoriatic arthritis in patients treated with efalizumab for moderate to severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nature of polyarthritis in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing treatment with efalizumab, a humanized anti-CD11a monoclonal antibody. METHODS: In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed patients who developed arthritis during treatment with efalizumab. The relationship between joint manifestations and psoriatic disease was addressed by using different classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The course of arthritis and its response to treatment were also investigated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients developed de novo inflammatory rheumatic disease, with a mean delay of 15 weeks following the start of treatment, and with exclusive asymmetric peripheral monarthritis or oligoarthritis (8 patients), inflammatory spinal disease (1 patient), or both (7 patients), associated in some cases with enthesitis and dactylitis. All patients fulfilled at least 2 different sets of classification criteria for PsA. In most of them, an improvement in skin lesions was observed at the onset of PsA, as measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (mean score 24.88 before efalizumab versus 18.78 at the time of arthritis). Efalizumab treatment was stopped in 11 patients and was followed by the elimination of rheumatologic symptoms in 1 patient, while 8 patients required treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with or without methotrexate, with 2 later being switched to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. Reintroduction of efalizumab (2 patients) was followed by a relapse of PsA. CONCLUSION: This study questions the role of efalizumab in the induction of PsA. It also emphasizes the discrepancy between the courses of psoriatic skin and joint manifestations under treatment. Prospective case-control studies are needed to accurately investigate the impact of efalizumab on PsA.

Confirmation of psoriasis susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p21 and 20p13 in French families.

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the skin. It is inherited as a multifactorial trait, with a strong genetic component. Linkage studies have identified a large number of disease loci, but very few could be replicated in independent family sets. In this study, we present the results of a genome-wide scan carried out in 14 French extended families. Candidate regions were then tested in a second set of 32 families. Analysis of the pooled samples confirmed linkage to chromosomes 6p21 (Z(MLB) score=3.5, P=0.0002) and 20p13 (Z(MLB) score=2.9, P=0.002), although there was little contribution of the second family set to the 20p13 linkage signal. Moreover, we identified four additional loci potentially linked to psoriasis. The major histocompatibility complex region on 6p21 is a major susceptibility locus, referred to as PSORS1, which has been found in most of the studies published to date. The 20p13 locus segregates independently of PSORS1 in psoriasis families. It has previously been thought to be involved in the predisposition to psoriasis and other inflammatory disorders such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and asthma. Although psoriasis and AD rarely occur together, this reinforces the hypothesis that psoriasis is influenced by genes with general effects on inflammation and immunity.

0.3% Tacrolimus gel and 0.5% Tacrolimus cream show efficacy in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a randomized, open-label, observer-blinded study.

The efficacy and safety of 0.3% tacrolimus gel and 0.5% tacrolimus cream compared with calcipotriol ointment were evaluated in adults (n = 124) with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Treatment was twice daily for a maximum of 12 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the percentage change in the local psoriasis severity index of a target lesion between baseline and week 12. By week 12, the median percentage changes in local psoriasis severity index of the target lesions in the tacrolimus gel, tacrolimus cream and calcipotriol groups were 55.6%, 50.0% and 58.6%, respectively (no statistically significant differences). Clinical improvement was observed after one week and increased throughout the study. Tacrolimus-treated patients experienced more application site skin burning (tacrolimus gel and cream both 31.0% versus 7.5% for calcipotriol; p = 0.011). Skin burning was mostly mild in intensity and decreased substantially after 1 week of treatment. There were no differences in the nature and incidence of infections and no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values.