Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a sensitive and highly specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary lung neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 345 cases, including 292 whole-tissue sections.

Recent evidence suggests a role for the nuclear marker INSM1 in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine lung neoplasms. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of INSM1 as a marker of neuroendocrine differentiation using a large series of whole-tissue sections of primary lung neoplasms. We stained 345 primary lung neoplasms with INSM1, including 292 whole-tissue sections. Most cases were also stained with synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56. The tumors included 64 small cell lung carcinomas, 24 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 64 carcinoid tumors (48 typical, 16 atypical), 130 adenocarcinomas, and 33 squamous cell carcinomas. For small cell lung carcinoma, the sensitivity of INSM1 (98%) was similar to synaptophysin (100%) and CD56 (95%) but considerably higher than chromogranin (83%). For large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, CD56 (92%) and synaptophysin (88%) were more sensitive than INSM1 (75%), while chromogranin was less sensitive (46%). All markers stained 100% of carcinoid tumors, except one atypical carcinoid tumor, which was negative for INSM1. The sensitivity of INSM1 for neuroendocrine lung neoplasms as a group (95%) was similar to synaptophysin (98%) and CD56 (97%), but higher than chromogranin (84%). The specificity of INSM1 for neuroendocrine lung neoplasms (97%) was similar to chromogranin (98%) but higher than synaptophysin (90%) and CD56 (87%). INSM1 staining was concordant in primary tumors and matched metastases. In conclusion, INSM1 is a reliable marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary lung neoplasms, with sensitivity similar to synaptophysin and CD56, and specificity similar to chromogranin.

Analytical and clinical performance of progesterone receptor antibodies in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of analytical and immunohistochemical performance of progesterone receptor (PR) antibodies with correlation to recurrence of invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. METHODS: The binding-affinity kinetics of PR clones 1E2, 1A6, 16 and 636 were compared using synthetic peptides derived from identified epitopes on a Biacore T200. A cohort of 351 cases (Hormone Receptor (HR)+/HER2-) were stained for PR expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and scored according to ASCO/CAP criteria. RESULTS: The stability of the antigen/antibody complex was greater for the 1E2 clone compared to 1A6, 16 and 636 clones. PR IHC on archival tissue resulted in 94.3% (299/317) concordance with clones. CONCLUSION: Clones evaluated in this study had a high level of concordance with IHC despite PR (1E2) demonstrating higher analytical binding properties than other clones. In a minority of cases (1.3% for 1E2 and 2.5% for 636) IHC results could convert estrogen receptor (ER)-/PR- to ER-/PR+ tumors, making these patients potentially eligible for endocrine therapy.

Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer provides an HER2:CEP17 (centromere enumeration probe for chromosome 17) ratio. Copy number alteration (CNA) in CEP17 may skew this ratio. The authors analyzed the impact of the 2013 American Society of Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines and an alternative chromosome 17 probe on HER2 status in tumor specimens with CEP17 CNA. METHODS: Specimens with CEP17 CNA (n = 310) were selected from 3048 tumor samples that were received from January 2013 to June 2015 for testing with the alternative chromosome 17 probe D17S122. Reclassification of HER2 status was assessed using the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. RESULTS: The alternative chromosome 17 probe reclassified 82 of 310 (26.5%) and 87 of 310 (28.1%) tumors using the 2007 and 2013 guidelines, respectively. Of the 41 of 310 tumors (13.2%) that were reclassified from nonamplified to amplified according to 2007 guidelines, 28 of 41 (68.3%) had an average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and <6.0. The 39 of 310 tumors (12.6%) that were reclassified from equivocal to amplified according to 2013 guidelines had a mean HER2 copy number between ≥4.0 and <6.0. Most of these patients had stage I, hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative tumors, which is an unusual clinicopathologic profile for HER2-amplified tumors, and most received HER2-targeted therapy in addition to endocrine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Reflex testing with an alternative chromosome 17 probe using the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines reclassified 28.1% of tumor samples that had CEP17 CNA, converting nearly one-half from equivocal to amplified. The benefit of HER2-targeted therapy in this patient population requires further study. Cancer 2017;123:2230-2239. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Fully automated dual-color dual-hapten silver in situ hybridization staining for MYC amplification: a diagnostic tool for discriminating secondary angiosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: MYC amplification occurs in post-radiation and chronic lymphedema-associated secondary angiosarcoma and some primary angiosarcomas. In this study, we tested the ability of automated dual-color dual-hapten in situ hybridization (DISH) staining to discriminate secondary angiosarcoma from radiation-associated atypical vascular lesions (AVL), and to correlate with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC amplification. METHODS: Cases of secondary angiosarcoma, including 11 biopsies and 3 excisions from 11 patients, and 5 AVL biopsies from 5 patients, were examined by FISH and DISH. DISH staining was performed using the Dual Color Open Probe software on a Ventana Benchmark XT automated slide stainer. Metallic black silver (MYC) and reference CHR8 red signals were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively enumerated for tumor nuclei. Small and large clusters of silver signals were recorded as 6 or 12 signals, respectively. MYC amplification was defined as MYC/CHR8 ratio >2.0. RESULTS: Where tissue was available for both DISH and FISH, all secondary angiosarcoma cases showed MYC amplification (11/11 = 100%) by both DISH and FISH. All AVL were negative for MYC amplification by both techniques (0/5 = 0%). CONCLUSION: In the current cohort, use of DISH identified all MYC amplified cases, and distinguished secondary angiosarcoma from AVL. DISH staining may be useful in distinguishing secondary angiosarcoma from AVL in challenging cases.

Automated Bright-Field Dual-Color In Situ Hybridization for MDM2: Interobserver Reproducibility and Correlation With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in a Series of Soft Tissue Consults.

CONTEXT: -Atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas contain alterations in the 12q13-15 region resulting in amplification of MDM2 and nearby genes. Identifying MDM2 amplification is a useful ancillary test, as the histologic mimics of atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas have consistently shown a lack of MDM2 amplification. OBJECTIVE: -To assess the interobserver reproducibility of a bright-field assay for MDM2 amplification (dual-color, dual-hapten in situ hybridization [DDISH]) among reviewers with varying degrees of experience with the assay and to assess the concordance of MDM2 DDISH with MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). DESIGN: -In total, 102 cases were assessed in parallel for MDM2 by FISH and DDISH. MDM2 amplification was defined as an MDM2 to chromosome 12 ratio of 2.0 or greater, whereas an MDM2 to chromosome 12 ratio of less than 2 was nonamplified. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was scored in the routine clinical laboratory and DDISH was evaluated by 3 different pathologists blinded to the final diagnosis and FISH results. RESULTS: -Fluorescence in situ hybridization categorized 27 cases (26%) as MDM2 amplified and 75 cases (74%) as nonamplified; the consensus DDISH diagnosis was 98% concordant with FISH. Agreement between MDM2 DDISH by each reviewer and MDM2 FISH was highly concordant (99%, 98%, and 98%, respectively, for reviewers 1, 2 and 3). The κ agreement of the 3 reviewers scoring DDISH was excellent (κ = 0.949, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively, for reviewers 1, 2, and 3). CONCLUSIONS: -This study highlights excellent concordance between DDISH and FISH in MDM2 copy number assessment. Moreover, excellent interobserver reproducibility of the DDISH assay was found among reviewers with varying levels of experience evaluating bright-field assays.

Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins predicts worse outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Recent studies suggested that MYC and BCL2 protein co-expression is an independent indicator of poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, the immunohistochemistry protocols for dual-expression staining and the scoring cut-offs vary by study. Sixty-nine cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were evaluated for MYC and BCL2 protein expression using various cut-offs that have been recommended in prior studies. Independent of the International Prognostic Index risk group, cases with dual protein expression of BCL2 and MYC using ≥50%/40% cut-offs and ≥70%/40% had significantly shorter overall survival than cases without. It was verified in this patient population that the use of BCL2 and MYC immunohistochemistry, performed with available in vitro diagnostic-cleared antibodies, provides rapid prognostic information in patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This study has practical implications for diagnostic laboratories and serves as a guide for implementation in the setting of future clinical trials.

ALK status testing in non-small-cell lung carcinoma by FISH on ThinPrep slides with cytology material.

INTRODUCTION: Oncogenic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) provide the basis for targeted therapy with crizotinib and other specific ALK inhibitors. Treatment eligibility is conventionally determined by the Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay on paraffin-embedded tissue (PET). On limited samples such as fine needle aspiration-derived cytoblocks, FISH for ALK is often uninformative. FISH performed on liquid-based ThinPrep slides (ThinPrep-FISH) may represent a robust alternative. METHODS: Two hundred thirty cytology samples from 217 patients with advanced NSCLC, including a consecutive series of 179 specimens, were used to generate matched ThinPrep slides and paraffin cytoblocks. The same ThinPrep slides used for cytologic diagnosis were assessed by standard ALK break-apart two-color probe FISH, after etching of tumor areas. Ultrasensitive ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) on corresponding cytoblocks [D5F3 antibody, OptiView signal amplification] served as the reference data set. RESULTS: ThinPrep-FISH ALK signals were robust in 228 of 230 cases and not compromised by nuclear truncation inherent in paraffin-embedded tissue-FISH; only two samples displayed no signals. Nine of 178 informative cases (5%) in the consecutive series and 18 of 228 informative cases (7.8%) overall were ALK rearranged by ThinPrep-FISH. In 154 informative matched ThinPrep-FISH and cytoblock-IHC samples, 152 were concordant (10, 6.5% ALK status positive; 142, 92.2% ALK status negative), and two (1.3%) were ThinPrep-FISH positive but IHC negative (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.6%, overall agreement 98.7%). CONCLUSION: Detection of ALK gene rearrangements in liquid cytology ThinPrep slides derived from patients with NSCLC can be confidently used for clinical ALK molecular testing.