Management of analgesia in acute pancreatitis: Results of a national survey. / Manejo de la analgesia en la pancreatitis aguda. Resultados de una encuesta nacional.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is one of the main reasons for digestive admissions. Adequate pain treatment is crucial in its management. However, there are hardly any descriptions of the analgesic guidelines used in our setting. METHODS: On-line survey on analgesic management in acute pancreatitis, aimed at attending physicians and residents practising in Spain. RESULTS: Two hundred and nine physicians from 88 centres responded to the survey. Ninety percent were specialists in gastrointestinal medicine and 69% worked in a tertiary centre. The majority (64.4%) do not routinely use scales to measure pain. When choosing a drug, experience in its use was the most important factor. The most commonly prescribed initial treatments are: combination of paracetamol and metamizole (53.5%), paracetamol alone (19.1%) and metamizole alone (17.4%). As rescue: meperidine (54.8%), tramadol (17.8%), morphine chloride (17.8%) and metamizole (11.5%). Continuous perfusion is used in 8.2% of initial treatments. Physicians with >10 years of service use more metamizole as monotherapy (50%), while residents and attending physicians with <10 years of service prescribe it in combination with paracetamol (85%). If progression is needed, morphine chloride and meperidine are mainly used. The speciality of the respondent, the size of the work centre and the unit/service where the patients were admitted did not influence the analgesia prescribed. Satisfaction with pain management reached 7.8/10 (SD 0.98). CONCLUSION: In our setting, metamizole and paracetamol are the most commonly used analgesics as initial pain treatment in acute pancreatitis, and meperidine is the most commonly used rescue analgesic.

Gastroduodenal Burkitt's lymphoma: a rare cause of epigastric pain and diarrhea.

A 54-year-old male with a medical history of diabetes mellitus type 2 and tonsil cancer treated with radiochemotherapy years previously was admitted to hospital due to one-month progressive diarrhea, epigastric pain and 14-kg weight loss. Laboratory tests revealed mild anemia (Hb 10.8 g/dl). Upper endoscopy (UE) showed multiple ulcerated lesions with raised edges and a hard consistency on biopsy, being more evident at the duodenum and with a lower frequency and smaller diameter in the stomach.

Clinical guidelines for endoscopic mucosal resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions.

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.

Clinical guidelines for endoscopic mucosal resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. / Guía clínica para la resección mucosa endoscópica de lesiones colorrectales no pediculadas.

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.

A Scoring System to Determine Risk of Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: After endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal lesions, delayed bleeding is the most common serious complication, but there are no guidelines for its prevention. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with delayed bleeding that required medical attention after discharge until day 15 and develop a scoring system to identify patients at risk. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 1214 consecutive patients with nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 20 mm or larger treated by EMR (n = 1255) at 23 hospitals in Spain, from February 2013 through February 2015. Patients were examined 15 days after the procedure, and medical data were collected. We used the data to create a delayed bleeding scoring system, and assigned a weight to each risk factor based on the ß parameter from multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients were classified as being at low, average, or high risk for delayed bleeding. RESULTS: Delayed bleeding occurred in 46 cases (3.7%, 95% confidence interval, 2.7%-4.9%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with delayed bleeding included age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.36; P < .01), American Society of Anesthesiologist classification scores of III or IV (OR, 1.90; P ≤ .05), aspirin use during EMR (OR, 3.16; P < .05), right-sided lesions (OR, 4.86; P < .01), lesion size ≥40 mm (OR, 1.91; P ≤ .05), and a mucosal gap not closed by hemoclips (OR, 3.63; P ≤ .01). We developed a risk scoring system based on these 6 variables that assigned patients to the low-risk (score, 0-3), average-risk (score, 4-7), or high-risk (score, 8-10) categories with a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.83). In these groups, the probabilities of delayed bleeding were 0.6%, 5.5%, and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of delayed bleeding after EMR of large colorectal lesions is 3.7%. We developed a risk scoring system based on 6 factors that determined the risk for delayed bleeding (receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77). The factors most strongly associated with delayed bleeding were right-sided lesions, aspirin use, and mucosal defects not closed by hemoclips. Patients considered to be high risk (score, 8-10) had a 40% probability of delayed bleeding.

Ionizing radiation in patients with Crohn´s disease. Estimation and associated factors.

INTRODUCTION: exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with an increased risk of developing tumors. Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) usually require multiple imaging tests using this type of radiation. OBJECTIVES: the objectives of this study were to estimate the total dose of ionizing radiation received by patients with Crohn's disease during their course and to identify the factors associated with higher radiation doses. METHODS: two hundred thirty-five CD patients diagnosed between 1972 and 2010 were included. The effective dose (ED) received by each patient was calculated retrospectively based on the number of gastrointestinal transit studies and computed tomography scans performed. Considering recent epidemiological studies, an ED greater than or equal to 50 mSv was used as the cut-off point for increased risk of developing cancer. RESULTS: the mean ED received per patient was 33.4 mSv (95% CI 29.3-37.5). A total of 49 (20.8%) patients received an ED ≥ 50 mSv. The following factors were identified as independent predictors associated with an ED ≥ 50 mSv: Age older than 40 years, need for surgery, age under 16 years at diagnosis and disease duration over 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: a substantial proportion of patients with Crohn's disease receive high doses of potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation. Identification of the most susceptible patients to receive high doses of radiation, monitoring of effective doses received and the use of imaging techniques that do not require ionizing radiation (MR enterography, abdominal ultrasound) could contribute in reducing patients' exposure to potentially carcinogenic ionizing radiation.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for proximal superficial lesions: efficacy and safety study in 59 consecutive resections.

INTRODUCTION: endoscopic mucosal resection is an accepted technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: forty one consecutive patients (23 males and 18 females, mean age of 61 ± 11.5 years) were included in our study. Fifty nine resections were performed in these patients in 69 sessions. Lesions treated consisted of elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett's esophagus (group A), high grade dysplasia appearing in random biopsies taken during the follow-up of Barrett's esophagus (group B) and superficial gastroduodenal lesions (group C). Snare resection after submucosal injection, band ligator-assisted or cap-assisted mucosal resection were the chosen techniques. RESULTS: we resected 7 elevated lesions with high grade dysplasia in the context of Barrett's esophagus, 6 complete Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia in 16 sequential sessions and 46 gastroduodenal superficial lesions (10 adenomas, 9 gastric superficial carcinomas, 18 carcinoid tumours and 9 lesions of different histological nature). Resections in the two first groups were complete in 100% of the cases, and in 97.9% of the cases in group C. Complications included 2 cases of limited deferred bleeding (groups A and B) and another two cases of stenosis with little clinical relevance in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: a) endoscopic mucosal resection is an efficient technique for the treatment of proximal gastrointestinal tract superficial lesions; b) it is a safe procedure with a low percentage of complications, which can generally be managed endoscopically; and c) in contrast with other ablative techniques, endoscopic mucosal resection offers the possibility of a pathologic analysis of the samples.