Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 85
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(3): 573-581, 2024 03 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular diagnostic panels have greatly enhanced detection of gastrointestinal pathogens. However, data on the impact of these tests on clinical and patient-centered outcomes are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge trial to determine the impact of multiplex molecular testing at 5 academic children's hospitals on children presenting to the emergency department with acute gastroenteritis. Caregivers were interviewed on enrollment and 7-10 days after enrollment to determine symptoms, risk factors, subsequent medical visits, and impact on family members. During the pre-intervention period, diagnostic testing was performed at the clinician's discretion . During the intervention period, multiplex molecular testing was performed on all children, with results available to clinicians. The primary outcome was return visits to a healthcare provider within 10 days of enrollment. RESULTS: Potential pathogens were identified by clinician-ordered tests in 19 of 571 (3.3%) in the pre-intervention period compared with 434 of 586 (74%) in the intervention period; clinically relevant pathogens were detected in 2.1% and 15%, respectively. In the multivariate model, the intervention was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of any return visit (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, .70-.90) after adjusting for potential confounders. Appropriate treatment was prescribed in 11.3% compared with 19.6% during the intervention period (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Routine molecular multiplex testing for all children who presented to the ED with acute gastroenteritis detected more clinically relevant pathogens and led to a 21% decrease in return visits. Additional research is needed to define patients most likely to benefit from testing. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02248285.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite , Criança , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Gastroenterite/tratamento farmacológico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(4): e0031323, 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391188

RESUMO

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide and the most common cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss. As there is no vaccine or other specific intervention to prevent congenital CMV infection, there is a need to identify maternal and congenital infections with sensitive and specific testing as early as possible. There is no widely accepted practice for screening during pregnancy or in all newborns for identification of possible cases of congenital CMV. Currently, screening during pregnancy is limited to those identified as at risk followed by fetal and/or neonatal testing when congenital infection is suspected. This review focuses primarily on the current status of laboratory testing for diagnosis of maternal and congenital CMV infections. Primary maternal infection is best diagnosed using serologic testing, including CMV IgM, IgG, and avidity testing, while fetal infection should be assessed by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) of amniotic fluid. Urine and saliva NAATs are the mainstay for diagnosis of congenital CMV in the first 3 weeks of life. Testing of dried blood spots can be useful for diagnosis of congenital CMV outside of the newborn period. The gaps in knowledge such as the prognostic value of viral loads in various sample types are addressed.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Doenças Fetais , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Citomegalovirus/genética , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; : e0035924, 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904385

RESUMO

Medical microbiologists, defined as doctoral-level laboratory directors with subspecialty training in medical microbiology, lead the clinical laboratory operations through activities such as clinical consultations, oversight of diagnostic testing menu, institutional leadership, education, and scholastic activities. However, unlike their clinical colleagues, medical microbiologists are largely unable to bill for clinical consultations performed within the hospital and, therefore, unable to generate relative value units or a similar quantifiable metric. As hospital budgets tighten and justification of staffing becomes a necessity, this may present a challenge to the medical microbiologist attempting to prove their value to the organization. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. Consults were generated equally from internal (laboratory-based) and external (hospital-based) parties, with the majority directly impacting patient management. Near universal acceptance of the medical microbiologist's recommendation highlights the worth derived from their expertise. External consults required more time commitment from the medical microbiologist than internal consults, although both presented ample opportunity for secondary value, including impact through stewardship, education, clinical guidance, and cost reduction. This study is a description of the content and impact of consultations that underscore the importance of the medical microbiologist as a key member of the healthcare team. IMPORTANCE: Medical microbiologists are invaluable to the clinical microbiology laboratory and the healthcare system as a whole. However, as medical microbiologists do not regularly generate relative value units, capturing and quantifying the value provided is challenging. As hospital budgets tighten, justification of staffing becomes a necessity. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed evaluation of the consultative value provided by medical microbiologists.

4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(6): e0028323, 2023 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184403

RESUMO

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common virus associated with congenital infection worldwide and is a major cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and developmental delay. Up to 90% of infants with congenital CMV (cCMV) infection are asymptomatic at birth, making the diagnosis challenging. Postnatal diagnosis involves testing newborn saliva and/or urine collected before 21 days of life to confirm cCMV infection. This multicenter study evaluated the performance of the Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct real-time PCR assay for the qualitative detection of CMV in newborn saliva (n = 2,023) and urine (n = 1,797) specimens. Compared to two PCR/bidirectional sequencing assays, the Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct assay demonstrated positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 98.6% and 99.9%, respectively, for saliva samples and a PPA of 97.8% and an NPA of 99.9% for urine specimens. Overall concordance was κ = 0.98 or near perfect compared to the composite reference methods with both sample types. By 95% probit analysis, the limit of detection (LoD) using the AD-169 reference strain was 350 ± 12 copies/mL in urine. The LoDs of saliva swabs in either 1 mL or 3 mL of transport medium were 274 ± 12 copies/mL and 300 ± 14 copies/mL, respectively. The Simplexa Congenital CMV Direct assay can be applied to both saliva and urine specimens collected from newborns less than 21 days of age to rapidly and reliably identify CMV infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Saliva , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Citomegalovirus/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(6): e0189122, 2023 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227281

RESUMO

Diagnostic tools that can rapidly identify and characterize microbes growing in blood cultures are important components of clinical microbiology practice because they help to provide timely information that can be used to optimize patient management. This publication describes the bioMérieux BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel clinical study that was submitted to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results obtained with the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel were compared to standard-of-care (SoC) results, sequencing results, PCR results, and reference laboratory antimicrobial susceptibility testing results to evaluate the accuracy of its performance. Results for 1,093 retrospectively and prospectively collected positive blood culture samples were initially enrolled, and 1,074 samples met the study criteria and were included in the final analyses. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 98.9% (1,712/1,731) and an overall specificity of 99.6% (33,592/33,711) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and yeast targets which the panel is designed to detect. One hundred eighteen off-panel organisms, which the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel is not designed to detect, were identified by SoC in 10.6% (114/1,074) of samples. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel also demonstrated an overall positive percent agreement (PPA) of 97.9% (325/332) and an overall negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9% (2,465/2,767) for antimicrobial resistance determinants which the panel is designed to detect. The presence or absence of resistance markers in Enterobacterales correlated closely with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance. We conclude that the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel produced accurate results in this clinical trial.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Bacteriemia , Humanos , Hemocultura , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Antibacterianos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Bactérias/genética , Leveduras/genética
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(11): e0035723, 2023 11 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877730

RESUMO

The bioMérieux BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous and rapid (~1 h) detection of 39 potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from synovial fluid (SF) samples. Thirty-one species or groups of microorganisms are included in the kit, as well as several AMR genes. This study, performed to evaluate the BIOFIRE JI Panel for regulatory clearance, provides data from a multicenter evaluation of 1,544 prospectively collected residual SF samples with performance compared to standard-of-care (SOC) culture for organisms or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing for AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.9% or greater for all but six organisms and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a specificity of 98.5% or greater for detection of all organisms and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.7% or greater for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel provides an improvement over SOC culture, with a substantially shorter time to result for both organisms and AMR genes with excellent sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA, and is anticipated to provide timely and actionable diagnostic information for joint infections in a variety of clinical scenarios.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Artrite Infecciosa , Humanos , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genética , Líquido Sinovial/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Bactérias/genética , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico
7.
J Infect Dis ; 225(5): 912-923, 2022 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of nasopharyngeal bacteria in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease has been underestimated. We measured the frequency and burden of respiratory bacteria in the upper respiratory tract of infants with RSV infection over 7 respiratory seasons, and their impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Children <2 years old with mild (outpatients, n=115) or severe (inpatients, n=566) RSV infection, and matched healthy controls (n=161) were enrolled. Nasopharyngeal samples were obtained for RSV, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae detection and quantitation by PCR. Multivariable models were constructed to identify variables predictive of severe disease. RESULTS: S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis, but not S. aureus, were detected more frequently in RSV-infected children (84%) than healthy controls (46%; P<.001). Detection of S. pneumoniae and/or H. influenzae was associated with fever, more frequent antibiotic treatment, worse radiologic findings, and higher neutrophil counts (P<.01). In adjusted analyses, S. pneumoniae/H. influenzae codetection was independentlyassociated with greater odds of hospitalization, higher disease severity scores, need for supplemental oxygen, and longer hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Nasopharyngeal codetection of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae in infants with RSV infection is associated with increased disease severity.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Bactérias , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Haemophilus influenzae , Humanos , Lactente , Moraxella catarrhalis , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios , Streptococcus pneumoniae
8.
J Infect Dis ; 225(2): 208-213, 2022 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34618885

RESUMO

The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children represents a fraction of cases worldwide, yet a subset of those infected are at risk for severe disease. We measured plasma severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in a cohort of 103 children hospitalized with COVID-19 with diverse clinical manifestations. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was detected in 27 (26%) of these children, lasted for a median of 6 (interquartile range, 2-9) days, and was associated with higher rates of oxygen administration, admission to the intensive care unit, and longer hospitalization.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Nasofaringe/virologia , RNA Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Viremia/epidemiologia
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(11): 2270-2280, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36285986

RESUMO

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, different SARS-CoV-2 variants have been identified and associated with higher transmissibility than the ancestral nonvariant strain. During January 1, 2021-January 15, 2022, we assessed differences in clinical and viral parameters in a convenience sample of COVID-19 outpatients and inpatients 0-21 years of age in Columbus, Ohio, USA, according to the infecting variant, identified using a mutation-specific reverse transcription PCR assay. Of the 676 patients in the study, 17.75% were infected with nonvariant strains, 18.49% with the Alpha variant, 41.72% with Delta, and 16.42% with Omicron. Rates of SARS-COV-2/viral co-infections were 15.66%-29.41% and were comparable across infecting variants. Inpatients with acute Delta and Omicron infections had lower SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values and more frequent fever and respiratory symptoms than those with nonvariant strain infections. In addition, SARS-COV-2/viral co-infections and the presence of underlying conditions were independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, irrespective of the infecting variant.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Pandemias , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(8): e0024122, 2022 08 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35658527

RESUMO

The COVID pandemic has put a spotlight on laboratory medicine, showcasing how vital diagnostic testing is for society and the health care system. It has also brought to light and accelerated the critical shortage of trained and experienced laboratory personnel that has been felt for decades. The need for laboratory professionals is expected to grow by 11% between 2020 and 2030, a higher rate of growth than the overall average for all other health care occupations. Here, the background to this workforce shortage is reviewed. Some proposed actions to help address the issue are put forth, including increasing awareness of the medical laboratory science profession along with bolstering training opportunities and awareness of alternate routes to obtaining certification as a medical laboratory scientist. In addition, recent survey data specifically related to the employee shortages in microbiology are presented which demonstrate that 80% of microbiology laboratories have vacant positions and that filling these positions is challenging for a number of reasons, including a lack of qualified applicants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Laboratórios , Pessoal de Laboratório Médico , Ciência de Laboratório Médico/educação , Pandemias
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(6): 1588-1597, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34013867

RESUMO

Emergence of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMp) challenges empiric macrolide therapy. Our goal was to determine MRMp rates and define characteristics of children infected with macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae (MSMp) versus MRMp in Ohio, USA. We cultured PCR-positive M. pneumoniae specimens and sequenced M. pneumoniae-positive cultures to detect macrolide resistance mutations. We reviewed medical records to compare characteristics of both groups. We identified 14 (2.8%) MRMp and 485 (97.2%) MSMp samples. Patients in these groups had similar demographics and clinical characteristics, but patients with MRMp had longer hospitalizations, were more likely to have received previous macrolides, and were more likely to have switched to alternative antimicrobial drugs. MRMp-infected patients also had ≈5-fold greater odds of pediatric intensive care unit admission. Rates of MRMp infections in children in central Ohio are low, but clinicians should remain aware of the risk for severe illness caused by these pathogens.


Assuntos
Pneumonia por Mycoplasma , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Criança , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Ohio , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico
12.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(8): e0092621, 2021 Jul 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011523

RESUMO

The emergence of more transmissible and/or more virulent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) has triggered intensive genomic surveillance, which is costly and difficult to sustain operationally over the long term. To address this problem, we developed a set of four multiplex mutation-specific PCR-based assays with same-day reporting that can detect five VOC and three variants of interest (VOI), as defined in the March 2021 guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/). The screening results were compared to the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and showed 100% concordance for strain typing for B.1.1.7 (n = 25) and P.1 (n = 5) variants using spike (S) mutation S-N501Y, S-E484K, and S-H69-V70del assays. The S-L450R assay, designed to detect the B.1.427/429 VOC, also identified multiple isolates of a newly emerging multiply mutated B.1.526.1 variant that is now rapidly increasing in the eastern United States. PCR approaches can be easily adopted in clinical laboratories, providing rapid screening methods to allow early detection of newly emergent variants and to efficiently triage cases for full genomic sequencing.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Mutação , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética
13.
J Pediatr ; 229: 216-222.e2, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33045237

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To test our hypothesis that routine year-round testing of specimens from multiple body sites and genotyping of detected virus would describe seasonal changes, increase diagnostic yield, and provide a better definition of clinical manifestations of human parechovirus (PeV-A) infections in young febrile infants. STUDY DESIGN: PeV-A reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was incorporated in routine evaluation of infants aged ≤60 days hospitalized at Nationwide Children's Hospital for fever and/or suspected sepsis-like syndrome beginning in July 2013. We reviewed electronic medical records of infants who tested positive for PeV-A between July 2013 and September 2016. Genotyping was performed with specific type 3 RT-PCR and sequencing. RESULTS: Of 1475 infants evaluated, 130 (9%) tested positive for PeV-A in 1 or more sites: 100 (77%) in blood, 84 (65%) in a nonsterile site, and 53 (41%) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Five infants (4%) were CSF-only positive, 31 (24%) were blood-only positive, and 20 (15%) were nonsterile site-only positive. PeV-A3 was the most common type (85%) and the only type detected in CSF. Although the majority (79%) of infections were diagnosed between July and December, PeV-A was detected year-round. The median age at detection was 29 days. Fever (96%), fussiness (75%), and lymphopenia (56%) were common. Among infants with PeV-A-positive CSF, 77% had no CSF pleocytosis. The median duration of hospitalization was 41 hours. Four infants had bacterial coinfections diagnosed within 24 hours of admission; 40 infants had viral coinfections. CONCLUSIONS: Although most frequent in summer and fall, PeV-A infections were encountered in every calendar month within the 3-year period of study. More than one-half of patients had PeV-A detected at more than 1 body site. Coinfections were common. PeV-A3 was the most common type identified and the only type detected in the CSF.


Assuntos
Infecções por Picornaviridae/diagnóstico , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/virologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Feminino , Febre/virologia , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Parechovirus/classificação , Parechovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Picornaviridae/sangue , Infecções por Picornaviridae/complicações , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estações do Ano
14.
BMC Pediatr ; 21(1): 238, 2021 05 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fever is a common symptom in children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). We aimed to describe the epidemiology of systemic viral infections and their predictive values for excluding serious bacterial infections (SBIs), including bacteremia, meningitis and urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children presenting to the ED with suspected systemic infections. METHODS: We enrolled children who presented to the ED with suspected systemic infections who had blood cultures obtained at seven healthcare facilities. Whole blood specimens were analyzed by an experimental multiplexed PCR test for 7 viruses. Demographic and laboratory results were abstracted. RESULTS: Of the 1114 subjects enrolled, 245 viruses were detected in 224 (20.1%) subjects. Bacteremia, meningitis and UTI frequency in viral bloodstream-positive patients was 1.3, 0 and 10.1% compared to 2.9, 1.3 and 9.7% in viral bloodstream-negative patients respectively. Although viral bloodstream detections had a high negative predictive value for bacteremia or meningitis (NPV = 98.7%), the frequency of UTIs among these subjects remained appreciable (9/89, 10.1%) (NPV = 89.9%). Screening urinalyses were positive for leukocyte esterase in 8/9 (88.9%) of these subjects, improving the ability to distinguish UTI. CONCLUSIONS: Viral bloodstream detections were common in children presenting to the ED with suspected systemic infections. Although overall frequencies of SBIs among subjects with and without viral bloodstream detections did not differ significantly, combining whole blood viral testing with urinalysis provided high NPV for excluding SBI.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Bacterianas , Infecções Urinárias , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Febre , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
15.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(5)2020 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32132186

RESUMO

The QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel (QIAstat-Dx RP) is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of 20 pathogens directly from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. The assay is performed using a simple sample-to-answer platform with results available in approximately 69 min. The pathogens identified are adenovirus, coronavirus 229E, coronavirus HKU1, coronavirus NL63, coronavirus OC43, human metapneumovirus A and B, influenza A, influenza A H1, influenza A H3, influenza A H1N1/2009, influenza B, parainfluenza virus 1, parainfluenza virus 2, parainfluenza virus 3, parainfluenza virus 4, rhinovirus/enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus A and B, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae This multicenter evaluation provides data obtained from 1,994 prospectively collected and 310 retrospectively collected (archived) NPS specimens with performance compared to that of the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel, version 1.7. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx RP and the comparator testing was 99.5%. In the prospective cohort, the QIAstat-Dx RP demonstrated a positive percent agreement of 94.0% or greater for the detection of all but four analytes: coronaviruses 229E, NL63, and OC43 and rhinovirus/enterovirus. The test also demonstrated a negative percent agreement of ≥97.9% for all analytes. The QIAstat-Dx RP is a robust and accurate assay for rapid, comprehensive testing for respiratory pathogens.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Nasofaringe/virologia , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/instrumentação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/instrumentação , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Viroses/diagnóstico , Viroses/microbiologia
16.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(7)2020 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32350045

RESUMO

Lower respiratory tract infections, including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, are common in hospitalized patient populations. Standard methods frequently fail to identify the infectious etiology due to the polymicrobial nature of respiratory specimens and the necessity of ordering specific tests to identify viral agents. The potential severity of these infections combined with a failure to clearly identify the causative pathogen results in administration of empirical antibiotic agents based on clinical presentation and other risk factors. We examined the impact of the multiplexed, semiquantitative BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel (PN panel) test on laboratory reporting for 259 adult inpatients submitting bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens for laboratory analysis. The PN panel demonstrated a combined 96.2% positive percent agreement (PPA) and 98.1% negative percent agreement (NPA) for the qualitative identification of 15 bacterial targets compared to routine bacterial culture. Semiquantitative values reported by the PN panel were frequently higher than values reported by culture, resulting in semiquantitative agreement (within the same log10 value) of 43.6% between the PN panel and culture; however, all bacterial targets reported as >105 CFU/ml in culture were reported as ≥105 genomic copies/ml by the PN panel. Viral targets were identified by the PN panel in 17.7% of specimens tested, of which 39.1% were detected in conjunction with a bacterial target. A review of patient medical records, including clinically prescribed antibiotics, revealed the potential for antibiotic adjustment in 70.7% of patients based on the PN panel result, including discontinuation or de-escalation in 48.2% of patients, resulting in an average savings of 6.2 antibiotic days/patient.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Pneumonia , Infecções Respiratórias , Adulto , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(7)2020 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32350043

RESUMO

The ability to provide timely identification of the causative agents of lower respiratory tract infections can promote better patient outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Current diagnostic testing options include culture, molecular testing, and antigen detection. These methods may require collection of various specimens, involve extensive sample treatment, and can suffer from low sensitivity and long turnaround times. This study assessed the performance of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) and Pneumonia Plus Panel (PNplus panel), an FDA-cleared sample-to-answer assay that enables the detection of viruses, atypical bacteria, bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance marker genes from lower respiratory tract specimens (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid). Semiquantitative results are also provided for the bacterial targets. This paper describes selected analytical and clinical studies that were conducted to evaluate performance of the panel for regulatory clearance. Prospectively collected respiratory specimens (846 BAL and 836 sputum specimens) evaluated with the PN panel were also tested by quantitative reference culture and molecular methods for comparison. The PN panel showed a sensitivity of 100% for 15/22 etiologic targets using BAL specimens and for 10/24 using sputum specimens. All other targets had sensitivities of ≥75% or were unable to be calculated due to low prevalence in the study population. Specificity for all targets was ≥87.2%, with many false-positive results compared to culture that were confirmed by alternative molecular methods. Appropriate adoption of this test could provide actionable diagnostic information that is anticipated to impact patient care and antimicrobial stewardship decisions.


Assuntos
Pneumonia , Infecções Respiratórias , Vírus , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vírus/genética
18.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(11): 2055-2063, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31454311

RESUMO

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) causes respiratory tract infections and neurologic manifestations. We compared the clinical manifestations from 2 EV-D68 outbreaks in 2014 and 2018 and a low-activity period in 2016 among hospitalized children in central Ohio, USA, and used PCR and sequencing to enable phylogenetic comparisons. During both outbreak periods, infected children had respiratory manifestations that led to an increase in hospital admissions for asthma. The 2018 EV-D68 outbreak appeared to be milder in terms of respiratory illness, as shown by lower rates of pediatric intensive care unit admission. However, the frequency of severe neurologic manifestations was higher in 2018 than in 2014. During the same period in 2016, we noted neither an increase in EV-D68 nor a significant increase in asthma-related admissions. Phylogenetic analyses showed that EV-D68 isolates from 2018 clustered differently within clade B than did isolates from 2014 and are perhaps associated with a different EV-D68 subclade.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Surtos de Doenças , Enterovirus Humano D/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Enterovirus Humano D/classificação , Infecções por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterovirus/história , Feminino , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Tipagem Molecular , Ohio/epidemiologia , Filogenia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Estações do Ano
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(2)2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30518543

RESUMO

Molecular methods offer superior sensitivity and specificity and reduce testing turnaround time from days to hours for detection of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis In this study, we evaluated the performance of the automated PCR-based Aries Bordetella Assay, which detects both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis directly from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The limits of detection (LoDs) were 1,800 CFU·ml-1 for B. pertussis and 213 CFU·ml-1 for B. parapertussis The assay detected 16/18 unique B. pertussis/B. parapertussis strains. Of 71 potentially cross-reacting organisms, 5 generated false positives in 1/6 replicates; none of 6 additional Bordetella spp. were erroneously detected. Specimens were stable at 20 to 25°C for at least 10 h, at 4 to 8°C for 10 days, and at temperatures not exceeding -70°C for 6 months. Of 1,052 nasopharyngeal specimens from patients with suspected pertussis, 3.0% (n = 32) were B. pertussis positive and 0.2% (n = 2) were B. parapertussis positive. Combining these data with Aries Bordetella Assay data from 57 nasopharyngeal samples with previously confirmed B. pertussis or B. parapertussis data and with data from 50 contrived B. parapertussis samples, the proportions of positive and negative agreement of the respective Aries assays with the reference assays were 97.1% and 99.0% for B. pertussis and 100% and 99.7% for B. parapertussis The Aries Bordetella Assay provides accurate detection and distinction of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis infections within 2 h. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02862262.).


Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Infecções por Bordetella/diagnóstico , Bordetella parapertussis/isolamento & purificação , Bordetella pertussis/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções por Bordetella/microbiologia , Bordetella parapertussis/genética , Bordetella pertussis/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
20.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(4): 252-255, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562462

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend confirmatory testing for negative rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A streptococcal pharyngitis in children. We sought to describe the work of follow-up generated by this process and frequency of our inability to notify patients of positive results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed laboratory and outreach nurse records of patients who had group A streptococcal pharyngitis testing performed in an academic pediatric emergency department during 2014. For patients with a negative RADT and subsequent positive backup direct nucleic acid probe test, we recorded whether the patient was successfully notified of the positive result, the number of contact attempts, and the time to antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: There were 6504 patients who had an RADT performed, of which 5474 (84.2%) were negative with a confirmatory test performed. There were 234 patients with positive confirmatory testing and not prescribed antibiotics at the time of the initial visit. Of these, 90.1% were ultimately contacted and prescribed appropriate antibiotics, whereas 7.3% were lost to follow-up and 2.6% had potentially unnecessary repeat visits. Of those contacted, 43.1% were reached only after multiple telephone calls or a letter. The median time from the negative RADT to the submission of an electronic prescription was 19.6 hours (interquartile range, 7.5-24.9 hours; range, 6-144 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Although confirmatory testing after a negative RADT in children is currently the standard of care, this practice requires a substantial amount of work. Furthermore, a significant fraction of patients are lost to follow-up or have unnecessary repeat visits.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Comunicação em Saúde , Faringite/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/imunologia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA