Geometric and dosimetric consequences of intra-fractional movement in single isocenter non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the geometric and dosimetric impacts of intra-fractional movement for patients with single or multiple brain metastasis treated using Varian Hyperarc™ mono-isocentric radiosurgery. METHODS: A total of 50 single or hypo-fractionated Hyperarc™ treatment courses (118 lesions) were included in the analysis. Intra-fractional translational and rotational movements were quantified according to the post-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT). Geometric displacements of all targets were calculated individually based on the assessed head movement in each treatment fraction and their relationships with treatment time and target-to-isocenter distances were studied. For dosimetric analysis, only single-fraction treatments (56 lesions) were included. Re-planning was performed with 0, 1, and 2 mm planning target volume (PTV) margins. Doses were then re-calculated on rotated CT images with isocenter shifted which emulate the change in patient treatment position. Target coverage, target and normal brain doses before and after intra-fractional movement were compared. RESULTS: The mean 3D target displacements was 0.6 ± 0.3 (SD) mm. Target shifts for patients treated within 10 min were significantly smaller than those treated in longer sessions. No correlation was found between target shift and target-to-isocenter distance as the origin of head rotation was not located at the isocenter. Loss of target coverage and minimum Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) dose due to intra-fractional movement were apparent only when no margin was used, leading to an extra 23% of the targets violating the dose acceptance criteria, in contrast, the effects on normal brain V12Gy were negligible regardless of the margin used. The use of 1 mm PTV margin can compensate clinically significant geographical miss caused by intra-fractional movements while limiting V12Gy to within dose criteria for 88% of the cases. The plan acceptance rate (fulfillment of both target and normal brain dose criteria) after intra-fractional movement was also the highest with the 1 mm margin. CONCLUSION: Although intra-fractional movements during Hyperarc™ treatments were small, there were substantial dosimetric effects due to the sharp dose fall-off near target boundaries. These effects could be mitigated by using a 1 mm PTV margin and maintaining the effective treatment time to within 10 min.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric performance of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in terms of target volume coverage and sparing of neurological organs-at-risk (OARs) in salvaging recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). The maximum dose to the internal carotid artery (ICA) and nasopharyngeal (NP) mucosa, which are associated with potential carotid blowout and massive epistaxis, were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMRT and IMPT treatment plans were created for twenty patients with locally advanced rNPC. Planning Target Volume (PTV) was used to account for the setup and spatial error/uncertainty in the IMRT planning. Robust optimization on Clinical Target Volume (CTV) coverage with consideration of range and setup uncertainty was employed to produce two IMPT plans with 3-field and 4-field arrangements. The planning objective was to deliver 60 Gy to the PTV (IMRT) and CTV (IMPT) without exceeding the maximum lifetime cumulative Biologically Effective Dose (BED) of the neurological OARs (applied to the Planning organs-at-risk volume). The target dose coverage as well as the maximum dose to the neurological OARs, ICA, and NP mucosa were compared. RESULTS: Compared with IMRT, 3-field IMPT achieved better coverage to GTV V100% (83.3% vs. 73.2%, P <0.01) and CTV V100% (80.5% vs. 72.4%, P <0.01), and lower maximum dose to the critical OARs including the spinal cord (19.2 Gy vs. 22.3 Gy, P <0.01), brainstem (30.0 Gy vs. 32.3 Gy, P <0.01) and optic chiasm (6.6 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy, P <0.01). The additional beam with the 4-fields IMPT plans further improved the target coverage from the 3-field IMPT (CTV V98%: 85.3% vs. 82.4%, P <0.01) with similar OAR sparing. However, the target dose was highly non-uniform with both IMPT plans, leading to a significantly higher maximum dose to the ICA (∼68 Gy vs. 62.6 Gy, P <0.01) and NP mucosa (∼72 Gy vs. 62.8 Gy, P <0.01) than IMRT. CONCLUSION: IMPT demonstrated some dosimetric advantage over IMRT in treating rNPC. However, IMPT could also result in very high dose hot spots in the target volume. Careful consideration of the ICA and NP mucosal complications is recommended when applying IMPT on rNPC patients.

Automatic segmentation for adaptive planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT: Time, geometrical, and dosimetric analysis.

The aim of this study was to quantify the geometrical differences between manual contours and autocontours, the dosimetric impacts, and the time gain of using autosegmentation in adaptive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for a commercial system. A total of 20 consecutive Stages I to III NPC patients who had undergone adaptive radiation therapy (ART) re planning for IMRT treatment were retrospectively studied. Manually delineated organs at risks (OARs) on the replanning computed tomography (CT) were compared with the autocontours generated by VelocityAI using deformable registration from the original planning CT. Dice similarity coefficients and distance-to-agreements (DTAs) were used to quantify their geometric differences. IMRT test plans were generated with the assistance of RapidPlan based on the autocontours of OARs and manually segmented target volumes. The dose distributions were applied on the manually delineated OARs, their dose volume histograms and dose constraints compliances were analyzed. Times spent on target, OAR contouring, and IMRT replanning were recorded, and the total time of replanning using manual contouring and autocontouring were compared. The averaged mean DTA of all structures included in the study were less than 2 mm, and 90% of the patients fulfilled the mean distance agreement tolerance recommended by AAPM 132.1 The averaged maximum DTA for brainstem, cord, optic chiasm, and optic nerves were all less than 4 mm, whereas temporal lobes and parotids have larger average maximum DTA of 4.7 mm and 6.8 mm, respectively. It was found that large contour discrepancies in temporal lobes and parotids were often associated with large magnitude of deformation (warp distance) in image registrations. The resultant maximum dose of manually segmented brainstem, cord, and temporal lobe and the median dose of manually segmented parotids were found to be statistically higher than those to their autocontoured counter parts in test plans. Dose constraints of the manually segmented OARs in test plans were only met in 15% of the cases. The average time of manual contouring and autocontouring were 108 and 10 minutes, respectively (p < 0.001). More than 30% of the total replanning time would be spent in manual OAR contouring. Manual OAR delineation takes up a significant portion of time spent in ART replanning and OAR autocontouring could considerably enhance ART workflow efficiency. Geometrical discrepancies between auto- and manual contours in head and neck OARs were comparable to typical interobserver variation suggested in various literatures; however, some of the corresponding dosimetric differences were substantial, making it essential to carefully review the autocontours.

MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer: Treatment outcomes from a single institution in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Paradigm has shifted from 2D to image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC). Increasing reports from pioneering institutions and large retrospective multicenter series have demonstrated improvements in outcome and reduction in toxicity with IGABT. However, there is scarcity of data on magnetic resonance (MR)-IGABT in Chinese patients. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of MR-IGABT for LACC in a single institution in Hong Kong. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA LACC treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy +/- concurrent cisplatin followed by MR-IGABT from January 2015 to January 2018 were included. Brachytherapy planning and dose reporting followed the GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Dosimetric and clinical outcomes including local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), cancer-specific survival, overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients were included. 71% were FIGO stage IIB or above; 52% had pelvic node involvement. Median high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) was 34.7 cm3 (12.3-155.1 cm3). Median dose to HRCTV D90 was 88.5 Gy (63.4-113.4 Gy) (EQD210). Median doses to the D2cc of bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were 83.1 Gy, 67.5 Gy, 69.0 Gy, and 68.9 Gy (EQD23), respectively. Median followup was 20.3 months (4.0-35.1 months). 24-month actuarial LC, PC, cancer-specific survival, and OS were 90%, 84%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. Stratification by clinical variables showed that FIGO stage had significant impact on LC and dose to HRCTV on both LC and PC. Treatment was well tolerated without any severe late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate-term results from systematic MR-IGABT for LACC demonstrate very promising outcomes with minimal toxicity. This fills the gap in evidence for MR-IGABT in Chinese patients.