A strategic neurological research agenda for Europe: Towards clinically relevant and patient-centred neurological research priorities.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurological disorders constitute a significant portion of the global disease burden, affecting >30% of the world's population. This prevalence poses a substantial threat to global health in the foreseeable future. A lack of awareness regarding this high burden of neurological diseases has led to their underrecognition, underappreciation, and insufficient funding. Establishing a strategic and comprehensive research agenda for brain-related studies is a crucial step towards aligning research objectives among all pertinent stakeholders and fostering greater societal awareness. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken by a working group from the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) to identify any existing research agendas relevant to neurology. Additionally, a specialized survey was conducted among all EAN scientific panels, including neurologists and patients, inquiring about their perspectives on the current research priorities and gaps in neurology. RESULTS: The review revealed the absence of a unified, overarching brain research agenda. Existing research agendas predominantly focus on specialized topics within neurology, resulting in an imbalance in the number of agendas across subspecialties. The survey indicated a prioritization of neurological disorders and research gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Building upon the findings from the review and survey, key components for a strategic and comprehensive neurological research agenda in Europe were delineated. This research agenda serves as a valuable prioritization tool for neuroscientific researchers, as well as for clinicians, donors, and funding agencies in the field of neurology. It offers essential guidance for creating a roadmap for research and clinical advancement, ultimately leading to heightened awareness and reduced burden of neurological disorders.

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate neuronal activity, but the exact mechanism of action (MOA) is unclear. This study investigates tDCS-induced modulation of the corticospinal excitability and the underlying MOA. By anesthetizing the scalp before applying tDCS and by stimulating the cheeks, we investigated whether stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves contributes to the effects of tDCS on corticospinal excitability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study, four experimental conditions with anodal direct current stimulation were compared in 19 healthy volunteers: 1) tDCS over the motor cortex (tDCS-MI), 2) tDCS over the motor cortex with a locally applied topical anesthetic (TA) on the scalp (tDCS-MI + TA), 3) DCS over the cheek region (DCS-C), and 4) sham tDCS over the motor cortex(sham). tDCS was applied for 20 minutes at 1 mA. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before tDCS and immediately, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after tDCS. A questionnaire was used to assess the tolerability of tDCS. RESULTS: A significant MEP amplitude increase compared with baseline was found 30 minutes after tDCS-MI, an effect still observed 60 minutes later; no time∗condition interaction effect was detected. In the other three conditions (tDCS-MI + TA, DCS-C, sham), no significant MEP modulation was found. The questionnaire indicated that side effects are significantly lower when the local anesthetic was applied before stimulation than in the other three conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The significant MEP amplitude increase observed from 30 minutes on after tDCS-MI supports the modulatory effect of tDCS on corticospinal neurotransmission. This effect lasted one hour after stimulation. The absence of a significant modulation when a local anesthetic was applied suggests that effects of tDCS are not solely established through direct cortical stimulation but that stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves also might contribute to tDCS-induced modulation.

Investigating the Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Cortical Excitability in Healthy Males.

OBJECTIVES: As a potential treatment for epilepsy, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has yielded inconsistent results. Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with electromyography (TMS-EMG) and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) can be used to investigate the effect of interventions on cortical excitability by evaluating changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). The goal of this study is to objectively evaluate the effect of taVNS on cortical excitability with TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG. These findings are expected to provide insight in the mechanism of action and help identify more optimal stimulation paradigms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-blind cross-over study, 15 healthy male subjects underwent active and sham taVNS for 60 min, using a maximum tolerated stimulation current. Single and paired pulse TMS was delivered over the right-sided motor hotspot to evaluate MEPs and TEPs before and after the intervention. MEP statistical analysis was conducted with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. TEPs were analyzed with a cluster-based permutation analysis. Linear regression analysis was implemented to investigate an association with stimulation current. RESULTS: MEP and TEP measurements were not affected by taVNS in this study. An association was found between taVNS stimulation current and MEP outcome measures indicating a decrease in cortical excitability in participants who tolerated higher taVNS currents. A subanalysis of participants (n = 8) who tolerated a taVNS current ≥2.5 mA showed a significant increase in the resting motor threshold, decrease in MEP amplitude and modulation of the P60 and P180 TEP components. CONCLUSIONS: taVNS did not affect cortical excitability measurements in the overall population in this study. However, taVNS has the potential to modulate specific markers of cortical excitability in participants who tolerate higher stimulation levels. These findings indicate the need for adequate stimulation protocols based on the recording of objective outcome parameters.

Recent Advances in the Use of Focused Ultrasound as a Treatment for Epilepsy.

Epilepsy affects about 1% of the population. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy are drug-resistant (DRE). Resective surgery is an effective treatment for DRE, yet invasive, and not all DRE patients are suitable resective surgery candidates. Focused ultrasound, a novel non-invasive neurointerventional method is currently under investigation as a treatment alternative for DRE. By emitting one or more ultrasound waves, FUS can target structures in the brain at millimeter resolution. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) leads to ablation of tissue and could therefore serve as a non-invasive alternative for resective surgery. It is currently under investigation in clinical trials following the approval of HIFU for essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. Low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can modulate neuronal activity and could be used to lower cortical neuronal hyper-excitability in epilepsy patients in a non-invasive manner. The seizure-suppressive effect of LIFU has been studied in several preclinical trials, showing promising results. Further investigations are required to demonstrate translation of preclinical results to human subjects.

The potential of invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation to improve verbal memory performance in epilepsy patients.

It has been demonstrated that acute vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in epilepsy patients. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has gained interest as a non-invasive alternative to improve cognition. In this prospective randomized cross-over study, we investigated the effect of both invasive VNS and taVNS on verbal memory performance in 15 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients conducted a word recognition memory paradigm in 3 conditions: VNS ON, VNS OFF and taVNS (3-period 3-treatment cross-over study design). For each condition, patients memorized 21 highlighted words from text paragraphs. Afterwards, the intervention was delivered for 30 s. Immediate recall and delayed recognition scores were obtained for each condition. This memory paradigm was repeated after 6 weeks of VNS therapy in 2 conditions: VNS ON and VNS OFF (2-period 2-treatment cross-over study design). Acute VNS and taVNS did not improve verbal memory performance. Immediate recall and delayed recognition scores were significantly improved after 6 weeks of VNS treatment irrespective of the acute intervention. We can conclude that the previously described positive effects of invasive VNS on verbal memory performance could not be replicated with invasive VNS and taVNS. An improved verbal memory performance was seen after 6 weeks of VNS treatment, suggesting that longer and more repetitive stimulation of the vagal pathway is required to modulate verbal memory performance.Clinical trial registration number: NCT05031208.