Intraperitoneal Nivolumab After Debulking Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Phase I Study with Expansion Cohort.

PURPOSE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are expected to be synergistic with intraperitoneal (IP) immunotherapy by increasing tumor antigen expression and mutational load. We assessed the feasibility and safety of IP nivolumab following complete CRS and HIPEC in pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03959761). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received IP nivolumab (0.5, 1 and 3 mg/kg) using a 3+3 dose-escalation design, starting 5-7 days after CRS and HIPEC. Four IP Q2W nivolumab infusions were planned. The primary objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of IP nivolumab based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives were to assess changes in tolerance of CRS and HIPEC. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were enrolled including 10 patients in the dose-escalation and 7 patients in the expansion phase. No DLT was observed at any dose-level in the 9 evaluable patients. Six of the 17 patients (35%) did not complete all planned infusions: 4 (23.5%) due to peritoneal catheter complications, 2 (11.8%) due to early progression. No procedure-related deaths occurred. Eleven patients (65%) experienced serious adverse events (SAEs), mainly transitory grade 3-4 transaminases elevations (6/11), and surgery-related (9/11). Four SAEs were related to the peritoneal catheter and two to HIPEC. No SAEs/grade 3-4 adverse events related to IP nivolumab occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of IP nivolumab in patients with relapsed advanced ovarian cancer; further investigation at 3 mg/kg is warranted.

Paired Comparison of Routine Molecular Screening of Patient Samples with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Using Three Targeted Assays.

INTRODUCTION: Progressive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80-85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 10-50% of patients with NSCLC harbor targetable activating mutations, such as in-frame deletions in Exon 19 (Ex19del) of EGFR. Currently, for patients with advanced NSCLC, testing for sensitizing mutations in EGFR is mandatory prior to the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma was collected from patients with NSCLC. We carried out targeted NGS using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit on cfDNA (circulating free DNA). Clinical concordance for plasma detection of known oncogenic drivers was reported. In a subset of cases, validation was carried out using an orthogonal OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 assay, as well as with our custom validated NGS assay. Somatic alterations were filtered, removing somatic mutations attributable to clonal hematopoiesis for our custom validated NGS assay. RESULTS: In the plasma samples, driver targetable mutations were studied, with a mutant allele frequency (MAF) ranging from 0.00% (negative detection) to 82.25%, using the targeted next-generation sequencing Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD Kit. In comparison with the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 kit, the EGFR concordance is 89.16% (based on the common genomic regions). The sensitivity and specificity rates based on the genomic regions (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20, and 21) were 84.62% and 94.67%. Furthermore, the observed clinical genomic discordances were present in 25% of the samples: 5% in those linked to the lower of coverage of the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 kit, 7% in those induced by the sensitivity limit on the EGFR with the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD Kit, and 13% in the samples linked to the larger KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF coverage of the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit. Most of these somatic alterations were cross validated in our orthogonal custom validated NGS assay, used in the routine management of patients. The concordance is 82.19% in the common genomic regions (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20, 21; KRAS exons 2, 3, 4; BRAF exons 11, 15; and PIK3CA exons 10, 21). The sensitivity and specificity rates were 89.38% and 76.12%, respectively. The 32% of genomic discordances were composed of 5% caused by the limit of coverage of the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit, 11% induced by the sensitivity limit of our custom validated NGS assay, and 16% linked to the additional oncodriver analysis, which is only covered by our custom validated NGS assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit resulted in de novo detection of targetable oncogenic drivers and resistance alterations, with a high sensitivity and accuracy for low and high cfDNA inputs. Thus, this assay is a sensitive, robust, and accurate test.

Circulating H3K27 Methylated Nucleosome Plasma Concentration: Synergistic Information with Circulating Tumor DNA Molecular Profiling.

The molecular profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a helpful tool not only in cancer treatment, but also in the early detection of relapse. However, the clinical interpretation of a ctDNA negative result remains challenging. The characterization of circulating nucleosomes (carrying cell-free DNA) and associated epigenetic modifications (playing a key role in the tumorigenesis of different cancers) may provide useful information for patient management, by supporting the contributive value of ctDNA molecular profiling. Significantly elevated concentrations of H3K27Me3 nucleosomes were found in plasmas at the diagnosis, and during the follow-up, of NSCLC patients, compared to healthy donors (p-value < 0.0001). By combining the H3K27Me3 level and the ctDNA molecular profile, we found that 25.5% of the patients had H3K27Me3 levels above the cut off, and no somatic alteration was detected at diagnosis. This strongly supports the presence of non-mutated ctDNA in the corresponding plasma. During the patient follow-up, a high H3K27Me3-nucleosome level was found in 15.1% of the sample, despite no somatic mutations being detected, allowing the identification of disease progression from 43.1% to 58.2% over molecular profiling alone. Measuring H3K27Me3-nucleosome levels in combination with ctDNA molecular profiling may improve confidence in the negative molecular result for cfDNA in lung cancer at diagnosis, and may also be a promising biomarker for molecular residual disease (MRD) monitoring, during and/or after treatment.

[hPG80 and cancer: A new blood biomarker in development for patient monitoring]. / hPG80 et cancer : un nouveau biomarqueur sanguin en développement pour le suivi des patients.

Recent technological advances coupled with our improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with cancer development have enabled better overall patient care. Among the newly identified biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA or circulating tumor cells, hPG80 (circulating progastrin) that is easy to detect and quantify by a simple ELISA assay has the potential to become a new routine clinical tool in oncology if on-going studies validated its utility. Indeed, on the one hand, hPG80 was found in the blood of patients with different tumors (colorectal, pancreatic, liver, lung, stomach, kidney cancers) at a significantly higher concentration than in healthy donors. Moreover, some studies suggested a potential association between hPG80 concentration changes and anti-cancer treatment efficacy in patients with gastro-intestinal and hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, hPG80 might be a prognostic factor for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma cancer (mRCC) and in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If these hypotheses were validated, hPG80 might help better stratify patients according to their prognosis, and also become a tool to monitor relapse and predict treatment response. Prospective validation studies are on-going.

Routine Molecular Screening of Patients with Advanced Non-SmallCell Lung Cancer in Circulating Cell-Free DNA at Diagnosis and During Progression Using OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 and NGS Technologies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of ultra-sensitive diagnostic tests to detect clinically actionable somatic alterations within the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) within circulating cell-free DNA is an important first step in determining the eligibility of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: We present the clinical validation (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) of a highly sensitive OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 test, which we compare to a custom next-generation sequencing assay, for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. The OncoBEAMTM digital-polymerase chain reaction method detects 36 different EGFR alterations in circulating cell-free DNA, whereas the next-generation sequencing assay covers major solid tumor oncodrivers. Of the 540 samples analyzed with the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 test, 42.4% of patients had undergone molecular testing at diagnosis (N = 229/540) and 57.7% of patients during disease progression (N = 311/540). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity were measured for this BEAMing assay. The number of mutant beads and mutant allelic fraction were measured for each EGFR alteration and the level of detection was established at 0.1% for a median of 2861 genome equivalent (GE) in each reaction using HD780 horizon control DNA, as well as by an internal quality reference standard. Approximately 10%, 27%, and 63% of the 540 samples contained < 1500 GE, a range of 1500-3000 GE, and > 3000 GE, which corresponded to a maximal assay sensitivity of 2.0%, 0.5-0.1%, and 0.1-0.05% mutant allelic fraction, respectively. In a routine hospital setting, 11.4% of non-small cell lung cancer tumors were positive at diagnosis for EGFR alterations, while 43.7% samples harbored EGFR mutations at progression, among which 40.3% expressed EGFR resistance mutations after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment with first- and second-generation drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 is a sensitive, robust, and accurate assay that delivers reproducible results. Next-generation sequencing and BEAMing technologies act complementarily in the routine molecular screening. We show that using a next-generation sequencing assay, despite its lower sensitivity, enables the identification of rare EGFR alterations or resistance mechanisms (mutation, deletion, insertion, and copy number variation) to orient first- and second-line treatments.