Executive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknowns.

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) updates the KDIGO 2012 guideline and has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, using robust methodology. This update, based on a substantially broader base of evidence than has previously been available, reflects an exciting time in nephrology. New therapies and strategies have been tested in large and diverse populations that help to inform care; however, this guideline is not intended for people receiving dialysis nor those who have a kidney transplant. The document is sensitive to international considerations, CKD across the lifespan, and discusses special considerations in implementation. The scope includes chapters dedicated to the evaluation and risk assessment of people with CKD, management to delay CKD progression and its complications, medication management and drug stewardship in CKD, and optimal models of CKD care. Treatment approaches and actionable guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations which followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. The limitations of the evidence are discussed. The guideline also provides practice points, which serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted, and it includes useful infographics and describes an important research agenda for the future. It targets a broad audience of people with CKD and their healthcare, while being mindful of implications for policy and payment.

Organization and Structures for Detection and Monitoring of CKD Across World Countries and Regions: Observational Data From a Global Survey.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Established therapeutic interventions effectively mitigate the risk and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Countries and regions have a compelling need for organizational structures that enable early identification of people with CKD who can benefit from these proven interventions. We report the current global status of CKD detection programs. STUDY DESIGN: A multinational cross-sectional survey. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders, including nephrologist leaders, policymakers, and patient advocates from 167 countries, participating in the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) survey from June to September 2022. OUTCOME: Structures for the detection and monitoring of CKD, including CKD surveillance systems in the form of registries, community-based detection programs, case-finding practices, and availability of measurement tools for risk identification. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of all participating countries, 19% (n=31) reported CKD registries, and 25% (n=40) reported implementing CKD detection programs as part of their national policies. There were variations in CKD detection program, with 50% (n=20) using a reactive approach (managing cases as identified) and 50% (n=20) actively pursuing case-finding in at-risk populations. Routine case-finding for CKD in high-risk populations was widespread, particularly for diabetes (n=152; 91%) and hypertension (n=148; 89%). Access to diagnostic tools, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) was limited, especially in low-income (LICs) and lower-middle-income (LMICs) countries, at primary (eGFR: LICs 22%, LMICs 39%, UACR: LICs 28%, LMICs 39%) and secondary/tertiary health care levels (eGFR: LICs 39%, LMICs 73%, UACR: LICs 44%, LMICs 70%), potentially hindering CKD detection. LIMITATIONS: A lack of detailed data prevented an in-depth analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive survey highlights a global heterogeneity in the organization and structures (surveillance systems and detection programs and tools) for early identification of CKD. Ongoing efforts should be geared toward bridging such disparities to optimally prevent the onset and progression of CKD and its complications. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Early detection and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is crucial to prevent progression to kidney failure. A multinational survey across 167 countries revealed disparities in CKD detection programs. Only 19% reported CKD registries, and 25% implemented detection programs as part of their national policy. Half used a reactive approach while others actively pursued case-finding in at-risk populations. Routine case-finding was common for individuals with diabetes and hypertension. However, limited access to gold standard tools such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), especially in low-income and lower-middle income countries, may hinder CKD detection. A global effort to bridge these disparities is needed to optimally prevent the onset and progression of CKD and its complications.

Outcomes for clinical trials involving adults with chronic kidney disease: a multinational Delphi survey involving patients, caregivers and health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Many outcomes of high priority to patients and clinicians are infrequently and inconsistently reported across trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD), which generates research waste and limits evidence-informed decision making. We aimed to generate consensus among patients/caregivers and health professionals on critically important outcomes for trials in CKD prior to kidney failure and the need for kidney replacement therapy, and to describe the reasons for their choices. METHODS: This was an online two-round international Delphi survey. Adult patients with CKD (all stages and diagnoses), caregivers and health professionals who could read English, Spanish or French were eligible. Participants rated the importance of outcomes using a Likert scale (7-9 indicating critical importance) and a Best-Worst Scale. The scores for the two groups were assessed to determine absolute and relative importance. Comments were analysed thematically. RESULTS: In total, 1399 participants from 73 countries completed Round 1 of the Delphi survey, including 628 (45%) patients/caregivers and 771 (55%) health professionals. In Round 2, 790 participants (56% response rate) from 63 countries completed the survey including 383 (48%) patients/caregivers and 407 (52%) health professionals. The overall top five outcomes were: kidney function, need for dialysis/transplant, life participation, cardiovascular disease and death. In the final round, patients/caregivers indicated higher scores for most outcomes (17/22 outcomes), and health professionals gave higher priority to mortality, hospitalization and cardiovascular disease (mean difference >0.3). Consensus was based upon the two groups yielding median scores of ≥7 and mean scores >7, and the proportions of both groups rating the outcome as 'critically important' being >50%. Four themes reflected the reasons for their priorities: imminent threat of a health catastrophe, signifying diminishing capacities, ability to self-manage and cope, and tangible and direct consequences. CONCLUSION: Across trials in CKD, the outcomes of highest priority to patients, caregivers and health professionals were kidney function, need for dialysis/transplant, life participation, cardiovascular disease and death.

Geographic and racial variability in kidney, cardiovascular and safety outcomes with canagliflozin: A secondary analysis of the CREDENCE randomized trial.

AIM: To explore the effect of canagliflozin on kidney and cardiovascular events and safety outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease across geographic regions and racial groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess efficacy and safety outcomes by geographic region and racial group. The primary composite outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), doubling of the serum creatinine (SCr) level, or death from kidney or cardiovascular causes. Secondary outcomes included: (i) cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization; (ii) cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke; (iii) HF hospitalization; (iv) doubling of the SCr level, ESKD or kidney death; (v) cardiovascular death; (vi) all-cause death; and (vii) cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or hospitalization for HF or for unstable angina. RESULTS: The 4401 patients were divided into six geographic region subgroups: North America (n = 1182, 27%), Central and South America (n = 941, 21%), Eastern Europe (n = 947, 21%), Western Europe (n = 421, 10%), Asia (n = 749, 17%) and Other (n = 161, 4%). The analyses included four racial groups: White (n = 2931, 67%), Black or African American (n = 224, 5%), Asian (n = 877, 20%) and Other (n = 369, 8%). Canagliflozin reduced the relative risk of the primary composite outcome in the overall trial by 30% (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.82; P = 0.00001). Across geographic regions and racial groups, canagliflozin consistently reduced the primary composite endpoint without evidence of heterogeneity (interaction P values of 0.39 and 0.91, respectively) or significant safety outcome differences. CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin reduces the risk of kidney and cardiovascular events similarly across geographic regions and racial groups.

Global variations in funding and use of hemodialysis accesses: an international report using the ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of contemporary data describing global variations in vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). We used the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to highlight differences in funding and availability of hemodialysis accesses used for initiating HD across world regions. METHODS: Survey questions were directed at understanding the funding modules for obtaining vascular access and types of accesses used to initiate dialysis. An electronic survey was sent to national and regional key stakeholders affiliated with the ISN between June and September 2022. Countries that participated in the survey were categorized based on World Bank Income Classification (low-, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income) and by their regional affiliation with the ISN. RESULTS: Data on types of vascular access were available from 160 countries. Respondents from 35 countries (22% of surveyed countries) reported that > 50% of patients started HD with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF or AVG). These rates were higher in Western Europe (n = 14; 64%), North & East Asia (n = 4; 67%), and among high-income countries (n = 24; 38%). The rates of > 50% of patients starting HD with a tunneled dialysis catheter were highest in North America & Caribbean region (n = 7; 58%) and lowest in South Asia and Newly Independent States and Russia (n = 0 in both regions). Respondents from 50% (n = 9) of low-income countries reported that > 75% of patients started HD using a temporary catheter, with the highest rates in Africa (n = 30; 75%) and Latin America (n = 14; 67%). Funding for the creation of vascular access was often through public funding and free at the point of delivery in high-income countries (n = 42; 67% for AVF/AVG, n = 44; 70% for central venous catheters). In low-income countries, private and out of pocket funding was reported as being more common (n = 8; 40% for AVF/AVG, n = 5; 25% for central venous catheters). CONCLUSIONS: High income countries exhibit variation in the use of AVF/AVG and tunneled catheters. In low-income countries, there is a higher use of temporary dialysis catheters and private funding models for access creation.

Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis therapies: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Home dialysis therapies have limited uptake in most regions despite recognized benefits such as increasing patients' independence, and several domains of quality of life with cost savings in some systems. OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping review of published literature to identify tools and guides used in systematically screening and assessing patient suitability for home dialysis. A secondary objective was to explore barriers and enablers associated with the home dialysis assessment process. It is important to identify gaps in current research to pose pertinent questions for future work in the field. DESIGN: Online databases Embase, Medline (Ovid), and CINAHL were used to identify articles published between January 2007 to May 2023. A total of 23 peer-reviewed primary and secondary studies that investigated screening or selection for patients > 18 years old with kidney failure for home dialysis met the study inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The studies consisted of secondary studies (n = 10), observational studies (n = 8), and survey-based studies (n = 5). The major themes identified that influence patient screening and assessment for home dialysis candidacy included: screening tools and guidelines (n = 8), relative contraindications (n = 4), patient or program education (n = 9), and socioeconomic factors (n = 2). LIMITATIONS: Consistent with the scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. The possible omission of evidence in languages other than English is a limitation. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identified tools and factors that potentially guide the assessment process for home dialysis candidacy. Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis requires a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, psychosocial, and logistical factors. Further research is required to validate and refine existing tools to establish standardized patient screening criteria and evaluation processes. Up-to-date training and education for healthcare providers and patients are needed to improve the utilization of home dialysis and ensure optimal outcomes.

A Current State of the Art and Science of Exercise in Dialysis: A Narrative Review.

Purpose of the review: The purpose of the review is to discuss current proven benefits and problems of integrating exercise in the care of people receiving dialysis by reviewing literature from the last few years and identifying important questions that still need to be asked and answered. Methods: A focused review and appraisal of the literature were done. Original peer-reviewed articles, review articles, opinion pieces and guidelines were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Only sources in English were accessed. Search terms "exercise" and "dialysis" were used to find active recruiting randomized trials in various clinical trial registry platforms. Key findings: Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of exercise training in individuals receiving dialysis, limited by factors such as short duration of follow-up and inconsistent adverse event reporting and outcomes selected. Notable gaps in exercise research in dialysis include ways to maintain programs and patient motivation, studies in peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients, and how best to define and measure outcomes of interest. Implications: This review summarizes the current state of exercise in people receiving dialysis and serves as a call to action to conduct large, randomized controlled trials to improve the quality of evidence needed to implement and sustain innovative, exercise interventions, and programs for this population.

Objectif de la revue: Discuter des bienfaits et problèmes avérés de l'intégration de l'exercice physique dans les soins des personnes dialysées en examinant la littérature des dernières années et en identifiant les questions importantes auxquelles il faut encore répondre. Méthodologie: Une revue ciblée et une évaluation de la littérature existante. Des articles originaux évalués par des pairs, des articles-synthèses, des articles d'opinion et des lignes directrices ont été répertoriés dans les bases de données Pubmed et Google Scholar. Seuls les articles en anglais ont été consultés. Les termes de recherche « exercice ¼ et « dialyse ¼ ont été utilisés pour rechercher les essais randomisés en cours de recrutement dans diverses plateformes de registres d'essais cliniques. Principales observations: De nombreuses études ont démontré les bienfaits de l'exercice physique chez les personnes dialysées. Ces études étaient toutefois limitées par des facteurs tels qu'une courte durée du suivi et une incohérence dans le rapport des événements indésirables et la sélection des résultats. Les principales lacunes observées dans les recherches portant sur l'exercice physique en contexte de dialyse concernent les moyens de maintenir les programmes et la motivation des patients, les études sur les patients traités par dialyse péritonéale et hémodialyse à domicile, et les meilleures façons de définir les résultats d'intérêt et de les mesurer. Conclusion: Cette revue résume la situation actuelle en ce qui concerne l'exercice physique chez les personnes dialysées. Elle constitue un appel à l'action pour la tenue d'essais cliniques de grande envergure visant l'amélioration de la qualité des données nécessaires à la mise en œuvre et au maintien d'interventions et de programmes d'exercice novateurs destinés à cette population.

Psychiatric Symptoms, Treatment Uptake, and Barriers to Mental Health Care Among US Adults With Post-COVID-19 Condition.

Importance: Psychiatric symptoms are reportedly common among adults with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). However, nationally representative data regarding symptom prevalence, treatment uptake, and barriers to care are needed to inform the development of care models. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms in US adults with PCC compared with those without PCC and assess treatment uptake and cost-related barriers to treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative US cross-sectional survey, were analyzed between October 2023 and February 2024. Exposure: Current PCC, defined as new symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection lasting more than 3 months and ongoing at the time of interview. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depression symptoms were evaluated by the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 instrument. Participants were classified as having received treatment if they received mental health counseling or therapy or medications for mental health. Sleep difficulties, cognitive difficulties, disabling fatigue, and cost-related barriers were assessed from additional NHIS questions. Results: Of the 25 122 participants representing approximately 231 million US adults (median [IQR] age, 46 [32-61] years; 49.8% male and 50.2% female participants), a weighted prevalence (wPr) of 3.4% (95% CI, 3.1%-3.6%) had current PCC. Compared with other US adults, participants with current PCC were more likely to have depression symptoms (wPr, 16.8% vs 7.1%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.51-2.55), anxiety symptoms (wPr, 16.7% vs 6.3%; AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.53-3.19), sleep difficulties (wPr, 41.5% vs 22.7%; AOR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.65-2.29), cognitive difficulties (wPr, 35.0% vs 19.5%; AOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.66-2.50), and disabling fatigue (wPr, 4.0% vs 1.6%; AOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.86). Among participants who had depression or anxiety symptoms, those with PCC had a similar likelihood of not having received treatment (wPr, 28.2% vs 34.9%; AOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.66-1.57). However, participants with current PCC were more likely to report a cost-related barrier to accessing mental health counseling or therapy (wPr, 37.2% vs 23.3%; AOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.40-2.98). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that people with PCC have a higher prevalence of psychiatric symptoms than other adults but are more likely to experience cost-related barriers to accessing therapy. Care pathways for PCC should consider prioritizing mental health screening and affordable treatment.

Identifying Barriers and Facilitators for Increasing Uptake of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors in British Columbia, Canada, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Background: Care gaps remain in modern health care despite the availability of robust, evidence-based medications. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated profound benefits in improving both cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients, the uptake of these medications remain suboptimal, and the causes have not been systematically explored. Objective: The purpose of this study was to use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to describe the barriers and facilitators faced by clinicians in British Columbia, Canada, when prescribing an SGLT2 inhibitor. To achieve this, we conducted semistructured interviews using the CFIR with practicing family physicians, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and cardiologists in British Columbia. Design: Semistructured interviews. Setting: British Columbia, Canada. Participants: Actively practicing family physicians, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and cardiologists in British Columbia. Methods: Twenty-one clinicians were interviewed using questions derived from the CFIR. The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and each transcription was individually analyzed in duplicate using thematic analysis. The analysis focused on identifying barriers and facilitators to using SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice and coded using the CFIR constructs. Once the transcriptions were coded, overarching themes were created. Results: Five overarching themes were identified to the barriers and facilitators to using SGLT2 inhibitors: current perceptions and beliefs, clinician factors, patient factors, medication factors, and health care system factors. The current perceptions and beliefs were that SGLT2 inhibitors are efficacious and have distinct advantages over other agents but are underutilized in British Columbia. Clinician factors included varying levels of knowledge of and comfort in prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors, and patient factors included intolerable adverse events and additional pill burden, but many were enthusiastic about potential benefits. Multiple SGLT2 inhibitor related adverse events like mycotic infections and euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis and the difficulty in obtaining reimbursement for these medications were also identified as a barrier to prescribing these medications. Facilitators for the use of SGLT2 inhibitors included consensus among colleagues, influential leaders, and peers in support of their use, and endorsement by national guidelines. Limitations: The experience from the clinicians regarding costs and the reimbursement process is limited to British Columbia as each province has its own procedures. There may be responder bias as clinicians were approached through purposive sampling. Conclusion: This study highlights different themes to the barriers and facilitators of using SGLT2 inhibitors in British Columbia. The identification of these barriers provides a specific target for improvement, and the facilitators can be leveraged for the increased use of SGLT2 inhibitors. Efforts to address and optimize these barriers and facilitators in a systematic approach may lead to an increase in the use of these efficacious medications.

Contexte: Des lacunes subsistent dans les soins de santé modernes, malgré l'existence de médicaments éprouvés et fondés sur des données probantes. Les inhibiteurs du cotransporteur de sodium-glucose de type 2 (SGLT2) ont démontré d'importants effets dans l'amélioration des résultats cardiovasculaires et rénaux des patients, mais l'utilization de ces médicaments demeure sous-optimale et les raisons qui expliquent cette situation n'ont pas été systématiquement explorées. Objectif: Utiliser le Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) pour décrire les obstacles et les éléments facilitateurs rencontrés par les cliniciens de la Colombie-Britannique (Canada) lorsqu'ils prescrivent un inhibiteur du SGLT2. Pour ce faire, nous avons mené des entretiens semi-structurés au moyen du CFIR auprès de médecins de famille, de néphrologues, de cardiologues et d'endocrinologues exerçant en Colombie-Britannique. Conception: Entretiens semi-structurés. Cadre: Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Participants: Médecins de famille, cardiologues, endocrinologues et néphrologues exerçant en Colombie-Britannique. Méthodologie: Les questions dérivées du CFIR ont été posées à vingt-et-un cliniciens. Les enregistrements audio ont été transcrits verbatim et chaque transcription a été analysée individuellement en double en utilisant l'analyze thématique. L'analyze s'est concentrée sur l'identification des obstacles et des facilitateurs à l'utilization des inhibiteurs du SGLT2 dans la pratique clinique et sur le codage selon les concepts du CFIR. Une fois les transcriptions codées, des thèmes généraux ont été créés. Résultats: Cinq thèmes généraux ont été identifiés pour les obstacles et les facilitateurs à l'utilization des inhibiteurs du SGLT2: les perceptions et les croyances actuelles, les facteurs liés aux cliniciens, les facteurs liés aux patients, les facteurs liés aux médicaments et les facteurs liés au système de santé. Les perceptions et croyances actuelles étaient que les inhibiteurs du SGLT2 sont efficaces, qu'ils présentent des avantages distincts des autres agents, mais qu'ils sont sous-utilisés en Colombie-Britannique. Les facteurs liés aux cliniciens incluaient des niveaux variables de connaissance et de confort vis-à-vis la prescription d'inhibiteurs du SGLT2. Les facteurs liés aux patients incluaient les événements indésirables intolérables et la charge médicamenteuse supplémentaire, mais plusieurs répondants voyaient positivement les bienfaits potentiels. Les nombreux événements indésirables liés aux inhibiteurs du SGLT2, notamment les infections mycosiques et l'acidocétose diabétique euglycémique, et la difficulté à obtenir le remboursement de ces médicaments ont également été cités comme raisons limitant la prescription de ces médicaments. Le consensus parmi les collègues, les leaders influents et les pairs en faveur des inhibiteurs du SGLT2 et l'inclusion de ces médicaments dans les lignes directrices nationales figuraient parmi les facilitateurs. Limites: Les expériences rapportées par les cliniciens en ce qui concerne les coûts et le processus de remboursement se limitent à la Colombie-Britannique, car chaque province a ses propres procédures. L'étude comporte un possible biais de réponse puisque les cliniciens ont été approchés par échantillonnage dirigé. Conclusion: Cette étude met en évidence différents thèmes concernant les obstacles et les facilitateurs à l'utilization des inhibiteurs du SGLT2 en Colombie-Britannique. L'identification de ces obstacles fournit une cible précise pour l'amélioration, alors que les facilitateurs peuvent être mis à profit pour accroître l'utilization des inhibiteurs de SGLT2. Les efforts déployés pour aborder et optimiser ces obstacles et ces facilitateurs dans le cadre d'une approche systématique pourraient mener à une augmentation de l'utilization de ces médicaments efficaces.

Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life in Working-Age COVID-19 Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Most working-age (18-64) adults have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and some may have developed post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). However, long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following infection remains uncharacterized. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, COVID-19 survivors from throughout British Columbia (BC), Canada, completed a questionnaire >2 years after infection. PCC status was self-reported, and HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. We compared HRQOL in those with current PCC, those with recovered PCC, and those without a history of PCC. Multivariable analyses were weighted to be representative of COVID-19 survivors in BC. RESULTS: Of the 1,135 analyzed participants, 19.2% had current PCC, and 27.6% had recovered PCC. Compared to those without a history of PCC, participants with recovered PCC had a similar mean EQ-5D health utility (adjusted difference -0.02 [95%CI -0.03, 0.00]), but those with current PCC had a lower health utility (adjusted difference -0.08 [95%CI -0.12, -0.05]). Participants with current PCC were also more likely to report problems with mobility (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 6.00 [95%CI 2.88-12.52]), self-care (aOR 5.96 [95%CI 1.84-19.32]), usual activities (aOR 8.00 [95%CI 4.27-14.99]), pain/discomfort (aOR 4.28 [95%CI 2.46-7.48]), and anxiety/depression (aOR 3.45 [95%CI 1.90-6.27]). CONCLUSIONS: In working-age adults who have survived >2 years following COVID-19, HRQOL is high among those who never had PCC or have recovered from PCC. However, individuals with ongoing symptoms have lower HRQOL and are more likely to have functional deficits. These findings underscore the importance of implementing targeted healthcare interventions to improve HRQOL in adults with long-term PCC.

Perceptions and Information-Seeking Behavior Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in 2023: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background: People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face an increased risk of severe outcomes such as hospitalization or death from COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination is a vital approach to mitigate the risk and severity of infection in patients with CKD. Limited information exists regarding the factors that shape COVID-19 vaccine uptake, including health information-seeking behavior and perceptions, within the CKD population. Objective: The objectives were to describe among CKD patients, (1) health information-seeking behavior on COVID-19, (2) their capacity to comprehend and trust COVID-19 information from different sources, and (3) their perceptions concerning COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Design/Setting: Cross-sectional web-based survey administered in British Columbia and Ontario from February 17, 2023, to April 17, 2023. Participants: Chronic kidney disease G3b-5D patients and kidney transplant recipients (CKD G1T-5T) enrolled in a longitudinal COVID-19 vaccine serology study. Methods and Measurements: The survey consisted of a questionnaire that included demographic and clinical data, perceived susceptibility of contracting COVID-19, the ability to collect, understand, and trust information on COVID-19, as well as perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data with values expressed as count (%) and chi square tests were performed with a significance level set at P ≤ .05. A content analysis was performed on one open-ended response regarding respondents' questions surrounding COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Results: Among the 902 patients who received the survey via email, 201 completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 22%. The median age was 64 years old (IQR 53-74), 48% were male, 51% were university educated, 32% were on kidney replacement therapies, and 57% had received ≥5 COVID-19 vaccine doses. 65% of respondents reported that they had sought out COVID-19-related information in the last 12 months, with 91% and 84% expressing having understood and trusted the information they received, respectively. Those with a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses were associated with having sought out (P =.017), comprehended (P < .001), and trusted (P =. 005) COVID-19-related information. Female sex was associated with expressing more concern about contracting COVID-19 (P = .011). Most respondents strongly agreed to statements regarding the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination. Respondents' questions about COVID-19 infection and vaccination centered on 4 major themes: COVID-19 vaccination strategy, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine safety, and the impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination on kidney health. Limitations: This survey was administered within the Canadian health care context to patients with CKD who had at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Race/ethnicity of participants was not captured. Conclusions: In this survey of individuals with CKD, COVID-19 information-seeking behavior was high and almost all respondents understood and trusted the information they received. Perceptions toward the COVID-19 vaccine and booster were mostly favorable.

Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality of COVID-19 in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: A Multi-Center Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Many questions remain about the maintenance dialysis population who survived COVID-19. Previous literature has focused on outcomes associated with the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection but it may underestimate the impact of disease. This study describes the long-term morbidity and mortality among patients receiving maintenance dialysis in Ontario, Canada who survived their SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the risk factors associated with long-term mortality. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients receiving maintenance dialysis in Ontario, Canada who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and survived 30 days between March 14, 2020 and December 1, 2021 (pre-Omicron), with follow-up until September 30, 2022. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while our secondary outcomes included reinfection, composite of cardiovascular (CV)-related death or hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, and admission to long-term care or complex continuing care. We also examined risk factors associated with long-term mortality using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We included 798 COVID-19 survivors receiving maintenance dialysis. After the first 30 days of infection, death occurred at a rate of 15.0 per 100 person-years (95% CI 12.9 - 17.5) over a median follow-up of 1.4 years (IQR 1.1, 1.7) with a nadir of death at approximately 0.5 years. Reinfection, composite CV death or hospitalization, and all-cause hospitalization occurred at a rate (95% CI) of 15.9 (13.6 - 18.50), 17.4 (14.9 - 20.4), and 73.1 (66.6 - 80.2) per 100 person-years, respectively. In addition to traditional predictors of mortality, ICU admission for COVID-19 had a prolonged impact on survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.6 - 4.3). Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 30-day survivors increased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 - 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of COVID-19 persists beyond the period of acute infection in the maintenance dialysis population in Ontario with high rates of death, reinfection, all-cause hospitalization, and CV disease among COVID-19 survivors.

Assessing Discharge Communication and Follow-up of Acute Kidney Injury in British Columbia: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Background and objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects up to 20% of hospitalizations and is associated with chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, increased mortality, and increased health care costs. Proper documentation of AKI in discharge summaries is critical for optimal monitoring and treatment of these patients once discharged. Currently, there is limited literature evaluating the quality of discharge communication after AKI. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of documentation of episodes of AKI at a tertiary care center in British Columbia, Canada. Methods design setting patients and measurements: This was a retrospective chart review study of adult patients who experienced AKI during hospital admission between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Laboratory data were used to identify all admissions to the cardiac and general medicine ward complicated by AKI defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. A random sample of 300 AKI admissions stratified by AKI severity (eg, stages 1, 2, and 3) were identified for chart review. Patients were excluded if they required ongoing renal replacement therapy after admission, had a history of kidney transplant, died during their admission, or did not have a discharge summary available. Discharge summaries were reviewed for documentation of the following: presence of AKI, severity of AKI, AKI status at discharge, practitioner and laboratory follow-up plans, and medication changes. Results: A total of 1076 patients with 1237 AKI admissions were identified. Of the 300 patients selected for discharge summary review, 38 met exclusion criteria. In addition, AKI was documented in 140 (53%) discharge summaries and was more likely to be documented in more severe AKI: stage 1, 38%; stage 2, 51%; and stage 3, 75%. Of those with their AKI documented, 94 (67%) documented AKI severity, and 116 (83%) mentioned the AKI status or trajectory at the time of discharge. A total of 239 (91%) of discharge summaries mentioned a follow-up plan with a practitioner, but only 23 (10%) had documented follow-up with nephrology. Patients with their AKI documented were more likely to have nephrology follow-up than those without AKI documented (17% vs 1%). Regarding laboratory investigations, 92 (35%) of the summaries had documented recommendations. In summaries that included medications typically held during AKI, only about half made specific reference to those medications being held, adjusted, or documented a post-discharge plan for that medication. For those with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) listing, 64% of discharge summaries mentioned holding, and 9% mentioned a discharge plan. For those with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) listing, 38% mentioned holding these medications, and 46% mentioned a discharge plan. In summaries with diuretics listed, 35% mentioned holding, and 51% included a discharge plan. Conclusions and limitations: We found suboptimal quality and completeness of discharge reporting in patients hospitalized with AKI. This may contribute to inadequate follow-up and post-hospitalization care for this patient population. Strategies are required for increasing the presence and quality of AKI reporting in discharge summaries. Limitations include our definition of AKI based on lab criteria, which may have missed some of the injuries that met the criteria based on urine output. Another limitation is that our definition of AKI based on the highest and lowest creatinine during admission may have led to some overclassification. In addition, without outpatient laboratories, it is possible that we have not captured the true baseline creatinine in some patients.

Contexte et objectif: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) complique jusqu'à 20 % des hospitalisations; elle est associée à l'insuffisance rénale chronique, aux maladies cardiovasculaires, à une mortalité accrue et à une augmentation des coûts de santé. La documentation appropriée de l'IRA dans les résumés de départ est essentielle pour optimiser la surveillance et le traitement des patients après leur sortie de l'hôpital. Il existe peu de littérature évaluant la qualité de la documentation de l'IRA dans les résumés de départ. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'exactitude et la qualité de la documentation des épisodes d'IRA dans un center de soins tertiaires de la Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Méthodologie conception et cadre de l'étude sujets et mesures: Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective des dossiers de patients adultes ayant présenté une IRA au cours de leur admission à l'hôpital entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 31 décembre 2018. Les données de laboratoire ont été utilisées pour répertorier toutes les admissions compliquées par une IRA (définie par les critères KDIGO) dans les services de cardiologie et de médecine générale. Un échantillon aléatoire de 300 admissions avec IRA stratifiée selon sa gravité (p. ex., stade, 1, 2 et 3) a été constitué pour l'examen des dossiers. Ont été exclus les patients qui avaient eu besoin d'une thérapie de suppléance rénale continue après leur admission, ceux qui avaient des antécédents de transplantation rénale, ceux qui étaient décédés pendant leur admission et ceux pour qui aucun résumé de départ n'était disponible. Les résumés de départ ont été examinés à la recherche d'une mention des éléments suivants : présence d'une IRA, gravité de l'IRA, statut de l'IRA à la sortie, plans de suivi pour les tests de laboratoire et suivi avec un praticien, changements dans la médication. Résultats: En tout, 1 076 patients avec un total de 1 237 admissions avec IRA ont été identifiés. Parmi les 300 patients sélectionnés pour l'examen du résumé de départ, 38 répondaient aux critères d'exclusion. L'IRA avait été documentée dans 140 (53 %) des cas et plus elle était grave, plus elle était susceptible d'être documentée (stade 1 = 38 %; stade 2 = 51 %; stade 3 = 75 %). Parmi ceux où l'IRA était documentée, 94 (67 %) mentionnaient sa gravité et 116 (83 %) mentionnaient son statut ou sa trajectoire à la sortie du patient. Un plan de suivi avec le praticien était mentionné dans 239 (91 %) des résumés de départ, mais seuls 23 (10 %) mentionnaient un suivi en néphrologie. Les patients dont l'IRA était documentée étaient plus susceptibles de faire l'objet d'un suivi en néphrologie que ceux sans mention de l'IRA (17 % contre 1 %). En ce qui concerne les plans de suivi de laboratoire, 92 (35 %) des résumés contenaient des recommandations. Dans les résumés qui mentionnaient des médicaments normalement maintenus pendant un épisode d'IRA, seule la moitié environ faisait spécifiquement référence à ces médicaments comme ayant été cessés, ajustés ou documentés dans un plan post-sortie. Dans les résumés de départ qui listaient des AINS, 64 % mentionnaient qu'ils avaient été cessés temporairement et 9 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Dans les résumés de départ qui listaient des IECA/ARA, 38 % mentionnaient que ces médicaments avaient été cessés temporairement et 46 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Dans les résumés qui listaient des diurétiques, 35 % mentionnaient qu'ils avaient été cessés temporairement et 51 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Limites et conclusion: Nous avons constaté que la qualité et l'exhaustivité des résumés de départ étaient sous-optimales chez les patients hospitalisés ayant vécu un épisode d'IRA. Cette situation peut contribuer à l'inadéquation du suivi et des soins post-hospitalization pour cette population de patients. Des stratégies sont nécessaires pour accroître la documentation d'un épisode d'IRA dans les résumés de départ et augmenter la qualité de sa communication. Les résultats de cette étude sont notamment limités par notre définition de l'IRA fondée sur des critères de laboratoire qui pourraient avoir manqué des patients répondant aux critères fondés sur la production d'urine. Notre définition de l'IRA fondée sur le taux de créatinine le plus élevée et le plus faible pendant l'admission pourrait également avoir conduit à un surdiagnostic. En outre, sans les résultats de laboratoires externes, il est possible que nous n'ayons pas saisi la mesure initiale réelle de la créatinine chez certains patients.

Oral Nutritional Supplement Prescription and Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Among Patients With Late-Stage Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: Malnutrition and protein-energy wasting (PEW) are nutritional complications of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) that contribute to morbidity, mortality, and decreased quality of life. No previous studies have assessed the effect of oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) on patient-reported symptom burden among patients with non-dialysis CKD (CKD-ND) who have or are at risk of malnutrition/PEW. Objective: The objective of this study was (1) to quantify the associations between baseline nutritional parameters and patient-reported symptom scores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite and (2) to compare the change in symptom scores among patients prescribed ONS with patients who did not receive ONS in a propensity-score-matched analysis. Design: This study conducted observational cohort analysis using provincial registry data. Setting: This study was done in multidisciplinary CKD clinics in British Columbia. Patients: Adult patients >18 years of age with CKD-ND entering multidisciplinary CKD clinics between January 1, 2010-July 31, 2019 who had at least 2 Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal (ESASr:Renal) assessments. Measurements: The measurements include nutrition-related parameters such as body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, serum phosphate, serum bicarbonate, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and ESASr:Renal scores (overall and subscores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite). Methods: Multivariable linear regression was applied to assess associations between nutritional parameters and ESASr:Renal scores. Propensity-score matching using the greedy method was used to match patients prescribed ONS with those not prescribed ONS using multiple demographic, comorbidity, health care utilization, and temporal factors. Linear regression was used to assess the association between first ONS prescription and change in ESASr:Renal overall score and subscores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite. Results: Of total, 2076 patients were included. Higher baseline serum albumin was associated with lower overall ESASr:Renal score (-0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.40 to -0.01 per 1 g/L increase in albumin), lower subscores for tiredness (-0.04, 95% CI = -0.07 to -0.01), nausea (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.04 to -0.01), and appetite (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.01). Higher BMI was associated with higher overall ESASr:Renal score (0.32, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.48 per 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI), higher symptom subscores for wellbeing (0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.04) and tiredness (0.05, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.07). Higher baseline NLR was associated with higher overall score (0.21, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.39 per 1 unit increase in NLR), higher symptom subscores for wellbeing (0.03, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.05) and nausea (0.03, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.05). In the propensity-score-matched analysis, there were no statistically significant associations between ONS prescription and change in overall ESASr:Renal (beta coefficient for change in ESASr:Renal = 0.17, 95% CI = -2.64 to 2.99) or for subscores for appetite, tiredness, nausea, and wellbeing. Limitations: Possible residual confounding. The ESASr:Renal assessments were obtained routinely only in patients with G5 CKD-ND and/or experiencing significant CKD-related symptoms. Conclusions: This exploratory observational analysis of patients with advanced non-dialysis CKD demonstrated BMI, serum albumin, and NLR were modestly associated with patient-reported symptoms, but we did not observe an association between ONS use and change in ESASr:Renal scores.

Contexte: La malnutrition et la dénutrition protéino-énergétique (DPÉ) sont des complications nutritionnelles de l'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) de stade avancé qui contribuent à la morbidité, à la mortalité et à la diminution de la qualité de vie associées à la maladie. Aucune étude n'a évalué l'effet des suppléments nutritionnels administrés par voie orale (SNO) sur le fardeau des symptômes autodéclarés par les patients non dialysés atteints d'IRC (IRC-ND) et souffrant de malnutrition/DPÉ ou risquant d'en souffrir. Objectifs: (1) Quantifier les associations entre les paramètres nutritionnels initiaux et les scores des symptômes autodéclarés en lien avec le bien-être, la fatigue, les nausées et l'appétit. (2) Comparer, dans une analyse des scores de propension appariés, la variation des scores associés aux symptômes des patients ayant reçu une ordonnance de SNO par rapport aux patients n'en ayant pas reçu. Conception: Analyse de cohorte observationnelle à partir des données du registre provincial. Cadre: Cliniques multidisciplinaires d'IRC en Colombie-Britannique. Sujets: Des patients adultes atteints d'IRC-ND admis entre le 1er janvier 2010 et le 31 juillet 2019 dans des cliniques multidisciplinaires d'IRC avec au moins deux évaluations selon l'Échelle d'évaluation Edmonton pour l'insuffisance rénale (ESASr:renal­Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal). Mesures: Les paramètres liés à la nutrition: indice de masse corporelle (IMC), albumine sérique, phosphate sérique, bicarbonate sérique, rapport neutrophiles/lymphocytes (RNL), ainsi que les scores ESASr:renal (scores globaux et scores secondaires pour le bien-être, la fatigue, les nausées et l'appétit). Méthodologie: La régression linéaire multivariable a servi à évaluer les associations entre les paramètres nutritionnels et les scores ESASr:renal. Une correspondance des scores de propension par la méthode Greedy a été utilisée pour apparier des patients ayant reçu ordonnance de SNO avec des patients n'en ayant pas reçu selon plusieurs facteurs démographiques, les comorbidités, l'utilisation des soins de santé et des facteurs temporels. La régression linéaire a servi à évaluer l'association entre la première ordonnance de SNO et la variation des scores globaux et des scores secondaires de l'ESASr:renal pour le bien-être, la fatigue, les nausées et l'appétit. Résultats: Au total, 2 076 patients ont été inclus à l'étude. Un taux d'albumine sérique plus élevé à l'inclusion était associé à un score ESASr:rénal global plus faible (-0,20 [IC 95 %: -0,40 à -0,01 pour 1 g/L d'augmentation de l'albumine]) et à des scores secondaires plus faibles pour la fatigue (-0,04 [IC 95 %: -0,07 à -0,01]), les nausées (-0,03 [IC 95 %: -0,04 à 0,01]) et l'appétit (0,03 [IC 95 %: -0,06 à -0,01]). Un IMC plus élevé était associé à un score ESASr:renal global plus élevé (0,32 [IC 95 %: 0,16 à 0,48 par augmentation de 1 kg/m2 de l'IMC]), des scores secondaires de symptômes plus élevés pour le bien-être (0,02 [IC 95 %: 0,00 à 0,04]) et la fatigue (0,05 [IC 95 %: 0,02 à 0,07]). Un RNL initial plus élevé était associé à un score ESASr:renal global plus élevé (0,21 [IC 95 %: 0,03 à 0,39 par unité d'augmentation du RNL]), des scores secondaires de symptômes plus élevés pour le bien-être (0,03 [IC 95 %: 0,01 à 0,05]) et les nausées (0,03 [IC 95 %: 0,02 à 0,05]). Dans l'analyse des scores de propension appariés, aucune association statistiquement significative n'a été observée entre une ordonnance de SNO et une variation significative dans les scores globaux de l'ESASr:renal (coefficient bêta de variation de l'ESASr:rénal: 0,17 [IC 95 %: -2,64 ­ à 2,99]) ou les scores secondaires pour l'appétit, la fatigue, les nausées et le bien-être. Limites: Possibilité de facteurs de confusion résiduels. Les évaluations ESASr:renal ont été effectuées de routine uniquement pour les patients atteints d'IRC-ND G5 et/ou présentant des symptômes importants liés à l'IRC. Conclusion: Cette analyse observationnelle exploratoire portant sur des patients atteints d'IRC avancée non dialysés a démontré que l'IMC, l'albumine sérique et le RNL étaient associés de façon modeste aux symptômes autodéclarés. Toutefois, aucune association n'a été observée entre une ordonnance de SNO et une variation des scores ESASr:renal.

Impact of Canagliflozin on Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes by Type 2 Diabetes Duration: A Pooled Analysis of the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken because it was unknown whether the duration of type 2 diabetes modifies the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin on cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program (N = 10,142) and Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy (CREDENCE) trial (N = 4,401) evaluated hazard ratios and 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazards for the effects of canagliflozin on CV and kidney outcomes, including progression and regression of albuminuria over 5-year intervals of disease duration. RESULTS: Canagliflozin had ranges of benefit across intervals of diabetes duration, with no heterogeneity for major adverse CV events, CV death or heart failure hospitalization, and kidney failure requiring therapy or doubling serum creatinine. Furthermore, canagliflozin reduced albuminuria progression and increased albuminuria regression with no interaction across all diabetes duration subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that earlier treatment with canagliflozin confers consistent cardiorenal benefits to individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Capacity for the management of kidney failure in the International Society of Nephrology Newly Independent States and Russia region: report from the 2023 ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA).

The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) was established to aid understanding of the status and capacity of countries to provide optimal kidney care worldwide. This report presents the current characteristics of kidney care in the ISN Newly Independent States (NIS) and Russia region. Although the median prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was higher (11.4%) than the global median (9.5%), the median CKD-related death rate (1.4%) and prevalence of treated kidney failure (KF) in the region (411 per million population [pmp]) were lower than they are globally (2.5% and 822.8 pmp, respectively). Capacity to provide an adequate frequency of hemodialysis (HD) and kidney transplantation services is present in all the countries (100%). In spite of significant economic advancement, the region has critical shortages of nephrologists, dietitians, transplant coordinators, social workers, palliative care physicians, and kidney supportive care nurses. Home HD remains unavailable in any country in the region. Although national registries for dialysis and kidney transplantation are available in most of the countries across the ISN NIS and Russia region, few registries exist for nondialysis CKD and acute kidney injury. Although a national strategy for improving care for CKD patients is presented in more than half of the countries, no country in the region had a CKD-specific policy. Strategies that incorporate workforce training, planning, and development for all KF caregivers could help ensure sustainable kidney care delivery in the ISN NIS and Russia region.

Pathways for Diagnosing and Treating CKD-Associated Pruritus: A Narrative Review.

Purpose of Review: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a common, persistent, and distressing itch experienced by patients across the CKD spectrum. Although the disorder is associated with adverse outcomes and poor health-related quality of life, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this narrative review is to offer health care providers guidance on how to effectively identify, assess, and treat patients with CKD-associated pruritus, with the goal of reducing symptom burden and improving patient-important outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL). Sources of Information: A panel of nephrologists and researchers from across Canada and the United States was assembled to develop this narrative review based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and their clinical experiences. Methods: A panel of nephrologists who actively care for patients with pruritus receiving dialysis from across Canada was assembled. Two researchers from the United States were also included based on their expertise in the diagnosis and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Throughout Spring 2023, the panel met to discuss key topics in the identification, assessment, and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Panel members subsequently developed summaries of the pertinent information based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and added information on their own clinical experiences. In all cases, approval of the article was sought and achieved through discussion. Key Findings: This narrative review provides pragmatic guidance addressing: (1) methods for screening CKD-associated pruritus, (2) assessing severity, (3) management of CKD-associated pruritus, and (4) suggested areas for future research. The panel developed a 3-pillar framework for proactive assessment and severity scoring in CKD-aP: systematic screening for CKD-associated pruritus (pillar 1), assessment of pruritus intensity (pillar 2), and understanding the impact of CKD-associated pruritus on the patient's QoL (pillar 3). Management of CKD-associated pruritus can include ensuring optimization of dialysis adequacy, achieving mineral metabolism targets (ie, calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone). However, treatment of CKD-associated pruritus usually requires additional interventions. Patients, regardless of CKD-associated pruritus severity, should be counseled on adequate skin hydration and other non-pharmacological strategies to reduce pruritus. Antihistamines should be avoided in favor of evidence-based treatments, such as difelikefalin and gabapentin. Limitations: A formal systematic review (SR) of the literature was not undertaken, although published SRs were reviewed. The possibility for bias based on the experts' own clinical experiences may have occurred. Key takeaways are based on the current available evidence, of which head-to-head clinical trials are lacking. Funding: This work was funded by an arm's length grant from Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. (the importer and distributer of difelikefalin in Canada). LiV Medical Education Agency Inc. provided logistical and editorial support.

Motif de la revue: Le prurit associé à l'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) est une démangeaison cutanée fréquente, persistante et invalidante que les patients de tout le specter de l'IRC peuvent ressentir. Bien que le prurit soit associé à des effets indésirables et à une mauvaise qualité de vie liée à la santé, il demeure sous-diagnostiqué et sous-traité. L'objectif de cette revue narrative est d'offrir des conseils aux professionnels de la santé sur la façon d'identifier, d'évaluer et de traiter efficacement les patients atteints de prurit associé à l'IRC; ceci dans le but de réduire la charge des symptômes et d'améliorer les résultats importants pour les patients, notamment leur qualité de vie (QdV). Sources de l'information: Un comité de néphrologues et de chercheurs de partout au Canada et des États-Unis a été constitué pour élaborer la présente revue narrative à partir des meilleures données disponibles, des lignes directrices actuelles pour le traitement et de leurs expériences cliniques. Méthodologie: Un groupe de néphrologues canadiens qui s'occupent activement de patients dialysés souffrant de prurit a été constitué. Deux chercheurs des États-Unis ont été inclus au groupe en raison de leur expertise dans le diagnostic et la prise en charge du prurit associé à l'IRC. Le comité s'est réuni tout au long du printemps 2023 pour discuter de sujets clés en lien avec l'identification, l'évaluation et la prise en charge du prurit associé à l'IRC. Les membres du comité ont par la suite rédigé des résumés des informations pertinentes en se basant sur les meilleures données disponibles et les lignes directrices actuelles pour le traitement, auxquels ils ont ajouté des informations issues de leurs propres expériences cliniques. Dans tous les cas, l'approbation du manuscrit a été sollicitée et obtenue par discussion. Principaux résultats: Cette revue narrative offre des conseils pragmatiques sur les points suivants: (1) les méthodes de dépistage du prurit associé à l'IRC; (2) l'évaluation de sa gravité; (3) sa prise en charge; et (4) les domaines suggérés pour de futures recherches. Le comité a développé un cadre à trois piliers pour l'évaluation proactive du prurit associé à l'IRC et l'établissement d'un score de gravité: le dépistage systématique du prurit associé à l'IRC (pilier 1), l'évaluation de son intensité (pilier 2) et la compréhension de son impact sur la QdV du patient (pilier 3). La prise en charge du prurit associé à l'IRC peut inclure l'optimisation de l'adéquation de la dialyse et l'atteinte des cibles du métabolisme minéral (c.-à-d. calcium, phosphate et hormone parathyroïdienne). Cependant, son traitement nécessite habituellement des interventions supplémentaires. Les patients, quelle que soit la gravité du prurit associé à l'IRC, devraient être avisés d'hydrater adéquatement leur peau et informés des autres stratégies non pharmacologiques afin de réduire le prurit. On devrait éviter les antihistaminiques et les remplacer par des traitements fondés sur des données probantes comme la difélikéfaline et la gabapentine. Limites: Aucune revue systématique de la littérature n'a été formellement entreprise, bien que les revues systématiques publiées aient été examinées. La possibilité d'un biais fondé sur les expériences cliniques des experts est envisageable. Les principales conclusions de cette étude sont fondées sur les données probantes actuellement disponibles, pour lesquelles il n'existe pas d'essais cliniques comparatifs. Financement: Ces travaux ont été financés par une subvention indépendante d'Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. (l'importateur et distributeur de la difélikéfaline au Canada). Un soutien logistique et éditorial a été fourni par liV Medical Education Agency Inc.

Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular and Kidney Prevention With Canagliflozin: Insights From the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without prevalent cardiovascular disease (secondary and primary prevention). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a pooled participant-level analysis of the CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program and CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial. The CANVAS Program included participants with type 2 diabetes at elevated cardiovascular risk, whereas the CREDENCE trial included participants with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease. Hazard ratios (HRs) with interaction terms were obtained from Cox regression models to estimate relative risk reduction with canagliflozin versus placebo across the primary and secondary prevention groups. We analyzed 5616 (38.9%) and 8804 (61.1%) individuals in the primary and secondary prevention subgroups, respectively. Primary versus secondary prevention participants were on average younger (62.2 versus 63.8 years of age) and more often women (42% versus 31%). Canagliflozin reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76-0.94]) consistently across primary and secondary prevention subgroups (Pinteraction=0.86). Similarly, no treatment effect heterogeneity was observed with canagliflozin for hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular death, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality (all Pinteraction>0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin reduced cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with no statistical evidence of heterogeneity for the treatment effect across the primary and secondary prevention subgroups in the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial. Although studies on the optimal implementation of canagliflozin within these populations are warranted, these results reinforce canagliflozin's role in cardiorenal prevention and treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01032629, NCT01989754, NCT02065791.

Implications of Implementing the 2021 CKD-EPI Equation Without Race on Managing Patients With Kidney Disease in British Columbia, Canada.

Introduction: We investigated the implications of implementing race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation among real-world patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods: This study included nondialysis-dependent patients with CKD aged ≥19 years who were registered in the Patient Records and Outcome Management Information System (PROMIS) as of March 31, 2016 (index date) with ≥1 serum creatinine measurement within 1 year before the index date. Patients with a history of kidney transplantation before the index date were excluded. CKD-EPI 2021 versus 2009 equation was the exposure variable. Difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and number (%) of patients reclassified to a different eGFR category were estimated. We used Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model to investigate the association between change in eGFR category and progression to kidney failure (incident maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) within 2 years. Results: A total of 11,604 patients (median age 73 years, 52% male) were included. Compared to the 2009 equation, eGFR from 2021 equation was on average 2.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2 higher. Variation was higher among males. Overall, ∼17% of the study sample were reclassified to a category with higher eGFR by 2021 equation (switchers). The highest proportion (28%) of patients were reclassified from G5 to G4. The risk of progressing to kidney failure was 22% less among switchers compared to nonswitchers; adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) is 0.78 (0.65, 0.94). Conclusion: CKD-EPI 2021 equation appeared to provide higher eGFR compared to 2009 equation. This higher eGFR values appeared to be concordant with subsequent real-world CKD progression outcomes. Higher eGFR from the 2021 equation may have substantial clinical implications in both diagnosis as well as long-term care of patients with CKD.