RESUMO
Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) based treatments are both recommended as first-line therapies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) by KDIGO 2021 guideline. However, the efficacy of RTX vs. CYC-based treatments in IMN is still controversial. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,022,355,717) by pooling data from randomized controlled trials or cohort studies in IMN patients using the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries (till Orc 1, 2022). The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate + partial remission (PR) rate. CR rate, immunologic response rate, relapse rate, and the risk of serious adverse events (SAE) were secondary outcomes. Eight studies involving 600 adult patients with IMN were included with a median follow-up duration of 12 to 60 months. RTX induced a similar overall remission rate compared with CYC (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.09, P = 0.23). At the follow-up time of 6 months, RTX was associated with a lower CR + PR rate compared with CYC (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.88, P = 0.003). Moreover, RTX might be less effective in inducing CR + PR than CYC treatment in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody levels (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.94, P = 0.02). The occurrences of CRs, relapse rates, immunologic response rates, and SAE were not significantly different between RTX and CYC, respectively. In conclusion, although the long-term efficacy and safety of CYC compared to RTX were comparable, CYC might respond faster and be more advantageous in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody titers.
Assuntos
Glomerulonefrite Membranosa , Adulto , Humanos , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , PacientesRESUMO
Central venous catheterization is a necessary and common method of building the circulation pathways of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Venous rupture is a severe and fatal complication of central venous catheterization. We herein present a case of slowly occurring venous rupture after reinsertion of a left internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter. A man in his early 70s was hospitalized with end-stage kidney disease. We inserted a hemodialysis catheter through the left IJV. A short section of the patient's catheter slipped out 1 month later. The original catheter was reinserted at its primary position without a guidewire. The patient reported chest pain and developed hypotension during dialysis the next day. He underwent femoral venous catheter insertion and heparin-free dialysis. The patient finally recovered and underwent regular hemodialysis using an arteriovenous fistula in the left forearm. This is the first reported case of venous laceration after repeated left IJV catheterization. Left IJV catheterization is associated with high rates of complications and should be closely monitored with the help of radiography during and after the operation. Central venous catheters should be carefully placed with clear knowledge of their direction and location to prevent serious complications.