Long-term outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and negative programmed ventricular stimulation followed with implantable loop recorders: Impact of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Programed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a risk stratification tool in patients at risk for adverse arrhythmia outcomes. Patients with negative PVS may yet be at risk for adverse arrhythmia-related events, particularly in the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of real-world patients with symptomatic VA without indication for device therapy and negative PVS, and to examine the role of cardiac scaring on arrhythmia recurrence. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic VA, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR), and negative PVS testing were included. All patients underwent placement of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Survival analysis was performed to investigate the impact of LGE-CMR findings on survival free from adverse arrhythmic events. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included (age 60 ± 14 years, women n = 36 (46%), ejection fraction 57 ± 9%, cardiomyopathy n = 26 (33%), mitral valve prolapse [MVP] n = 9 (12%), positive LGE-CMR scar n = 49 (62%), history of syncope n = 23 (29%)) including patients with primarily premature ventricular contractions (n = 21) or nonsustained VA (n = 57). Patients were followed for 1.6 ± 1.5 years during which 14 patients (18%) experienced VA requiring treatment (n = 14) or syncope due to bradycardia (n = 2). Four/9 patients (44%) with MVP experienced VA (n = 3) or syncope (n = 1). Baseline characteristics between those with and without adverse events were similar (p > 0.05); however, the presence of cardiac scar on LGE-CMR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio: 5.6 95% confidence interval: [1.2-27], p = 0.03, log-rank p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort with long-term follow-up, adverse arrhythmic outcomes occurred in 18% of patients with symptomatic VA despite negative PVS, and this risk was significantly greater in patients with positive DE-CMR scar. Long term-monitoring, including the use of ICM, may be appropriate in these patients.

Incidental left atrial appendage isolation after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and long-term risk of thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation may occur during radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aims to describe the mechanisms and long-term thromboembolic risk related to incidental LAA isolation. METHODS: Patients who experienced incidental LAA isolation after AF ablation were included. Culprit sites where ablation resulted in LAA isolation were identified. Thromboembolic risk despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) was compared to that in a propensity-matched control group without LAA isolation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with LAA isolation, and 82 matched patients without LAA isolation were included. The patient age, ejection fraction, LA diameter, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were 64 ± 11 years, 55 ± 12%, 45.0 ± 7 mm and 2.62 ± 1.5, respectively. Culprit sites included the LAA base, mitral isthmus, inferior LA, Bachmann's bundle, coronary sinus, and Marshall vein. After 4.2 ± 3.6 years follow-up, thromboembolism occurred in 7 of 41 patients (17%) with LAA isolation versus 3 of 82 patients (4%) without isolation (log rank p < .009, HR 5.14, 95% CI [1.32-19.94], p = .02). Patients with and without thromboembolism had similar CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores (2.65 ± 1.3 vs. 2.71 ± 0.76, p = .89). Thromboembolism occurred during noncompliance with or temporary discontinuation of OAC in four of the seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental LAA isolation may occur during ablation of atrial arrhythmias in the vicinity of, or even at sites remote from the appendage. Patients with incidental LAA isolation had higher rates of thromboembolism compared to patients without isolation. Since thromboembolism may occur despite prescription for OAC, the risks of LAA isolation must be weighed against clinical benefit and appendage occlusion devices should be considered in vulnerable patients.

Anatomical location of leadless pacemaker and the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if the location of implantation of the leadless pacemaker (LP) makes a difference in the incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PICM based on the location of implantation of LP. METHODS: A total of 358 consecutive patients [women: 171 (48%), mean age: 73 ± 15 years] with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) > 50%, who received an LP (Micra) between January 2017 and June 2022, formed the study cohort. Micra-AV and Micra-VR were implanted in 122 (34%) and 236 (66%) patients, respectively. Fluoroscopically, the location of implantation of LP in the interventricular septum (IS) was divided into two equal halves (apex/apical septum [AS] and mid/high septum [HS]). During follow-up, PICM was defined as an EF drop of ≥10%. RESULTS: LP was implanted in 109 (34%) and 249 (66%) patients at AS and HS locations, respectively. During a mean 18 ± 8 months follow-up, 28 patients (7.8%) developed PICM. Among the 249 patients with HS placement of LP, 10 (4%) developed PICM, whereas among the 109 patients with AS placement of LP, 18 (16.5%) developed PICM (p = .002). AS location was associated with a higher risk of PICM compared to HS locations (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.42, p < .001). CONCLUSION: AS location of LP was associated with a higher risk of PICM compared to HS placement. Larger randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Electrophysiological characteristics and long-term outcome of substrate-based catheter ablation for left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia targeting fragmented antegrade Purkinje potentials during sinus rhythm.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics and long-term outcome of patients undergoing substrate-based ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) guided by targeting of fragmented antegrade Purkinje potentials (FAPs) during sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study retrospectively analysed 50 consecutive patients referred for ablation. Substrate mapping during sinus rhythm was performed to identify the FAP that was targeted by ablation. FAPs were recorded in 48 of 50 (96%) patients during sinus rhythm. The distribution of FAPs was located at the proximal segment of posterior septal left ventricle (LV) in two (4.2%) patients, middle segment in 33 (68.8%) patients, and distal segment in 13 (27.1%) patients. In 32 of 48 (66.7%) patients, the FAP displayed a continuous multicomponent fragmented electrogram, while a fragmented, split, and uncoupled electrogram was recorded in 16 (33.3%) patients. Entrainment attempts at FAP region were performed successfully in seven patients, demonstrating concealed fusion and the critical isthmus of LPF-VT. Catheter ablation targeting at the FAPs successfully terminated the LPF-VT in all 48 patients in whom they were seen. Left posterior fascicular (LPF) block occurred in four (8%) patients after ablation. During a median follow-up period of 61.2 ± 16.8 months, 47 of 50 (94%) patients remained free from recurrent LPF-VT. CONCLUSION: Ablation of LPF-VT targeting FAP during sinus rhythm results in excellent long-term clinical outcome. FAPs were commonly located at the middle segment of posterior septal LV. Region with FAPs during sinus rhythm was predictive of critical site for re-entry.

Catheter ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes: a multicentre study.

AIMS: Ablation of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias may be limited by a deep intramural location of the arrhythmogenic source. This study evaluates the acute and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter series included patients with structurally normal heart or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and intramural outflow tract PVCs defined by: (a) ≥ 2 of the following criteria: (1) earliest endocardial or epicardial activation < 20ms pre-QRS; (2) Similar activation in different chambers; (3) no/transient PVC suppression with ablation at earliest endocardial/epicardial site; or (b) earliest ventricular activation recorded in a septal coronary vein. Ninety-two patients were included, with a mean PVC burden of 21.5±10.9%. Twenty-six patients had had previous ablations. All PVCs had inferior axis, with LBBB pattern in 68%. In 29 patients (32%) direct mapping of the intramural septum was performed using an insulated wire or multielectrode catheter, and in 13 of these cases the earliest activation was recorded within a septal vein. Most patients required special ablation techniques (one or more), including sequential unipolar ablation in 73%, low-ionic irrigation in 26%, bipolar ablation in 15% and ethanol ablation in 1%. Acute PVC suppression was achieved in 75% of patients. Following the procedure, the PVC burden was reduced to 5.8±8.4%. The mean follow-up was 15±14 months and 16 patients underwent a repeat ablation. CONCLUSION: Ablation of intramural PVCs is challenging; acute arrhythmia elimination is achieved in 3/4 patients, and non-conventional approaches are often necessary for success.

Comparison of strategies for catheter ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS: Traditional ablation strategies including targeting the earliest Purkinje potential (PP) during left posterior fascicular (LPF) ventricular tachycardia (VT) or linear ablation at the middle segment of LPF during sinus rhythm are commonly used for the treatment of LPF-VT. Catheter ablation for LPF-VT targeting fragmented antegrade Purkinje (FAP) potential during sinus rhythm is a novel approach. We aimed to compare safety and efficacy of different ablation strategies (FAP ablation vs. traditional ablation) for the treatment of LPF-VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with electrocardiographically documented LPF-VT referred for catheter ablation received either FAP ablation approach or traditional ablation approach. Electrophysiological characteristics, procedural complications, and long-term clinical outcome were assessed. A total of 189 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were included. Fragmented antegrade Purkinje ablation was attempted in 95 patients, and traditional ablation was attempted in 94 patients. Acute ablation success with elimination of LPF-VT was achieved in all patients. Left posterior fascicular block occurred in 11 of 95 (11.6%) patients in the FAP group compared with 75 of 94 (79.8%) patients in the traditional group (P < 0.001). Fragmented antegrade Purkinje ablation was associated with significant shorter procedure time (94 ± 26 vs. 117 ± 23 min, P = 0.03) and fewer radiofrequency energy applications (4.1 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.5, P = 0.003) compared with the traditional group. One complete atrioventricular block and one left bundle branch block were seen in the traditional group. Over mean follow-up of 65 months, 89 (93.7%) patients in the FAP group and 81 (86.2%) patients in the traditional group remained free of recurrent VT off antiarrhythmic drugs (P = 0.157). CONCLUSION: Left posterior fascicular-ventricular tachycardia ablation utilizing FAP and traditional ablation approaches resulted in similar acute and long-term procedural outcomes. Serious His-Purkinje injury did occur infrequently during traditional ablation. The use of FAP ablation approach was associated with shorter procedure time and fewer radiofrequency energy applications, especially for non-inducible patients.

Prognostic Value of Nonischemic Ringlike Left Ventricular Scar in Patients With Apparently Idiopathic Nonsustained Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) scar on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance has been correlated with life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with apparently idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We investigated the prognostic significance of a specific LV-LGE phenotype characterized by a ringlike pattern of fibrosis. METHODS: A total of 686 patients with apparently idiopathic nonsustained VA underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. A ringlike pattern of LV scar was defined as LV subepicardial/midmyocardial LGE involving at least 3 contiguous segments in the same short-axis slice. The end point of the study was time to the composite outcome of all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest because of ventricular fibrillation or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (4%) had a ringlike pattern of scar (group A), 78 (11%) had a non-ringlike pattern (group B), and 580 (85%) had normal cardiac magnetic resonance with no LGE (group C). Group A patients were younger compared with groups B and C (median age, 40 vs 52 vs 45 years; P<0.01), more frequently men (96% vs 82% vs 55%; P<0.01), with a higher prevalence of family history of sudden cardiac death or cardiomyopathy (39% vs 14% vs 6%; P<0.01) and more frequent history of unexplained syncope (18% vs 9% vs 3%; P<0.01). All patients in group A showed VA with a right bundle-branch block morphology versus 69% in group B and 21% in group C (P<0.01). Multifocal VAs were observed in 46% of group A patients compared with 26% of group B and 4% of group C (P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 34-84 months), the composite outcome occurred in 14 patients (50.0%) in group A versus 15 (19.0%) in group B and 2 (0.3%) in group C (P<0.01). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of LGE with ringlike pattern remained independently associated with increased risk of the composite end point (hazard ratio, 68.98 [95% CI, 14.67-324.39], P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with apparently idiopathic nonsustained VA, nonischemic LV scar with a ringlike pattern is associated with malignant arrhythmic events.

Anatomy of the proximal septal vein in patients with focal intramural ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Focal ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the intramural myocardium of the basal septum are difficult to localize and ablate. Proximal septal veins emptying into the great cardiac vein can reach close to the origin of intramural arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: To assess characteristics of proximal septal coronary veins in patients with intramural VAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 84 consecutive patients with intramural VAs, 29 patients (age 60 ± 11years, 16 males, ejection fraction 47 ± 13%) underwent preprocedural cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA). In 14 of these patients, the intramural site of origin (SOO) was identified with multipolar catheters. The intramural SOO could not be accessed with mapping catheters in the other 15 patients while mapping the coronary venous system. The CTA identified sizable proximal septal veins in all patients in whom the SOO could be accessed with mapping catheters. In the patients in whom the intramural SOO was not identified, the proximal septal veins were often either small (<2 mm at the branching site) or non-existent (n = 9, p = .001). The proximal septal veins in patients in whom the SOO was identified were larger than in the patients in whom the SOO could not be identified (3.0 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.1 ± 0.9 mm, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural imaging with CTAs can be beneficial in identifying the anatomy of proximal septal coronary veins that allow adequate mapping of patients with suspected intramural VAs.

Intramural mapping of intramural septal ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Intramural ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can originate in patients with or without structural heart disease. Electrogram (EGM) recordings from intramural sources of VA have not been described thoroughly. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the presence of scar may be linked to the site of origin (SOO) of focal, intramural VAs. METHODS: In a series of 21 patients (age: 55 ± 11 years, 12 women, mean ejection fraction 43 ± 14%) in whom the SOO of intramural VAs was identified, we analyzed bipolar EGM characteristics at the SOO and compared the findings with the endocardial breakout site. The patients were from a pool of 86 patients with intramural VAs referred for ablation. RESULTS: In 16/21 patients intramural scarring was detected by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging In patients in whom the intramural SOO was reached, intramural bipolar EGMs showed a lower voltage and had broader EGMs compared to the endocardial breakout sites (0.97 ± 0.56 vs. 2.28 ± 0.15 mV, p = .001; and 122.3 ± 31.6 vs. 96.5 ± 26.3 ms, p < .01). All intramural sampled sites at the SOO had either low voltage or broad abnormal EGMs. The activation time was significantly earlier at the intramural SOO than at breakout sites (-36.2 ± 11.8 vs. -23.2 ± 9.1 ms, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Sites of origin of intramural VAs with scar by CMR display EGM characteristics of scarring, supporting that scar tissue localizes to the SOO of intramural outflow tract arrhythmias in some patients. Scarring identified by CMR may be helpful in planning ablation procedures in patients with suspected intramural VAs.

Association between biventricular pacing and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in the early post-operative period after left ventricular assist device implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) improve outcomes in heart failure patients. Early ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are common after LVAD and are associated with increased mortality. The association between left ventricular pacing (LVP) with CRT and VAs in the early post-LVAD period remains unclear. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients undergoing LVAD implantation from 1/2016 to 12/2019. Patients were divided into those with CRT and active LVP (CRT-LVP) immediately post-LVAD implant versus those without CRT-LVP. Implantable cardiac defibrillator electrograms were reviewed and early VAs were defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation occurring within 30 days of LVAD implantation. RESULTS: Of 186 included patients (mean age 53 years, 75% male, mean body mass index 28), 72 had CRT devices, 63 of whom had LV pacing enabled after LVAD implant (CRT-LVP group). Patients with CRT-LVP were more likely to have VA in the early postoperative period (21% vs. 4%; p = .0001). All 9 patients with CRT in whom LVP was disabled had no early VA. Among those with early VA, patients with CRT-LVP were more likely to have monomorphic VT (77% vs. 40%; p = .07). In multiple logistic regression, CRT-LVP pacing remained an independent predictor of early VA after adjustment for history of VA and AF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRT-LVP after LVAD implant had a higher incidence of early VA (specifically monomorphic VT). Epicardial LV pacing may be proarrhythmic in the early postoperative period after LVAD.

Cardiac Involvement and Arrhythmias Associated with Myotonic Dystrophy.

Myotonic dystrophy is an autosomal dominant genetic disease of nucleotide expansion resulting in neuromuscular disease with two distinct subtypes. There are significant systemic manifestations of this condition including progressive muscular decline, neurologic abnormalities, and cardiac disease. Given the higher prevalence of cardiac dysfunction compared to the general population, there is significant interest in early diagnosis and prevention of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Cardiac dysfunction has an origin in abnormal and unstable nucleotide repeats in the DMPK and CNBP genes which have downstream effects leading to an increased propensity for arrhythmias and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Current screening paradigms involve the use of routine screening electrocardiograms, ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors, and cardiac imaging to stratify risk and suggest further invasive evaluation. The most common cardiac abnormality is atrial arrhythmia, however there is significant mortality in this population from high-degree atrioventricular block and ventricular arrhythmia. In this review, we describe the cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy with an emphasis on arrhythmia which is the second most common cause of death in this population after respiratory failure.

The value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with ventricular noncompaction and ventricular arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) including premature ventricular complexes, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The value of imaging with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) and programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for risk stratification in patients with VA and LVNC is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DE-CMR and PVS are beneficial for risk stratification and whether CMR helps to identify VA target sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with LVNC undergoing ablation for VAs were included, all patients had preprocedure DE-CMR. A total of 23 patients (7 women, 46 ± 14 years, ejection fraction 35 ± 14) were included and followed for 2.9 ± 2.2 years. DE-CMR scar was present in 12/23 patients (52%). PVS was performed in 20/23 patients, 8/10 patients (80%) with scar were inducible for VT compared to 0/10 (0%) patients without scar (p < .001). VA target sites in patients with scarring were located adjacent to areas of scarring in all but 1 patient and ablation was successful in 15/23 patients (65%). Patients with scar had worse survival free of VT than those without scar (log rank p = .01) and patients with inducible VT had worse survival free of VT than those who were noninducible (log rank p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CMR defined scar in patients with LVNC was associated with inducible VT and worse outcomes. Inducibility for VT was associated with VT recurrence. Furthermore, CMR is beneficial in localizing the arrhythmogenic substrate in LVNC and therefore can aid in procedural planning.

Efficacy and tolerability of quinidine as salvage therapy for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Quinidine is an effective therapy for a subset of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VF) syndromes; however, the efficacy of quinidine in scar-related monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2020 a single VT referral center, a total of 23 patients with MMVT and structural heart disease (age 66.7 ± 10.9, 20 males, 15 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, mean LVEF 22.2 ± 12.3%, 9 with left ventricular assist device [LVAD]) were treated with quinidine (14 quinidine gluconate; 996 ± 321 mg, 8 quinidine sulfate; 1062 ± 588 mg). Quinidine was used in combination with other antiarrhythmics (AAD) in 19 (13 also on amiodarone). All patients previously failed >1 AAD (amiodarone 100%, mexiletine 73%, sotalol 32%, other 32%) and eight had prior ablations (median of 1.5). Quinidine was initiated in the setting of VT storm despite AADs (6), inability to tolerate other AADs (4), or recurrent VT(12). Ventricular arrhythmias recurred despite quinidine in 13 (59%) patients at a median of 26 (4-240) days after quinidine initiation. In patients with recurrent MMVT, VT cycle length increased from 359 to 434 ms (p = .02). Six (27.3%) patients remained on quinidine at 1 year with recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in all. The following adverse effects were seen: gastrointestinal side effects (6), QT prolongation (2), rash (1), thrombocytopenia (1), neurologic side effects (1). One patient discontinued due to cost. CONCLUSION: Quinidine therapy has limited tolerability and long-term efficacy when used in the management of amiodarone-refractory scar-related MMVT.

Pacemaker malfunction? What is the mechanism?

Pacing artifacts on ECG are commonly encountered in clinical practice. We present a case of an external interference from a chronic retained abdominal generator leading to an ECG manifestation of atria lead malfunction. Careful attention to history and physical examination can identify sources of external pacemaker artifact.

How to perform left atrial transseptal access and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation from a superior approach.

The standard technique for percutaneous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves obtaining left atrial access and catheter manipulation from an inferior transfemoral venous access. However, in patients with inferior vena cava interruption, a standard transfemoral venous approach is not possible. In these cases, a percutaneous approach from a superior central vein, such as the internal jugular vein or the axillary/subclavian vein can be considered. In this article, we describe the details of our technique to obtain left atrial catheterization and perform catheter ablation of AF from a superior approach. Our technique involves the use of steerable sheaths, dedicated radiofrequency wires, and intracardiac echocardiography guidance.

Association of septal late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance with ventricular tachycardia ablation targets in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of septal substrate-associated ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is challenging. We sought to standardize the characterization of septal substrates on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and to examine the association of that substrate with VT exit and isthmus sites on invasive mapping. METHODS: LGE-CMR was performed before electroanatomic mapping and ablation for VT in 20 NICM patients. LGE extent and distribution were quantified using myocardial signal-intensity Z scores (SI-Z). The SI-Z thresholds correlating to previously validated voltage thresholds, for abnormal tissue and dense scar were defined. RESULTS: Bipolar and unipolar (electrogram) voltage amplitude measurements from the LV and RV were negatively associated with SI-Z from LGE-CMR imaging (p < .05). SI-Z thresholds for appropriate CMR identification of septal substrates were determined to be greater than -.15 for border zone and greater than .03 for a dense scar. Among all patients, 34 critical VT sites were identified with SI-Z distribution in the range of -.97 to .06. Thirty (88.2%) critical sites were located in the dense LGE, 1 (2.9%) in the border zone, and 3 (8.9%) in healthy tissue but within 7 mm of LGE. Of note, critical VT sites were all located at the basal septum close to valves (distance to aortic valve: 17.5 ± 31.2 mm, mitral valve: 21.2 ± 8.7 mm) in nonsarcoidosis cases. CONCLUSIONS: Critical sites of septal VT in NICM patients are predominantly in the CMR defined dense scar when using standardized signal-intensity thresholds.

Collateral injury of the conduction system during catheter ablation of septal substrate in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) little is known about the clinical impact of catheter ablation (CA) of septal ventricular tachycardia (VT) resulting in the collateral injury of the conduction system (CICS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-five consecutive patients with NICM underwent CA of septal VT. Outcomes in patients with no baseline conduction abnormalities who developed CICS (group 1, n = 28 [29%]) were compared to patients with no CICS (group 2, n = 17 [18%]) and to patients with preexisting conduction abnormalities or biventricular pacing (group 3, n = 50 [53%]). Group-1 patients were younger, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction and a lower prevalence of New York Heart Association III/IV class compared to group 3 while no significant differences were observed with group 2. After a median follow-up of 15 months, VT recurred in 14% of patients in group 1, 12% in group 2 (P = .94) and 32% in group 3 (P = .08) while death/transplant occurred in 14% of patients in group 1, 18% in group 2 (P = .69) and 28% in group 3 (P = .15). A worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (median LVEF variation, -5%) was observed in group 1 compared to group 2 (median LVEF variation, 0%; P < .01) but not group-3 patients (median LVEF variation, -4%; P = .08) with a consequent higher need for new biventricular pacing in group 1 (43%) compared to group 2 (12%; P = .03) and group 3 (16%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and septal substrate, sparing the abnormal substrate harboring the conduction system provides acceptable VT control while preventing a worsening of the systolic function.

Association of scar distribution with epicardial electrograms and surface ventricular tachycardia QRS duration in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: The association of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with epicardial and surface ventricular tachycardia (VT) electrogram features, in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), is unknown. We sought to define the association of LGE and viable wall thickness with epicardial electrogram features and exit site paced QRS duration in patients with NICM. METHODS: A total of 19 patients (age 53.5 ± 11.5 years) with NICM (ejection fraction 40.2 ± 13.2%) underwent CMR before VT ablation. LGE transmurality was quantified on CMR and coregistered with 2294 endocardial and 2724 epicardial map points. RESULTS: Both bipolar and unipolar voltage were associated with transmural signal intensity on CMR. Longer electrogram duration and fractionated potentials were associated with increased LGE transmurality, but late potentials or local abnormal ventricular activity were more prevalent in nontransmural versus transmural LGE regions (p < .05). Of all critical VT sites, 19% were located adjacent to regions with LGE but normal bipolar and unipolar voltage. Exit site QRS duration was affected by LGE transmurality and intramural scar location, but not by wall thickness, at the impulse origin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and VT, LGE is associated with epicardial electrogram features and may predict critical VT sites. Additionally, exit site QRS duration is affected by LGE transmurality and intramural location at the impulse origin or exit.

Can Anticoagulation Be Stopped After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the pros and cons of discontinuing oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), and data from relevant studies, and summarizes the most recent Expert Consensus recommendations on the topic. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with AF are at risk of cerebrovascular embolic events (CVEs) including stroke and transient ischemic attacks. OAT can be effective in preventing CVEs, while catheter ablation is an effective treatment to eliminate AF. Whether OAT can be safely discontinued after successful AF ablation remains a controversial topic. Retrospective studies have suggested that successful AF ablation may mitigate the risk of CVE such that OAT may be discontinued in select patients after AF ablation. In certain patients with AF who undergo successful AF ablation, OAT might be able to be safely discontinued with continued long-term rhythm monitoring.

Procedural findings and clinical outcome of second-generation cryoballoon ablation in patients with variant pulmonary vein anatomy.

INTRODUCTION: The procedural findings and clinical outcome of second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation in patients with variant pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy have not been fully investigated. METHODS: A total of 424 consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation with CB2 were included. Computed tomographic (CT) scan was performed in all patients before the procedure. The study population was divided into common PV, accessory PV, and nonvariant PV groups according to the CT scan. Procedural findings and clinical outcome between the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Variant PV anatomy was observed in 118 of 424 (27.8%) patients. PV isolation was successfully achieved in all patients in three groups with low rates of need for touch-up ablation (P = 0.974). Total procedure time was longer in the accessory PV group compared with nonvariant PV group (53.7 ± 12.9 vs 49.5 ± 8.8 minutes; P < 0.001). More number of applications per patient were required in accessory PV group compared with the nonvariant PV and common PV groups (7.5 ± 2.1 vs 6.5 ± 1.6, P < 0.001; 7.5 ± 2.1 vs 6.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.027, respectively). No significant difference in phrenic nerve (PN) injury was observed between the three groups (P = 0.693). During mean follow-up duration of 16.1 ± 3.3 months, there was no significant difference in rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences in the three groups (13 of 43 common PV group, 21 of 75 accessory PV group, and 80 of 306 nonvariant PV group, P = 0.178). CONCLUSION: Variant PV patterns are common in patients undergoing ablation for drug-resistant AF. CB2 ablation appears to be a reasonable strategy in the setting of the variant PV anatomy with a small increase in procedure time and the number of cryoapplications.