Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 97
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 26(4): 99-106, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353898

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: GERD after bariatric surgery is an ongoing concern for bariatric surgeons and their patients. This paper reviews the association of persistent or de novo GERD after multiple types of bariatric surgery, and focuses on the work up and management of GERD after SG. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent large, multicenter randomized clinical trials have shown stronger associations between SG and GERD compared to RYGB. A large group of internationally recognized bariatric surgeons collaborated on 72 consensus statements to help guide the bariatric community on the subject of redo surgeries after SG, including as it pertains to GERD. We present an algorithm that consolidates the best-practices recommendations of the work-up and management of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy, and mention areas of persistent controversy where future research is warranted.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
2.
Surg Endosc ; 37(6): 4812-4817, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36121502

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Myotomy is the gold standard treatment for achalasia, yet long-term failure rates approach 15%. Treatment options for recurrent dysphagia include pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic redo myotomy, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), or esophagectomy. We employ both PD and POEM as first-line treatment for these patients. We evaluated operative success and patient reported outcomes for patients who underwent PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after myotomy. METHODS: We identified patients with achalasia who underwent PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after previous myotomy within a foregut database at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Eckardt scores, and overall change in each were compared across PD and POEM groups. Successful treatment of dysphagia was defined by Eckardt scores ≤ 3. RESULTS: 103 patients underwent myotomy for achalasia. Of these, 19 (18%) had either PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia. Nine were treated with PD and 10 with POEM. The mean change in Eckardt and GERD-HRQL scores did not differ between groups. 50% of the PD group and 67% of the POEM group had resolution of their dysphagia symptoms (p = 0.65). Mean procedure length was greater in the POEM group (267 vs 72 min, p < 0.01) as was mean length of stay (1.56 vs 0.3 days, p < 0.01). There was one adverse event after PD and three adverse events after POEM. After PD, 7 patients (70%) required additional procedures compared to four patients (44%) in the POEM group, consisting mostly of repeat PD. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after myotomy have similar rates of dysphagia resolution and reflux symptoms. Patients undergoing PD enjoy a shorter length of stay and shorter procedure time but may require more subsequent procedures.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Acalasia Esofágica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Miotomia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Humanos , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/cirurgia , Dilatação/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(2): 781-806, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36529851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD. METHODS: Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m2) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss. CONCLUSION: Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Adulto , Humanos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Obesidade/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Surg Endosc ; 36(6): 3805-3810, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34459975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in surgical leadership have come under increased scrutiny, and in order to better understand why these disparities exist, it is important to study the disparities across surgical fellowship programs. METHODS: Data derived from the Fellowship Council (FC) database for fellows completing training from academic years 2015-2019 were analyzed. Available information included institution, fellowship type, program director (PD), associate program director (APD), faculty, and fellow names for all FC Fellowships. Faculty and fellow gender were determined from personal knowledge or publicly available online biographical information. RESULTS: A total of 1023 fellows and 221 programs were analyzed. The advanced gastrointestinal (GI)/minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship programs included 321 fellows, with a small increase in the percentage of female fellows from 28 to 31% over 5 years. Advanced GI/MIS/bariatric fellowship programs had a total of 262 fellows, also with a small increase in the percent of female fellows, from 29 to 38% in the study period. The gender of program directors, assistant program directors, and faculty for the fellowship programs studied were analyzed as well. Of the 221 programs in the Fellowship Council data, 13.6% of program directors, 18.3% of associate program directors, and 19.9% of faculty were female. Advanced GI/MIS fellowship programs had the lowest percentage of female PDs, with only 9.3% of the program directors being female. Colorectal surgery fellowships had the highest percentage of female PDs, with 33% being female. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, women are underrepresented in gastrointestinal surgery fellowships among both trainees and educators. It is likely that a significant contributing factor to this underrepresentation of female fellows is the underrepresentation of female program directors and faculty; although neither our study nor any previously published study has proven that statistically.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Bolsas de Estudo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Liderança , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
5.
Surg Endosc ; 36(1): 778-786, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are often present in patients with Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Whereas antireflux surgery (ARS) provides predictably excellent results in patients with typical GERD, those with atypical symptoms have variable outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize the response of LPR symptoms to antireflux surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent ARS between January 2009 and May 2020 were prospectively identified from a single institutional database. Patient-reported information on LPR symptoms was collected at standardized time points (preoperative and 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively) using a validated Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaire. Patients were grouped by preoperative RSI score: ≤ 13 (normal) and > 13 (abnormal). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using chi-square test or t-test. A mixed effects model was used to evaluate improvement in RSI scores. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (mean age 57.8 years, 70% female, mean BMI 29.4). Patients with a preoperative RSI ≤ 13 (n = 61) and RSI > 13 (n = 115) were similar in age, BMI, primary reason for evaluation, DeMeester score, presence of esophagitis, and hiatal hernia (p > 0.05). The RSI > 13 group had more female patients (80 vs 52%, p = < 0.001), higher mean GERD-HRQL score, lower rates of PPI use, and normal esophageal motility. The RSI of all patients improved from a mean preoperative value of 19.2 to 7.8 (2 weeks), 6.1 (8 weeks), and 10.9 (1 year). Those with the highest preoperative scores (RSI > 30) had the best response to ARS. When analyzing individual symptoms, the most likely to improve included heartburn, hoarseness, and choking. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, patients with LPR symptoms achieved a rapid and durable response to antireflux surgery. Those with higher preoperative RSI scores experienced the greatest improvement. Our data suggest that antireflux surgery is a viable treatment option for this patient population.


Assuntos
Esofagite Péptica , Hérnia Hiatal , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Humanos , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/etiologia , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Surg Res ; 264: 408-417, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most commonly performed elective operation in the United States, with over 800,000 cases annually. While clinical outcomes comparing laparoscopic versus open techniques have been well documented, there is little data comparing costs associated with these techniques. This study evaluates the cost of healthcare resources during the 90-d postoperative period following inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Adult patients with an ICD-9 or CPT code for inguinal hernia repair from 2012 to 2014 were included. Patients with continuous enrollment for 6 mo prior to surgery and 6 mo after surgery were analyzed. Related healthcare service costs (readmission and/or ER visit and/or outpatient visit) were calculated by clinical classification software and generalized linear modeling was used to compare healthcare utilization between groups. RESULTS: 124,582 cases were identified (open = 84,535; lap = 40,047). Index surgery cost was 41% higher in laparoscopic cases. The cost for readmission was close to $25,000 and similar between both groups, but the laparoscopic group were 12% less likely to be readmitted for surgical complications within 90-d when compared to the open group. Cost of bilateral laparoscopic repair is less than that of serial unilateral open repairs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair carries a higher index surgery cost than open repair. However, open repair has an increased rate of readmission. To maximize value, efforts should be directed at minimizing readmissions and improving identification of bilateral hernias at the time of initial presentation.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/economia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Surg Endosc ; 35(8): 4794-4804, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025250

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis (GP) is hallmarked by nausea, vomiting, and early satiety. While dietary and medical therapy are the mainstay of treatment, surgery has been used to palliate symptoms. Two established first-line surgical options are gastric electrostimulation (GES) and pyloric procedures (PP) including pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. We sought to compare these modalities' improvement in Gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) subscores and potential predictors of therapy failure. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery at a single institution were prospectively identified and separated by surgery: GES, PP, or combined GESPP. GCSI was collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 1 year. Postoperative GCSI score over 2.5 or receipt of another gastroparesis operation were considered treatment failures. Groups were compared using Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included: 18 GES, 51 PP, and 13 GESPP. Mean age was 44, BMI was 26.7, and 80% were female. Preoperative GCSI was 3.7. The PP group was older with more postsurgical gastroparesis. More patients with diabetes underwent GESPP. Preoperative symptom scores and gastric emptying were similar among all groups. All surgical therapies resulted in a significantly improved GCSI and nausea/vomiting subscore at 6 weeks and 1 year. Bloating improved initially, but relapsed in the GES and GESPP group. Satiety improved initially, but relapsed in the PP group. Fifty-nine (72%) had surgical success. Ten underwent additional surgery (7 crossed into the GESPP group, 3 underwent gastric resection). Treatment failures had higher preoperative GCSI, bloating, and satiety scores. Treatment failures and successes had similar preoperative gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Both gastric electrical stimulation and pyloric surgery are successful gastroparesis treatments, with durable improvement in nausea and vomiting. Choice of operation should be guided by patient characteristics and discussion of surgical risks and benefits. Combination GESPP does not appear to confer an advantage over GES or PP alone.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Gastroparesia , Piloromiotomia , Adulto , Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Esvaziamento Gástrico , Gastroparesia/etiologia , Gastroparesia/cirurgia , Humanos , Piloro/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5159-5166, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Typically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperative complications, such as emergency department visits and readmissions, with the utilization of phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety of a phone follow-up care pathway following elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who underwent elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2019 at a large academic health system in the Midwest United States were identified from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized by type of postoperative follow-up: in-person or phone follow-up. Baseline demographics, operative, and postoperative data were compared between follow-up groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate predictors of having any related emergency department (ED) visit/readmission/reoperation within 90 days. RESULTS: We included 2009 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair during the study period. 321 patients had in-person follow-up only, while 1,688 patients had phone follow-up. There was a higher rate of laparoscopic repair in the phone follow-up group (85.4% vs. 53.0% for in-person follow-up). There were no differences in rates of related 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations between the phone and in-person follow-up groups. On multivariable logistic regression, receipt of phone follow-up was not a predictor of having 90-day ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR 1.30, 95% CI [0.83, 2.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent phone follow-up had similarly low rates of adverse outcomes to those with in-person follow-up. Phone follow-up protocols may be implemented as an alternative for patients and provide a means to decrease healthcare utilization following inguinal hernia repair.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Seguimentos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Surg Endosc ; 35(8): 4444-4451, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909205

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of inguinal hernias is predominantly based on physical exam, although imaging may be used in select cases. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of unnecessary imaging used in the diagnosis of inguinal hernias. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair at a large academic health system in the U.S. from 2010 to 2017 were included. Within this cohort, we identified patients who received imaging 6 months prior to surgery. Through chart review of physical exam findings and imaging indications, we categorized patients into four imaging categories: unrelated, necessary, unnecessary, and borderline. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with receipt of unnecessary imaging. RESULTS: Of 2162 patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery, 249 patients had related imaging studies 6 months prior to surgery. 47.0% of patients received unnecessary imaging. 66.9% and 33.1% of unnecessary studies were ultrasounds and CT scans, respectively. 24.5% of patients had necessary studies, while 28.5% had studies with borderline indications. On multivariable analysis, having a BMI between 25.0 and 29.9 kg/m2 was associated with receipt of unnecessary studies. Primary care providers and ED physicians were more likely to order unnecessary imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 50% of all patients who receive any related imaging prior to surgery had potentially unnecessary diagnostic radiology studies. This not only exposes patients to avoidable risks, but also places a significant economic burden on patients and our already-strained health system.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Radiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Hérnia Inguinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Surg Endosc ; 34(1): 240-248, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While clinical outcomes have been reported for anti-reflux surgery (ARS), there are limited data on post-operative encounters, including readmission, and their associated costs. This study evaluates healthcare utilization during the 90-day post-operative period following ARS including fundoplication and/or paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the Truven Health MarketScan® Databases. Patients older than 16 years with an ICD-9 procedure code or Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for ARS and a primary diagnosis of GERD during 2012-2014 were selected. Healthcare spending and utilization on emergency department (ED) visits, performance of outpatient endoscopy, and readmission were examined. Reasons for readmission were classified based on ICD-9 code. RESULTS: A total of 40,853 patients were included in the cohort with a mean age of 49 years and females comprising 76.0%. Mean length of stay was 1.4 days, and 93.0% of patients underwent a laparoscopic approach. The mean cost of the index surgical admission was $24,034. Readmission occurred in 4.2% of patients, and of those, 26.3% required a surgical intervention. Patients requiring one or more related readmissions accrued additional costs of $29,513. Some of the most common reasons for readmission were related to nutritional, metabolic, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Presentation to the ED occurred in 14.0% of patients, and outpatient upper endoscopy was required in 1.5% of patients, but with much lower associated costs as compared to readmission ($1175). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing ARS do not require additional care within 90 days of surgery. Patients who are readmitted accrue costs that almost double the overall cost of care compared to the initial hospitalization. Measures to attenuate potentially preventable readmissions after ARS may reduce healthcare utilization in this patient population.


Assuntos
Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Fundoplicatura/economia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Hérnia Hiatal/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Surg Endosc ; 34(4): 1704-1711, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31292743

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heller myotomy (HM) has historically been considered the gold standard treatment for achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less-invasive procedure and offers a quicker recovery. Although some studies have compared short-term outcomes of HM and POEM, predictors of long-term dysphagia resolution remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes for achalasia patients who underwent either POEM or HM over a 9-year period. METHODS: Data from our single academic institutional foregut database were used to identify achalasia patients who underwent HM or POEM from 2009 to 2018. Electronic health record data were reviewed to obtain patient characteristics and operative data. Achalasia severity stages were established for each patient using esophagram findings from an attending radiologist blinded to the procedure type. Postoperative outcomes were assessed via telephone for patients with at least 9 months of follow-up using Eckardt dysphagia scores. Patient age, sex, type of operation, and duration of follow-up were included in a multivariable linear regression model with Eckardt score as the outcome. RESULTS: Our cohort included 141 patients (97 HM and 44 POEM). Eighty-two patients completed a phone survey at the 9 months or greater time interval (response rate = 58%). Mean Eckardt scores were 2.98 and 2.53 at a median follow-up of 3 years and 1 year for HM and POEM patients, respectively (an Eckardt score ≤ 3 is considered a successful myotomy). Lower stages of achalasia on esophagram (e.g., Stage 0 vs. Stage 4) were associated with greater dysphagia improvement. On multivariable analysis, operative approach was not associated with a statistically significant difference in dysphagia outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: POEM and HM were associated with similar rates of dysphagia resolution for achalasia patients at a median of 2 years of follow-up. Both procedures appear to be durable options for achalasia treatment.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Miotomia de Heller/métodos , Piloromiotomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Acalasia Esofágica/complicações , Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Período Pós-Operatório , Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
J Surg Res ; 235: 52-57, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691837

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication is the gold standard operation for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It has been suggested that persistent postoperative dysphagia is increased following Nissen fundoplication compared to partial fundoplication. This study aimed to determine risk factors for persistent postoperative dysphagia, specifically examining the type of fundoplication. METHODS: Patients experiencing GERD symptoms who underwent laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet, or Dor fundoplication from 2009 to 2016 were identified from a single-institutional database. A dysphagia score was obtained as part of the GERD health-related quality of life questionnaire. Persistent dysphagia was defined as a difficulty swallowing score ≥1 (noticeable) on a scale from 0 to 5 at least 1 y postoperatively. Odds ratios of persistent dysphagia among those who underwent antireflux surgery were calculated in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for fundoplication type, sex, age, body mass index, and redo operation. RESULTS: Of the 441 patients who met inclusion criteria, 255 had ≥1 y of follow-up (57.8%). The median duration of follow-up was 3 y. In this cohort, 45.1% of patients underwent Nissen fundoplication and 54.9% underwent partial fundoplication. Persistent postoperative dysphagia was present in 25.9% (n = 66) of patients. On adjusted analysis, there was no statistically significant association between the type of fundoplication (Nissen versus partial) and the likelihood of postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent postoperative dysphagia after antireflux surgery occurred in approximately one-quarter of patients and did not differ by the type of fundoplication. These findings suggest that both Nissen and partial fundoplication are reasonable choices for an antireflux operation for properly selected patients.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/epidemiologia , Fundoplicatura/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
J Surg Res ; 242: 136-144, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31077945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative testing of anastomoses and staples lines is commonly performed to minimize the risk of postoperative leaks in bariatric surgery, but its impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the association between leak testing and 30-d postoperative leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study utilizing 2015-2016 data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Postoperative outcomes were compared using χ2 test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-d outcomes. RESULTS: We included 237,081 patients. Leak testing was performed on 73.0% and 92.1% of LSG and RYGB patients, respectively. LSG was associated with lower rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission than RYGB. On multivariable analysis, intraoperative leak testing was associated with increased rates of postoperative leak for LSG and RYGB (OR 1.48 and 1.90, respectively) and lower rates of bleed for LSG (OR 0.76). There were no significant associations between leak testing and rates of reoperation or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Use of intraoperative leak testing was not associated with improved outcomes for either LSG or RYGB. A prospective trial investigating leak testing is warranted to better elucidate its impact.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/efeitos adversos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Surg Endosc ; 32(1): 217-224, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643054

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have significant benefits when compared to open inguinal hernia repair, yet remains underutilized in the United States. The traditional model of short, hands-on, cognitive courses to enhance the adoption of new techniques fails to lead to significant levels of practice implementation for most surgeons. We hypothesized that a comprehensive program would facilitate the adoption of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP) for practicing surgeons. METHODS: A team of experts in simulation, coaching, and hernia care created a comprehensive training program to facilitate the adoption of TEP. Three surgeons who routinely performed open inguinal hernia repair with greater than 50 cases annually were recruited to participate in the program. Coaches were selected based on their procedural expertise and underwent formal training in surgical coaching. Participants were required to evaluate all aspects of the educational program and were surveyed out to one year following completion of the program to assess for sustained adoption of TEP. RESULTS: All three participants successfully completed the first three steps of the seven-step program. Two participants completed the full course, while the third dropped out of the program due to time constraints and low case volume. Participant surgeons rated Orientation (4.7/5), GlovesOn training (5/5), and Preceptored Cases (5/5) as highly important training activities that contributed to advancing their knowledge and technical performance of the TEP procedure. At one year, both participants were performing TEPs for "most of their cases" and were confident in their ability to perform the procedure. The total cost of the program including all travel, personal coaching, and simulation was $8638.60 per participant. DISCUSSION: Our comprehensive educational program led to full and sustained adoption of TEP for those who completed the course. Time constraints, travel costs, and case volume are major considerations for successful completion; however, the program is feasible, acceptable, and affordable.


Assuntos
Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/educação , Laparoscopia/educação , Currículo , Educação Médica Continuada/economia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados Unidos
15.
Cancer ; 123(3): 410-419, 2017 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27680893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that esophagectomy is severely underused for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The recent expansion of endoscopic local therapies, advances in surgical techniques, and improved postoperative outcomes have changed the therapeutic landscape. The impact of these developments and evolving treatment guidelines on national practice patterns is unknown. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage 0 to III esophageal cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2013). The receipt of potentially curative surgical treatment over time was analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with surgical treatment. RESULTS: The analysis included 52,122 patients. From 2004 to 2013, the overall rate of potentially curative surgical treatment increased from 36.4% to 47.4% (P < .001). For stage 0 disease, the receipt of esophagectomy decreased from 23.8% to 17.9% (P < .001), whereas the use of local therapies increased from 34.3% to 58.8% (P < .001). The use of surgical treatment increased from 43.4% to 61.8% (P < .001), from 36.1% to 45.0% (P < .001), and from 30.8% to 38.6% (P < .001) for patients with stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, divergent practice patterns and adherence to national guidelines were noted between academic and community facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The use of potentially curative surgical treatment has increased for patients with stage 0 to III esophageal cancer. The expansion of local therapies has driven increased rates of surgical treatment for early-stage disease. Although the increased use of esophagectomy for more advanced disease is encouraging, significant variation persists at the patient and facility levels. Cancer 2017;123:410-419. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Endoscopia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
J Surg Res ; 218: 117-123, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985837

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective weight loss and comorbidity treatment among severely obese patients. However, there are limited data describing its impact on patient-reported quality of life (QoL). We examined patient-reported QoL after bariatric surgery and analyzed variables associated with higher postoperative QoL. METHODS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and weight loss data were obtained from our institutional database for patients who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2010 to December 2012. QoL scores were obtained during preoperative and postoperative visits (2, 6, 12, 24, 52, and 104 wk) from the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to generate odds ratios for variables hypothesized a priori to be associated with higher postoperative QoL. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were included in the study. Patients lost an average of 59.1% (±19.0) of excess body weight 1 y after surgery. One-year postoperative QoL scores were available for 42% of patients. Mean QoL scores improved from 0.82 preoperatively to 1.66 1 y postoperatively (P = 0.004). Patients scored higher in all individual areas of Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II: self-esteem (0.22 versus 0.36), physical activity (0.11 versus 0.31), social life (0.28 versus 0.36), work ability (0.07 versus 0.22), sexual functioning (0.04 versus 0.16), and approach to food (0.11 versus 0.26; all P values <0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher QoL was associated with private insurance/self-pay versus Medicare (odds ratio 4.20 [95% confidence interval 1.39-12.68]). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients experienced significant improvement in QoL 1 y after surgery. Identifying modifiable predictors of high QoL after bariatric surgery requires additional investigation.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Derivação Gástrica , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Surg Endosc ; 31(8): 3072-3077, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28664439

RESUMO

The Medicare program has transitioned to paying healthcare providers based on the quality of care delivered, not on the quantity. In May 2015, SAGES held its first ever Quality Summit. The goal of this meeting was to provide us with the information necessary to put together a strategic plan for our Society over the next 3-5 years, and to participate actively on a national level to help develop valid measures of quality of surgery. The transition to value-based medicine requires that providers are now measured and reimbursed based on the quality of services they provide rather than the quantity of patients in their care. As of 2014, quality measures must cover 3 of the 6 available National Quality domains. Physician quality reporting system measures are created via a vigorous process which is initiated by the proposal of the quality measure and subsequent validation. Commercial, non-profit, and governmental agencies have now been engaged in the measurement of hospital performance through structural measures, process measures, and increasingly with outcomes measures. This more recent focus on outcomes measures have been linked to hospital payments through the Value-Based Purchasing program. Outcomes measures of quality drive CMS' new program, MACRA, using two formats: Merit-based incentive programs and alternative payment models. But, the quality of information now available is highly variable and difficult for the average consumer to use. Quality metrics serve to guide efforts to improve performance and for consumer education. Professional organizations such as SAGES play a central role in defining the agenda for improving quality, outcomes, and safety. The mission of SAGES is to improve the quality of patient care through education, research, innovation, and leadership, principally in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery.


Assuntos
Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Aquisição Baseada em Valor , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Endoscopia , Cirurgia Geral , Hospitais , Humanos , Medicare , Médicos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
18.
World J Surg ; 41(8): 2143-2152, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28332057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colectomy is one of the most common major abdominal procedures performed in the USA. A better understanding of risk factors and the effect of operative approach on adverse postoperative outcomes may significantly improve quality of care. METHODS: Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of colon cancer undergoing colectomy were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2013-2015 targeted colectomy database. Patients were stratified into five groups based on specific operative approach. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the five groups and identify risk factors for 30-day anastomotic leak, readmission, and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 25,097 patients were included in the study, with a 3.32% anastomotic leak rate, 1.20% mortality rate, and 9.57% readmission rate. After adjusting for other factors, open surgery and conversion to open significantly increased the odds for leak, mortality, and readmission compared to laparoscopy. Additionally, smoking and chemotherapy increased the risk for leak and readmission, while total resection was associated with increased mortality and leak. CONCLUSIONS: Operative approach and several other potentially modifiable perioperative factors have a significant impact on risk for adverse postoperative outcomes following colectomy. To improve quality of care for these patients, efforts should be made to identify and minimize the influence of such risk factors.


Assuntos
Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 18(10): 53, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595155

RESUMO

While the asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) can be observed safely, surgery is indicated for symptomatic hernias. Laparoscopic repair is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality; however, it is associated with a higher rate of radiologic recurrence when compared with the open approach. Though a majority of patients experience good symptomatic relief from laparoscopic repair, strict adherence to good technique is critical to minimize recurrence. The fundamental steps of laparoscopic PEH repair include adequate mediastinal mobilization of the esophagus, tension-free approximation of the diaphragmatic crura, and gastric fundoplication. Collis gastroplasty, mesh reinforcement, use of relaxing incisions, and anterior gastropexy are just a few adjuncts to basic principles that can be utilized and have been widely studied in recent years. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of literature addressing key aspects and controversies regarding the optimal approach to repairing paraesophageal hernias laparoscopically.


Assuntos
Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Esôfago/patologia , Gastropexia/métodos , Hérnia Hiatal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Hiatal/etiologia , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Telas Cirúrgicas , Toracoscopia/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
20.
Surg Endosc ; 30(4): 1692-8, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is gaining increasing popularity in the treatment of esophageal cancer. In fact, while surgical and oncologic outcomes are not inferior to those achieved through a traditional open approach, patients undergoing MIE benefit from shorter length of stay, lesser pain and prompter recovery. This technique is, however, highly challenging, and the development of a MIE program, even in the setting of a tertiary center, requires time and progressive honing of surgical skills. METHODS: We use a minimally invasive Ivor Lewis approach. The abdominal phase of the procedure includes complete celiac lymphadenectomy and tubularization of the stomach, which will constitute the neo-esophagus. The video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery portion of the operation takes place in left lateral decubitus and allows for optimal thoracic lymphadenectomy and anastomosis. RESULTS: From October 2011 to January 2015, we treated 52 patients with the above-described procedure. The evolution of our anastomotic technique included a first group of circular stapled anastomosis with Orvil™ and 3.5-mm EEA™ (n = 16 patients), subsequently abandoned in favor of a linear anastomosis (n = 12), before going back to the Orvil™ coupled with 4.8-mm EEA™ (n = 22) in more recent times. There were also an additional two anastomoses that did not fall under any of these categories. We experienced two postoperative deaths. The overall leak rate was 14%, but fell down to 4% in the last group. Median LOS was 9 days. Lymph node retrieval was adequate throughout the whole series. CONCLUSIONS: Developing a MIE program requires a significant learning curve before the results plateau. Only once a technique of choice is refined and mastered, the advantages granted by MIE become apparent.


Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Estômago/cirurgia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA