Practical Evidence-Based Medicine at the Student-to-Physician Transition: Effectiveness of an Undergraduate Medical Education Capstone Course.

INTRODUCTION: Medical information is expanding at exponential rates. Practicing physicians must acquire skills to efficiently navigate large bodies of evidence to answer clinical questions daily. How best to prepare medical students to meet this challenge remains unknown. The authors sought to design, implement, and assess a pragmatic evidence-based medicine (EBM) course engaging students at the transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An elective course was offered during the required 1-month Capstone medical school curriculum. Participants included one hundred sixty-eight graduating fourth-year medical students at Emory University School of Medicine who completed the course from 2012 to 2018. Through interactive didactics, small groups, and independent work, students actively employed various electronic tools to navigate medical literature and engaged in structured critical appraisal of guidelines and meta-analyses to answer clinical questions. RESULTS: Assessment data was available for 161 of the 168 participants (95.8%). Pre- and post-assessments demonstrated students' significant improvement in perceived and demonstrated EBM knowledge and skills (p < 0.001), consistent across gender and specialty subgroups. DISCUSSION: The Capstone EBM course empowered graduating medical students to comfortably navigate electronic medical resources and accurately appraise summary literature. The objective improvement in knowledge, the perceived improvement in skill, and the subjective comments support this curricular approach to effectively prepare graduating students for pragmatic practice-based learning as resident physicians.

Teaching laboratory medicine to medical students: implementation and evaluation.

CONTEXT: Laboratory medicine is an integral component of patient care. Approximately 60% to 70% of medical decisions are based on laboratory results. Physicians in specialties that order the tests are teaching medical students laboratory medicine and test use with minimal input from laboratory scientists who implement and maintain the quality control for those tests. OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement, and evaluate a 1.5-day medical student clinical laboratory experience for fourth-year medical students in their last month of training. DESIGN: The experience was devised and directed by laboratory scientists and included a panel discussion, laboratory tours, case studies that focused on the goals and objectives recently published by the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists, and medical-student presentations highlighting salient points of the experience. The same knowledge quiz was administered at the beginning and end of the experience and 84 students took both quizzes. RESULTS: A score of 7 or more was obtained by 16 students (19%) on the initial quiz, whereas 34 (40%) obtained the same score on the final quiz; the improvement was found to be statistically significant (P  =  .002; t  =  3.215), particularly in 3 out of the 10 questions administered. CONCLUSIONS: Although the assessment can only measure a small amount of knowledge recently acquired, the improvement observed by fourth-year medical students devoting a short period to learning laboratory medicine principles was encouraging. This medical student clinical laboratory experience format allowed teaching of a select group of laboratory medicine principles in 1.5 days to an entire medical school class.