Landscape of germline pathogenic variants in patients with dual primary breast and lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer predisposition is most often studied in the context of single cancers. However, inherited cancer predispositions can also give rise to multiple primary cancers. Yet, there is a paucity of studies on genetic predisposition in multiple primary cancers, especially those outside of well-defined cancer predisposition syndromes. This study aimed to identify germline variants associated with dual primary cancers of the breast and lung. METHODS: Exome sequencing was performed on germline DNA from 55 Singapore patients (52 [95%] never-smokers) with dual primaries in the breast and lung, confirmed by histopathology. Using two large control cohorts: the local SG10K_Health (n = 9770) and gnomAD non-cancer East Asians (n = 9626); and two additional local case cohorts of early-onset or familial breast cancer (n = 290), and lung cancer (n = 209), variants were assessed for pathogenicity in accordance with ACMG/AMP guidelines. In particular, comparisons were made with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the ClinVar database, pathogenicity predictions were obtained from in silico prediction software, and case-control association analyses were performed. RESULTS: Altogether, we identified 19 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants from 16 genes, detected in 17 of 55 (31%) patients. Six of the 19 variants were identified using ClinVar, while 13 variants were classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic using ACMG/AMP guidelines. The 16 genes include well-known cancer predisposition genes such as BRCA2, TP53, and RAD51D; but also lesser known cancer genes EXT2, WWOX, GATA2, and GPC3. Most of these genes are involved in DNA damage repair, reaffirming the role of impaired DNA repair mechanisms in the development of multiple malignancies. These variants warrant further investigations in additional populations. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified both known and novel variants significantly enriched in patients with primary breast and lung malignancies, expanding the body of known cancer predisposition variants for both breast and lung cancer. These variants are mostly from genes involved in DNA repair, affirming the role of impaired DNA repair in the predisposition and development of multiple cancers.

International recommendations for plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA measurement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in resource-constrained settings: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to constrain health-care staff and resources worldwide, despite the availability of effective vaccines. Aerosol-generating procedures such as endoscopy, a common investigation tool for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, are recognised as a likely cause of SARS-CoV-2 spread in hospitals. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is considered the most accurate biomarker for the routine management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A consensus statement on whether plasma EBV DNA can minimise the need for or replace aerosol-generating procedures, imaging methods, and face-to-face consultations in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma is urgently needed amid the current pandemic and potentially for future highly contagious airborne diseases or natural disasters. We completed a modified Delphi consensus process of three rounds with 33 international experts in otorhinolaryngology or head and neck surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and clinical oncology with vast experience in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, representing 51 international professional societies and national clinical trial groups. These consensus recommendations aim to enhance consistency in clinical practice, reduce ambiguity in delivering care, and offer advice for clinicians worldwide who work in endemic and non-endemic regions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, in the context of COVID-19 and other airborne pandemics, and in future unexpected settings of severe resource constraints and insufficiency of personal protective equipment.

Experience from Asian centers in a named-patient-use program for afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who had progressed following prior therapies, including patients with uncommon EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated outcomes among patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated at Asian centers participating in the global named-patient-use (NPU) program for afatinib. METHODS: Patients had progressed after initial benefit with erlotinib or gefitinib, and/or had an EGFR or HER2 mutation, had no other treatment options, and were ineligible for afatinib trials. The recommended starting dose of afatinib was 50 mg/day. Dose modifications were allowed, and afatinib was continued as long as deemed beneficial. Response and survival information was provided voluntarily. Safety reporting was mandatory. RESULTS: 2242 patients (26% aged ≥ 70 years, 96% with adenocarcinoma) received afatinib at centers in 10 Asian countries. Most were heavily pre-treated, including prior treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib. Of 1281 patients tested, 1240 had EGFR mutations (common: 1034/1101; uncommon: 117/1101). There were no new safety signals, the most common adverse events being rash and diarrhea. Objective response rate (ORR) was 24% overall (n = 431 with data available), 27% for patients with common EGFR mutations (n = 230) and 28% for those with uncommon mutations (n = 32); median time to treatment failure (TTF) in these groups was 7.6 months (n = 1550), 6.4 months (n = 692) and 8.4 months (n = 83), respectively. In patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions (n = 23) and HER2 mutations (n = 12), median TTF exceeded 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcomes in this study were similar to those reported in the analysis of the global NPU. Afatinib achieved clinical benefits in patients with refractory NSCLC. ORR and TTF were similar between patients with tumors harboring uncommon and common EGFR mutations.

Influence of afatinib dose on outcomes of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib is an oral irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Dose dependent side effects can limit drug exposure, which may impact on extracranial and central nervous system (CNS) disease control. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 125 patients diagnosed with advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC treated with first-line afatinib at a tertiary Asian cancer center, exploring clinicopathological factors that may influence survival outcomes. Median progression free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of PFS between subgroups of patients was done using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Out of 125 patients, 62 (49.6%) started on 40 mg once daily (OD) afatinib, 61 (48.8%) on 30 mg OD and 1 (0.8%) on 20 mg OD. After median follow-up of 13.8 months from afatinib initiation, the observed response rate was 70.4% and median PFS 11.9 months (95% CI 10.3-19.3). 42 (33.6%) patients had baseline brain metastases (BM) and PFS of those who started on 40 mg OD (n = 17) vs. 30 mg OD (n = 25) was 13.3 months vs. 5.3 months (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.99). BM+ patients who started on 40 mg had similar PFS to patients with no BM (13.3 months vs. 15.0 months; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34-1.80). CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC with BM+, initiating patients on afatinib 40 mg OD was associated with improved PFS compared to 30 mg OD, underscoring the potential importance of dose intensity in control of CNS disease.

Correction to: Influence of afatinib dose on outcomes of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

ᅟ.

Matrisomics: Beyond the extracellular matrix for unveiling tumor microenvironment.

The matrisome, a group of proteins constituting or interacting with the extracellular matrix (ECM), has garnered attention as a potent regulator of cancer progression. An increasing number of studies have focused on cancer matrisome utilizing diverse -omics approaches. Here, we present diverse patterns of matrisomal populations within cancer tissues, exploring recent -omics studies spanning different '-omics' levels (epigenomics, genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics), as well as newly developed sequencing techniques such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics. Some matrisome genes showed uniform patterns of upregulated or downregulated expression across various cancers, while others displayed different expression patterns according to the cancer types. This matrisomal dysregulation in cancer was further examined according to their originating cell type and spatial location in the tumor tissue. Experimental studies were also collected to demonstrate the identified roles of matrisome genes during cancer progression. Interestingly, many studies on cancer matrisome have suggested matrisome genes as effective biomarkers in cancer research. Although the specific mechanisms and clinical applications of cancer matrisome have not yet been fully elucidated, recent techniques and analyses on cancer matrisomics have emphasized their biological importance in cancer progression and their clinical implications in deciding the efficacy of cancer treatment.

Magnetic augmentation through multi-gradient coupling enables direct and programmable profiling of circulating biomarkers.

Conventional magnetic biosensing technologies have reduced analytical capacity for magnetic field dimensionality and require extensive sample processing. To address these challenges, we spatially engineer 3D magnetic response gradients for direct and programmable molecular detection in native biofluids. Named magnetic augmentation through triple-gradient coupling for high-performance detection (MATCH), the technology comprises gradient-distributed magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated within responsive hydrogel pillars and suspended above a magnetic sensor array. This configuration enables multi-gradient matching to achieve optimal magnetic activation, response and transduction, respectively. Through focused activation by target biomarkers, the platform preferentially releases sensor-proximal nanoparticles, generating response gradients that complement the sensor's intrinsic detection capability. By implementing an upstream module that recognizes different biomarkers and releases universal activation molecules, the technology achieves programmable detection of various circulating biomarkers in native plasma. It bypasses conventional magnetic labeling, completes in <60 minutes and achieves sensitive detection (down to 10 RNA and 1000 protein copies). We apply the MATCH to measure RNAs and proteins directly in patient plasma, achieving accurate cancer classification.

High-Throughput Microfluidic Extraction of Platelet-free Plasma for MicroRNA and Extracellular Vesicle Analysis.

Cell-free RNAs and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are valuable biomarkers in liquid biopsies, but they are prone to preanalytical variabilities such as nonstandardized centrifugation or ex vivo blood degradation. Herein, we report a high-throughput and label-free inertial microfluidic device (ExoArc) for isolation of platelet-free plasma from blood for RNA and EV analysis. Unlike conventional inertial microfluidic devices widely used for cell sorting, a submicrometer size cutoff (500 nm) was achieved which completely removed all leukocytes, RBCs, platelets, and cellular debris based on differential lateral migration induced by Dean vortices. The single-step operation also reduced platelet-associated miRNAs (∼2-fold) compared to centrifugation. We clinically validated ExoArc for plasma miRNA profiling (39 samples) and identified a 7-miRNA panel that detects non-small cell lung cancer with ∼90% sensitivity. ExoArc was also coupled with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to isolate EVs within 50 min with ∼10-fold higher yield than ultracentrifugation. As a proof-of-concept for EV-based transcriptomics analysis, we performed miRNA analysis in healthy and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects (n = 3 per group) by coupling ExoArc and ExoArc+SEC with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay. Among 293 miRNAs detected, plasmas and EVs showed distinct differentially expressed miRNAs in T2DM subjects. We further demonstrated automated in-line EV sorting from low volume culture media for continuous EV monitoring. Overall, the developed ExoArc offers a convenient centrifugation-free workflow to automate plasma and EV isolation for point-of-care diagnostics and quality control in EV manufacturing.

Combinatorial Hypofractionated Radiotherapy and Pembrolizumab in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Objectives Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is an aggressive disease associated with poor outcomes and resistance to therapies. Our study aim was to evaluate the activity of a combinatorial regimen of sandwich sequencing of pembrolizumab immunotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT). Methods In this case series, patients with ATC received hypofractionated RT (QUAD-shot) and intravenous pembrolizumab 200mg every 3-4 weeks. Pembrolizumab was continued until disease progression or up till 24 months. Concurrent Lenvatinib treatment was allowed. Primary endpoint was best overall response (BOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, we performed immune profiling of circulating T cells in a responder to investigate the immune response to our combinatorial treatment. Results At median follow-up of 32.6 months (IQR: 26.4-38.8), of a cohort of 5 patients, BOR was 80%; with 2 complete responses (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR). Patients who achieved CR remained disease-free at last follow-up. Median PFS was 7.6 months (IQR: 6.2-NR), and 1-year PFS and overall survival rate was 40% (95% CI: 13.7-100) for both. Treatment was well-tolerated, with mostly grade 1-2 adverse events. Immune profiling of one partial responder revealed an increase in activated CD4 and CD8 T cells post-QUAD-shot RT, which was further enhanced during the maintenance phase of pembrolizumab. Conclusions Herein, we reported a case series of 5 patients with ATC, with 2 long-term survivors who were treated with surgical debulking followed by QUAD-shot RT and pembrolizumab, possibly due to synergy of local and systemic treatments in activating anti-tumour immunogenic cytotoxicity. This regimen warrants further investigation in a larger cohort of patients.

Diverse Resistant Mechanisms Identified Using Serial Next-Generation Sequencing in a Patient With ALK-Rearranged Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.

Both tissue and plasma-based next generation sequencing (NGS) facilitate the identification of actionable oncogene alterations at diagnosis and resistant mechanisms on progression. The value of longitudinal profiling is less established among patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, underpinned by concerns of limited treatment options post-progression and assay sensitivity. We report a case of a patient with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with serial tissue and plasma NGS performed post-progression, whose results helped to guide sequencing of treatment options leading to an overall survival exceeding 8 years from diagnosis of metastatic disease.

Circulating Biomarkers for Prediction of Immunotherapy Response in NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes the majority of the lung cancer population and the prognosis is poor. In recent years, immunotherapy has become the standard of care for advanced NSCLC patients as numerous trials demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are more efficacious than conventional chemotherapy. However, only a minority of NSCLC patients benefit from this treatment. Therefore, there is an unmet need for biomarkers that could accurately predict response to immunotherapy. Liquid biopsy allows repeated sampling of blood-based biomarkers in a non-invasive manner for the dynamic monitoring of treatment response. In this review, we summarize the efforts and progress made in the identification of circulating biomarkers that predict immunotherapy benefit for NSCLC patients. We also discuss the challenges with future implementation of circulating biomarkers into clinical practice.

Efficacy of Anti-PD1 Blockade in Treating Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-PD1 antibody has emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic option in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancers (RM-NPC). We aim to summarise existing evidence on the use of anti-PD1 antibodies in the treatment of these patients and compare its effectiveness with standard-of-care palliative chemotherapy. Our secondary aim is to explore potential combination therapies with anti-PD1 antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing the efficacy of various anti-PD1 antibodies in the treatment of RM-NPC (either as first or second line treatment) from inception to 2 September 2022. Meta-analyses were performed to correlate the various anti-PD1 antibodies with primary endpoints including overall response rate disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 1,887 patients met the inclusion criteria. The use of anti-PD1 antibody monotherapy as second-line treatment of RM-NPC revealed an ORR of 23 % (95 % CI = 19 %-28 %) and DCR of 51 % (95 % CI = 42 %-60 %). The ORRs for first-line as well as a combination of first and second-line treatments were 21 % (95 % CI = 15 % - 30 %) and 22 % (95 % CI = 6 % - 56 %, I2 = 75 %) respectively. The 12-month PFS and 12-month OS was also 27 % (95 % CI = 21 %-33 %) and 63 % (95 % CI = 53 %-72 %) respectively. ORR was much higher at 73 % (95 % CI = 32 %-94 %) when anti-PD1 antibodies were combined with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD1 antibody demonstrate considerable activity in previously treated RM-NPC patients. Combining anti-PD1 antibodies with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy enhanced the efficacy of treatment.

Molecular testing in non-small cell lung cancer: A consensus recommendation.

Introduction: Lung cancer remains an important cause of cancer-related mortality in Singapore, with a greater proportion of non-smokers diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the past 2 decades. The higher prevalence of targetable genomic alterations in lung cancer diagnosed in Singapore compared with countries in the West, as well as the expanding therapeutic landscape for NSCLC in the era of precision medicine, are both factors that underscore the importance of efficient and effective molecular profiling. Method: This article provides consensus recommendations for biomarker testing for early-stage to advanced NSCLC. These recommendations are made from a multidisciplinary group of lung cancer experts in Singapore with the aim of improving patient care and long-term outcomes. Results: The recommendations address the considerations in both the advanced and early-stage settings, and take into account challenges in the implementation of biomarker testing as well as the limitations of available data. Biomarker testing for both tumour tissue and liquid biopsy are discussed. Conclusion: This consensus statement discusses the approaches and challenges of integrating molecular testing into clinical practice for patients with early- to late-stage NSCLC, and provides practical recommendations for biomarker testing for NSCLC patients in Singapore.

A Phase 1b/2 Study of Alpelisib in Combination with Cetuximab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Alpelisib in combination with cetuximab showed synergistic anti-tumour activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) models. OBJECTIVES: The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined in a phase 1b dose-escalation study. Phase 2 evaluated anti-tumour activity with a randomised part in cetuximab-naïve patients and a non-randomised part in cetuximab-resistant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  Alpelisib was administered in 28 d cycles as whole tablets, suspension from crushed tablets or suspension from dispersible tablets in patients with platinum-resistant, recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. RESULTS: The RP2D determined for alpelisib was 300 mg/d. Alpelisib-cetuximab achieved an overall response rate of 25% and 9.9% and disease control rate of 75% and 43.7% in phase 1b and phase 2 studies, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) per central review was 86 d for combination treatment and 87 d for cetuximab monotherapy (unadjusted HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.69-1.82; P > 0.05). When adjusted for baseline covariates [sum of longest diameters from central data, haemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC), the results favoured combination treatment (adjusted HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.97; P = 0.039). PFS per investigator assessment resulted in an unadjusted HR of 0.76 (95% CI 0.49-1.19; P > 0.05) favouring combination treatment. The median PFS in cetuximab-resistant patients was 3.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of alpelisib to cetuximab did not demonstrate a PFS benefit in cetuximab-naïve patients with advanced HNSCC. The alpelisib-cetuximab combination showed moderate activity in cetuximab-resistant patients, with a consistent safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01602315; EudraCT 2011-006017-34.

Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade in recurrent/metastatic EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Single-agent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) activity in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is limited. Dual CPI shows increased activity in solid cancers. In this single-arm phase II trial (NCT03097939), 40 patients with recurrent/metastatic EBV-positive NPC who failed prior chemotherapy receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. Primary outcome of best overall response rate (BOR) and secondary outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], clinical benefit rate, adverse events, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival [OS]) are reported. The BOR is 38% with median PFS and OS of 5.3 and 19.5 months, respectively. This regimen is well-tolerated and treatment-related adverse events requiring discontinuation are low. Biomarker analysis shows no correlation of outcomes to PD-L1 expression or tumor mutation burden. While the BOR does not meet pre-planned estimates, patients with low plasma EBV-DNA titre (<7800 IU/ml) trend to better response and PFS. Deep immunophenotyping of pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies demonstrate early activation of the adaptive immune response, with T-cell cytotoxicity seen in responders prior to any clinically evident response. Immune-subpopulation profiling also identifies specific PD-1 and CTLA-4 expressing CD8 subpopulations that predict for response to combined immune checkpoint blockade in NPC.

Real world efficacy of osimertinib in second line/beyond in patients with metastatic EGFR+ non-small cell lung cancer and role of paired tumour-plasma T790M testing at tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance.

Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for use in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. We examined its performance in the second/subsequent line after resistance to first- and second-generation (1/2G) EGFR-TKI. Methods: We reviewed electronic records of 202 patients who received osimertinib from July 2015 to January 2019 in the second/subsequent line after progression on prior EGFR-TKI. Of these, complete data from 193 patients were available. Clinical data including patient characteristics, primary EGFR mutation, T790M mutation status, presence of baseline brain metastases (BM), first-line EGFR-TKI use, and survival outcomes were extracted, and results retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of 193 evaluable patients, 151 (78.2%) were T790M+ (T790M positive) with 96 (49.2%) tissue confirmed; 52% of patients received osimertinib in the second line setting. After median follow up of 37 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort was 10.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.64-11.50] months and median overall survival (OS) was 20 (95% CI: 15.61-23.13) months. Overall response rate (ORR) to osimertinib was 43% (95% CI: 35.9-50.3%); 48.3% in T790M+ vs. 20% in T790M- (T790M negative) patients. OS in T790M+ patients was 22.6 vs. 7.9 months in T790M- patients (HR 0.43, P=0.001), and PFS was 11.2 vs. 3.1 months respectively (HR 0.52, P=0.01). Tumour T790M+ was significantly associated with longer PFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.01) compared to tumour T790M- patients, however this association was not seen with plasma T790M+. Of the 22 patients with paired tumor/plasma T790M testing, response rate (RR) to osimertinib was 30% for those plasma T790M+/tumour T790M-, compared to 63% and 67% for those who were plasma T790M+/tumour T790M+ and plasma T790M-/tumour T790M+, respectively. By multivariable analysis (MVA), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.53, P<0.001) and PFS (HR 2.10, P<0.001), whereas presence of T790M+ was associated with longer OS (HR 0.50, P=0.008) and PFS (HR 0.57, P=0.027). Conclusions: This cohort demonstrated the efficacy of osimertinib in second line/beyond for EGFR+ (EGFR mutation-positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue T790M result appeared more predictive of osimertinib efficacy compared to plasma, highlighting potential T790M heterogeneity and the advantage with paired tumor-plasma T790M testing at TKI resistance. T790M- disease at resistance remains an unmet treatment need.

Dietary factors and the risk of lung cancer by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and histological subtypes.

Background: Previous studies have reported differential associations of certain dietary factors such as soy consumption by epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFR +) subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the other dietary factors including meat, fruits, and vegetables have differential risks on different histological and molecular subtypes of lung cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to evaluate these associations. Methods: A total of 3,170 cases and 4,238 controls from three different studies (Genes and Environment in Lung Cancer Study, Lung Cancer Consortium Singapore Study, and Multi-ethnic Cohort Study) were included. Information on demographics, lifestyle, and dietary consumption was obtained using questionnaires. Diet was assessed by using the number of standard servings of each item consumed per week. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between meat, vegetables, and fruits consumption with lung cancer risk after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: We identified a significant inverse association between higher consumption of fruits and the risk of lung cancer (2nd tertile: OR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.46-0.65; 3rd tertile: OR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.65-0.91), compared with the lower (1st tertile) consumption of fruits. Higher vegetable consumption was significantly associated with a lower risk of EGFR + lung cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54-0.88), however, this association was not significant among EGFR wild-type (-) lung cancer. Conversely, higher consumption of total meat (OR = 2.10, 95%CI = 1.58-2.79) was significantly associated with higher lung cancer risk, as compared with the lower consumption group. Conclusions: Differential associations between vegetable consumption with EGFR mutation status in NSCLC were found. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess this association and elucidate the biological mechanisms.