RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (ATs; deep brain stimulation [DBS] or pump therapies: continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion [CSAI], levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel [LCIG]) are used in later stages of Parkinson disease (PD). However, decreasing efficacy over time and/or side effects may require an AT change or combination in individual patients. Current knowledge about changing or combining ATs is limited to mostly retrospective and small-scale studies. The nationwide case collection Combinations of Advanced Therapies in PD assessed simultaneous or sequential AT combinations in Germany since 2005 to analyze their clinical outcome, their side effects, and the reasons for AT modifications. METHODS: Data were acquired retrospectively by modular questionnaires in 22 PD centers throughout Germany based on clinical records and comprised general information about the centers/patients, clinical (Mini-Mental Status Test/Montréal Cognitive Assessment, Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], side effects, reasons for AT modification), and therapeutical (ATs with specifications, oral medication) data. Data assessment started with initiation of the second AT. RESULTS: A total of 148 AT modifications in 116 patients were associated with significantly improved objective (median decrease of MDS-UPDRS Part III 4.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV 6.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV-off-time item 1.0 points [p < 0.001]) and subjective clinical outcome and decreasing side effect rates. Main reasons for an AT modification were insufficient symptom control and side effects of the previous therapy. Subgroup analyses suggest addition of DBS in AT patients with leading dyskinesia, addition of LCIG for leading other cardinal motor symptoms, and addition of LCIG or CSAI for dominant off-time. The most long-lasting therapy-until requiring a modification-was DBS. DISCUSSION: Changing or combining ATs may be beneficial when 1 AT is insufficient in efficacy or side effects. The outcome of an AT combination is comparable with the clinical benefit by introducing the first AT. The added AT should be chosen dependent on dominant clinical symptoms and adverse effects. Furthermore, prospective trials are needed to confirm the results of this exploratory case collection. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, in patients with PD, changing or combining ATs is associated with an improvement in the MDS-UPDRS or subjective symptom reporting.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Carbidopa/uso terapêutico , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Infusões Subcutâneas , Combinação de Medicamentos , Géis/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prehospital identification of stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), that should be immediately transported to a thrombectomy capable centre is an unsolved problem. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of a state-wide standard operating procedure (SOP) using the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) is feasible and enables correct triage of stroke patients to hospitals offering (comprehensive stroke centres, CSCs) or not offering (primary stroke centres, PSCs) thrombectomy. METHODS: Prospective study involving all patients with suspected acute stroke treated in a 4-month period in a state-wide network of all stroke-treating hospitals (eight PSCs and two CSCs). Primary endpoint was accuracy of the triage SOP in correctly transferring patients to CSCs or PSCs. Additional endpoints included the number of secondary transfers, the accuracy of the LAMS for detection of LVO, apart from stroke management metrics. RESULTS: In 1123 patients, use of a triage SOP based on the LAMS allowed triage decisions according to LVO status with a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 59.0-79.5%) and a specificity of 84.9% (95%-CI: 82.6-87.3%). This was more favourable than the conventional approach of transferring every patient to the nearest stroke-treating hospital, as determined by geocoding for each patient (sensitivity, 17.9% (95%-CI: 9.4-26.5%); specificity, 100% (95%-CI: 100-100%)). Secondary transfers were required for 14 of the 78 (17.9%) LVO patients. Regarding the score itself, LAMS detected LVO with a sensitivity of 67.5% (95%-CI: 57.1-78.0%) and a specificity of 83.5% (95%-CI: 81.0-86.0%). CONCLUSIONS: State-wide implementation of a triage SOP requesting use of the LAMS tool is feasible and improves triage decision-making in acute stroke regarding the most appropriate target hospital.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent pathological creatine kinase (CK) levels are associated with aggressive behavior in patients admitted to psychiatric facilities. It is based on the assumption that CK activity increases prior to a rise in motor activity and aggressive behavior. It should be noted that this assumption requires additional confirmation in more extended studies. METHOD: Over a period of 3 months, the CK levels of 317 psychiatric inpatients were assessed immediately following admission to a secure ward. During the course of the patients' stay (mean: approximately 11 days), their aggressive behavior was independently assessed using the Staff Observation Aggression Scale (SOAS-R). RESULTS: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis estimated an area under the curve (AUC) for subsequent aggressive behavior of 70.7% with a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 71.2%. When the variables involuntarily admission, lifetime history of aggression and absence of suicide attempts were also taken into account, the AUC was higher at 78.2%. CONCLUSION: Despite some methodological shortcomings in the collection of data, the study indicates that it could be useful to measure CK levels at the time of admission because elevated levels may indicate an increased risk of successive aggressive behavior for patients on secure psychiatric wards.
Assuntos
Agressão/fisiologia , Creatina Quinase/sangue , Transtornos Mentais/enzimologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medição de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute symptomatic seizures and epileptic disorders are frequent health problems of elderly patients. An early and reliable distinction of the seizure etiology is important to ensure adequate treatment, and to prevent unwarranted diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. METHODS: We review the current literature based on a MEDLINE search, describe age-related problems in detail, with particular attention to clinical practice, discuss possible criteria and potential pitfalls for diagnostics, and provide a compilation of etiologic factors for acute symptomatic seizures. RESULTS: The most common causes of acute symptomatic seizures - acute cerebrovascular disorders, metabolic disorders, traumatic brain injury, meningo-encephalitis, cerebral tumors, and withdrawal of alcohol and other central agents - are well-defined and seem to permit straightforward diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The current classification of seizures and epileptic syndromes apparently provides clear definitions. However, multiple age-related risk factors, as well as a reduced discriminatory power of clinical and technical diagnostic criteria can make the distinction difficult. CONCLUSION: Typical age-related problems are incomplete or missing medical history, dementia, oligosymptomatic seizures, inconclusive EEG and cerebral imaging results, multiple pathological findings and comorbidity with ambiguous significance, confounding sleep disorders, intake of proconvulsive drugs, and psychogenic seizures. All diagnostic and therapeutic decisions need to be based on an integrative and individual approach that includes diagnostic findings and risk factors, the intake of medications and other agents, and the social situation of the elderly patient.