The Top 100 Most-Cited Publications in Clinical Craniofacial Research.

INTRODUCTION: Craniosynostosis is a birth defect defined as premature closure of sutures leading to possible neurological deficits and cosmetic deformities. Most of the current literature to date focuses on craniosynostosis etiology by analyzing genetics. This paper is a bibliometric analysis of the most influential works related to the clinical management of craniosynostosis to help guide clinicians in their decision-making. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clarivate Web of Science database was used to identify the top 100 most-cited articles addressing the clinical management of craniosynostosis. A bibliometric review was performed to analyze publication metrics and track research trends. RESULTS: The 100 most-cited publications pertaining to craniosynostosis management were cited a cumulative 12,779 times. The highest cited article was Shillito and colleagues' "Craniosynostosis: A Review Of 519 Surgical Patients" with 352 citations. The oldest clinical craniosynostosis article dates back to 1948, and the most recent was published in 2016. The year with the most clinical-focused publications was 2011. The most prolific author was Renier, D. The United States produced 56 of the 100 articles. Most articles (n=52) were level 3 evidence. DISCUSSION: This bibliometric evaluation of craniosynostosis provides insight into the most impactful literature on this topic. The highest cited articles retrospectively analyze large sample sizes, outline proper evaluation, discuss intervention timelines, and highlight specific treatment plans for this birth defect. By filtering through existing literature, this analysis can guide clinicians on the management of craniosynostosis to maximize patient outcomes.

The Most Influential Publications Regarding Hair Transplantation: A Bibliometric Review.

INTRODUCTION: This bibliometric review aims to assess the impact of significant publications within the field of hair transplantation. Citation counts will serve as a primary influence indicator. METHODS: An exhaustive search was conducted using Clarivate's Web of Science database, yielding 260 publications related to hair transplantation. These were evaluated and sorted based on citations, narrowing down to the 50 most highly cited works for analysis. Parameters including citation density, authorship, institutional affiliations, country of origin, year of publication, article topic, and the level of evidence for each publication were obtained. RESULTS: Analyzed publications were cited a total of 1341 times. Authorship analysis revealed that the most significant contributors regarding hair transplantation were Bernstein and Rassman. We also identified the leading institutions affiliated with these works, highlighting the primary academic and research centers driving the field. Geographical analysis exhibited the US' dominance in producing impactful publications. Most publications were also classified within Level IV and Level V according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence system. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive snapshot of the pivotal publications shaping hair transplantation. Our findings underscore significant contributions within this field and may assist researchers and clinicians in understanding the evolution and the current state of the hair transplantation literature. This bibliometric analysis can serve as a roadmap for those seeking to delve into this rapidly evolving field, facilitating the identification of research gaps and formulating future research directions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Impact of Florida Law HB21 on Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Outpatient Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Florida lae House Bill 21 (HB21) on opioid prescribing patterns by a single orthopedic hand surgeon after outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery. METHODS: The following variables were evaluated with retrospective chart review before and after implementation of HB21: type of opioid, number of pills, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), emergency department visits, and readmissions. In addition, the Florida Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (E-FORCSE [Electronic-Florida Online Reporting of Controlled Substance Evaluation]) was queried to determine the number of pills and MMEs prescribed and sold for the latter cohort. Student t tests, Fisher exact tests, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: We reviewed 231 consecutive patients who underwent hand or upper extremity surgery from July 2017 to July 2018 and 207 consecutive patients from January 2020 to January 2021. The average age was significantly different between the cohorts (48.41 vs 44.98 years, P = .025); however, there were no significant differences across other demographic variables. After controlling for age, the average number of pills prescribed per patient decreased significantly after HB21 (25.11 vs 21.6 pills, P < .001). The number of MMEs prescribed per patient decreased as well, but the decrease was not statistically significant (167.8 vs 154.1 MMEs, P = .054). There was an association between preoperative opioid prescriptions filled and prolonged opioid use (odds ratio 6.438, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Florida law HB21 resulted in significantly fewer pills prescribed per patient, suggesting that legislation likely changed prescriber behavior and/or patient demand regarding postoperative opioid prescriptions after outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery.

Analysis of Questions in Sections of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to assess all available studies that analyzed the types of questions in individual sections of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination, which may be used as a reference for residents studying for their examination. METHODS: Following the Providing Innovative Service Models and Assessment extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a systematic review was conducted on studies that report on sections or question categories of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers and an arbitrator reviewed and extracted relevant data from 20 included studies which made up the systematic review. RESULTS: All 20 studies in the review reported the mean number of questions per section, with the highest coming from musculoskeletal trauma (18.9% to 19.0%). 18 studies reported the Buckwalter taxonomic classification; 42.0% of questions were T1, 18.2% were T2, and 39.5% were T3 with a wide range from section to section. Primary sources were nearly three times more likely to be cited when compared with textbook sources. There were 12 journals that were commonly cited with the most being the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume (17/18). DISCUSSION: This study accurately portrays the characteristics of each section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination over the past 10 years. These data suggest that orthopaedic residents may be inclined to focus on musculoskeletal trauma, topics related to clinical management, and primary journal sources for studying. In addition, residency programs may choose to focus on higher yield sources or material to prepare their residents for the examination.

The Most Influential Publications in Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Total joint replacements are some of the most common procedures performed by surgeons. There has been a recent increase to transition these procedures to the outpatient setting. Objective: Our study seeks to identify the most influential publications, in terms of total citations, regarding outpatient total hip and knee replacement surgeries. Methods: The database used to collect the data for this analysis was Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. The search query selected and used to collect data was: "outpatient or ambulatory," with a "Title" filter AND "total joint replacement" AND "total joint arthroplast*" with "Topic" filters. The papers returned were then sorted by total number of citations and exported to Google Sheets for further analysis. Results: The most cited publication was "Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique," by Berger et al.. This was the oldest publication analyzed (2005), the most recent publication being published in 2020. The publications analyzed were cited a total number of 1,774 times and averaged 35.5 citations per year. The Journal with the most attributable publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty. Conclusion: This study provides a measure of the most cited articles on outpatient arthroplasty. Most literature on the topic were categorized as Clinical Science and Outcomes (50%), comprised level of evidence III (28%), were published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (54%) and came out of the United States (76%). Knowledge of these most influential articles allows for a foundation of understanding on a rapidly growing area of arthroplasty among clinicians.

Characteristics and trends of the most cited papers in robotic assisted arthroplasty.

Purpose: To compile and analyze the top 50 most frequently cited articles published on robotic-assisted arthroplasty, allowing clinicians to effectively identify the most influential literature pertaining to this topic. Methods: Guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews were used as the foundation for data collection and analysis. All papers pertaining to robotic-assisted arthroplasty were retrieved using the Scopus database. Data including: manuscript title, authors, total citation count, level of evidence, journal, publication year, and country of publication was extracted from a final list of articles. Results: The top 50 publications regarding robotic assisted arthroplasty were cited a total of 4530 times (including self-citations), with an average total of 91. The years with the most publications in the top 50 were: 2017, 2018, and 2019, producing 7, 6, and 5 papers, respectively. Only 4 papers in the top 50 were published prior to the year 2003. The most common level of evidence was level V, and the most common category was Clinical Outcomes (74%). The United States contributed half of the 50 articles, and Princess Grace Hospital and University of London were the most contributory institutions, each with 6 of the top 50 articles. Conclusion: This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the most cited and influential papers in robotic-assisted arthroplasty. Understanding these trends in the literature will ultimately pave the way for physicians and researchers to continue to innovate and research in a targeted manner as they gain an understanding of what has been studied and what remains inadequately explored. Level of evidence: 3.

Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Articles.

Purpose: To compile and analyze the top 50 most frequently cited articles published in the Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy journal. Methods: Guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews were used as the foundation for data collection and analysis. Scopus database was used to acquire the metric analyzed in the study. Once collected, the data was exported to an excel sheet in order to be organized, sorted, and analyzed in accordance with the metrics of interest. Results: The United States was the most contributory nation with 14 publications, followed by Sweden with13 publications and Germany with eight publications. The most contributory institution was Umeå University in Vasterbottens, Sweden (8) followed by National Institute for Working Life in Stockholm, Sweden (7) and The University of Pittsburgh (5). Most publications were either Level II (19) or Level III (19) in terms of Level of Evidence. There was only one publication that was classified as a Level I paper. Conclusion: The Journal of Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, and Arthroscopy has published very influential research papers as noted by the number of citations amassed by its most popular articles. KSSTA's top cited publications hail largely from major European and United States institutions and are composed of high-quality reports of mostly Level 2 and Level 3 evidence classifications. Level of Evidence: 3.

Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Arthroplasty Articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Introduction: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) is one of most influential orthopaedic journals, with Total Joint Replacements (TJR) being a frequent topic. The importance of TJR research parallels it's high prevalence in American society. Objective: To compile and analyze the top 50 most frequently cited articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery regarding total joint reconstruction or arthroplasty. Methods: Guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews were used as the foundation for data collection and analysis. Scopus database was used to acquire the metric analyzed in the study. Data was then exported to an excel sheet for analysis. Results: The top 50 TJR publications analyzed for this study were cited a total of 35,850 times (including self-citations), with an average number of citations per article of 717. Kurtz and Neer II were the only authors contributing more than one. 38 of 50 articles analyzed met the criteria for Level II or III in terms of Level of Evidence (LOE). The United States contributed the most publications with a total of 34. Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital, with eight publications each, were the highest contributing institutions. Conclusion: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery has published very influential research papers as noted by the number of citations amassed by its most popular articles. JBJS's top cited publications hail largely from major institutions in the United States and are composed of high-quality reports of mostly Level 2 and Level 3 evidence classifications. Level of Evidence: 3.

Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research Articles.

Background: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research is one of the most influential and reputable scientific journals in the field of orthopaedics. Some of the most reputable publications related to orthopaedic research can be attributed to this journal and it continues to have a significant impact on modern research. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify the most influential articles, in terms of number of citations, published by Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. The goal of analyzing the most cited articles in is to create a baseline for future researchers to build upon and to uncover any trends in orthopaedic research. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines were used to structure the data collection and analysis of this study. The Scopus database was used to compile the publication data. Data was then exported to an excel sheet to be further analyzed via a multi-author review process. Results: The most cited article was "A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder" by Constant et al.. The 50 articles analyzed in this study were cited a total of 32,404 times, averaging 719 citations per year, per publication. The oldest article was published in 1971, and the newest in 2008. The United States was the country with the most attributable publications and The University of Florida was the most contributory institution. Conclusions: Our study recognizes Clinical Orthopaedics and Related research as having a strong predilection for older articles and a continued strength for modern publications.