Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence?

The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support in various clinical scenarios has been increasing consistently, despite the lack of sufficient evidence regarding its benefit and safety from adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Although the ARREST trial (Advanced Reperfusion Strategies for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation) and a secondary analysis of the PRAGUE OHCA trial (Prague Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) provided some evidence in favor of VA-ECMO in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the INCEPTION trial (Early Initiation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) has not found a relevant improvement of short-term mortality with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, the results of the recently published ECLS-SHOCK trial (Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock) and ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) discourage the routine use of VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Ongoing clinical trials (ANCHOR [Assessment of ECMO in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock, NCT04184635], REVERSE [Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock, NCT03431467], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO, NCT05577195], PIONEER [Hemodynamic Support With ECMO and IABP in Elective Complex High-risk PCI, NCT04045873]) may clarify the usefulness of VA-ECMO in specific patient subpopulations and the efficacy of combined mechanical circulatory support strategies. Pending further data to refine patient selection and management recommendations for VA-ECMO, it remains uncertain whether the present usage of this device improves outcomes.

Current Therapies and Future Horizons in Cardiac Amyloidosis Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a condition characterized by misfolding and extracellular deposition of proteins, leading to organ dysfunction. While numerous forms of CA exist, two subtypes dominate clinical prevalence: Transthyretin amyloid (ATTR) and immunoglobulin light chain amyloid. RECENT FINDINGS: The current scientific landscape reflects the urgency to advance therapeutic interventions with over 100 ongoing clinical trials. Heart failure treatment is affected by CA phenotype with poor tolerance of otherwise frequently used medications. Treating comorbidities including atrial fibrillation and valvular disease remains a challenge in CA, driven by technical difficulties and uncertain outcomes. Tafamidis is the first ATTR-stabilizer approved with a rapidly growing rate of clinical use. In parallel, various new therapeutic classes are in late-stage clinical trials including silencers, antibodies and genetic therapy. Managing CA is a critical challenge for future heart failure care. This review delineates the current standard-of-care and scientific landscape of CA therapy.

(Non)-Exertional Variables of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure with and Without Cardiac Amyloidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) constitutes an important etiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Since patients with CA show early exhaustion, we aimed to investigate whether non-exertional variables of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provide additional information in comparison to traditional peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). RECENT FINDINGS: We retrospectively investigated CPET variables of patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF with (n = 21) and without (n = 21, HF) CA at comparable age and ejection fraction. Exertional and non-exertional CPET variables as well as laboratory and echocardiographic markers were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in CPET variables between groups. The secondary outcome was rehospitalization in patients with CA during a follow-up of 24 months. Correlations between CPET, NTproBNP, and echocardiographic variables were calculated to detect patterns of discrimination between the groups. HF patients with CA were inferior to controls in most exertional and non-exertional CPET variables. Patients with CA were hospitalized more often (p = 0.002), and rehospitalization was associated with VE/VCO2 (p = 0.019), peak oxygen pulse (p = 0.042), the oxygen equivalent at the first ventilatory threshold (p = 0.003), circulatory (p = 0.024), and ventilatory power (p < .001), but not VO2peak (p = 0.127). Higher performance was correlated with lower E/e' and NTproBNP as well as higher resting heart rate and stroke volume in CA. Patients with CA displayed worse non-exertional CPET performance compared to non-CA HF patients, which was associated with rehospitalization. Differences between correlations of resting echocardiography and CPET variables between groups emphasize different properties of exercise physiology despite comparable ejection fraction.

Moderate Continuous and Modified High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The Prospective Train-the-LVAD Trial.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) of 4 minutes at 80%-90% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) has been shown to be feasible in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effect of shorter bouts of HIIT, which reduce the anaerobic burden, has not been investigated compared to moderate continuous training (MCT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective, monocentric study (NCT05121077) randomizing patients with LVADs into 20 minutes of MCT (n = 10) or short bouts (≤ 90 seconds) of HIIT (n = 10) following cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 50%-60% and 80%-90% of VO2peak. Each of the 18 supervised sessions (3×/week, t0-t1) included 10 minutes of strengthening training. The primary outcome was the increase of VO2peak in the 2 groups between t0 and t1. Secondary outcomes were changes in the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, the 6-minute walk distance and the percentage of VO2peak at the first ventilatory threshold. VO2peak significantly increased with HIIT (13.0 ± 4.6mL/kg/min vs 14.6 ± 4.3mL/kg/min; P = 0.037), but not with MCT (11.8 ± 3.3mL/kg/min vs 13.1 ± 3.3mL/kg/min; P = 0.322), without between-group differences (P = 0.853). Secondary outcomes improved from t0-t1 in MCT and HIIT, without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short bouts of HIIT are feasible, and they improved VO2peak and functional parameters in patients in this pilot prospective study.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation in patients with advanced heart failure with and without left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV), indicating pathological fluctuations on pulmonary arterial pressure, is associated with mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Whether left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-induced ventricular unloading can reverse EOV and may prevent short-term rehospitalization has not been investigated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center in- and outpatient analysis of patients with (n = 20, LVAD) and without (n = 27, HF) circulatory support and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 22.8 ± 7.9%). The association of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables and 3 months-rehospitalization (3MR) as a primary outcome was analyzed. Furthermore, CPET variables were compared regarding the presence of EOV (+/-). RESULTS: Lower VO2peak (11.6 ± 4.9 ml/kg/min vs. 14.4 ± 4.3 ml/kg/min, p = 0.039), lower increase of PETCO2 (CI = 0.049-1.127; p = 0.068), and higher VE/VCO2 (43.8 ± 9.5 vs. 38.3 ± 10.6; p = 0.069) were associated with 3MR. Flattening of O2 pulse (CI = 0.139-2.379; p = 0.487) had no impact on 3MR. EOV was present in 59.5% (n = 28/47) of patients, without a significant difference between LVAD and HF patients (p = 0.959). Patients with HF/EOV+ demonstrated significantly lower VO2peak compared with HF/EOV- (p = 0.039). LVAD/EOV+ displayed significantly lower EF (p = 0.004) and fewer aortic valve opening than LVAD/EOV- (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Lower VO2peak , but not EOV, was associated with 3MR. EOV occurred at a similar rate in LVAD and HF patients, which may illustrate insufficient unloading during exercise in chronic LVAD therapy and may contribute to the limited exercise capacity following LVAD implantation. Simultaneous CPET and right heart catheterization studies are needed to elucidate whether EOV may serve as a non-invasive predictor of insufficient LV unloading necessitating LVAD reprograming.

18F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography in cardiac amyloidosis.

PURPOSE: Bone-tracer scintigraphy has an established role in diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) as it detects transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR). Positron emission tomography (PET) with amyloid tracers has shown high sensitivity for detection of both ATTR and light-chain (AL) CA. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of 18F-flutemetamol in CA. METHODS: We enrolled patients with CA or non-amyloid heart failure (NA-HF), who underwent cardiac 18F-flutemetamol PET/MRI or PET/CT. Myocardial and blood pool standardized tracer uptake values (SUV) were estimated. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 mapping/ extracellular volume (ECV) estimation were performed. RESULTS: We included 17 patients (12 with CA, 5 with NA-HF). PET/MRI was conducted in 13 patients, while PET/CT was conducted in 4. LGE was detected in 8 of 9 CA patients. Global relaxation time and ECV were higher in CA (1448 vs. 1326, P = 0.02 and 58.9 vs. 33.7%, P = 0.006, respectively). Positive PET studies were demonstrated in 2 of 12 patients with CA (AL and ATTR). Maximal and mean SUV did not differ between groups (2.21 vs. 1.69, P = 0.18 and 1.73 vs. 1.30, P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Although protein-independent binding is supported by our results, the diagnostic yield of PET was low. We demonstrate here for the first time the low sensitivity of PET for CA.

A novel TTR mutation (p.Ala65Val) underlying late-onset hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis with mixed cardiac and neuropathic phenotype: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis is a rare, genetically heterogeneous and phenotypically variable systemic disease characterized by deposition of misfolded transthyretin fibrils in various tissues. ATTRv cardiomyopathy and progressive axonal polyneuropathy are the most common manifestations, leading to severe disability and ultimately death within approximately ten years. As disease-modifying treatment options evolve, timely diagnosis and treatment initiation are crucial to prevent rapid disease progression. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report on a 73-year old patient initially diagnosed with cardiac wild-type ATTR (ATTRwt) amyloidosis by endomyocardial biopsy. Molecular genetic analysis revealed a novel TTR sequence variant (p.Ala65Val) that is highly likely to be amyloidogenic in light of previously reported TTR mutations and the patient's clinical presentation and family history. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings expand the spectrum of known pathogenic TTR mutations and underline the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup in amyloidosis patients including careful genetic testing to avoid misdiagnosis and missing of treatment opportunities and to enable cascade testing and tracking of carriers.

Early experience with the Impella pump: Single-center registry.

BACKGROUND: With the rapid development of mechanical circulatory support technologies, patients presenting with cardiogenic shock have gained access to various treatment opportunities which were not until recently available. The Impella® pump (Abiomed, Danvers, USA) is a minimally invasive device which provides excellent left ventricular unloading and full circulatory support. The aim of the study was to review our center's experience with Impella® and to analyze the major adverse events associated with the device. METHODS: From January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 32 patients underwent Impella® implantation at our center for various indications. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 60.3 ± 12.4 years and 9.4% were female. All patients presented with acute cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS Class I (53.1%) and INTERMACS Class II (46.9%). Twenty-six patients (81.25%) out of the whole cohort have been mobilized on Impella® support. Seventeen patients (53.1%) have been weaned from the Impella® support and 10 patients (31.3%) have been bridged to durable LVAD. The median time on Impella® was 7 days (IQR 5.0-11.0). 30-day mortality was 37.5%, with 56.25% survival until hospital discharge. Only one patient developed vascular complications consisting of arm hypoperfusion. There were no cases of stroke on Impella® support. CONCLUSION: The Impella® axial-flow pump seems an appropriate therapeutic option for patients with acute cardiogenic shock requiring partial or full hemodynamic support. It also provides sufficient left ventricular unloading to allow full mobilization and neurological assessment of the patients. Furthermore, Impella® offers a high rate of myocardial recovery.

Impact of severe mitral regurgitation on postoperative outcome after durable left-ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is a common finding in patients with end-stage heart failure. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of preoperative moderate-to-severe MR on postoperative outcomes and survival after durable left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: From August 2010 to May 2021, 246 patients underwent a durable LVAD implantation. We stratified the patients into two groups: Group A (n = 109) presented with MR 0-I°, and Group B presented with MR II-III° (n = 137). MR II-III° was defined according to the current recommendations (i.e., vena contracta ≥ 7 mm, regurgitation volume ≥ 30 ml or effective regurgitation orifice area ≥ 20 mm2 ). RESULTS: Significantly more patients in Group B suffered from pulmonary hypertension and presented with chronic obstructive lung disease. We observed significantly higher rates of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) II-III° in Group B (76.1%) versus Group A (14.8%) (p < 0.001) and TR III° in Group B (30.4%) versus Group A (3.7%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of right heart failure between the groups. Within our cohort, the in-hospital, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality was 22.4%, 32.1%, 50.7%, and 64.4%, respectively. Group B showed significantly worse overall survival (p = 0.05). Patients with preoperative TR II-III° had a significantly worse survival than those with TR 0-I° (p = 0.048). In patients presenting with MR II-III°, we discovered that TR III° seems to predict both in-hospital and mid-term mortality. CONCLUSION: MR II-III° negatively affects the outcomes in patients requiring LVAD implantation. Persisting MR II-III° is an independent predictor of mortality. Patients with concomitant preoperative TR II-III° are at increased risk of developing postoperative major adverse events. Addressing the MR might be considered for these patients.

Initial experience with CytoSorb therapy in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in patients with advance heart failure is still associated with an important risk of immune dysregulation and infections. The aim of this study was to determine whether extracorporeal blood purification using the CytoSorb device benefits patients after LVAD implantation in terms of complications and overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2010 and January 2020, 207 consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation, of whom 72 underwent CytoSorb therapy and 135 did not. Overall survival, major adverse events, and laboratory parameters were compared between 112 propensity score-matched patients (CytoSorb: 72 patients; non-CytoSorb: 40 patients). RESULTS: WBC (p = .033), CRP (p = .001), and IL-6 (p < .001), significantly increased with LVAD implantation, while CytoSorb did not influence this response. In-hospital mortality and overall survival during follow-up were similar with CytoSorb. However, patients treated with CytoSorb were more likely to develop respiratory failure (54.2% vs. 30.0%, p = .024), need mechanical ventilation for longer than 6 days post-implant (50.0% vs. 27.5%, p = .035), and require tracheostomy during hospitalization (31.9% vs. 12.5%, p = .040). No other significant differences were observed with regard to major adverse events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results showed that CytoSorb might not convey a significant morbidity or mortality benefit for patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

Impact of time to diagnosis on Mayo stages, treatment outcome, and survival in patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of time to diagnosis on cardiac Mayo stages, treatment outcome, and overall survival. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 77 consecutive patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2020 with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement. Medical history was recorded in standardized form with the help of a questionnaire. RESULTS: Time from onset of symptoms of cardiac failure to diagnosis was correlated with the severity of cardiac involvement in modified Mayo 2004 and revised Mayo 2012 staging systems (rs  = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.07-0.50, P = .007 and rs  = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.01-0.45, P = .03). Patients with advanced Mayo 2004 stages received reduced-intensity regimens and had a lower probability to achieve adequate hematologic- and cardiac response after first-line treatment than patients with early stages (rs  = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.04-0.48, P = .01 and rs  = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.82, P < .0001) and poorer overall survival (P = .0004). Compared with patients diagnosed within the first year, patients diagnosed after 13-18 or ≥19 months from first symptoms had a 3- to 5 times higher risk of dying. Our data indicate that there is a 12-month window within which the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis needs to be established to avoid early deterioration and death. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitizing physicians and raising awareness for the disease are crucial for timely diagnosis and may improve the outcome of the disease.

Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation recurrence after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

We aimed to identify predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence (MR) after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Patients with FMR were enrolled who underwent PMVR using the MitraClip® device. Procedural success was defined as reduction of MR of at least one grade to MR grade ≤ 2 + assessed at discharge. Recurrence of MR was defined as MR grade 3 + or worse at one year after initially successful PMVR. A total of 306 patients with FMR underwent PMVR procedure. In 279 out of 306 patients (91.2%), PMVR was successfully performed with MR grade ≤ 2 + at discharge. In 11.4% of these patients, MR recurrence of initial successful PMVR after 1 year was observed. Recurrence of MR was associated with a higher rate of heart failure rehospitalization during the 12 months follow-up (52.0% vs. 30.3%; p = 0.029), and less improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [68% vs. 19% of the patients presenting with NYHA functional class III or IV one year after PMVR when compared to patients without recurrence (p = 0.001)]. Patients with MR recurrence were characterized by a higher left ventricular sphericity index {0.69 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.64, 0.74] vs. 0.65 (IQR 0.58, 0.70), p = 0.003}, a larger left atrium volume [118 (IQR 96, 143) ml vs. 102 (IQR 84, 123) ml, p = 0.019], a larger tenting height 10 (IQR 9, 13) mm vs. 8 (IQR 7, 11) mm (p = 0.047), and a larger mitral valve annulus [41 (IQR 38, 43) mm vs. 39 (IQR 36, 40) mm, p = 0.015] when compared to patients with durable optimal long-term results. In a multivariate regression model, the left ventricular sphericity index [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.120, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.039-1.413, p = 0.003)], tenting height (OR 1.207, 95% CI 1.031-1.413, p = 0.019), and left atrium enlargement (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.000-1.038, p = 0.047) were predictors for MR recurrence after 1 year. In patients with FMR, baseline parameters of advanced heart failure such as spherical ventricle, tenting height and a large left atrium might indicate risk of recurrent MR one year after PMVR.

Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation for advanced heart failure in critically ill patients (INTERMACS 1 and 2): A retrospective study.

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for advanced heart failure is becoming increasingly common. However, optimal timing and patient selection remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure in critically ill patients (INTERMACS 1 and 2). Between August 2010 and January 2020, 207 consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation. Overall survival, major adverse events, and laboratory parameters were compared between patients in INTERMACS 1-2 (n = 107) and INTERMACS 3-5 (n = 100). Preoperative white blood cells, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, bilirubin, alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase were all significantly higher in INTERMACS 1-2 when compared to INTERMACS 3-5 (P < .05). During hospitalization following LVAD implantation, patients in INTERMACS 1-2 were more likely to develop major infections (41.1% vs. 23.0%, P = .005), respiratory failure (57.9% vs. 25.0%, P < .001), mild (20.6% vs. 8.0%, P = .010), and moderate (31.8% vs. 7.0%, P < .001) right heart failure, and acute renal dysfunction (56.1% vs. 6.0%, P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.00 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.24-3.39 years), they had a higher incidence of thoracic (15.9% vs. 4.0%, P = .005) and gastrointestinal bleeding (21.5% vs. 11.0%, P = .042), as well as right heart failure (18.7% vs. 1%, P < .001). Risk of death was significantly higher in the INTERMACS 1-2 group (hazards ratio (HR) 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-2.40, P = .011). LVAD implantation in critically ill patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our results suggest that decision for LVAD should be not be delayed until INTERMACS 1 and 2 levels whenever possible.

Prevention and treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock.

Cardiogenic shock is still a major driver of mortality on intensive care units and complicates ∼10% of acute coronary syndromes with contemporary mortality rates up to 50%. In the meantime, percutaneous circulatory support devices, in particular venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), have emerged as an established salvage intervention for patients in cardiogenic shock. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides temporary circulatory support until other treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridge to ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation, or decision-making. In this critical care perspective, we provide a concise overview of VA-ECMO utilization in cardiogenic shock, considering rationale, critical care management, as well as weaning aspects. We supplement previous literature by focusing on therapeutic issues related to the vicious circle of retrograde aortic VA-ECMO flow, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, insufficient LV unloading, and severe pulmonary congestion limiting prognosis in a relevant proportion of patients receiving VA-ECMO treatment. We will outline different modifications in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support to meet this challenge. Besides a strategy of running ECMO at lowest possible flow rates, novel therapeutic options including the combination of VA-ECMO with percutaneous microaxial pumps or implementation of a venoarteriovenous-ECMO configuration based on an additional venous cannula supplying towards pulmonary circulation are most promising among LV unloading and venting strategies. The latter may even combine the advantages of venovenous and venoarterial ECMO therapy, providing potent respiratory and circulatory support at the same time. However, whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality has to be evaluated in the urgently needed, ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134), ANCHOR (NCT04184635), and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). These studies will provide the opportunity to investigate indication, mode, and effect of LV unloading in dedicated sub-analyses. In future, the Heart Teams should aim at conducting a dedicated randomized trial comparing VA-ECMO support with vs. without LV unloading strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Publisher Correction to: 18F-florbetaben positron emission tomography detects cardiac involvement in systemic AA amyloidosis.

The correct title for this paper should be: 18F-florbetaben positron emission tomography detects cardiac involvement in systemic AA amyloidosis.

Prediction of acute kidney injury after left ventricular assist device implantation: Evaluation of clinical risk scores.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent in patients scheduled for implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and associated with increased mortality. Although several risk models for the prediction of postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT) have been developed for cardiothoracic patients, none of these scoring systems have been validated in LVAD patients. A retrospective, single center analysis of all patients undergoing LVAD implantation between September 2013 and July 2016 was performed. Primary outcome was AKI requiring RRT within 14 days after surgery. The predictive capacity of the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS), the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (STS), and the Simplified Renal Index Score (SRI) were evaluated. 76 patients underwent LVAD implantation, 19 patients were excluded due to preoperative RRT. RRT was associated with a prolonged ventilation time, length of stay on the ICU and 180 day mortality (14(60.9%) vs 6(17.6%), P < .01). Whereas the Thakar Score (7.43 ± 1.75 vs 6.44 ± 1.44, P = .02) and the Mehta Score (28.12 ± 15.08 vs 21.53 ± 5.43, P = .02) were significantly higher in patients with RRT than in those without RRT, the SRI did not differ between these groups (3.96 ± 1.15 vs 3.44 ± 1.05, P = .08). Using ROC analyses, CCS, STS, and SRI showed moderate predictive capacity for RRT with an AUC of 0.661 ± 0.073 (P = .040), 0.637 ± 0.079 (P = .792), and 0.618 ± 0.075 (P = .764), respectively, with comparable accuracy in the Delong test. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, only the De Ritis Ratio (OR 2.67, P = .034) and MELD (OR 1.11, P = .028) were identified as predictors of postoperative RRT. Risk scores which are predictive in general cardiac surgery cannot predict RRT in patients after LVAD implantation. Therefore, it seems to be necessary to develop a specific risk score for this patient population.

Circulating macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is characterized by impaired systolic ejection capacity and/or diastolic filling of the heart, leading to a multisystem disorder. Remote organ failure, systemic inflammation or pulmonary hypertension (PH) are hallmarks of the pathophysiological changes in HF. The Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is involved in a variety of cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases. Circulating MIF levels and their potential role as a disease marker in the different subgroups of HF have not been investigated yet. We here aimed to unravel a potential role of MIF in HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: MIF plasma levels were assessed in 249 consecutive patients with HF. MIF was detectable in all investigated subjects and showed no difference with regard to the nature of HF (preserved or reduced ejection fraction). Spearman correlation revealed an association with inflammatory biomarkers (white blood cell count r = 0.18, p = 0.005; c-reactive protein r = 0.20, p = 0.003). MIF was associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) as assessed by echocardiography (r = 0.23, p < 0.001). Log-transformed PASP was also independently associated with MIF in a multivariable linear regression model (p = 0.02). Follow-up (FU) data after 180 days revealed that patients with increased MIF values (in ng/ml) were more likely to reach the endpoint all-cause mortality (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.004-1.02, p = 0.005, per unit change). CONCLUSION: MIF is detectable in the circulation of patients with HF and might be associated with clinical endpoints in HF, markers of inflammation and PH. These promising results should stimulate further research to elucidate the role of MIF in the multisystem disorder of HF.

Deep sedation Vs. general anesthesia in 232 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip® system.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a series of 232 patients whether the MitraClip® procedure can be performed safely using deep sedation (DS) without general anesthesia (GA). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip® system is a safe and effective therapy for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are at high operative risk or are unsuitable for surgery. For these patients, avoidance of GA might be beneficial. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, we performed 232 MitraClip® procedures for the treatment of severe MR. Of those, 76 procedures were performed using GA, while the remaining 156 procedures were performed using DS. RESULTS: Age, logistic EuroScore, severity of MR, left and right ventricular function, and renal function did not differ between the groups. The primary combined safety endpoint, which was defined as the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, conversion to surgery, major vascular complications or pneumonia, did not differ between MitraClip® procedures performed using GA and MitraClip® procedures performed using DS. Intraprocedural conversion to GA was required in 2% of the patients in the DS group. There were no differences in procedural success or clinical outcome between the groups at the 3-month follow-up. Preparation time in the catheterization laboratory and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were shorter in the DS group compared to the GA group. CONCLUSION: The MitraClip® implantation performed using DS is as safe and effective as MitraClip® implantation performed using GA. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

MitraClip® Implantation Under Cerebral Protection: A Case Report.

MitraClip® implantation is commonly used in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and who are at high risk for surgical mitral valve repair. The occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack is a potential complication in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation, and incidences of up to 2.6% have been reported. Herein is reported the case of an 84-year-old woman with severe MR and a thin filamentous structure at the rim of the left atrial appendage of unknown etiology. Due to a high surgical risk, the heart team decided to perform endovascular mitral valve repair using the MitraClip procedure. In order to prevent stroke, the implantation procedure was performed using a cerebral protection system.