RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Peripheral inflammation is probably involved in the pathogenesis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and it may be a common feature with Parkinson's disease (PD). The peripheral immune profile in PSP remains unclear, as well as whether the inflammatory pathways differ from those in PD. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proven to be a well-established biomarker of systemic inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the peripheral immune profile in PSP compared with PD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted including patients with PSP and PD and healthy controls (HCs). Leukocyte subpopulations and the NLR were measured in peripheral blood. Multivariate linear regression and post hoc tests were applied. Electronic databases were searched in November 2023 to perform meta-analyses to clarify the peripheral immune profile in PSP. RESULTS: Our cohort included 121 patients with PSP, 127 patients with PD and 266 HCs. The NLR was higher in PSP and PD compared with HCs. PSP had a higher neutrophil count compared with HCs. Whilst a lower lymphocyte count was found in PD compared with HCs, the lymphocyte count did not differ between PSP and HCs. The meta-analyses supported this immune profile. CONCLUSIONS: PSP and PD show an increased peripheral inflammation and a higher NLR compared with HCs. Different pathogenic inflammatory mechanisms are probably involved in PSP and PD, since in PSP this altered peripheral immune profile is mainly driven by neutrophils. Understanding the neutrophils' role in PSP may allow for the development of targeted therapies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several antithrombotic treatments during emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) have been proposed, but an appropriate protocol to balance risk-benefit is not well known. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban compared with aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing eCAS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of the prospective ARTISTA Registry, including patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery occlusion treated with eCAS. Two groups, according to antiplatelet drug, were studied: aspirin (250-500 mg single-dose) versus tirofiban (500 µg bolus+200 µg/h). Primary outcomes were the rate of in-stent thrombosis and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within the first 24 hours. RESULTS: During the period 2019-2023, 181 patients were included, 103 received aspirin, 78 tirofiban; 149 (82.3%) had tandem lesions. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 9 (9.4%) in the aspirin group, as compared with 1 (1.3%) in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.98; P=0.048). The primary safety outcome was detected in 12 (11.7%) in the aspirin group, as compared with 2 (2.6%) in the tirofiban group (aOR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.87; P=0.034). The tirofiban group presented a lower risk of parenchymal hemorrhage (18 (17.4%) vs 4 (5.2%), aOR=0.27, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.88; P=0.029) and an increased rate of excellent recanalization (expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2c-3) (50 (48.5%) vs 54 (69.2%); aOR=2.15, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.13; P=0.02). There were no differences in functional outcomes or mortality at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural antithrombotic therapy with tirofiban was associated with a lower risk of in-stent thrombosis and sICH at 24 hours from eCAS compared with aspirin. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our results.