Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(5): 800-802, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35815357

RESUMO

A retrospective review over 12 months was conducted to assess the success rates for ultrasound-guided removal of an intrauterine device (IUD). Cases were broken up into two groups. There were 241 cases in which removal had been unsuccessful in the office setting. Where the strings were not visible the device was successfully removed in 97.7% of attempts. The second group had visible strings and 100% were successfully removed. The success rate for ultrasound-guided removal of IUDs when the strings are not visible supports the pilot study published in 2012. This approach can successfully avoid the need for sedation and or hospital admission in over 97% of cases.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Feminino , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Ultrassonografia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 60(6): 914-918, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has been steadily increasing locally and internationally. Investigations into reducing rates, and the long-term complications, of OASIS are required. AIMS: To determine if applying a new method of perineal guarding at the time of delivery reduces the incidence of OASIS at an Australian tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed for the three  years prior to and following mandatory introduction of a new method of perineal guarding. The novel 'Please Squeeze' technique involved placement of the accoucheur's thumb and index finger just above the line of the posterior fourchette at crowning and bringing them firmly one centimetre postero-medially to reduce tension. Demographic data were extracted from the unit's obstetric database (ObstetriX). RESULTS: There were 9453 deliveries prior to, and 9805 deliveries following commencement of 'Please Squeeze', with no difference in the incidence of caesarean (30.4% vs 30.3% P = 0.87) or forceps (6.3% vs 5.8% P = 0.14) between groups. The incidence of primiparas (P = 0.005), ventouse (P < 0.001) and spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD) (P = 0.005) between groups. There was a clinically important 20% reduction in the incidence of OASIS across all vaginal deliveries from 3.5% to 2.8% (P = 0.006). In SVD, there was a 20% decrease in OASIS from 2.4% to 2.2% (P = 0.02), and a 14% decrease in OASIS with assisted vaginal delivery from 8% to 7.3% (P = 0.002). The incidence of episiotomy increased 16% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel 'Please Squeeze' perineal guarding method contributed to a reduced incidence of OASIS in an Australian tertiary hospital.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/lesões , Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Lacerações/prevenção & controle , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Períneo/lesões , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Episiotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Lacerações/etiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA