Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the contribution of intrinsic tissue thickness to the appearance of a thick mitral valve in patients with mitral valve prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, blinded transesophageal echocardiographic study was performed to determine the relative contributions of leaflet redundancy and overlap versus intrinsic tissue thickening as mechanisms for the apparent increase in diastolic thickness of the mitral valve. BACKGROUND: Increased diastolic thickness of the mitral valve has been identified as an echocardiographic feature that predicts subsequent adverse sequelae in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). METHODS: Eleven patients with clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic evidence of MVP and 11 age-matched control subjects underwent protocol transesophageal echocardiography to image the mitral valve in two orthogonal planes and to measure its thickness in systole and diastole. RESULTS: Maximal diastolic width of the slack, unloaded anterior leaflet was significantly greater in patients with MVP than in control subjects (mean +/- SD: 0.64 +/- 0.20 cm vs. 0.30 +/- 0.04 cm, p < 0.001). Similarly, diastolic posterior leaflet width was greater in patients with MVP (0.67 +/- 0.39 cm vs. 0.31 +/- 0.06 cm, p < 0.01). In contrast, minimal systolic width of the distended pressure-loaded mitral valve was not significantly different between patients with MVP and control subjects for either the anterior (0.22 +/- 0.05 cm vs. 0.20 +/- 0.04 cm, p = NS) or the posterior (0.25 +/- 0.07 cm vs. 0.24 +/- 0.05 cm, p = NS) leaflets. The percent change in leaflet width from diastole to systole (% delta W), an index of the contribution of dynamic factors (e.g., leaflet redundancy and overlap) to the apparent increase in diastolic leaflet thickness, was significantly greater in patients with MVP than in control subjects for both the anterior (% delta W 62 +/- 13% vs. 34 +/- 16%, p < 0.001) and the posterior (% delta W 54 +/- 19% vs. 22 +/- 21%, p < 0.005) leaflets. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent increase in diastolic mitral leaflet thickness in patients with MVP versus control subjects is largely attributable to dynamic factors such as leaflet redundancy, overlap and deformation. During diastole, when the mitral leaflets are slack and unstressed, the leaflets appear markedly thickened in patients with MVP. In contrast, during systole, when developed intraventricular pressure distends the leaflets, causing them to stretch and balloon into the left atrium, the intrinsic tissue thickness is much less than that measured in diastole. These findings have important implications for the morphologic criteria used to diagnose MVP and the potential pathophysiologic mechanisms for adverse sequelae in this syndrome.

Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of systolic mitral leaflet displacement among patients with mitral valve prolapse.

Though qualitative transthoracic echocardiographic criteria for abnormal systolic leaflet motion are widely accepted as diagnostic characteristics of mitral valve prolapse, transesophageal echocardiographic criteria have not been evaluated against such a standard. Because transesophageal imaging planes are not identical to transthoracic imaging planes, validation of transesophageal echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse is needed. Eleven patients with mitral valve prolapse (based on physical findings and transthoracic echocardiographic criteria) and 11 healthy persons underwent prospective transesophageal echocardiography in two orthogonal imaging planes. Measurements of maximal leaflet displacement superior to the annular hinge points and mitral prolapse area subtended by the displaced mitral leaflets and the chord connecting the annular hinge points were performed in triplicate and averaged by a blinded observer. Though maximal systolic leaflet displacement was greater among patients with mitral valve prolapse than healthy subjects for both the transesophageal four-chamber (0.66+/-0.39 cm versus 0.05+/-0.11 cm, p < 0.001) and two chamber views (0.57+/-0.44 cm versus 0.20+/-0.25 cm, p < 0.04), no unique value differentiated patients with from those without mitral valve prolapse. Mitral prolapse area was greater for patients with mitral valve prolapse than for healthy subjects in both transesophageal four-chamber (1.23+/-1.18 cm2 versus 0.03+/-0.06 cm2, p < 0.02) and two-chamber views (1.73+/-1.65 cm2 versus 0.21+/-0.31 cm2, p < 0.02). Whereas a mitral prolapse area of 0.20 cm2 uniquely differentiated patients with from those without mitral valve prolapse in the four-chamber view, data overlap prevented determination of a similar diagnostic criterion for the two-chamber view. The difficulty in defining quantitative transesophageal echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse based on leaflet displacement alone suggested that the simple qualitative observation of leaflet displacement above the annular hinge points should not be used as a defining morphologic criterion for mitral valve prolapse.