Reappraising imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation: be aware of differential diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES: Imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation (ACT) have been published. We aimed to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with a presumed pancreatic ACT diagnosis, reappraising the value of these published imaging criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective study (2003-2021) of consecutive patients with a presumed diagnosis of ACT as suggested by the local expert multidisciplinary case review board. Patients without available imaging (CT or MRI) for review were excluded. Patients were classified into "certain" ACT (if ≥ 2 imaging criteria and no differential diagnosis) or "uncertain" ACT (if ≥ 1 imaging criteria and suggested differential diagnoses). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (35 males, [55%]) were included. ACT was considered "certain" for 34 patients (53%) and "uncertain" for 30 patients (47%). The number of ACT criteria did not differ between groups, with 91.2% of patients with ≥ 3 ACT imaging criteria in the "certain" group vs 93.3% in the "uncertain" group (p = 0.88). In the "uncertain" group, the main suggested differentials were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (18/30 patients, 60%), calcifying chronic pancreatitis (8/30 patients, 27%), both (three patients, 10%) and serous cystadenoma (one patient, 3%). Calcifications were significantly more frequent in the "uncertain" group (89% vs 63% in the "certain" group, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Published ACT imaging criteria are frequently associated with features suggesting differential diagnoses. They appear insufficient to reach a final diagnosis in a subset of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: ACT displays a heterogeneous morphological imaging presentation challenging the non-invasive diagnostic work-up. Physicians' and radiologists' awareness of this entity is important to better understand its natural history and improve non-invasive diagnostic criteria. KEY POINTS: The criteria to help diagnose ACT are frequently associated with features suggestive of differentials. The main alternatives suggested when ACT diagnosis was "uncertain" were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and calcifying chronic pancreatitis. Published ACT diagnostic imaging criteria can be insufficient for a definite non-invasive diagnosis.

Long-term quality of life is better after laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Three randomized controlled trials have reported improved functional recovery after Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). Long-term results regarding quality of life (QoL) are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare long-term QoL of LPD versus OPD. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A monocentric retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among patients < 75 years old who underwent LPD or OPD for a benign or premalignant pathology in a high-volume center (2011-2021). An electronic three-part questionnaire was sent to eligible patients, including two diseases specific QoL questionnaires (the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer (QLQ-C30) and a pancreatic cancer module (PAN26) and a body image questionnaire. Patient demographics and postoperative data were collected and compared between LPD and OPD. RESULTS: Among 948 patients who underwent PD (137 LPD, 811 OPD), 170 were eligible and 111 responded (58 LPD and 53 OPD). LPD versus OPD showed no difference in mean age (51 vs. 55 years, p = 0.199) and female gender (40% vs. 45%, p = 0.631), but LPD showed lower BMI (24 vs 26; p = 0.028) and higher preoperative pancreatitis (29% vs 13%; p = 0.041). The postoperative outcome showed similar Clavien-Dindo ≥ III morbidity (19% vs. 23%; p = 0.343) and length of stay (24 vs. 21 days, p = 0.963). After a similar median follow-up (3 vs. 3 years; p = 0.122), LPD vs OPD patients reported higher QoL (QLQ-C30: 49.6 vs 56.3; p = 0.07), better pancreas specific health status score (PAN20: 50.5 vs 55.5; p = 0.002), physical functioning (p = 0.002), and activities limitations (p = 0.02). Scar scores were better after LPD regarding esthetics (p = 0.001), satisfaction (p = 0.04), chronic pain at rest (p = 0.036), moving (p = 0.011) or in daily activities (p = 0.02). There was no difference in digestive symptoms (p = 0.995). CONCLUSION: This monocentric study found improved long-term QoL in patients undergoing LPD, as compared to OPD, for benign and premalignant diseases. These results could be considered when choosing the surgical approach in these patients.

Molecular deciphering of primary liver neuroendocrine neoplasms confirms their distinct existence with foregut-like profile.

Isolated hepatic localizations of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are generally considered as metastatic NETs of unknown primary but could correspond to primary hepatic NETs (PHNETs), a poorly explored entity. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of PHNETs and compare them with other primary NETs. We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients managed for hepatic localization of NET without extra-hepatic primary tumor after exhaustive clinical, imaging, and immunohistochemical characterization. We performed whole-exome sequencing with mutational and copy number analysis. Transcriptomic profiles were compared with pancreatic (n = 31), small-bowel (n = 22), and lung (n = 15) NETs using principal component analysis, unsupervised clustering, and gene set enrichment analysis. Among 27 screened patients, 16 had PHNET (solitary tumor in 63%, median size 11 cm, G2 NETs in 81%) following clinical and pathological review. DNA analyses showed 'foregut-like' genomic profiles with frequent alterations in pathways of Fanconi DNA repair (75%), histone modifiers (58%), adherens junctions (58%), and cell cycle control (50%). The most frequently involved genes were KMT2A (58%), ATM (42%), CDH1, CDKN2C, FANCF, and MEN1 (33% each). Transcriptomic analyses showed that PHNETs clustered closer to foregut (pancreatic, lung) NETs than to midgut (small-bowel) NETs, while remaining a distinct entity with a specific profile. Assessment of potentially predictive biomarkers suggested efficacy of treatments usually active in foregut NETs. In conclusion, PHNETs display a foregut-like molecular profile distinct from other types of NETs, with recurrent molecular alterations. Upon exhaustive work-up to exclude an unrecognized primary tumor, PHNETs should not be considered metastatic NETs from an unknown primary. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct of unknown origin: causes and risk factors of pre-malignancy or malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: A dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is mainly due to obstructive causes (pancreatic tumor, chronic pancreatitis) or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study aims to assess the risk of pre-malignancy or malignancy in case of MPD dilatation with no visible mass nor obstructive calcification on computed tomography scan (CT-scan) in a population operated for it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients operated on from November 2015 to December 2019 in our center for a significant dilatation of the MPD without visible obstructive cause on CT-scan were included. Preoperative work-up included at least CT-scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Primary endpoint was the final pathological diagnosis. Secondary endpoints were predictive factors of malignancy. RESULTS: 101 patients were included, mean age 68 years-old. Final pathological data were pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 2), IPMN with high-grade dysplasia (n = 37), high-grade Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PanIN) (n = 2) (total of pre-malignant or malignant lesions: n = 41), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 6), IPMN with low-grade dysplasia (n = 45), low-grade PanIN (n = 5), chronic pancreatitis (n = 3), and benign stenosis (n = 1). On preoperative explorations, the median diameter of MPD was 7 mm [3-35]. MRI and/or EUS showed intraductal material, nodule, or cyst in 22, 32, and 52 patients, respectively; 22 patients without nodule visible on MRI or EUS had still a pre-malignant or malignant lesion. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors for pre-malignancy or malignancy were symptoms before surgery (p = 0.01), MPD dilatation without downstream stenosis (p = 0.046), and the presence of nodule (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: A dilatation of the MPD without detectable mass or obstructive calcification on CT-scan was associated with a pre-malignant or malignant lesion in 41 patients. Symptoms before surgery, MPD dilatation without duct narrowing, and the presence of nodules on MRI/EUS were associated with the risk of  pre-malignancy or malignancy.

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of reflux cholangitis following bilio-enteric anastomosis.

Twenty-five patients with reflux cholangitis (RC) defined as acute cholangitis (AC) with normal abdominal imaging occurring > 3 months after bilioenteric anastomosis were described and compared to 116 AC patients with biliary obstruction (tumoral, lithiasis). RC episodes occurred a median 4.5 months after surgery; 18 (72%) had recurrent RC (n ≥ 3). RC episodes were less severe than obstructive AC; the outcome was favorable with short antibiotic courses and no selection of antibiotic-resistance. However, multiple recurrent RC occurred in 20 patients (80%). Prophylactic or pre-emptive antibiotics were successful in 3 and 11 patients. Revision surgery for jejunal loop lengthening was successful in 2/4 patients.

Specificities of acute cholangitis in patients with cancer: a retrospective comparative study of 130 episodes.

Pancreatic and biliary duct cancers are increasing causes of acute cholangitis (AC). We retrospectively characterize 81 cancer-associated cholangitis (CAC) compared to 49 non-cancer-associated cholangitis (NCAC). Clinical and biological presentations were similar. However, in CAC, antibiotic resistance and inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy were more frequent; more patients required ≥ 2 biliary drainages; and mortality at day 28 was higher than in NCAC. Death was associated with initial severity and CAC in a multivariate analysis. Cholangitis associated with pancreatic or biliary duct cancers requires specific empirical antimicrobial therapy; early use of biliary drainage may improve outcomes.

Impact of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy on the therapeutic management of single pancreatic cystic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis and therapeutic management of large single pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) represent major issues for clinicians and essentially rely on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) findings. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) has high diagnostic performance for PCLs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nCLE on the therapeutic management of patients with single PCLs. METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study. Five independent pancreatic disease experts from tertiary hospitals independently reviewed data from a prospective database of 206 patients with single PCL, larger than 2 cm and who underwent EUS-FNA and nCLE. Two evaluations were performed. The first one included the sequential review of clinical information, EUS report and FNA results. The second one included the same data + nCLE report. Participants had to propose a therapeutic management for each case. RESULTS: The addition of nCLE to EUS-FNA led to significant changes in therapeutic management for 28% of the patients (p < 0.001). nCLE significantly increased the interobserver agreement of 0.28 (p < 0.0001), from 0.36 (CI 95% 0.33-0.49) to 0.64 (CI 95% 0.61-0.67). nCLE improved the rates of full agreement among the five experts of 24% (p < 0.0001), from 30 to 54%. With nCLE, the surveillance rate of benign SCAs fell by 35%, from 40 (28/70) to 5% (4/76). CONCLUSION: The addition of nCLE to EUS-FNA significantly improves reliability of PCL diagnosis and could impact the therapeutic management of patients with single PCLs. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01563133.

Extended Laparoscopic Central Pancreatectomy with Clamping of the Mesentericoportal Vein and Resection of the Splenic Vessels for a Large Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPPTs) are low malignant potential entities found mainly in young females.1,2 Pancreatectomy without tumor rupture is the treatment of choice, and the laparoscopic approach is indicated.3,4 Limited pancreatectomy is possible due to the low risk of malignancy (< 10%) based on the low risk of lymph node invasion or true vascular invasion.1,2 Centrally located large SPPTs can be treated by extended central pancreatectomy with or without vascular resection to avoid pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: A 24-year-old woman was admitted with abdominal pain. A 6-cm SPPT was discovered at the neck-body junction in close contact with the anterior aspect of the mesentericoportal vein (MPV) and the splenic vessels, with signs of segmental portal hypertension. To avoid an extended pancreatectomy for this young patient, an extended central pancreatectomy was performed, with resection of the splenic vessels, and the MPV was freed from the tumor under clamping for 10 min, with no need for vascular reconstruction. The duration of the surgery was 260 min, with 200 ml of blood loss and no transfusion. RESULTS: The woman's postoperative course was uneventful, with a hospital stay of 16 days. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of a 6-cm SPPT tumor (R0 and N0). The patient was asymptomatic 1 year later, with no tumor recurrence and no pancreatic insufficiency. Between 2011 and 2018 the authors performed 72 laparoscopic central pancreatectomies, with SPPT performed for 13 patients (18%). Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy was extended (n = 5) or standard (n = 8) with no conversion, no recurrence, and no pancreatic insufficiency. CONCLUSION: An SPPT tumor is a good indication for the laparoscopic approach because this entity is found in young patients with a low risk of malignancy. Large centrally located tumors can be treated by extended central pancreatectomy to avoid a large pancreatectomy with greater early and long-term disadvantages.

19 G nitinol needle versus 22 G needle for transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic solid masses: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to compare a flexible 19 G needle with nitinol shaft (19 G Flex) with a standard 22 G needle for transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling of pancreatic head tumors. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic head tumors requiring tissue diagnosis were randomized into two arms: puncture with either a 19 G Flex needle or a 22 G needle. The primary end point was diagnostic accuracy for malignancy. The secondary end points were ergonomic scores, sample cytohistological quality, and complications. A 6-month follow-up was performed. RESULTS: 125 patients were randomized and 122 were analyzed: 59 patients in the 19 G Flex arm and 63 patients in the 22 G arm. The final diagnosis was malignancy in 111 patients and benign condition in 11. In intention-to-treat analysis, the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of the 19 G Flex and 22 G needles was 69.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 56.1 % - 80.8 %) vs. 87.3 % (95 %CI 76.5 % - 94.4 %), respectively (P = 0.02). In per-protocol analysis excluding eight technical failures in the 19 G Flex group, the diagnostic accuracy of the 19 G Flex and 22 G needles was not statistically different: 80.4 % (95 %CI 66.9 % - 90.2 %) vs. 87.3 % (95 %CI 76.5 % - 94.4 %; P = 0.12). Technical success was higher in the 22 G arm than in the 19 G Flex arm: 100 % (95 %CI 94.3 % - 100 %) vs. 86.4 % (95 %CI 75.0 % - 94.0 %), respectively (P = 0.003). Transduodenal EUS-guided sampling was more difficult with the 19 G Flex (odds ratio 0.68, 95 %CI 0.47 - 0.97). CONCLUSION : The 19 G Flex needle was inferior to a standard 22 G needle in diagnosing pancreatic head cancer and more difficult to use in the transduodenal approach.

Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of pancreatic cystic lesions: a prospective multicenter validation study in patients with definite diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) enables observation of the inner wall of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) during an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). This study prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of nCLE for large, single, noncommunicating PCLs using surgical histopathology or EUS-FNA cytohistopathology as a reference diagnosis. METHODS: From April 2013 to March 2016, consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of indeterminate PCLs without evidence of malignancy or chronic pancreatitis were prospectively enrolled at five centers. EUS-FNA and nCLE were performed and cystic fluid was aspirated for cytohistopathological and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) analysis. The diagnostic performance of nCLE was assessed against the reference standard and compared with that of EUS and CEA. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01563133). RESULTS: 206 patients underwent nCLE and 78 PCLs (mean size 40 mm, range 20 - 110 mm) had reference diagnoses (53 premalignant and 25 benign PCLs). Post-procedure pancreatitis occurred in 1.3 % of the patients. nCLE was conclusive in 71 of the 78 cases (91 %). The sensitivies and specifities of nCLE for the diagnosis of serous cystadenoma, mucinous PCL, and premalignant PCL were all ≥ 0.95 (with 95 % confidence interval from 0.85 to 1.0). The AUROC was significantly larger for nCLE than for CEA or EUS. CONCLUSIONS: nCLE had excellent diagnostic performance that surpassed that of CEA and EUS for the diagnosis of large, single, noncommunicating PCLs. The nCLE procedure should be considered in patients with indeterminate PCLs to ensure a more specific diagnosis.