Gender differences in acute stone admissions - should we have a lower threshold for treatment in female patients?

OBJECTIVES: To examine the gender-related differences in the presentation, management and outcomes of patients admitted with acute renal colic at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 231 consecutive patients requiring inpatient admission for acute renal colic between October 2015 and March 2018. For each admission, data on demographics, admission blood results, stone characteristics, management and outcomes were collected. Differences between genders were compared using the chi-squared and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Gender distribution was 35% female: 65% male. There was no significant difference in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification grade or history of diabetes. Women had a higher admission C-reactive protein level (89.3 vs 32.9 mg/L, P < 0.001) and neutrophil count (10.0 vs 8.8 × 109 /L, P = 0.04) than men. They also had more positive cultures (34.1% vs 6.0%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to require percutaneous nephrostomy insertion (9.8% vs 0.7%, P = 0.005). Women had more intensive therapy unit (ITU) admissions (12.2% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001) and longer lengths of stay (4.4 vs 1.8 days, P < 0.001) than men. There was no mortality in our series. CONCLUSION: In the present study, women admitted with acute renal colic were more likely to have an associated infection than men and require rapid decompression. Although there was no difference in mortality, women experienced greater morbidity as evidenced by the higher rate of ITU admissions and longer length of stay. These differences are important to consider when assessing the suitability of conservative management for female patients.

The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now recommended prebiopsy in numerous healthcare regions based on the findings of high-quality studies from expert centres. Concern remains about reproducibility of mpMRI to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for csPCa in a real-world setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study, including men referred with raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or an abnormal digital rectal examination who had undergone mpMRI followed by transrectal or transperineal biopsy, was conducted. Patients could be biopsy naïve or have had previous negative biopsies. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary definition for csPCa was International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) ≥2 (any Gleason ≥7); the accuracy for other definitions was also evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Across ten sites, 2642 men were included (January 2011-November 2018). Mean age and PSA were 65.3yr (standard deviation [SD] 7.8yr) and 7.5ng/ml (SD 3.3ng/ml), respectively. Of the patients, 35.9% had "negative MRI" (scores 1-2); 51.9% underwent transrectal biopsy and 48.1% had transperineal biopsy, with 43.4% diagnosed with csPCa overall. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for ISUP GG≥2 were 87.3% and 87.5%, respectively. The NPVs were 87.4% and 88.1% for men undergoing transrectal and transperineal biopsy, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value of MRI were 49.8% and 49.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV increased to 96.6% and 90.6%, respectively, when a PSA density threshold of 0.15ng/ml/ml was used in MRI scores 1-2; these metrics increased to 97.5% and 91.2%, respectively, for PSA density 0.12ng/ml/ml. ISUP GG≥3 (Gleason ≥4+3) was found in 2.4% (15/617) of men with MRI scores 1-2. They key limitations of this study are the heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the data. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI when used in real-world settings is able to rule out csPCa accurately, suggesting that about one-third of men might avoid an immediate biopsy. Men should be counselled about the risk of missing some significant cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for ruling out prostate cancer, especially when combined with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Previous results published from specialist centres can be reproduced at smaller institutions. However, patients and their clinicians must be aware that an early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer could be missed in nearly 10% of patients by relying on MRI and PSAD alone.

Challenging situations in partial nephrectomy.

Although most partial nephrectomies are performed as primary procedures in the elective or semi-imperative setting on kidneys with relatively normal anatomy, this is not always the case. The indications for partial nephrectomy continue to expand and it is becoming particularly relevant in patients with single functioning kidneys, poor kidney function, anatomical anomalies and hereditary syndromes predisposing to multiple kidney cancers, such as Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. These, along with previous abdominal surgery, pose surgical challenges. In this article we offer advice as to how to tackle these unusual situations. An ability to master the whole range of indications will allow the modern upper renal tract surgeon to offer partial nephrectomy to a wider range of patients.

The future of partial nephrectomy.

Innovation in recent times has accelerated due to factors such as the globalization of communication; but there are also more barriers/safeguards in place than ever before as we strive to streamline this process. From the first planned partial nephrectomy completed in 1887, it took over a century to become recommended practice for small renal tumours. At present, identified areas for improvement/innovation are 1) to preserve renal parenchyma, 2) to optimise pre-operative eGFR and 3) to reduce global warm ischaemia time. All 3 of these, are statistically significant predictors of post-operative renal function. Urologists, have a proud history of embracing innovation & have experimented with different clamping techniques of the renal vasculature, image guidance in robotics, renal hypothermia, lasers and new robots under development. The DaVinci model may soon no longer have a monopoly on this market, as it loses its stranglehold with novel technology emerging including added features, such as haptic feedback with reduced costs. As ever, our predictions of the future may well fall wide of the mark, but in order to progress, one must open the mind to the possibilities that already exist, as evolution of existing technology often appears to be a revolution in hindsight.

Penile lesion in end-stage renal failure - cancer or otherwise?: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy presenting with a penile lesion.

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy or calciphylaxis is a rare condition that can present with clinical features similar to penile cancer. It is a diagnosis to consider in patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) presenting with a penile lesion. We describe one such case, where a patient with ESRF presented with a solid, tender penile mass and underwent surgery for presumed penile cancer. Histopathological analysis however confirmed a diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy, without evidence of malignancy. The clinical diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy relies on a high index of suspicion, and lesion biopsy is controversial due to a high risk of poor wound healing and sepsis. New treatment options are encouraging, and have been reported, albeit in small numbers. Delayed diagnosis can adversely affect both quality of life and prognosis in a condition with an extremely high mortality rate.