ALLiance for sEcondary PREvention after an acute coronary syndrome. The ALLEPRE trial: A multicenter fully nurse-coordinated intensive intervention program.

The main objective of cardiovascular disease prevention is to reduce morbidity and mortality by promoting a healthy lifestyle, reducing risk factors, and improving adherence to medications. Secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome has proved to be effective in reducing new cardiovascular events, but its limited use in everyday clinical practice suggests that there is considerable room for improvement. The short-term results of evidence-based studies of nurse-coordinated secondary prevention programs have been positive, but there is a lack of long-term outcome data. The Alliance for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Emilia-Romagna region (ALLEPRE) is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial designed to compare the effects of a structured nurse-coordinated intensive intervention on long-term outcomes and risk profiles after an acute coronary syndrome with those of the standard of care. All of the patients randomized to the intervention group take part in 9 one-to-one sessions with an experienced nurse from the participating centers with the aim at promoting healthy lifestyles, reducing risk factors, and increasing adherence to medication over a mean period of 5 years. The primary clinical end point is the reduction in the risk of the 5-year occurrence of major adverse events (a composite of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, and nonfatal stroke). The primary surrogate end point is the achievement of prespecified targets relating to classical risk factors, lifestyle modifications, and adherence to pharmacological therapy after 2 years of follow-up. Coronary heart disease is a chronic degenerative disease, and patients who recover from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of developing recurrent events.1 Although secondary prevention measures have proved to be effective and are strongly recommended by all of the international guidelines,2., 3. the 4 EUROASPIRE surveys4., 5., 6., 7., 8. showed that there was still a high prevalence of conventional risk factors, that secondary prevention measures were inadequately implemented, and that their main goals were often not reached. In addition, there were considerable discrepancy in secondary prevention practices between centers and countries, and a widespread underuse of cardiac prevention and rehabilitation programs despite their demonstrated effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular risk over time.9., 10. Over the last 10 years, nurses have been increasingly involved in successful cardiovascular risk management,11., 12., 13. but although this has improved levels of cardiovascular risk, no clear reduction in hard end points such as major cardiovascular adverse events and mortality has been demonstrated.10 The aim of the ALLEPRE trial is to evaluate the benefit of a homogeneous, structured, secondary prevention intervention program, fully coordinated by nurses from in- and outpatient clinics, in terms of cardiovascular risk profiles and major clinical events in ACS patients living in the large Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.

Assessing MICRO-vascular resistances via IMR to predict outcome in STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI (AMICRO): Rationale and design of a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PPCI) the evaluation of coronary microcirculatory resistance index (IMR) predict the extent of microvascular damage and left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, the impact of IMR on the clinical outcome after PPCI in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) remains unsettled. AIM: We designed a prospective multicenter controlled clinical trial to evaluate the prognostic value of IMR in terms of clinical outcome and left ventricular remodeling in STEMI patients with MVD undergoing PPCI. METHODS AND DESIGN: The study will involve 242 patients with MVD defines as the presence of at least a non-culprit lesion of >50% stenosis at index coronary angiography. Both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and IMR will be measured in the infarct-related artery (IRA) after successful PPCI. Measurements of FFR and IMR will be repeated in the IRA and performed in the non-culprit vessels at staged angiography. The non-culprit vessel lesions will be treated only in the presence of a FFR<0.75. A 2D echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction will be performed before hospital discharge and at 1-year follow-up. The primary end-point of the study will be the composite of cardiovascular death, re-hospitalization for heart failure and resuscitation or appropriate ICD shock during 1-year of follow-up. Secondary end-points will be the impact of IMR in predicting LV remodeling during follow-up and correlations between IMR and ST-segment resolution. Other secondary endpoints will be need for new revascularization, stent thrombosis and re-infarction of the non-culprit vessels territory. IMPLICATIONS: If IMR significantly correlates with differences in outcome and LV remodeling, it will emerge as a potential prognostic index after PPCI in patients with MVD.

Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Analysis From a Multicenter Italian Registry (the FREAK Study).

OBJECTIVES: To establish if the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) influences fractional flow reserve (FFR) value in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. BACKGROUND: FFR-guided coronary revascularization reduces cardiac adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease. CKD impairs microcirculation and increases cardiovascular risk. Whether CKD presence may limit FFR accuracy is unknown. METHODS: We used data from a multicenter prospective registry enrolling 1.004 patients undergoing FFR evaluation for intermediate stenosis. We assessed the relationship between clinical and angiographic variables and FFR measurement. CKD was defined as CrCl value ≤45 ml/min. FFR value was considered potentially flow-limiting, and therefore positive, if ≤0.80. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was calculated in 20 patients stratified according CrCl value (single-center substudy). RESULTS: FFR measurement was positive in 395 (39%) patients. Overall, 131 (13%) patients had CKD. Patients with CrCl ≤45 ml/min showed significantly higher FFR values as compared to the others (0.84 ± 0.07 vs. 0.81 ± 0.08, p < 0.001). Positive FFR occurrence was lower in patients with CrCl ≤45 ml/min (27% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). After multivariable analysis, diabetes (HR 1.07, 95%CI 1.008-1.13, p = 0.03), left anterior descending (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.27-1.43, p < 0.001) and CrCl ≤45 ml/min (HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.87-0.97, p = 0.005) emerged as independent predictors of FFR measurement. Accordingly, IMR values were higher in patients with CrCl ≤45 ml/min (32 U [28245] vs. 16 U [11220], p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FFR and IMR measurements differ between CKD patients and those with normal renal function. Flow-limiting FFR is less frequent in patients with CrCl ≤45 ml/min. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

New-generation drug-eluting stents reduce stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction: a propensity-score-adjusted analysis from the multicenter REAL registry (REgistro Regionale AngiopLastiche Dell'Emilia-Romagna).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) or early-generation DES in a real-world registry. BACKGROUND: New-generation DESs have proved to be more effective and safer than early-generation DES in randomized trials. However, the effects of new-generation DES versus early-generation DES in everyday clinical practice deserve further verification. METHODS: A propensity-score and inverse-probability weighted analysis of 5,332 patients undergoing DES implantation (2,557 new-generation and 2,775 early-generation) between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011 was performed, with a median follow-up of 3 years. We assessed the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]), and angiographic stent thrombosis (ST) during follow-up. RESULTS: At 3-years, new-generation DES in comparison with early-generation DES were associated with a reduced risk of MI (5% versus 7.4%, hazard ratio [HR]=0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.51-0.82, P=0.0004) and angiographic ST (0.5% vs. 1.1%, HR=0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.72, P=0.004), whereas, the risk of TVR (10.9% vs. 13.5%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.16, P=0.99) and overall MACE was not significantly different (19.2% vs. 22.4%, HR=0.94, 95% CI=0.83-1.07, P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our data from a large all-comers multicenter registry confirm that, in comparison with early-generation DES, the use of new-generation DES is associated with similar efficacy and increased long-term safety, because of a reduced risk of ST and MI.

Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the differences in cardiac outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) as a function of whether they underwent culprit-only primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or multivessel PCI, either during PPCI or as a staged procedure. BACKGROUND: MVD occurs in about 40% of patients presenting with STEMI, and it has been associated with a worse outcome compared to single-vessel disease. The most favorable PCI strategy for dealing with significant nonculprit lesions has to be established. METHODS: A total of 2061 STEMI patients with MVD undergoing PPCI, prospectively enrolled in the REAL Registry between July 2002 and December 2010, were considered: 706 underwent culprit-only PPCI; 367 multivessel PCI during the index procedure; 988 had a staged PCI within 60 days. Mortality and outcomes were calculated at 30 days and 2 years. RESULTS: At multivariate analysis, culprit-only PPCI was associated with higher rates of cardiac outcomes as compared to staged multivessel PCI, taken as reference [Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-5.89, P = 0.006 for 30-day mortality, and HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.35-2.74, P = 0.0002 for 2-year mortality, respectively]. Short-term mortality rates were higher in multivessel PCI group as compared to staged PCI group (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.06-6.26, P = 0.03); no differences were observed at 2-year follow-up (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.64-1.82, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the current guidelines recommendation to perform culprit-only PPCI in STEMI patients with MVD without hemodynamic compromise, followed by a staged PCI of noninfarct-related significant lesions.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator system with floating atrial sensing dipole: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The concept of a single-lead dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with floating sensing atrial dipole has been proven safe and functional. We report a single-center experience with this ICD system; the major focus of the work is on the recorded atrial activation and its stability on a medium term follow-up. METHODS: Thirteen patients received a DX ICD (BIOTRONIK SE & Co, Berlin, Germany) with the Linox Smart S DX(ProMRI) ICD lead; the implantation data were reported. Daily P- and R-wave sensing amplitude was collected and followed up during 200 days; their coefficient of variance (CV) was calculated. In addition, all the atrial and ventricular high-rate episodes were analyzed. RESULTS: The total x-ray exposure time was 3.9 ± 1.8 minutes. The overall mean sensing was 4.2 ± 1.9 mV for P wave and 12.9 ± 4.5 mV for R wave. The CV was significantly higher for the P-wave amplitude than for the R-wave one (0.25 ± 0.11 vs 0.08 ± 0.06; P < 0.001). A total of 27 high ventricular rate episodes were recorded and correctly discriminated by the device. Fifty-six high atrial rate episodes were recorded, 49 were true arrhythmic events. CONCLUSIONS: The single-lead ICD system with floating atrial dipole provides reliable atrial sensing amplitude over time. The physician, without the implantation of an additional lead, has the atrial information that may be used for the discrimination of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia/ventricular tachycardia, for the early detection of atrial fibrillation episodes and for the evaluation of changes in the patient's heart status.

Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery stenting: hovering among bleeding risk, thromboembolic events, and stent thrombosis.

Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is the antithrombotic treatment recommended after an acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary artery stenting. The evidence for optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients, in whom long-term treatment oral anticoagulation is mandatory, is however scarce. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the various antithrombotic strategies adopted in this population, we reviewed the available evidence on the management of patients receiving oral anticoagulation, such as a vitamin-k-antagonists, referred for coronary artery stenting.Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent indication for oral anticoagulation. The need of starting antiplatelet therapy in this clinical scenario raises concerns about the combination to choose: triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and a thienopyridine being the most frequent and advised. The safety of this regimen appeared suboptimal because of an increased risk in hemorrhagic complications. On the other hand, the combination of oral anticoagulation and an antiplatelet agent is suboptimal in preventing thromboembolic events and stent thrombosis; dual antiplatelet therapy may be considered only when a high hemorrhagic risk and low thromboembolic risk are perceived. Indeed, the need for prolonged multiple-drug antithrombotic therapy increases the bleeding risks when drug eluting stents are used.Since current evidence derives mainly from small, single-center and retrospective studies, large-scale prospective multicenter studies are urgently needed.

One-year results from the Assessing MICRO-vascular resistances via IMR to predict outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI (AMICRO) trial.

Background: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PPCI) the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) correlates to the extent of myocardial damage and left ventricular (LV) function recovery. Data on the IMR time-course and impact on clinical outcome in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD) are scarce. Aims: We designed a prospective, multicenter clinical trial to assess the infarct-related artery (IRA)-IMR in STEMI patients with MVD undergoing PPCI and to explore its potential in relationship with outcome and LV remodeling. Methods: The study enrolled 242 STEMI patients with MVD. Both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and IMR of the IRA were assessed after successful PPCI. Then, FFR/IMR measurements were repeated in the IRA at a staged angiography, and FFR-guided angioplasty was performed in non-IRA lesions. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, re-infarction, re-hospitalization for heart failure, resuscitation or appropriate ICD shock at 1-year follow-up. Results: A significant improvement of IRA-IMR values (from 47.9 to 34.2, p < 0.0001) was observed early after PPCI. Staged FFR-guided angioplasty was performed in 102 non-IRA lesions. We failed to find a correlation between IRA-IMR, clinical events and LV remodeling. Notwithstanding, in patients with anterior STEMI an inverse correlation between initial IMR values and LV function at follow-up was observed. Conclusion: After successful PPCI, a significant proportion of patients with STEMI and MVD had coronary microvascular dysfunction as assessed by IMR that recovered early after reperfusion. Higher IMR values predicted lack of improvement of LV function only in anterior STEMI. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier [NCT02325973].

Comparison of 2-year clinical outcomes with sirolimus and paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with diabetes: results of the Registro Regionale AngiopLastiche Emilia-Romagna Registry.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to paclitaxel-eluting-stents (PES) in unselected diabetics in routine practice is still debated. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the 2-year incidence of MACE (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization) of SES and PES in a real-world setting of patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Observational, multicenter, nonrandomized study. SETTING: Prospective web-based registry (REAL Registry; study period, 2002-2005) comprising all 13 hospitals performing PCI. PATIENTS: Among the 945 eligible patients treated with either SES alone (n = 606) or PES alone (n = 339), 29% were insulin-requiring, 72% had multivessel coronary disease, 26% had prior myocardial infarction and 10% had poor left ventricular function. MEASUREMENTS: Unadjusted and propensity score-adjusted 2-year clinical outcome. RESULTS: After propensity score adjustment, 2-year MACE incidence in the SES and PES groups was equivalent (23.3% vs. 23.7%, HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.72-1.42, P = 0.96). Adjusted 2-year angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of the SES patients versus 2.6% of the PES patients (P = 0.15). In this large, real-world, diabetic population treated with DES, there was no difference in outcome between SES and PES. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the long-term safety of different types of DES in patients with diabetes.

Twenty-four months clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary arteries: the long-term SES-SMART clinical study.

AIMS: It has been demonstrated that, in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) reduce restenosis after the percutaneous revascularization of small coronary arteries, but the long-term clinical outcomes of this treatment have not yet been investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The long-term SES-SMART clinical study was a multicentre, prospective, randomized, single-blind study of 257 patients receiving a SES or BMS in a small coronary artery, who were evaluated at discharge, 30 days, 8 and 24 months after stenting. The clinical endpoint of the study was a 24 months composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, which included death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), and cerebrovascular accident. The 24 months follow-up was completed by 254 patients (98.8%). The use of SES was associated with a significantly lower incidence of the clinical endpoint (12.6% vs. 33.1%; HR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.55; P < 0.0001), which was not only due to a reduction in TLR (7.9% vs. 29.9%; HR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.59; P < 0.0001), but also to a reduction in myocardial infarction (1.6% vs. 10.2%; HR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.66; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In comparison with BMS, the use of SES in the percutaneous revascularization of small coronary arteries is associated with improved clinical outcomes after 2 years follow-up.

Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis remains the treatment of choice in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cannot be done within 90 min. However, the best subsequent management of patients after thrombolytic therapy remains unclear. To assess the best management, we randomised patients with STEMI treated by thrombolysis and abciximab at a non-interventional hospital to immediate transfer for PCI, or to standard medical therapy with transfer for rescue angioplasty. METHODS: 600 patients aged 75 years or younger with one or more high-risk features (extensive ST-segment elevation, new-onset left bundle branch block, previous myocardial infarction, Killip class >2, or left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%) in hospitals in France, Italy, and Poland were treated with half-dose reteplase, abciximab, heparin, and aspirin, and randomly assigned to immediate transfer to the nearest interventional centre for PCI, or to management in the local hospital with transfer only in case of persistent ST-segment elevation or clinical deterioration. The primary outcome was a composite of death, reinfarction, or refractory ischaemia at 30 days, and analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number 00220571. FINDINGS: Of the 299 patients assigned to immediate PCI, 289 (97.0%) underwent angiography, and 255 (85.6%) received PCI. Rescue PCI was done in 91 patients (30.3%) in the standard care/rescue PCI group. The primary outcome occurred in 13 patients (4.4%) in the immediate PCI group compared with 32 (10.7%) in the standard care/rescue PCI group (hazard ratio 0.40; 95% CI 0.21-0.76, log rank p=0.004). Major bleeding was seen in ten patients in the immediate group and seven in the standard care/rescue group (3.4%vs 2.3%, p=0.47). Strokes occurred in two patients in the immediate group and four in the standard care/rescue group (0.7%vs 1.3%, p=0.50). INTERPRETATION: Immediate transfer for PCI improves outcome in high-risk patients with STEMI treated at a non-interventional centre with half-dose reteplase and abciximab.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia: selective approach to the slow pathway via the cephalic veins.

Inferior venous access to the right heart is not possible in some patients due to vena caval obstruction. Here we describe a case of a patient with atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia where radiofrequency ablation from the inferior vena cava was impossible because of the presence of important stenosis of the distal part of the vein. Catheter ablation of the slow pathway could be performed successfully using a superior approach via the cephalic veins.

Clinical impact of an inter-hospital transfer strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: the Emilia-Romagna ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction network.

AIMS: This study sought to evaluate the impact of an inter-hospital transfer strategy on treatment times and in-hospital and 1 year cardiac mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (p-PCI) in the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, where an efficient region-wide system for reperfusion has been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3296 patients with STEMI, undergoing on-site p-PCI (2444 patients) (OS group) or p-PCI after inter-hospital transfer (852 patients) (T group) between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2006 in the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, were considered. During the study period, the number of patients undergoing p-PCI increased both for patients admitted to interventional centres and for those admitted to peripheral hospitals. At the same time, the proportion of patients with STEMI initially admitted to peripheral hospitals and not transferred and the door-to-balloon time delays of transfer patients decreased. In spite of longer door-to-balloon delay in the transfer group [112 min (86-147) vs. 71 min (46-104)], in-hospital cardiac mortality (OS 7.0 vs. T 5.4%, P = 0.10) did not significantly differ between the two groups. After multivariable adjustment, the transfer strategy was not associated with increased risk of in-hospital [odds ratio 0.956; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.442] and 1 year (hazard ratio 0.817; 95% CI 0.617-1.085) cardiac mortality. CONCLUSION: This study, concerning an established STEMI regional network, suggests that a strategy of inter-hospital transfer for p-PCI, when supported by an organized system of care, may be applied with rapid reperfusion times and favourable short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial.

AIMS: To test the equivalence of high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban vs. abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in terms of ST-segment resolution (STR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The FATA trial (Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab) was a prospective, multicentre, open-label trial that enrolled 692 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive abciximab (n = 341) or HDB tirofiban (n = 351). Primary endpoint was the rate of complete (> or =70%) STR 90 min after first balloon inflation. Thirty-day incidence of major bleedings, death, re-infarction and new revascularizations was also evaluated. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced, with the exception of previous MI rates (tirofiban 6% vs. abciximab 2.6%, P = 0.03). The procedure was successful in 96.7% of the abciximab and in 96.6% of the tirofiban cohort (P = 0.94). Complete STR was obtained in 67.05% of the tirofiban and 70.45% of the abciximab group (Delta -3.4%, 95% confidence interval -10.35 to +3.56), which falls beyond the predefined Delta +/- 10% equivalence boundaries. Rates of secondary endpoints were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study failed to show the equivalence of HBD of tirofiban and abciximab as adjunctive therapy to PPCI.

Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents: two-year results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia Romagna) multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been questioned recently. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2002 and June 2005, 10,629 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with either DES (n=3064) or bare-metal stents (BMS, n=7565) were enrolled in a prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and angiographic stent thrombosis during 2-year follow-up. A propensity score analysis to adjust for different baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics was performed. The 2-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 17.8% in the DES group and 21.0% in the BMS group (P=0.003 by log-rank test). Angiographic stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the DES group and 0.6% in the BMS group (P=0.09). After adjustment, the 2-year cumulative incidence of death was 6.8% in the DES group and 7.4% in the BMS group (P=0.35), whereas the rates were 5.3% in DES and 5.8% in BMS for acute myocardial infarction (P=0.46), 9.1% in DES and 12.9% in BMS for target-vessel revascularization (P<0.00001), and 16.9% in DES and 21.8% in BMS for major adverse cardiac events (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of target-vessel revascularization in the DES group were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.76), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.69), and reference vessel diameter (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world population, the beneficial effect of DES in reducing the need for new revascularization compared with BMS extends to 2 years without evidence of a worse safety profile.

Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease (results from the REgistro Regionale AngiopLastiche Emilia-Romagna registry).

Percutaneous revascularization of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remains a challenging task. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to decrease the incidence of restenosis in de novo native coronary artery lesions. However, their clinical value in SVGs remains to be established. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs and bare metal stents (BMSs) for de novo lesions in SVGs. In a large prospective, multicenter registry, 360 patients underwent stenting of a de novo lesion in SVGs using BMSs (288 patients) or DESs (72 patients). Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization, was recorded at a 12-month follow-up. Compared with the DES group, patients receiving BMSs were more likely to be men, to have chronic renal insufficiency or higher Charlson scores, but less likely to have undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention. Incidence of MACEs at 12-month follow-up was similar in the 2 groups (17.8% in DES group vs 20.3% in BMS group, respectively, p = 0.460). Cox regression analysis identified age, chronic renal failure, cardiogenic shock at presentation, and ostial location of stenosis as independent predictors of long-term MACEs. In conclusion, our data suggest that rates of 12-month MACEs associated with the use of DESs and BMSs are similar in patients undergoing treatment of de novo lesions in SVGs.

Same-day transfer for the invasive strategy of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome admitted to spoke hospitals: Data from the Emilia-Romagna Regional Network.

BACKGROUND: The service strategy (same-day transfer between spoke hospital and hub centre with catheterisation laboratory (cath-lab) facility to perform invasive procedures) has been suggested to improve the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) admitted to spoke hospitals. We used data from a large prospective Italian registry to describe application, performance and outcome of the service strategy in the daily clinical practice. METHODS: This study was based on an observational, post-hoc analysis of all consecutive NSTEACS patients admitted to spoke non-invasive hospitals of the Emilia-Romagna regional network and receiving coronary artery angiography (CAA)±percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated: application of service strategy, time to cath-lab access, hospital stay length, 30-days occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: From January 2011-December 2012, 2952 NSTEACS consecutive patients were admitted to spoke non-invasive hospitals and received CAA. Overall, 1765 (60%) patients were managed with a service strategy. After multivariable analysis, service strategy emerged as independent predictor of faster access to cath-lab (within 72 h: hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.7, p<0.0001; within 24 h: HR 2.8, 95% CI 2.2-3.3, p<0.0001, respectively). Service strategy significantly reduced hospital stay length (-5.5 days, p<0.0001). We estimated a mean of €1590 saved for each patient managed with service strategy. Thirty-day occurrence of adverse events did not differ between patients managed with or without a service strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In our daily clinical practice, a service strategy seems to be an effective approach to optimise the invasive management of NSTEACS patients admitted to spoke hospitals.

Comparison of effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis or clinical adverse events.

We evaluated the clinical effect of selective use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in real-world, high-risk patients. A total of 4,237 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (SES, n = 872, bare metal stents [BMSs], n = 3,365) was enrolled in a prospective regional survey. A prespecified high-risk subset of patients was selected on the basis of clinical and angiographic characteristics. A propensity score analysis was performed to compare patients who received SESs with those who received BMSs. Patients in the SES group more often had diabetes and more frequently had previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, type C lesions, and multivessel procedures. Patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction were treated more often with BMSs. At 9 months, the use of SESs was associated with fewer major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization; hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.85) and target lesion revascularizations (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.91). This decrease was more evident in a prespecified high-risk subgroup of patients (major adverse cardiac events, 8.0% SES vs 15.6% BMS, hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.72). We conclude that selective SES use in real-world patients who have high-risk clinical and angiographic characteristics is associated with significant decreases in major adverse cardiac events and repeat revascularizations compared with BMS use.

Coronary artery surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare 7-year rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke in a large cohort of octogenarians with left main coronary artery or multivessel disease, treated with coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Two propensity score-matched cohorts of patients undergoing revascularization procedures at regional public and private centers of Emilia-Romagna, Italy, from July 2002 to December 2008 were used to compare long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (947 patients) and coronary artery bypass grafting (441 patients). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in 30-day mortality. In the follow-up the overall and the matched percutaneous coronary intervention population experienced significantly worse outcomes in terms of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. No difference was found for stroke between treatment groups. Percutaneous coronary intervention was an independent predictor of increased death at long-term follow-up. The subgroups in which coronary artery bypass grafting reduced more clearly the risk of death were age 80 to 85 years, previous myocardial infarction, history of cardiac heart failure, chronic renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, and patients with three-vessel disease associated with the left main coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world setting, surgical coronary revascularization remains the standard of care for patients with left main or multivessel disease. The long-term outcomes of current percutaneous coronary intervention technology in octogenarians are yet to be determined with adequately powered prospective randomized studies.

Association of bleeding, mortality and sex in acute coronary syndromes: the missing triangle.

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and antithrombotic drugs are the standard therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but their impact on bleeding and mortality in women has not been adequately investigated. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of ACS patients, who were referred to 6 of the 13 centres belonging to the REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna programme in Emilia-Romagna for coronary angiography and PCI between June 2010 and November 2011. The aim of the study was to verify whether the incidence of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events-defined in-hospital bleeding after an ACS is significantly higher in women than in men, and to evaluate its impact on short and long-term mortality. RESULTS: The analysis involved a total of 1686 patients (511 women and 1175 men). The women were older and more frequently affected by hypertension, congestive heart failure and single-vessel disease; however, none of the clinical or procedural variables was significantly different between the sexes after statistical adjustment. There was a significantly higher rate of in-hospital bleeding among the women [8.6 vs. 5.8%; adjusted odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-2.52, P = 0.004], but the adjusted hazard ratio for short and long-term all-cause mortality was not significantly different. After optimal adjustment, bleeding, but not female sex, was identified as a predictor of short-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.68, 95% CI 1.21-5.93, P = 0.01), but this was not confirmed in the case of long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 0.91-2.71, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: After optimal adjustment for baseline differences, the findings of this contemporary Italian PCI registry study showed that women experience bleeding more frequently, but do not have worse mortality outcomes than men. Bleeding was confirmed as an independent predictor of short-term mortality.