Expert panel consensus recommendations on the utilization of nebulized budesonide for managing asthma and COPD in both stable and exacerbation stages in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the utilization of nebulized budesonide for acute asthma and COPD exacerbations as well as for maintenance therapy in adults. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a search on PubMed for nebulized budesonide treatment. SELECTED STUDIES: Selecting all English-language papers that utilize Mesh phrases "asthma," "COPD," "budesonide," "nebulized," "adult," "exacerbation," and "maintenance" without temporal restrictions, and narrowing down to clinical research such as RCTs, observational studies, and real-world studies. RESULTS: Analysis of 25 studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide in asthma (n = 10) and COPD (n = 15). The panel in Thailand recommended incorporating nebulized budesonide as an additional or alternative treatment option to the standard of care and systemic corticosteroids (SCS) based on the findings. CONCLUSION: Nebulized budesonide is effective and well-tolerated in treating asthma and COPD, with less systemic adverse effects compared to systemic corticosteroids. High-dose nebulized budesonide can enhance clinical outcomes for severe and mild exacerbations with slow systemic corticosteroid response. Nebulized budesonide can substitute systemic corticosteroids in some situations.

Paradoxical eosinophilic and cytokine responses to oral corticosteroid treatment in patients with asthma exacerbations.

Background: Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) orchestrates eosinophilic inflammation, which may increase during asthma exacerbations. In contrast, microRNA-1 (miR-1) inhibits TSLP-mediated eosinophil trafficking in lung endothelium. Whether the balance of TSLP and miR-1 levels determines the response to oral corticosteroids (OCSs) during the treatment of asthma exacerbations remains unknown. Objective: Our aim was to investigate the involvement of TSLP/miR-1 axis in inflammatory response to OCS treatment for asthma exacerbations. Methods: We measured the concentrations of TSLP and other inflammatory cytokines and miR-1 expression during acute asthma exacerbations treated with standard OCSs in a real-life setting. A total of 28 consecutive patients with acute asthma exacerbations treated with OCS (prednisolone 30 mg/d) for 1 week at the emergency department were studied prospectively. Steroid responders were identified by a significant reduction in blood eosinophil counts, whereas paradoxical responders (PRs) showed no markedly decreased or even increased absolute blood eosinophil counts after OCS treatment. Differential white blood cell counts, blood cytokine levels, and miR-1 expression within and between groups were compared before and after OCS treatment. The baseline cytokine concentrations in both groups were compared with those of patients with stable asthma. Results: OCS treatment significantly reduced TSLP levels in steroid responders, whereas this effect did not occur in PRs (P = .006 and P = .742, respectively). In contrast, miR-1 expression was unchanged in steroid responders in response to OCS, whereas it was markedly reduced in the PRs, despite higher expression at baseline than in patients with stable asthma, which may account for slower resolution of the exacerbation. Conclusions: In some asthmatic patients with acute exacerbations who do not suppress eosinophils after a course of OCS, there is a paradoxical decrease in plasma miR-1 level and increase in TSLP level versus in steroid responders, which may result in slower clinical recovery.

Exploring Clinical Remission in Moderate Asthma - Perspectives from Asia, the Middle East, and South America.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical remission is a relatively new concept in asthma but recent research initiatives suggest it could be an ambitious and achievable therapeutic target for patients with asthma. METHODS: In this modified Delphi study (comprising two online surveys, completed either side of a virtual scientific workshop), the opinions of a panel of respiratory physicians were evaluated to summarize perspective statements on key therapeutic outcomes and criteria for on-treatment clinical remission in patients with moderate asthma. An agreement threshold was pre-defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants. RESULTS: Surveys 1 and 2 were completed by 20 and 18 participants, respectively. Most participants (95%) agreed with the concept of clinical remission in moderate asthma and that this should be a desirable treatment goal (90%). Based on a composite measure of 4-6 desirable therapeutic outcomes, current understanding of clinical remission was considered as 12 months with no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids, no daytime or night-time asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 or Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 0.75), stable lung function, and no treatment-related adverse events. No agreement was reached on the role of relievers in defining therapeutic outcomes or on the wider use of biomarkers and airway hyperresponsiveness for defining asthma remission in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: In line with recent consensus statements from the United States and Europe, there was a high level of agreement on the elements of clinical remission among a panel of respiratory physicians from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Extension of the concept of clinical remission to patients with moderate asthma was considered aligned with the potential of clinical remission as a goal of therapy.